AFP interview Flashcards

(34 cards)

1
Q

hierarchy of evidence

A

1) Meta-analysis/ Systematic Review
2) RCT
3) Cohort
4) Case control
5) Cross sectional
6) Case series (collection of similar cases)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Meta analysis definiton

A

An overview of a topic in which the results of all of the included studies are similar enough statistically that the results are combined and analysed as if it were one study.

A meta-analysis uses the quantitative results from the individual studies, pools them together using a statistical method, and produces a new single quantitative result. This new quantitative result is known as the ‘pooled treatment result’and is depicted graphically in a forest plot

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Systematic review definition

A

An overview of primary research on a particular research question that tries to identify, select and appraises all relevant high quality evidence to answer the research question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

A disadvantage of meta-analysis & systematic reviews

A

Relies on published studies –> publication bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

RCT definition

A

Cohort study

• People are randomly allocated to a treatment or control group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

5 advantages of RCTs

A
  • Studies effect
  • Has a control group (balances the confounders)
  • Randomised
  • Powered for analysis
  • Blinding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

5 disadvantages of RCTs

A
• Expensive
• Time consuming
• Volunteer bias
• Not realistic clinical practice (e.g frequent
follow-ups)
• Can be ethically problematic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cohort study defintion

A

Longitudinal observational study - follows people with a common exposure (e.g smoking) over time to determine the risk of subsequent disease

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

5 advantages of Cohort studies

A
  • Studies risk factors (for common outcomes)
  • Safe (ethics)
  • Match characteristics
  • Realistic patients
  • Establish timing & directionality of events
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

5 disadvantages of Cohort studies

A
• Cannot blind (difficult)
• Loss in follow-up (attrition bias)
• Expensive
• Hidden confounder
• Requires large sample sizes or long follow-up
for rare diseases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case control definition

A

Identifies two groups (with and w/o disease) and looks back for contributing factors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

4 advantages of case control studies

A
  • Studies rare outcomes & disorders
  • Small sample size required
  • Quick & Cheap
  • Safe (ethics)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 disadvantages of case control studies

A
  • Recall bias (retrospective study)
  • Selection bias
  • Difficult to select control groups
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Cross-sectional study defintion

A

Descriptive study

• ‘Snapshot’ of a population at a given time in which disease and exposure status are measured at the same time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

2 advantages of cross-sectional studies

A
  • Quick & Cheap

* Safe (ethics)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

4 disadvantages of cross-sectional studies

A
  • Association not causation
  • Recall bias
  • Unequal group sizes
  • Unequal distribution of confounders
17
Q

Case series definition

A

Collection of similar cases from a hospital or healthcare professional

18
Q

What is audit?

A

Review of (current) practice against a set standard

19
Q

What is research?

A

Study trying to find out what we should be doing with an aim to advance medical studies or protocols and procedures

20
Q

What is quality improvement?

A

A process by which we achieve better patient experience and outcomes

21
Q

What is research governance?

A

The range of regulations, principles and standards of good practice which ensure high quality research

22
Q

How is risk and risk ratio (same as relative risk) calculated?

A

AR = Absolute risk (No of events / no of people)

Risk ratio = (AR in treatment group/ AR in control group)

23
Q

What does a risk ratio of 1 (or CI including 1) mean?

A

No significant difference between intervention and control

24
Q

What does a risk ratio of 2 mean?

A

Events are two times MORE likely in the treatment group than the control group

25
What does a risk ratio of 0.5 mean?
Events are 50% (0.5) LESS likely in the treatment group than the control group
26
What is a type 1 error?
Rejection of null hypothesis when it was true (i.e. a false positive) Think of a pregnant man (false positive)
27
What is a type 2 error?
Failing to reject a false null hypothesis (false negative) Think of someone who is pregnant but pregnancy test is negative < False negative (T2 error) is most dangerous because you are missing the disease
28
Which criteria is used to report RCTs?
CONSORT
29
Which criteria is used to report systematic reviews and meta analyses?
PRISMA
30
Which criteria is used to report cohort studies and cross sectional studies?
STROBE
31
What are the four steps to critiquing/presenting a paper or a graph?
1. PICO 2. internal validity (biases and confounders) 3. Results (statistical significance and clinical significance) 4. External validity (clinical relevance)
32
What is selection bias and what are the two main ways it can arise?
A bias in assignment or selection of patients for a study that arises from study design rather than by chance, which occurs: • when the subjects studied are not representative of the target population • when the study and control groups are not matched properly, and so can affect the outcome of the study
33
What is external validity?
Whether the results of the study can be applied to non-study patients or populations.
34
What two methods can be used to reduce selection bias?
1. Randomised allocation | 2. Restriction of inclusion criteria