Admin questions Flashcards
(38 cards)
Frequent presenter patients
Goals of individualised plan
Goals
- Reduce LOS in ED
- Reduce presentations
- Improve patient care
- Provide long term support for patient
- Improve engagement with community supports e.g. GP
DNW patients
4 reasons for DNW and provide some solutions
Reasons for DNW
1. Dependent others at home
2. Basic needs not met e.g. food/water/pain
3. Perceived long waits
4. ED overcrowding/access block
5. Poor communication from triage staff
6. Poor access to ED beds due to admissions in ED
7. WR unsuitable area for some patients e.g. psych/paeds
Solutions
1. Provide food/water/nursing in WR
2. Separate FT/paeds with separate staff allocation
3. Increase staff
4. Hospital wide approach to access block
Triage scale category times
1 - Immediately
2 - <10 mins
3 - <30 mins
4 - <60 mins
5 - <2 hours
Explain emergency triage performance
What is transfer of care and its target?
ETP
- 80% of patients presenting to ED should leave within 4 hours (discharge/admission/transfer)
- Based on data that prolonged ED stay/access block/overcrowding increases mortality
- But some patients needs to wait >4 hours so clinical judgement overrides
TOC
- ideally 100% transfer to AV to ED bed or WR
Guideline development
General steps
- Identify if there is a need for development
- Review existing guidelines
- Initial a proposal
- Establish development team
- Define problem
- Review evidence
- Draft guideline
- Seek endorsement from organisation
- Implement
- Ongoing monitoring and review/evaluation
What diagnostic tools can be used to identify how care is provided?
Root cause analyses
Process mapping
Interviews
Surveys
Direct observation of processes
Adverse effects reviews - incident reporting systems
M&M
Mass casualty incidents
List 4 designated areas to be set up at the scene
- Command post
- Casualty collection area
- Patient treatment area
- Ambulance loading point
What are the differences between disaster and ED triage?
Disaster
- Goal - deliver greatest good to greatest no. of pts
- Focused assessment
- Repeated at multiple stages
- Performed by trained disaster staff (medical/paramedics)
- Pts sorted - immediate/delayed/minimal care or unsalvageable
ED triage
- Individualised detailed approach in order of arrival
- Single point in time
- Senior nursing staff perfomrs
- ATS categories based on urgency
List at least 4 actions that will be required before the arrival of casualties from this disaster
- Activate hospital external disaster code
- Clear existing patients – transfer admitted patients to wards, dischargeable patients home, WR/unseen patients notified and removed as possible
- Prepare designated areas for receiving pts per code plan
- Allocate roles
- Recall additional staff
- Notify key hospital areas of disaster e.g. blood bank/path/radiology/OT, security/ICU
- Prepare resources e.g. additional medical supplies
Disaster - what information should be conveyed?
METHANE
Major incident - confirm that it has been declared
Exact location
Type of incident e.g. explosion
Hazards
Access points/routes
No. & type of casualties expected
Emergency services present already and what is required?
Disaster zones, outline roles/tasks carried out in each zone
Hot
Actual disaster area e.g. in/around the trains
Specialised/authorised rescue personnel only – search/rescue of. Victims to be evacuated to warm zone
Warm
Area immediate outside hot zone
Decontamination area if required
Triage of casualties
Safe areas for personnel
Cold
Outside warm zone – free of contamination
Casualty collection & treatment areas
Transport collection areas
Assembly point for non-injured/ambulating patients
Perimeter – controlled access needed
Advantages of ‘sieve’ triage over ‘sort’ triage
Describe how ‘sort’ triage is carried out
- Simple
- Quick
- No equipment needed
- Minimal training needed, can be done by non-clinical personnel
Sort triage:
- Triage based on assessing physiological parameters
- Scores assigned for RR, SBP, GCS to calculate a triage revised trauma score (TRTS)
- Category then assigned based on score
Sieve
- Quick initial assessment to categorise pts based on injuries
- Simple criteria e.g. mobility, breathing
- Rapidly separate those who can wait from those requiring immediate care
Sort
- More detailed assessment
- Optimises resource allocation
List 5 processes to undertake to stand down a disaster
- Clarify if total or partial stand down; if partial which parts will continue
- Re-institute normal ED function incll. Decisions re staffing levels, re-establishing normal pt flow
- Defusing – debrief to staff, seek feedback, allow staff to share thoughts and feelings
- Operational debrief – seek feedback within 1 week to analyse the organisational response
- Modify ED disaster plan in response to debrief and analyses
- Counselling of staff affected by disaster if required
List 5 essential generic elements of any written protocol document
- Who must comply
- What is the setting applicable
- Precautions, contraindications
- Equipment, procedure and outline steps
- Tools and resources
- Document management – author, review
List 3 indications for chemical restraint in ED
- High risk harm to self, others or property
- Verbal de-escalation unsuccessful
- Requires assessment and management
Simulation
- Components of a pre-debrief that create a safe environment for the scenario
Outline 3 key components of your framework for debriefing a simulation scenario
Identify potential barriers or risks to running in-situ simulation and a mitigating solution for each
- Formative rather than summative – identifies areas for learning & improvement and not an assessment of individual performance
- Orientation to environment – equipment, drugs, manikin etc
- Expectations of participants -express that it’s based on clinical case and not designed to trick participants
- Confidentiality – not discussed outside of session
Outline 3 key components of your framework for debriefing a simulation scenario
1. Reactions phase – trainees discuss their reactions (emotions/feelings) from being in the scenario
2. Identify what was performed well and what was challenging
a. Learning needs identified by partipants
3. Analysis
a. Understand participants framework for decisions made
b. Address clinical knowledge and non technical e.g. communication factors
4. Summarise – take home points – on learning objectives that were identified
Identify potential barriers or risks to running in-situ simulation and a mitigating solution for each
- Reluctance to precipitate - allocate time/date so staff aware and can prepare
- Reluctance to perform when ED busy - conduct during times of low volume or dedicated education times
- Disturb patients - separate area for sim
- Take up clinical space - SIM areas outside ED
- lack of equipment/funding - keep out of date equipment for sim
- Risk of sim equipment used on real patients - clear labels, separate areas etc
What is palliative care?
