Agency-Revision Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

Definition of an agent- Bowstead and Reynolds

A

Fiduciary relationship- between 2 persons- principal and agent- agent has express/ implied authority to act on behalf of P and affect his legal relations- no general formalities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actual Authority

A

P consents in advance to A’s actions- gives A actual authority to act in such a manner that binds P- consent may be express or implied

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Apparent Authority

A

A appears to 3rd party to have authority, whether they actually have it or not- must be due to representations by P, and not A- again, binds principal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Usual/ Customary

A

Exists where A has the authority of a person who, in his position, would usually/ customarily have- may expand A’s scope of authority, or lay independent to it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Ratification

A

Exists where A does not have authority at the time of acting on P’s behalf- P later ratifies/ adopts the agents actions- thus becoming bound by them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

“Hely-Hutchinson”

A

MD- appointed- impliedly authorised to act within scope of ordinary MD duties.
NB/ lack of objection may be taken as permission.
NB/ Implied authority can never contradict express direction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

“Kett v. Shannon”

A

FAX- Know from case note, mechanic and the FIAT- ratio: apparent authority must be purported by P and not A. Belief of 3rd party is not enough to establish apparent authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

“Freeman & Lokcyer”

A

Test for apparent authority:
- Representation must be made by P, whether by word or conduct.
- Principal must be capable of making such a representation
- Third party must rely on the representation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Reliance, Apparent Authority, “Freeman & Lokcyer”

A

Reasonable- Objectively Justifiable in All Circumstances
Causal- The 3rd Party would not have entered into the contract otherwise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

“Armagas LTD”

A

Reliance, but not objectively reasonable- representation must come from P, not the assurances of A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

“Turquad”

A

Reliance may be reasonable and casual via company conduct, rather than actual word/ written representations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

“Livingston”

A

Merchant acted beyond actual authority, but within customary authority- bound principals- ‘Agents, regardless of actual authority, may have implied authority to act according to usual customs, unless expressly restricted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

“Bolton Partners”

A

“Ratification makes acceptance binding retroactively, making the act valid as if authorised from the beginning”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

“Watteau v. Fenwick”

A

The cigar and bovril case- P bound under fact specific circumstance- “the outside world still believed Humble was the owner, especially as his name was displayed “as proprietor” above the door’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Agency, By Ratification, Prerequisites- White

A
  1. A acting, or purporting to act, for P
  2. P must be in existence, competent and capable of being ascertained by T
  3. P can ratify lawful/ unlawful acts, but cannot ratify a nullity.
  4. P must ratify within a reasonable amount of time
  5. P must have full knowledge, of all relevant circumstances
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

“Carey”

A

In ratification, the actual identity of P does not need to be disclosed, but there must be enough info available for T to find them if they so wish

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

“O’Connell”

A

‘Non-disclosure of irrelevant enquiries, or ludicrous artificial offers, shall not deem ratification invalid’
‘For ratification to be deemed invalid… non-disclosure must relate to information which, according to ordinary business standards, could be said to be material to a decision to accept or reject a particular offer”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

“Barclay’s Bank”

A

Bank and Solicitor case- “The actual method of ratification should be express or implied”- “Non objection &/or acceptance of proceeds will constitute for the purposes of ratification”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

“Brown”

A

Goods-in-transit, unauthorised agent attempted to stop them, act could nit be ratified by P a time later as the goods had already reached their destination, and a principal cannot ratify a nullity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

“Lloyd v. Grace (1912)” and deceit

A

Principal will be held liable for A’s deceit, or other misrepresentations, if A was acting within their authority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

“Refuge Assurance” and deceit

A

P need not have knowledge of A’s deceit to be liable for it

22
Q

Disclosed Agency- Def

A

3rd party aware A is acting as an agent, and thus on behalf of another at the time of contracting- identity is insignificant

23
Q

Undisclosed Agency- Def

A

3rd party under the belief that A is acting on their own behalf, and thus not for any other person

24
Q

Why does the disclosure of agency matter?

