All Flashcards
(37 cards)
Consul?
CONSULS who commanded the army, convened and presided over the Senate and the popular assemblies and executed their decrees, and represented the state in foreign affairs.
Sulla’s dictatorship is the primary reason that in the future…
…people would be so afraid of one man having too much power.
Praetor?
were high-ranking magistrates that served in the ancient Roman government. Praetors played the role of judicial and military supervision and were only below the consuls in terms of power rank.
Sulla 97 BC?
Praetor urbanos
Who is responsible in the first place, for the stretching of the elastic band?
Gaius Marius
Which officials are novos Homos?
Gaius Marius
Cicero
115 BC Marius?
Praetor Urbanos
THE TRIBUNE OF THE PLEBS
was a protector of the common people or plebians. He had the power to veto legislation in the Senate and could introduce legislation as well. He could protect a plebian from unjust punishment by a magistrate and prosecute and administer sentences.
The AEDILES
were responsible for maintenance of public buildings (aedēs) and regulation of public festivals. They also had powers to enforce public order and duties to ensure the city of Rome was well supplied and its civil infrastructure well maintained, akin to modern local government. Two Plebeian Aediles and two patrician were elected
Where did Sulla distinguish himself firstly?
The Numidian war under Marias’s charge
QUAESTORS
were elected officials who supervised the state treasury and conducted audits. When assigned to provincial governors, the duties were mainly administrative and logistical, but also could expand to encompass military leadership and command.
Sulla early life summarized -
He was from a wealthy family, and lived in lodgings when he was younger. As he grew older he hung around with actors/actresses (prostitutes, high class prostitutes were very wealthy) and shared their dissolute lifestyle. He had loved a wealthy woman and was left her heir, and also gained property from his step mother. This left him moderately well off. There was so little money in Rome there were restrictions on how much jewelry you could own - they melted some down to use as money in the Roman army. As a result of his great grandfather, his family was disgraced and his father did not talk to him. His father wanted him to stop hanging around actors. Sulla’s girlfriend was a prostitute, and it is possible that he killed her.
List of examples of Sulla’s wrongdoings against Rome?
Marched on Rome
Was a dictator
Killed a consul and then had himself elected the following year (80 BC)
Sulla’s positions —>
97 BC - Praetor Urbanos
88 BC - Consul (was chased from Rome by the tribunate)
81 - 79 BC - dictator
Marius’s positions?
115 BC - Praetor Urbanos
109-108 BC - sent as commander against King Jugurtha who had become an enemy of Rome.
108 BC - consul
Legislation he passed/ important moments
He passed a law which allowed the men of the head count to enrol in the legions/army. Before this, you need a certain amount of wealth to be able to enlist. Marius got rid of this qualification which meant any man could join the legions. This resulted in thousands of men owing their military careers to Marius, which fewed a lot of opposition and was supposed to be temporary.
What did Sulpicius do during Sulla’s consulship? What was the result?
During Sulla’s consulship, Sulpicius, using armed gangs and 600 equestrians as a bodyguard had ‘convinced’ the Assembly to remove Sulla’s eastern command and had it transferred it to Marius. Marius then deployed two military tribunes to assume command of Sulla’s army. Sulla then gave a speech to his 3,500 soldiers, which made them loyal to him - and when Marius’s legions turned up, slaughtered all of them. They then commenced their march on Rome to take back what was rightfully theirs. When asked why he would march soldiers against his own country, he replied, “to deliver her from tyrants”. Sulla, the first person to conquer Rome, then overturned Marius and Sulpicius’ actions and reinstated himself as consul. Sulla and his legions had the coveted eastern command again, and Marius was forced to flee Rome. Sulla laid siege in Athens between 87-86 BC, it was during this time he heard the news that Marius and his faction had returned and captured Rome, passing a decree which declared Sulla an enemy of the state. Marius then cut off money from Sulla’s campaign, so he was forced to tax the local Greeks to fund his campaign. Suddenly, back in Rome, Marius died from pneumonia in 86 BCE.
Timeline of the conflict between Sulla and Marius
105 BC?
Marius was unconstitutionally elected in absentia to his second consulship.
When he (Marius) had crossed to Africa, Metellus [an aristocratic enemy of Marius who had been fighting in Africa], now became a victim of jealousy, and vexed because, after he had brought the war to an end and had nothing further to do than to seize the person Jugurtha, [African King that Rome was at war with], Marius was coming to enjoy the crown and the triumph, - a man whose ingratitude towards his benefactor had raised him to power, - would not consent to meet him, but privately left the country while Rutilisus, who had become his legate, handed over the army to Marius.
And in the end a retribution [Payback] fell upon Marius; for Sulla robbed him of the glory of his success, as Marius had robbed Metellus.
But when Jugurtha in his flight and wandering felt compelled to make him his last hope and sought haven with him, Bocchus received him, more out of regard for his position as a suppliant than from goodwill, and kept him in his hands.
But when Sulla had come to him in all confidence, Bocchus experienced a change of heart and felt repentant, and for many days wavered in his plans, deliberating whether to surrender Jugurtha or to hold Sulla as a prisoner. Finally, however, he decided upon his first plan of treachery, and put Jugurtha alive into the hands of Sulla.
This was the first bitter and incurable hatred between Marius and Sulla, which nearly brought Rome to ruin. For many wished Sulla to have the glory of the affair because they hated Marius, and Sulla himself had a seal-ring made, which he used to wear, on which engraved was the surrender of Jugurtha to hi by Bocchus.
Who did Sulla fight in 83 BC? What was the result?
In 83 BC Sulla landed in Italy with 5 legions (leaving behind his original 2 in Asia to keep the peace). Many of the younger generation believed that he would win and found support from Crassus and a young Pompey. A battle ensued between Sulla and his supporters and the consular armies led by Carbo and the son of Marius and their Samnite allies.
The final decisive occurred on 1st November 82 BC outside of the Collins Gate of Rome - Sulla was victorious and the younger Marius committed suicide. The Samnites were slaughtered and Sulla then sent Pompey to the provinces to finish off the last of the Marias supporters
Timeline of the conflict between Sulla and Marius
91 BC? (context +)
The social war broke out
Timeline of the conflict between Sulla and Marius
88 BC?
88 BC - The First Mithridatic War began: Mithridates VI invaded the Roman province of Asia in response to a Roman-backed invasion of Pontus by the neighbouring king of Bithynia, Nicomedes IV. The Social War ended in a Roman victory, with Sulla gaining much glory and power as a result. Marius, on the other hand, gained little, despite having played a crucial role in the War. That same year, Sulla was elected consul prior, while a proposal to transfer command in Asia from Sulla to Marius was duly decreed (someone used armed guards to threaten the senate for this to happen). Sulla, however, refused to give up control of his 35,000 strong army and went on to take Rome and defeats Marius. The latter, by then aged 70, fled to Africa where he famously despaired of his misfortunes amid the ruins of Carthage.
Why were Sulla’s reforms significant?
Since quaestors are elected by people in the future it meant that the senate was also indirectly elected by the people. Tribunes were no longer allowed to propose legislation to the people, were deprived of their judical powers and their right to veto was limited. Most importantly if you were a tribune you were then ineligble for any other office - creating a political dead end. Individuals would no longer seek to be tribunes as they were political dead ends.