Adverse Possession Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

Statute of Limitations Act

A

1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

No action to recover land brought not by a state body after the expiration of 12 years

A

s13(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

State solicitor is not a state body

A

O’Hagan v Grogan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Could leave no doubt in the mind of a landowner that occupation adverse to his title was taking place

A

Doyle v O’Neill

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Doyle v O’Neill

A

Could leave no doubt in the mind of a landowner that occupation adverse to his title was taking place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Adverse possession starts

A

when the adverse possessor occupies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

the title extinguished can be

A

no greater than the title of the paper owner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Factual possession signifies an appropriate degree of physical control

A

Powel v McFarlane

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Powel v McFarlane

A

Factual possession signifies an appropriate degree of physical control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

minimal acts continue possession

A

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007

A

minimal acts continue possession

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007 judge

A

Clarke J

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

once the title is extinguished, no subsequent act of possession can be re-instated

A

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

sporadic visits to the property where not enough for adverse possession

A

Dunne v Iarnród Éireann 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Back garden - not sporadic visits

A

Byrne v Dublin City Council 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

if true owner does nothing to interrupt possession title is extinguished

A

Hamilton v ACC Loan Management 2018

17
Q

Paper owner walked the land

A

Brown v Fahey

18
Q

visited the property several times a year

A

Mulhern v Brady

19
Q

brought auctioneer to the property

20
Q

serving a letter but never entering the property is not sufficient to disturb period of adverse possession

A

Mahon v O’Reilly

21
Q

Permitted to graze cattle

A

Brown v Fahey 1975

22
Q

possession with consent/ license of the owner

A

Hughes v Griffin

23
Q

permission to live in the house - implied license

24
Q

Animus possidendi is possession inconsistent with the title and the inconsistency involves an intention to exclude

A

Murphy v Murphy 1980

25
Murphy v Murphy 1980
Animus possidendi is possession inconsistent with the title and the inconsistency involves an intention to exclude
26
Feehan v Leamy 2000 judge
Finnegan J
27
'an intention to preclude the true owner and all other persons from enjoyment of the estate'
Feehan v Leamy 2000
28
Feehan v Leamy 2000
an intention to preclude the true owner and all other persons from enjoyment of the estate'
29
found there was no intention to exclude
Dundalk UDC v Coleman
30
there must be clear and affirmative evidence that the trespasser had intention to possess and made such intention clear to the world
Powell v McFarlane 1979
31
Powell v McFarlane 1979
there must be clear and affirmative evidence that the trespasser had intention to possess and made such intention clear to the world
32
fence needs to exclude all others
Tracey Enterprises McAdam Ltd v Dury 2006
33
occasional visitors- no intention to exclude
Griffen v Bleithin 1999
34
acts must be adverse to the owners future use
Leigh v Jack Cork Corp v Lynch
35
Future use taken into account when considering animus possidendi
Durack Manufacturing v Considine
36
Defences
Acknowledgement Fraud Disability
37
Acknowledgement
Edington v Clarke in comparison to.. Ofulue v Bassert (without prejudice basis)
38
Fraud
s71(1) 1957 Act
39
Disability
s49 1957 Act