A
  • Effects P’s ability to ratify A’s actions
  • Effects A’s liability to T
25
"Siu Yin Kwan"- The drowned seamen case
Illustrates that whilst distinguishing undisclosed and disclosed agency is fine in theory, its harder in practice
26
"Humble v. Hunter"- The Charter Party Case
Non Intervention by P Agent signed contract as 'owner' CR; 'Any contract entered into by A that purports them as principal/ owner shall exclude the undisclosed principal'
27
"Greer v. Downs Supply Co."- Personal Selection of A
TP; 'I would've never entered into this contract if I'd have known Godwin was acting for someone else, and not himself' CR: P cannot intervene, as contract is personal in nature.
28
"Said v. Butt"- Personal Opposition of P
The Russian MD case, tickets to theatre. CR: Principal cannot enforce a contract that T would've never made with them on a point of personal opposition.
29
"Dyster v. Randall"- Purchase of land, contrasts with "Said v. Butt"
P allowed to intervene here, as identity "not central to the contract"
30
Based off "Said v. Butt" and "Dyster v. Randall", when does P's Right of Intervention not apply?
When the contract is: - of a personal nature - clearly intended to exclude the principal
31
How does the 'Commercial Agents Directive' define an agent?
Self-employed Continuing authority to either: -negotiate sale/purchase of goods on behalf of 'P' -negotiate &/or conclude contracts on behalf of P and in their name
32
"Pacflex BV"- Defining an agent
CR- Pacflex do not qualify as a CA under the directive as: -Renumeration structure characterised by mark-up, and not commission. -Lack of continuing authority to n/c contracts or negotiate s/p of goods -Operated much more akin to an independent distributor than a CA
33
"Poseidon Chartering BV"- Defining continuing authority
1 Contract- 10yrs of renewal- 2.5% commission scheme- CR: -"Continuing authority is a flexible, content driven standard, to be broadly interpreted' -"Agent need not possess full contractual conclusion power" -"Truly critical- ongoing, enduring nature of relationship between P & A'
34
"Murphy Brewery LTD,"- To negotiate, or negotiate and conclude, contracts for the sale of goods
Costello J.: 'Negotiation does not require in some way, bartering and haggling so as to endeavour to reach some sort of agreement between A and T' 'Negotiation may simply occur through sale, or quantity of sale'
35
"Kenny v. ROC Ireland"- The petrol manager and negotiation.
CR: Relied on "Yokohama SPA" and AG Cosmos... 3 conditions to constitute CA; - Self-Employed - Continuing Character of Contractual Relationship with P -Activity of A, in P's name, which may consist of being an intermediary with regard to sale/ purchase or concluding a sale/ purchase
36
"Parks v. ESSO" (UK)
Similar facts to "Kenny", but different ruling- Parks was not an intermediary in the sale, or concluding party in the sale, of self-service petrol
37
"Tamarind INT."
Goods, for the purpose of the CAD, include electricity, gas, and other fossil fuels
38
"Software Incubator"
Software, sold electronically and subject to an annual license, constituted goods for the purposes of the CAD
39
"Asigna LTD"-KEY CASE, JURISDICTION
Clause stating Ontario law would apply to whole contract was overridden by Reg.17- 'if it can apply, it will' "An agent's claim for compensation in the EU is strictly the jurisdiction of the EU"
40
Regulation 5 requires...
Agency agreement must be evidenced in writing- whilst agreement need not be via formal contract, it must be evidenced in writing
41
"Moore v. Pietta"
Whilst Reg.5 requires the agreement be evidenced in writing, the agreement need not be formally construed- letters, emails, general correspondence will all evidence the agreement
42
"Moore v. Pietta"- Break Up
Any attempts to 'break up' the agency, via a series of fixed-term contracts with inactivity in-between will not fly- "agency will be evaluated as a whole"
43
"Bushell Interiors LTD."- Territorial Disputes
The term 'master dealer', or anything alike, will be construed narrowly under the law, and will generally not confer a right of exclusivity to A
44
"Ingmar GB Ltd."- Territorial Disputes
Ingmar expressly granted exclusive territory of GB and IRE. Thus, A could only work within specified area, and P could not appoint anymore agents to that area. CJEU- "exclusivity clauses will be reviewed on a case by case basis"
45
"Ingmar GB LTD"- Test: What area does a customer belong in?
"where the actual customers activities took place": factors inc. - Where negotiations took place - Where goods are delivered - *Where goods were ordered from*- key factor, if others contradict, this will decide customer where customer belongs
46
What regulation defines an agent's right to commission?
Regulation 6
47
Amount of commission?
Customary/ reasonable
48
Art. 7 dictates ...
When an agent is actually entitled to commission
49
ART.7: 3 Entitlements
- Concluded contract was a result of A's actions - Concluded contract was a result of repeat transactions introduced by A - If A has an exclusive right to represent A in a particular area/ group, then all contracts stemming from that group count as contracts concluded by A
50
Post- termination entitlement to commission:
(A) Transaction was mainly attributable to A's efforts, whilst an agent of P, and was entered into within a reasonable time after termination. (B) Actual orders were placed before the termination of agency
51