Agency Flashcards
(29 cards)
Agency
Relationship that arises when 1 person, P, manifests an intention that another person, A, shall act on his behalf
Formation
Capacity
Consent
Control
Writing
Not req by agency law
Req by SOF
- equal dignities doctrine - agency agmt’s must be in writing when A is to enter into certain K’s w/in SOF
Consent
Both P and A is nec to form
- express - written or oral stmt’s
- implication - pty’s conduct
Control
A must act subject to P’s control, but degree of control doesn’t need to be significant
Requisite level may be found simply by fact that P has specified the task that A should perform, even if P hasn’t prescribed the details of how the task should be accomplished
Capacity
P must have K’ual capacity
A need not
Duties owed by A
A, even if unpaid, is a FD of P, and owes corresponding FD’s
Duty of care
Duty of loyalty
Duty of obedience
Duty of care
A owes duty to carry out agency w/ reas care
- sliding scale depending on any special skills A may have
Duty of loyalty
A owes duty of undivided loyalty to P, including
- A must acct to P for any profits made while carrying out P’s instructions
- A must act solely for P’s benefit and not to benefit himself or a 3rd pty
- A must refrain from dealing w/ P as an adverse pty or from acting on behalf of an adverse pty
- A may not compete w/ P concerning subject matter of the agency
- A may not use P’s prop (including confidential info) for A’s own purposes or a 3rd pty’s purposes
Duty of obedience
A must obey all reas directions of P
If A doesn’t have actual auth and enters into a K on behalf of P, then breach
Duties owed by P
Not FD in nature
- if A incurs expenses or suffers other losses in carrying out P’s instructions, P has a duty to indemnify A
- unless circumstances indicate otherwise, inferred that P agreed to compensate P for his services
K liability
Power to bind P to a K
- actual auth granted by P to A
- apparent auth arising from P’s holding out another as his A to 3rd pty’s
- ratification of A’s act by P
Actual express auth
Expressed by P in words, oral or written
Contained w/in 4 corners of agency agmt and those expressly granted by P
Actual implied auth
A reas believes he has auth as a result of P’s axn’s
Auth inferred from P’s words or conduct, from custom or from P’s acquiescence
Apparent auth
P’s words or conduct would lead a reas person in the 3rd pty’s position to believe that A has auth to act on P’s behalf
Title or position may establish
Can’t be created by mere rep’n’s of A or a 3rd pty
Ratification
A purports to act on behalf of P w/o any auth at all, but P subsequently validates the act and becomes bound
- P must have knowledge of all material facts re the K
- P must accept the benefits of the transaction, entirely, can’t ratify portion only
- Can’t be used to alter rt’s of intervening pty’s
Liability in K
If actual auth, apparent auth, or ratification is present, P is liable on the K and A isn’t
However, if P is undisclosed (at time of A’s transaction, 3rd pty has no notice that A is acting for a P) or partially disclosed (at the time of A’s transaction, 3rd pty has notice that A is acting for a P, but has no notice of P’s identity), A is also liable on the K - P is still liable
Termination of actual auth
When A knows or should have known of the termination
- after a specified time or event
- change of circumstances
- breach of FD by A
- unilateral act by either P or A
- death or incapacity of P or A
Termination of apparent auth
If P gives A a writing manifesting his auth to be shown to 3rd pty’s, A’s apparent auth won’t be terminated w/ respect to 3rd pty’s who see and rely on such writing after termination of her auth
Lingering apparent auth - P must tell all 3rd pty’s that A has no auth to bind P - very hard
Tort liability
Respondeat superior
Master/ER is liable for torts committed by servant/EE w/in scope of his employment
Servant
Subject to another’s control as to the means used to achieve a particular result
IC
Subject to another’s control as results only, but not over how to achieve those results
Servant - IC factors
Skill req, tools and facilities, period of employment, basis of compensation, biz purpose, distinct biz
Conduct w/in scope of employment
Was conduct of the kind that A was hired to perform?
Did tort occur on the job? - frolic, detour
Was conduct at least in part to benefit P?