Actus Reus and Mens Rea Flashcards

1
Q

Each criminal offence will have an actus reus and mens rea and both elements must be proven to be held…

A

Criminally liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Formula of criminal liability

A

Actus Reus + Mens Rea - Valid Defence = criminal liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Actus Reus?

A

Guilty conduct by defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does Actus Reus consist of?

A

All elements of an offence that don’t relate to state of mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can Actus Reus be a positive act?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Generally liable for omission to act?
Exception to the answer?

A

No
Unless there is a recognised duty to act and the defendant failed to discharge that duty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

4 circumstances for a duty to act?

A

Statutory or contractual duty
Special relationship
Voluntary assumption of responsibility
Creation of
OR a contribution to a dangerous situation
AND then fails to take steps to avert it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

As part of the actus reus, prosecution must also prove?

A

Factual and legal causation,
D’s act OR omission actually caused the prohibited result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Factual causation?

A

‘But for’ the defendant’s actions, would the prohibited result occur?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

When is factual causation not established?

A

Result would have happened anyway, regardless of the defendant’s conduct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Legal causation?

A

Defendant’s conduct must be a substantial and operating cause of the result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

3 elements of substantial and operating cause of the result?

A

Act must be more than a trivial/minimal cause if the result.
Need not be the only cause of the result.
Must be the operating cause at the time of death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Legal causation
Chain of causation must not be broken by a new and intervening act:
(3 examples)

A

Act by the victim.
Intervention by a third party which is free, deliberate, and informed.
Unforeseeable natural event.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Thin skull rule?

A

Defendant must take their victim as they find them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Does inherent weakness in the victim break the chain of causation?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The thin skull rule applies to victim’s physical or mental condition or belief.
Example:

A

Refuse treatment due to their religious beliefs and die as a result.

17
Q

Mens Rea?

A

Guilty state of mind by the defendant

18
Q

Can mens rea be objective and subjective?

A

Yes

19
Q

Necessary mens rea must be satisfied for the elements of the actus reus.
The actus reus and mens rea must….

A

Correspond

20
Q

What are the 3 main areas of mens rea?

A

Intention (direct or indirect)
Recklessness
Negligence

21
Q

direct intention where the defendant intends to bring about the actus reus:

A

defendant wants to achieve something OR has a specific purpose OR outcome in mind.

22
Q

Indirect intention where the defendant intends to bring about the actus reus:

A

outcome wasn’t the main aim BUT a by-product of what they intended.

23
Q

Test for indirect intention is:

A

 Was the consequence a virtual certainty as a result of the defendant’s conduct? (objective)
AND
 Did the defendant realise that the consequence was a virtual certainty? (subjective).

24
Q

Recklessness?

A

Defendant takes an unjustified risk (objective standard).

25
Q

Recklessness is satisfied where:
(2 elements)

A
  • Defendant personally foresees the risk (subjective)
    AND
  • Defendant goes on to unreasonably take that risk (objective).
26
Q

Negligence in criminal law?

A

Defendant fails to meet the standards of a reasonable person (objective standard).
Focus in NOT on the defendant’s state of mind,
BUT whether the conduct of the defendant fails to meet the standards of the reasonable person.

27
Q

certain offences can be…

A

strict liability.

28
Q

No mens rea for the corresponding actus reus for…

A

strict liability.

29
Q

Strict liability offences normally consist of offences relating to:

A

health and safety, driving AND consumer protection.