Admissibility Flashcards

1
Q

What are the main requirements for admissibility?

A
  1. Victim requirements - Art. 34
  2. Exhaustion of local remedies - Art. 35
  3. The application has not been brought before
  4. The application is not manifestly ill-founded
  5. Not abusive
  6. De minimis principle - The case must be serious enough
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the requirements for victim status?

A
  1. Victim of a convention right (ratione loci)
  2. There must be a concrete review unless:
    - There is a potential violation which can not be proven (like secret surveillance)
    - You are affected by the rule in itself (Norris - Law prohibiting gay sex)
  3. You must be a direct victim unless:
    - Right to life - Close relatives can apply (cause you’re dead…)
  4. Committed by a contracting party (ratione personae)
  5. Within 6 months (ratione temporis)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

In which case do you lose your victim status?

A

(i) The state acknowledges you victim status
(ii) The state offers full redress:
- Full and sufficient
- Your rights must be practical and effective - Art. 19
- Is compensation always sufficient?
- You need effective investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is effective investigation?

A
  1. Promptness of proceedings

2. Is the sentence sufficient to discharge the authorities? Art. 19

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the requirements for exhaustion of domestic remedies?

A

Based on the subsidiarity principle (art. 1) - MS are primarily entrusted with securing EHR:

  1. Remedies must be adequate and effective
  2. Fulfilled if the remedy is bound to fail - Case law shows that the applicant stands no chance of succeeding in appeal court and
  3. Administrative practice:
    - (i) Repetition of acts - Consistency/pattern
    - (ii) Official tolerance
    - (iii) Sufficient evidence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Salah Sheekh v. The Netherlands

A

An effective remedy requires:

  1. Independent and rigorous scrutiny
  2. Remedy with automatic suspensive effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Nikolova and Velichkova v. Bulgaria

A

Proceedings must be prompt for effective investigation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly