Agency Flashcards

1
Q

Restatement 2nd of Agency, Section 1: 4 Elements

A
  1. Manifestation of Consent (assent) by Principal.
    a) The Agent shall ACT on P’s behalf AND
    b) The Agent shall be subject to P’s CONTROL
  2. Consent (assent) by the Agent so to act for the Principal.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Teacher volunteers her car to her son’s coach to drive in Paris. Agency Relationship?

A

Gorton v. Doty

  1. Yes
  2. Doty (P) volunteered her car under the express condition the coach drive.
  3. Coach (A) consented by driving the car.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Restatement 2nd of Agency, Sections 15 & 16 (50-54)

A

It is not essential to the existence of authority that there be a K between P and A or that the agent promise to act as such.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R2A, S. 16 (p. 53)

A

It is not essential to the relationship of P and A that they, or either, receive compensation (for the relationship to exist).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R2A, S. 140: 4 Elements

A
  1. Creditor
  2. Who ASSUMES CONTROL
  3. of his debtor’s business
  4. RESULT: may become a PRINCIPAL w/ Liability for acts & transactions of debtor in connection w/ his business.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R2A, S. 140: 2 Comments

A
  1. “Merely EXERCISING VETO POWER by preventing purchases or sales above specified amounts does NOT thereby become a principal.”
  2. Creditor becomes a principal when it EXERCISES DE FACTO CONTROL over conduct of debtor.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R2A, S. 14K: 8 Elements

A
Agency v. Buyer-Supplier 
1. One who CONTRACTS 
2. To acquire PROPERTY 
3. From a THIRD PERSON, AND
4. Convey it to another, AND
5. CONTRACTOR agreed that he is to 
     a) ACT PRIMARILY FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE OTHER AND 
      b)  NOT FOR HIMSELF 
5. RESULT: is the AGENT of the other 
3rd Party (Apple IPhone) --> S (supplier/At&t) --> B (buyer/Brooke)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R2A, S. 14K - Comment: 3 Factors indicating that one is a supplier and NOT an agent are:

A
  1. Receives FIXED PRICE for property no matter what price paid by him.
  2. Acts in OWN NAME and receives TITLE to property later transferred
  3. Has an INDEPENDENT BUSINESS in buyi8ng and selling similar property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

a) Cargill, by its control and influence over Warren, became a principal with liability for the transactions entered into by its agent Warren
b) Cargill was an active participant in Warren’s operations RATHER than simply a financier
c) Cargill’s course of dealing with Warren was a paternalistic relationship in which Cargill made the key economic decisions and kept Warren in existence

A

Gay Jenson Farms Co. v. Cargill, Inc.

1. Holding: Cargill was a liable principal to Warren.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 6 Attribution Rules?

A
  1. Actual - Express
  2. Actual - Implied/Incidental
  3. Apparent
  4. Inherent
  5. Estoppel
  6. Ratification
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Joyce, the sole owner of 370 leasing co. (P), sued Ampex (D) for breach of K. D, through Kays, sent P a document with a signature block for both P and D to sign. P signed, D didn’t. Mueller, Ampex higher up over Kays, acknowledged there was an agreement in an intra-office memo.

a) P Arg: Offer to Sell
b) D’s Arg: Not offer to sell b/c Ampex did not sign  P’s Counter: Offer to Purchase later accepted by Ampex Rep.

A

370 Leasing Corp. v. Ampex Corp. –> Apparent Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bill Hogan hired his bro, Sam Hogan (P), to help paint the church. Sam fell and broke his arm and sued the church for workers comp. Sam had worked w/ Bill at the church prior times. A church elder told Bill he could hire another guy but he was hard to get ahold of and never discussed Sam.

a) Ruling 1 (Old Workers Comp. Board): For D, Sam not an employee of church
b) Ruling 2 (New Workers’ Comp. Board): For P, Sam is an employee of church

A

Mill Street Church v. Hogan –> Implied/Incidental Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R2A, S. 7 - Actual Authority (3 Elements)

A
  1. Power of A
  2. To affect legal relations with P
  3. Done in accordance with P’s manifestation of Consent to A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R2A, S. 26 - Creation of Actual Authority (3 Elements)

A
  1. Objective manifestation of P
  2. A’s reasonable interpretation of that manifestation
  3. A’s belief that she is authorized to act for P
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

R2A, S. 35 - When Incidental/Implied Authority is Inferred (6 Elements)

A
  1. Acts
  2. Which are incidental,
  3. Usually accompany, OR
  4. are reasonably necessary
  5. to accomplish a transaction.
  6. Fills the gaps in express authority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What fills in the gaps of express authority?

A

Incidental/Implied Authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

R2A, S. 8 & 27 - Apparent Authority; Creation of Apparent Authority (3 Elements)

A
  1. Objective manifestation from one party (apparent principal)
  2. Which reaches a 3rd Party
  3. Causing the 3rd Party to reasonably believe that another party (apparent agent) is authorized to act for the apparent principal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

R3A, S. 2.03 - Apparent Authority (5 Elements)

A
  1. 3rd Party
  2. Reasonably believes
  3. Actor
  4. has authority to act on behalf of P AND
  5. that belief is traceable to P’s manifestations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Apparent Authority: What counts as a “manifestation” by the Principal? (7 Things)

A
  1. Direct communications from P –> by letter/word of mouth
  2. Authorized statements of the agent
  3. Documents or other indicia of authority given by the P to the A
  4. Communications from 3rd Persons who have heard o the agent’s authority from authorized or permitted channels of communication
  5. Appointing a person to a position like manage or treasurer
  6. Communication to the public through signs or advertising
  7. Continuously employing the agent
20
Q

R2A, S. 8(A), 161, `194, 195 - Inherent Authority: Principal Liability (5 Elements)

A
  1. Principal liable for acts done on his account
  2. that usually accompany or are incidental
  3. to transactions agent authorized to conduct
21
Q

R3A Agency Approach to Inherent Authority –> 2.06 (2) Liability of Undisclosed Principal (5 Elements)

A
  1. R3A declines to recognize inherent authority
  2. But states rule for undisclosed principals that achieves the same result under 2.06:
    a) Undisclosed principal
    b) may NOT rely
    c) on instructions given an agent
    d) that qualify OR reduce the agent’s authority
    e) to less than the authority a 3rd Party would reasonably believe the agent to have under the same circumstances if the Principal had been disclosed.
22
Q

R2A S. 3(a) & 3(b) - Inherent Authority: Covers actions by General Agent or General Manager (General Agent v. Special Agent)

A

3(a): General Agent is an agent authorized to conduct a series of transaction involving CONTINUTITY Of service
3(b): Special Agent is an agent authorized to conduct a SINGLE transaction or a SERIES of transactions NOT involving continuity of service

23
Q

If apparent authority is established, then there is no need to establish what?

A

Inherent authority

24
Q

R3A, S. 1.03 - Manifestation

A

A person manifests assent or intention through WRITTEN or SPOKEN words or OTHER CONDUCT

25
Q

R2A, S. 82, 83, 91 - Ratification (3 Elements)

A
  1. Retroactive approval of a previously unauthorized act.
  2. Affirmance through words, conduct, OR silence indicating consent.
  3. Requirement of INTENT & KNOWLEDGE of all material facts.
26
Q

R3A, Chp. 4 - Ratification Timing

A
  1. Timing: Cannot follow events that would cause ratification to have adverse/inequitable effects on 3rd Party.
27
Q

R2A, S. 8B - Estoppel

A
  1. Principal
  2. allows another (who has NO authority)
  3. to create appearance of authority AND
  4. does NOT correct the misimpression
    a) Reasonable belief by 3rd party
    b) Change in position by 3rd Party (reliance)
28
Q

R3A S. 2.05 - Estoppel

A
  1. Liable to 3rd Part ywho has made a detrimental change in position due to belief it was for another person’s account.
  2. Such person intentionally OR carelessly caused such belief.
  3. With NOTICE of such belief, such person did NOT take reasonable steps to notify them of facts.
29
Q

Policy for Inherent Authority

A

Exists for the protection of persons harmed by or dealing with a servant or other agent. “B/c agents are fiduciaries acting generally in the principal’s interests, and are trusted and controlled by him, it is fairer that the risk of loss caused by disobedience of agents should fall upon the principal rather than upon 3rd persons.” - Nogales

30
Q

R2A, S. 321 - Liability of Agent for Partially Disclosed Principal

A
  1. Person purporting to make a K
  2. with a third party
  3. for a partially disclosed principal
  4. RESULT: is a party to the K
31
Q

R2A, S. 4 - Definition of Partially Disclosed Principal

A
  1. Partially Disclosed Principal =
  2. 3rd party had notice
  3. that the agent MAY be acting for a principal BUT
  4. has NO NOTICE of principal’s identity
32
Q

If agent is acting on behalf of a disclosed principal, is the agent liable on the K?

A

No.

33
Q

R2A, S. 4 - Definition of Disclosed Principal

A
  1. Disclosed Principal =
  2. At the time the transaction was conducted by the agent,
  3. the 3rd Party KNEW
    a) the agent was acting for a principal, AND
    b) the Principal’s Identity
34
Q

If the agent is acting on behalf of an undisclosed principal, is the Agent liable on the K?

A

Yes.

35
Q

R2A, S. 4 - Definition of Undisclosed Principal

A
  1. Undisclosed Principal =

2. 3rd Party has NO notice that the agent is acting for a Principal

36
Q

R2A, S. 219 - Respondeat Superior Liability

A
  1. Master is subject to liability
  2. For torts of his Servants
  3. Committed in the SCOPE OF EMPLOYMENT
37
Q

R2A, S. 2 - Definition of Master

A

Master

  1. Principal
  2. Who EMPLOYS an Agent
  3. to perform service in HIS affairs AND
  4. who CONTROLS or has the RIGHT TO CONTROL
  5. the PHYSICAL CONDUCT of the other
38
Q

R2A, S. 2 - Definition of Servant

A

Servant

  1. Agent
  2. Employed by a master
  3. to perform in HIS affairs whose PHYSICAL CONDUCT in the performance of the service
  4. is CONTROLLED or is subject to the RIGHT to CONTROL by the master
39
Q

R2A, S. 2 - Definition of Independent Contractor

A

Independent Contractor

  1. Person who contracts with another
  2. to do something for him BUT
  3. is NOT CONTROLLED by the other NOR subject to the other’s right to control
  4. with respect to his PHYSICAL CONDUCT
  5. May or may not be an agent
40
Q

R2A, S. 220(2) - Relevant Factors of Control over Servant

A
  1. Extent of control over details of work
    a) Right to TERMINATE relationship
    b) Engaged in distinct business or occupation
    c) Whether occupation is usually directed by EMPLOYER or INDEPENDENTLY CARRIED OUT
    d) Level of Skill
    e) who supplies the tools & place of work
    f) Length of time of employment
    g) Method of payment (hourly or per job)
    h) Is work part of regular business of employer?
    I) Do parties BELIEVE they are creating a master/servant relationship?
    j) Is the Principal in business?
41
Q

Licensing System used in business.

A

Franchise

42
Q

Party that grants franchise rights by K.

A

Franchisor

43
Q

Franchisor’s 3 Obligations are?

A

License use of valuable NAME, LOGO, and “SYSTEM”

44
Q

Party that contracts for franchise rights?

A

Franchisee

45
Q

Franchisee’s 3 Obligations are?

A
  1. Payment of royalties
  2. Payment of Advertising fees
  3. Must operate within “system” –> set forth in K and/or in operating manual
46
Q

3 Sources of Franchise Law?

A
  1. State K Law
  2. State Franchise Regulation
    a) Requires DISCLOSURE of RISKS of franchise relationship
  3. Agency Law
    a) Franchisor-franchisee relationship can give rise to liability claims against the franchisor for FRANCHISEE NEGLIGENCE based on agency principles.
47
Q

In Murphy v. Holiday Inns, why was there no agent/principal relationship?

A

Because Holiday Inns did NOT control Murphy’s (the franchisee) DAY-TO-DAY BUSINESS OPERATION.