Agression Flashcards Preview

Psyhcology > Agression > Flashcards

Flashcards in Agression Deck (34)
Loading flashcards...
1
Q

What are the two explanations for insitiuational aggression in prisons

A

Dispositional and situational

2
Q

What model is dispositional

A

Importation model

3
Q

What is the importation model

A

Institutional aggression results from characteristics of prisoners. This includes beliefs, values, norms, attitudes and a history or learning experiences as well as gender, race and class.

4
Q

Why do inmates import behaviours

A

To negotiate their way through the unfamiliar prison environment in which existing inmates use aggression to establish power, status, influence and access to resources.

5
Q

What do prisoner characteristics include according to DeLisi

A

Several negative dispositional features like childhood trauma, high levels of anger and irritability, histories of substance abuse and violent behaviour

6
Q

What do the consequences of the dispositional explanation to prison aggression include

A

Suicidal activity.
Sexual misconduct.
They also conducted more physical violence than inmates with fewer negative dispositional features.

7
Q

What is the model in the situational explanations for aggression in prisons

A

Deprivation model

8
Q

What does the deprivation model suggest

A

Harsh prison conditions cause stesss for inmates and they cope by resorting to aggressive and often violent behaviour. It is also influenced by the nature of the prison regime.

9
Q

What is an unpredictable regime in a prison

A

That regularly uses ‘lock ups’ to control behaviour creates frustration, reduced stimulation and reduces access to ‘goods’ even further. This is a recipe for aggression

10
Q

What is aggression in relation to the problem of deprivation

A

An adaptive solution

11
Q

What do the harsh situational conditions in a prison include

A

Psychological factors like being deprived of freedom, independence, safety and heterosexual intimacy.

Physical factors like deprivation of material goods and services increases competition amounted inmates to acquire them.

12
Q

Who investigated the factors that predicted inmate aggression

A

Steiner

13
Q

What did Steiner find

A

In 512 prisons in the US he found that inmate-on-inmate violence was more common in prisons where there were higher proportions of female staff, Hispanic inmates and inmates in protective custody for their own safety. These are prison-level factors because they are independent of the individual characteristics of prisoners. The factors that reliably predicted aggressive behaviour is in line with the deprivation model

14
Q

Strength of the importation model

A

Research support. Camp studied male inmates with similar criminal histories and predispositions to aggression - half were placed in low security and the other half in more security. 33% of prisoners in low and 36% in high were involved in agfesssive misconduct within two years. The difference was not statistically significant so the conclusion was that the features of he prison environment are less important in predicting aggression than the behaviour of inmates. Strong evidence for the dispositional explanation.

15
Q

Limitation of the importation model

A

Alternative explanation may be better. It ignores the roles of prison officials and factors relating to running of prisons. An Administrative control model states that poorly managed prisons are likely to experience the most serious forms of inmate violence. Poor management includes unofficial rules and guard brutality and these factors may be more influential in determining aggression than inmate characteristics.

16
Q

Strength of deprivation model

A

Research support. Steiner found that cookie was more common in prisons with more female staff, Hispanic inmates, African American inmates and protective custody. These are all prison factors bc they are independent of the prison. In this study factors relatively predicted aggressive behaviour in line with the deprivation model.

17
Q

Limitation of the deprivation model

A

It predicts that a lack of feeedom and heterosexual contact leads to aggressive behaviour but research into conjugal visits shows there was no link between involvement in these visits and reduced aggressive behaviour. Shows that situational factors do not necessarily affect prison violence and casts doubt on validity of the model

18
Q

What is de-individuation

A

A psychological state in which an individual loses their personal identity and takes on the identity of the social group when, for example, in a crowd or wearing a uniform. The results may be to free the individual from the constraints of social norms.

19
Q

What did zimbardo argue

A

Our behaviour is usually constrained by social norms and most forms of aggressive behaviour is discouraged but when we become part of a crowd we lose refrain and may behave in emotional, impulsive and irrational ways

20
Q

Why do we experience less personal guilt at harmful aggression directed at offers

A

Because responsibility becomes shared throughout the crowd

21
Q

What are several conditions of de-individuation that promotes agression

A
Darkness
Drugs
Alcohol
Uniform
Disguises
Anonymity
22
Q

Who said that ‘anonymity shaped crowd behaviour’

A

Dixon

23
Q

Why is anonymity an important factor in de-individuation

A

we have less fear of retribution in a crowd because we are a small and unidentifiable part of a faceless crowd. Anonymity provides fewer opportunities for others to judge us negatively

24
Q

What two types of self-awareness does anonymity reduce

A

Private self awareness

Public self awareness

25
Q

Who argues that anonymity reduces self awareness

A

Rogers and Prentice-Dunn

26
Q

Why is private self awareness reduced in anonymity

A

Our attention is focused outwardly to the events around us, so we think less about or own beliefs and feelings - we are less self-critical and evaluative

27
Q

What is public self awareness reduced

A

We realise we are anonymous and our behaviour is less likely to be judged by others - we no longer care how others see us so we become less accountable for our aggressive and destructive actions

28
Q

What is suggestibility

A

Where you are ready to take on suggestions and influences of others

29
Q

What is contagion

A

This is where a behaviour or mindset spreads like a contagion disease amongst a crowd

30
Q

Example of de-individuatjon as a force of good as Zimbaddo suggested it could be

A

200 strangers responded to Facebook invitation for funeral of veteran with no friends or family

31
Q

Strength of anonymity increasing de-individualism

A

Resech support. Zimbardos guards wore uniform and reflective sunglasses and became violent beyond their own morals and values. Shows that anomity makes because less accountable for their actions and they become more violent. Supports.

32
Q

Limitation of animity creating deinviduation (zimbardo)

A

Demand characteristics in his study. One inmate said he was playing a character from ‘cool hand luke’ because that’s what he believed he had to act like. ‘Good-participant’ effect.

33
Q

Strength of de-individuaton

A

Resech support. Mann studied newspaper articles of people who had committed suicide and in 10/21 of the events there was evidence of a ‘baiting crowd’. This was more likely when it was dark and the person was high up with a large crowd

34
Q

Limitation of the de-individuation theory

A

Androcentric. It may be an adequate explanation of crowd aggression in males but females have been found to be significantly less likely to turn aggressive in the same circumstances so the theory is an incomplete theory of human aggression