Anxiety Flashcards
(31 cards)
DSM-s + Anxiety
-separation anxiety disorder
- selective mutism
- generalised anxiety disorder - disproportionate worry over everyday things
- specific phobia
-panic disorder
- social anxiety disorder
Limbic system + Anxiety
- Anterior cingulate cortex
- prefrontal Cortex
-ventromedial Cortex (orbitofrontal)
-Amygdala
urbach-wiethe Disease- Amygdala + Anxiety
- Feinstein et al >
- AMygdala destroyed
- doesn’t feel fear/ anxiety in response to external fear provoking stimuli
Genetic influence + anxiety
-Hettema et al ->
- laid out many genetic influences
- A1 + A2 genes are common amongst all anxiety disorders
-ASP specific genes to specisic disorders
environmental factor: Locus of control + anxiety
- Hudson + Rapee-> the more controlling the mothers parenting style the more anxious the children
- when present monkey with something fearful it runs to its mum
Locus of control - monkey study + anxiety
-master monkey obtain food + water by pressing levers
- delivered at same time to yoked monkey
-later in life yoked monkeys generally more anxious as they had lack of control in early life of food
DSM-5 generalised anxiety disorder
- 2 criteria:
A) excessive anxiety + worry occurring more days than not for 6 months
B) 3 + of the following symptoms: restlessness, easily fatigued, difficulty concentrating, irritability, muscle tension, sleep disturbance
Nitsche + amygdala activity for general anxiety
-large response of multiple Amygdala regions in response to aversive + neutral pictures
Treatment for general anxiety disorder
-Wetherell et al -> SSRI effective in reducing worry symptoms + CBT helped more
DSM-5 specific phobias
-criteria A= fear/ anxiety about a specific object or situation
- criteria B = phobic object almost always provokes immediate fear
Phobias + external cues
-Neutral stimulus VS scary stimulus
-pairing of initial unfeared puppy with a scary dog produces a conditioned response + you associate the 2 with fear
phobias- avoidance component
- Aversive conditioned stimuli (small puppy) generally avoided in future
- Never learn it isn’t scary
- Aversive stimuli become neg reinforcers
Learning Theory of Phobias -Watson + Raynor
- conditioning unite rat + presented to albert
-when albert touched rat loud sound occurred - when first presented with objects he wasn’t afraid of
. The conditioned: he begin to cry after the loud noise - when showed a rabbit he started crying
- conditioned fear was generalised to other similar objects
Evaluating Learning Theories of phobias
- conditioning of emotional reactions is predisposed towards some stimuli more than others
- ohman et al-> potentially phobic stimuli (snakes; spiders) more conditionable than flowers, mushrooms (non -emotive stimuli )
- When non-phobic objects were feared it was almost immediately extinguished
phobias- Beh therapy- modelling
- Therapist performs beh on patients hierarchical list while they watch
- learn that the phobia isn’t scary
phobias- Beh therapy- Flooding
- full exposure to stimuli from outset
-low takeup rates but effective
-initially very fearful but learn they’ve come to no harm + anxiety subsides
phobias- Beh therapy- systematic desensitisation
-patient learns basic relaxation techniques
- draws list of hierarchical fear situations
- begin at bottom work way up to most feared removing anxiety at each stage
- reasonably effective
DSM-5-panic disorder
- criteria A: recurrent unexpected panic attacks
-palpitations, sweating, breathless, dizziness
Panic disorder- interoceptive cues
- random internal event, small internal signals, unbothered
-large internal signals = state of panic -large response - small internal events will come to trigger larger physical response through pavlovian association
- Avoid anything that triggers fear of panic attack
- intetoceptive conditioning = classical conditioning of panic attacks in response to bodily sensations
panic disorder + most responsive brain regions
-Domschke et al - presented fearful vs non-fear images to panic disorder ppts
- hyperactivity in amygdala + orbitofrantal cortex
Panic Disorder- Interoceptive cues study
- Ehlers + Breuer
-people with phobias or panic disorders showed similarly high levels of trait + state anxiety - panic disorder sig more accurate in monitoring own heart rate
-phobias had highest error rate - intetoceptive conditioning = classical conditioning of panic attacks in response to bodily sensations
panic disorder - virtual treatment of conditioned interoceptive response
-Botella et al-> systematic desensitisation to internal cues incl heart rate response to virtual reality exposure
-worked as well as actual exposure even 12 months after to real situations
Panic disorder- exposure training + breathing tech
- Sanchez-Meca et dl meta-analysis concluded exposure/desensitisation training coupled with relaxation/breathing training is most effective
2 factor model of anxiety disorders- fear conditioning
- Mowrer’s
- classical conditioning -> learn to fear neutral stimulus that is paired with intrinsically aversive stimuli (UCS)
- gain relief by avoiding CS
- Through operant conditioning, avoidant response is maintained by reinforcing the fear
-weaknesses : many can’t remember a threatening event triggering symptoms, may experiencing serious threat don’t dev anxiety