Advocacy - Criminal Law Flashcards

1
Q

What is the general rule and exceptions to the right to bail?

A

General rule = defendant has an unconditional right to bail until convicted

Exceptions = substantial grounds for believing the defendant will:

a) Fail to surrend to custody
b) Commit a further offence whilst on bail
c) Interfere with a witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What factors are taken into account when considering whether bail should be granted?

A
  1. Nature and seriousness of the offence
  2. The defendant’s character, antecedents, associations and community ties
  3. The defendant’s history in respect of previous grants of bail
  4. The strength of evidence against the defendant
  5. Any other relevant factors
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

For each exception to the right to bail, what bail conditions can be imposed?

A
  1. Failing to surrender to custody:
    a) Sureties
    b) Security
    c) Reporting to a police station
    d) Residence
    e) Surrender passport
  2. Committing further offences whilst on bail
    a) Reporting to a police station
    b) Residence
    c) Curfew
    d) Non-communication with prosecution witnesses
    e) Restrictions on entering specified areas
  3. Interfering with a witness
    a) Non-communication with prosecution witnesses
    b) Restrictions on entering specified areas
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the aggravating factors?

A
  1. Previous convictions
  2. D’s record in respect to previous grants of bail
  3. Racial or religious aggravation
  4. Disability or sexual orientation hostility
  5. Offences against someone who provides a public service
  6. Commission of an offence in front of a child
  7. Using a minor to mind a weapon
  8. Terrorist connections
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the mitigating factors?

A
  1. D experienced a greater degree of provocation
  2. D acted on impulse
  3. D acted in genuine fear
  4. D has attempted to make reparations to victim
  5. D played a minor role in offence
  6. Particularly old/young
  7. Mental/physical disability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What must be shown to exclude evidence of a confession under s 76 PACE 1984?

A
  1. Oppression
    a) Torture, inhuman or degrading treatment
    b) Case law: hostile and aggressive questioning are examples of oppression
    c) Causal link between oppressive behaviour and making the confession
  2. Circumstances which renders the confession unreliable
    a) Something said/done which caused D to make the confession (eg: inducement)
    b) Breaches of PACE (eg: being denied access to legal advice)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What must be shown to exclude evidence of a confession under s 78 PACE 1984

A

That it would have such an adverse effect on the fairness of proceedings that it ought not to be admitted

The breach must have been significant and substantial

Court will take into account:
1. How serious the breach was
2. Whether it was deliberate
3. Whether the presence of a solicitor would have remedied/prevented the breach

Is the probative value of the accused person’s statement overridden by its prejudicial effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the requirements for a video identification procedure?

A

Witness is shown moving images of several people including the suspect

1 suspect = 8 other people
2 suspects = 12 other people

Must resemble the height, age and general appearance of the suspect and be carrying out the same sequence of movements

If the suspect has any unusual features (eg: tattoos or facial scar) these need to be concealed on D or replicated on the other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the requirements of an identification parade?

A

Held at a police station

At least 8 other people stand in a line alongside the suspect

Suspect can choose their position in the line, but cannot alter the position of other people

Witness must look at everyone in the parade twice before making a decision

If the suspect has any unusual features (eg: tattoos or facial scar) these need to be concealed on D or replicated on the other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the requirements of a group identification procedure?

A

Witness sees the suspect in an informal group of people
- Can happen with the consent of D or covertly

Suspect must be able to join these people and be capable of being seen by the witness at the same time as other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the requirements of confrontation?

A

Witness is brought face-to-face with suspect in the police station

Last resort, normally because D has refused to take part in other identification procedures

Before confrontation, witness must be told that the person they are about to confront may not be the person they saw

Usually happens with the suspect’s solicitor present

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Who is responsible for the ID procedure?

A

An identification officer who is:
a) Not below the rank of an inspector
b) Is not involved with the investigation

Responsible for choosing the ID procedure and ensuring it is carried out properly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is the general rule and exceptions for hearsay evidence?

A

General rule = hearsay evidence is inadmissible

Exceptions:

  1. Parties agree
  2. Preserved at common law:
    a) Res gestae
    b) Evidence of a confession
  3. It is in the interests of justice to admit it
  4. Witness is missing
  5. Business document
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

When is the ‘witness is missing’ ground available for introducing hearsay evidence?

A
  1. Oral evidence would in theory be admissible
  2. The witness can be identified to the court’s satisfaction
  3. Witness cannot attend because they are:
    a) Dead
    b) Physically/mentally unfit to testify
    c) Outside UK and it is not reasonably practicable to secure their attendance
    d) Cannot be found and reasonable steps have been taken to secure their attendance
    e) Afraid to testify and leave of court has been granted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When can hearsay evidence be admitted under the ‘business document’ ground?

A
  1. Created or received in a course of business
  2. Where the person supplying it had personal knowledge of the matters dealt with; and
  3. Everyone receiving the document was in the course of business
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Turnbull guidelines: when considering whether the ID evidence is weak, you should refer to ADVOKATE. What does this stand for?

A

Amount of time under observation

Distance between the witness and the defendant

Visibility at the time

Was anything Obstructing the witness’ view

Was the defendant ever Known to the witness beforehand

Did the witness have Any reason to remember the defendant

How much Time has lapsed since the witness saw the incident

Are there any Errors or material discrepancies in the witness’ first and subsequent accounts of the defendant

17
Q

Bad character evidence: what needs to be shown for evidence to be admitted under one of the gateways?

A
  1. Important explanatory evidence = impossible or difficult to understand the case without the evidence
  2. Important issue between D and P = D had a propensity to commit same/similar crimes or be untruthful
    - Used by prosecution to admit evidence of previous convictions
  3. Substantial probative value = used by one defendant to admit bad character evidence of another co-defendant
    - Would a fair minded court regard the previous convictions as having substantial evidential value?
  4. Correct a false impression given by D = expressly/impliedly made an assertion about themselves that is false or misleading
  5. Attack another person’s character = D accuses another of having:
    a) Committed an offence; or
    b) Behaved, or is disposed to behave, in a reprehensible way