AO3: Duchess Of Malfi Flashcards

(37 cards)

1
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT: TRAGEDY: Perepeteia

A

A reversal of fortune; the hero will reverse from his initial excellent status

In Aristotelian tragedy, peripeteia is the sudden reversal of fortune or change in circumstances experienced by the protagonist. This shift is often ironic and unexpected by the character, though it may be foreshadowed for the audience. It’s a key element in creating pity and fear, leading to catharsis.

While The Duchess of Malfi doesn’t adhere strictly to all classical tragic structures, several moments could be interpreted as containing elements of peripeteia:

  1. The Discovery of the Duchess’s Marriage and Children (Act III, Scene II):

For the Duchess, her attempt to maintain a semblance of happiness and secrecy is shattered when Bosola, under Ferdinand’s orders, stages the discovery of her husband and child. This is a sudden and devastating reversal of her relatively secure (though hidden) domestic life. Her fortune shifts from a degree of personal contentment to imminent danger and exposure.
2. Ferdinand’s Descent into Madness (Act IV onwards):

For Ferdinand, his initial position of power and control undergoes a drastic and horrifying reversal. His obsessive pursuit and cruel torment of his sister lead him to a profound madness, specifically lycanthropy. This is an ironic twist, as the one who sought to inflict suffering becomes consumed by his own mental anguish. His fortune shifts from the powerful oppressor to a pitiable madman.
3. Bosola’s Change of Heart and Attempted Revenge (Act V):

Bosola experiences a peripeteia when he realizes the extent of the evil he has served and the injustice done to the Duchess and Antonio. This recognition leads to a reversal of his allegiance and intentions. He shifts from being a tool of the brothers’ cruelty to seeking revenge for the Duchess’s death. However, this reversal ultimately leads to his own tragic demise, highlighting the relentless nature of the play’s tragic trajectory.
4. The Killing of the Wrong Person (Act V, Scene V):

Bosola intends to kill the Cardinal but mistakenly kills Antonio. This is a crucial and ironic reversal of his plan, highlighting the chaos and tragic miscommunication that plague the final act. His attempt to rectify his past actions leads to further bloodshed and the acceleration of the tragedy.
Why these moments fit (with caveats):

Sudden Change: Each of these instances marks a significant and relatively abrupt shift in a character’s circumstances or intentions.
Ironic Element: There’s often an irony involved. The Duchess’s attempt at secrecy leads to a more brutal exposure. Ferdinand’s control leads to his own loss of control. Bosola’s attempt at justice results in further tragedy.
Impact on the Plot: These reversals are key turning points that drive the plot towards its catastrophic conclusion.
It’s important to note that The Duchess of Malfi is a Jacobean tragedy, and while it draws on classical elements, it also deviates from strict Aristotelian form. The play features multiple characters experiencing reversals, and the overall movement is a relentless downward spiral rather than a single protagonist’s fall. However, recognizing these moments of peripeteia helps us understand the play’s dramatic power and its exploration of fate, justice, and the consequences of human action

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT: TRAGEDY: hubris

A

Excessive pride or confidence; the hero will often assume godlike status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT: TRAGEDY: Hamartia

A

A fatal flaw within the hero; their downfall will come from their own doing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT: TRAGEDY: Peripeteia

A

The idea that a tragic hero should come from a background of excellence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT: TRAGEDY: Anagnorisis

A

A movement of realisation; an insight into themselves, the situations, and others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT: TRAGEDY: Catharsis

A

The cleansing of the audience; they feel better after watching the tragedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - JAMES I COURT: Sycophants

A

a person who acts obsequiously towards someone important in order to gain advantage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - JAMES I COURT: Basilikon Doron

A

James I treaty on how to be a good king.
IRONY as he surrounded himself with noble people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - JAMES I COURT: Profligacy

A

Excessive + irresponsible spending of funds and money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - JAMES I COURT: Sexual Licentiousness

A

Dirty deeds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - JAMES I COURT: Robert Carr + George Villiers

A

Hugely sycophantic towards James I who he valued + gave titles and honours to them whose he didn’t deserve.
Sexual licentious letters sent to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT - LINKED TEXTS: The First Blast of the Trumpet Against the Monstruous Regiment of Women (1588)

A

John Knox’s pamphlet criticised women in power, saying it was a ‘monstrous in nature’.
When Elizabeth I became queen she banned Knox from coming over to England

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT - LINKED TEXTS: The Spanish Tragedy (1587)

A

Thomas Kyd’s tragedy established the genre of Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy, bringing back traits from Senecan tragedy (themes such as horrors + violence)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT - LINKED TEXTS: Titus Andronicus (1588)

A

Shakespeare’s bloodies revenge tragedy; this play sees rape, body parts cut off, and mothers unwittingly eating their own children

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT - LINKED TEXTS: Basilikon Doran (1599)

A

King James I’s treatise instructing his son on how to best run a court, including (ironically) to choose courtiers with care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

LITERARY CONTEXT - LINKED TEXTS: The Devil’s Law Case (1623)

A

In Webster’s only other play, he asserts the importance of social order, particularly in terms of law

17
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - FIGURES: Queen Elizabeth I

A

Queen Elizabeth reserved the right to choose who she should marry – and whether she should marry at all.

Queen Elizabeth I (1533-1603) was one of England’s most iconic and influential monarchs, reigning from 1558 until her death. Her 44-year rule, often referred to as the Elizabethan Age, is considered a golden period in English history, marked by relative peace, prosperity, and a flourishing of the arts.

