all content

Question 1

duty of care pre-existing precedent.

Answer 1

robinson

Question 2

Duty of care in novel situation: 3-part test

Answer 2

caparo v dickman

Question 3

Duty of care part 1: Some harm to someone in cs position is reasonably foreseeable as a result of the DS actions

Answer 3

Kent v griffiths

Question 4

learner or with inexperience

Answer 4

nettleship v weston

Question 4

duty of care part 2 : proximity in time, space and relationship

Answer 4

bourhill v young

Question 5

duty of care part 3 it is fair just and reasonable to impose a duty on d as it would benefit the public to impose liability on the defendant and it would not lead to the flood gates of litigations opening.

Answer 5

hill v cc of west yorkshire

Question 6

professionals or experts

Answer 6

bolam v friern hospital

Question 6

motorists owe a duty to other road users

Answer 6

nettle v weston

Question 6

children owe a duty of care to others

Answer 6

mullins v richards

Question 12

D could have prevented the harm by.. and could be said d did not take the steps that were in proportion to the likelihood and seriousness of risk of harm

Answer 12

bolton v stone