Treatment aimed at providing patient comfort and preventing pain/nausea rather than reversing disease process.
- Focuses on QOL
- Aims to prevent/treat suffering rather than curing
- Holistic approach – physical, emotional, mental, social, spiritual needs
- Life limiting illnesses e.g. cancer
Advanced care directives
What information should be in an ACD?
Patient’s preferences for
- Treatment goals e.g. resus, CPR, intubation ICU vs ward based care
- Transfer to hospital wishes if deterioration
- Active treatment vs comfort/palliation
Names/contact details of substitute decision maker/NOK
Other important issues for pt e.g. religious, care of pet etc
Requests for organ/tissue donation
Causes of ED overcrowding
- Input
- Throughput
- Output
Input
- Pt unable to access GP
- High volume of low acuity presentations
- Limited access to diagnostic services in community esp after hours
- Presentations with more urgent/complex care needs
Throughout
- Delayed senior decision making
- Large volume workload
- Presence of junior medical staff in ED
- ED nursing staff shortages
- Delays with test results
- Delays with disposition plans
Output
- Late inpatient discharges
- Lack of inpatient beds
- Access block
Adverse consequences of ED overcrowding and examples
Patient
Delay to diagnoses and treatment = poor outcomes
Increased mortality
Patient dissatisfaction
Staff
Staff fatigue/burnout
Clinical errors
Increased violence towards staff
Solutions to ED overcrowding
Input
Senior EP review at triage for rapid assessment to facilitate early ix and disposition
Extended GP opening hours
Urgent care centres
Throughoutput
Use of fast track for ambulatory patients
Use of SSU for patients likely to be discharged within 24h
Early physician assessment/supported triage
ED nurse flow coordinator
Bedside registration
Nurse initiated protocols e.g. analgesia
Early inpatinet consultation
Increase bed numbers in ED
Increase ED staff
Output
Early morning discharge
Early senior decision making
Use of transient lounges
Hospital coordinator – active bed management
ED admitting rights
Increase inpatient beds and staff
Complaints management
- Formally acknowledge complaint/incident in writing
- Give expected timeframe for review process
- Inform patient liason/complaints department
- Review medical notes/documentation
- Interview staff involved, provide necessary support
- Review department’s results checking process/any department guidelines/policies relating to the presentation
- Formalise findings and recommendations in writing and action it
- Present findings @ M&M
- Provide education to ED staff
- Feedback to patient/family with apology
SSU
What is the role of SS?
Exclusion criteria for SSU?
Manage ED patients who benefit from extended ED treatment and observation but have expected LOS <24h
Exclusion:
1. Patients with complex medical/surgical problems
2. Multiple problems
3. Elderly
4. Paediatrics
5. Patients without clear diagnosis or management plan
6. Patients requiring intensive nursing
7. Risk to staff – e.g. psychosis, forensic hx, violent
Elements of the patient’s history that would be suspicious for drug-seeking behaviour.
History of IVDU / treatment for opiate addiction
Multiple recent ED presentations for similar somatic complaints, often no clear underlying diagnosis
Doctor shopping / using multiple providers
Repeated reports of lost or stolen medications
Request for specific opioids by name and dose
Claims of allergies to non-opioid analgesics
Vague, inconsistent or dramatic histories with lack of objective signs
Anger or irritability when questioned about reasons for ED presentation
Refusal of diagnostic workup or physical examination / focus on obtaining pain relief rather than investigating cause of pain
Frequently self-discharges after receiving opiates / history of absconding with IV cannula in situ