Actus Reus- Cases and General Rules Flashcards

1
Q
  1. Actions

Involuntary Actions

A

M v R 2013

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

General rule

  • M v R (involuntary action)
A

Conduct should be considered as general not criminal, involuntary conduct is not a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Actions

Cause of Voluntariness

A

Burns v Bider 1967

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

General Rule

  • Burns v Bider 1967 ( cause of voluntariness)
A
  • Guilt depends on actions origins
  • Must come from external influence not internal
  • Conduct is intoxicated people is excluded
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. Actions

Reflex Actions

A

Re Wickcliffe 1987

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

General rule

  • Re Wickliffe 1987 (reflex actions)
A

Look at circumstances to see if person was in control of their actions or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. Actions

Earlier Voluntary Conduct

A

Jiminez 1992

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

General Rule

  • Jiminez 1992 (earlier voluntary conduct)
A

Look at overall conduct of individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. Omissions

Exception one ( where a person has a legal duty to act, and fails to comply)

A

DPP v Poniatowska

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

General rule

DPP v Poniatowska ( exception one)

A
  • Is there a duty?
  • How did it arise?
  • Does the defendants actions fall within its scope?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

s156 Crimes Act examples

(Person in charge of a dangerous thing is under a legal duty to take reasonable precautions)

List 2 of 3 at least

A
  1. R v T 2016
  2. R v Vanner 2005
  3. R v Mataafi 2016
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

S152 Crimes Act

(Duty of a parent to provide the necessities of life to a child)

List 2 at least

A
  1. Q v R 2017
  2. R v X 2015
  3. L v R 2011
  4. JF v Police 2013
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. Omissions

Exception two ( where duty arises because of a persons actions)

A

R v Miller

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

General rule

R v Miller (exception two)

A
  1. Cour of Appeal (continuous act theory)

2. House of Lords (continuous act and duty theory)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. Omissions

Exception three (where offence can only be committed by omission)

Problem of continuing actions

Two cases

A
  • Fagan v MPC 1969

- R v Kaitamaki

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. State of Affairs Offences

General rule

A

No conduct is needed, it is enough if a state of affairs exists

17
Q
  1. Surrounding Circumstances

General Rule

A

Existence of particular circumstances can transform an otherwise lawful act into a crime

18
Q

Causation

But for test

A

R v Hughes 2013

19
Q

Causation

Common sense test

A

R v Hughes

21
Q

General rule

R v Hughes

A

Legal causation requires a level of fault

22
Q

Causation

Novus Actus Interveniens

First event

Two cases

A

R v Smith (main case)

McKnight v NZ Biogas

23
Q

Causation

Novus Actus- Natural Events

List 2 of 3

A

R v Hart
Bush v Commonwealth
R v White

24
Q

Causation

Novus Actus - Other Persons

List 1 of 2

A

State v Scates

R v Jordan

25
Q

Causation

Novus Actus - The Victim

List 3 of 6

A
R v Royall
R v Hughes 
R v Roberts
People v Lewis 
R v Wall

Gable Tostee (most important)

26
Causation Multiple Factors List 3
1. R v Royall 2. R v Lewis 3. R v McKinnon 4. R v Smith 5. Hennigan