Early Life and Accession:
Born in 1533, Elizabeth was the daughter of King Henry VIII and his second wife, Anne Boleyn.
Her early life was tumultuous. Her mother was executed when Elizabeth was only two, and she was declared illegitimate.
After the death of her half-sister, Queen Mary I, Elizabeth ascended to the throne in 1558 at the age of 25.
Key Accomplishments:
Religious Settlement: Elizabeth established a moderate Protestant Church of England, seeking to find a middle ground between Catholic and Puritan extremes. The Acts of Supremacy and Uniformity (1559) solidified this settlement.
Defeat of the Spanish Armada (1588): This decisive English naval victory against the powerful Spanish fleet secured England’s independence and marked a turning point in its rise as a global power.
Economic Prosperity: Elizabeth’s reign saw a period of economic growth, fueled by overseas exploration, trade, and the establishment of the Royal Exchange.
Patronage of the Arts: The Elizabethan Age witnessed a remarkable flourishing of literature, theatre, and music, with iconic figures like William Shakespeare, Christopher Marlowe, and Edmund Spenser. Elizabeth was a patron of the arts and her court was a center of cultural activity.
Exploration and Colonization: Elizabeth supported voyages of discovery to the New World, laying the groundwork for English colonization in North America, with Virginia named in her honor.
Character and Personality:
Elizabeth was highly intelligent and well-educated, fluent in several languages.
She was known for her strong will, determination, and shrewd political acumen.
Her image as the “Virgin Queen,” who never married and devoted herself to her kingdom, became a powerful symbol of national unity.
While capable of great charm and diplomacy, Elizabeth also possessed a formidable temper and could be ruthless when necessary.
She was a master of public image, using progresses and carefully crafted speeches to cultivate the loyalty and affection of her subjects.
Challenges and Difficulties:
Religious Divisions: Despite the religious settlement, Elizabeth faced ongoing challenges from both Catholics and radical Protestants.
Plots and Rebellions: Numerous plots against her reign, often involving her cousin Mary, Queen of Scots, threatened her rule.
War with Spain: The long and costly war with Spain, while ultimately successful, strained England’s resources.
Succession Crisis: Elizabeth’s unmarried status and lack of an heir created anxieties about the future of the monarchy.
Queen Elizabeth I died in 1603, leaving behind a legacy as one of England’s greatest and most beloved monarchs. Her reign is remembered as a time of strength, stability, and cultural achievement that shaped the course of English history.

While Queen Elizabeth I died in 1603, a decade before John Webster likely wrote The Duchess of Malfi (around 1612-1614), her long and impactful reign (1558-1603) provides a crucial backdrop for understanding the play’s social, political, and even literary landscape. Here’s how:

  1. The Powerful Female Monarch:

A Precedent of Female Rule: Elizabeth I’s successful rule as a powerful female monarch for over four decades challenged traditional patriarchal norms. While the play depicts a society where the Duchess’s brothers believe they have the right to control her life, the memory of a strong, independent queen like Elizabeth would have been fresh in the minds of Webster’s audience.
Contrasting Images of Female Authority: The play presents a stark contrast between the real-life example of a powerful and politically astute female ruler and the fictional Duchess, who, while possessing agency and a strong will in her personal life, ultimately falls victim to the patriarchal forces around her. This contrast might have prompted audiences to reflect on the different ways female authority could be exercised and the dangers it could face.
2. Concerns about Succession and Marriage:

Elizabeth’s Unmarried Status: Queen Elizabeth I famously remained unmarried, using the prospect of marriage as a political tool but ultimately choosing to rule alone. Her unmarried status was a constant source of anxiety about the succession.
The Duchess’s Marriage as a Political Act: In The Duchess of Malfi, the Duchess’s brothers are vehemently against her remarriage, not just out of familial pride but also due to concerns about who she might choose and the potential political implications of that union for their power. This reflects the broader historical anxieties surrounding royal and noble marriages.
3. The Court as a Site of Power and Intrigue:

Elizabeth’s Court: The Elizabethan court was a complex world of patronage, ambition, and political maneuvering. While often idealized, it also had its share of rivalries and power struggles.
The Corrupt Court of Malfi: Webster’s depiction of the court of Malfi as a place of corruption, spying, and moral decay resonates with the historical realities and dramatic portrayals of royal courts, including the awareness of potential abuses of power. Antonio’s initial praise of the French court as uncorrupt implicitly critiques the Italian (and perhaps contemporary English) courtly life.
4. Literary and Dramatic Landscape:

Elizabethan Golden Age of Theatre: Elizabeth’s reign fostered a vibrant theatrical culture that paved the way for the Jacobean drama of playwrights like Webster. The conventions of tragedy, character development, and dramatic language established during her time influenced Webster’s work.
The Rise of Revenge Tragedy: While revenge tragedy flourished in the Elizabethan and Jacobean eras, the anxieties about justice, order, and the consequences of private vengeance explored in plays like Hamlet (written during the transition from Elizabethan to Jacobean era) find echoes in The Duchess of Malfi. The play can be seen as a continuation and a darker exploration of these themes in a post-Elizabethan world.
5. Gender Roles and Expectations:

Elizabeth’s Defiance of Gender Norms: As a ruling queen, Elizabeth I inherently defied many of the traditional expectations placed upon women in her era. She projected an image of strength, intelligence, and independence.
The Duchess’s Transgression: The Duchess’s desire for personal happiness and her choice to marry for love, defying her brothers’ control, can be seen as a challenge to the patriarchal norms that Elizabeth, in her own way, also navigated. However, the tragic consequences for the Duchess highlight the dangers faced by those who transgress societal expectations, even those of high status.

18
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - FIGURES: Lady Arbella Stuart

A

She married below her class for love and starved herself to death instead of renewing herself to death

The life of Lady Arabella Stuart (1575-1615), a cousin of King James I with a claim to the English throne, bears striking parallels to the tragic circumstances of John Webster’s The Duchess of Malfi. Examining these connections can illuminate the play’s historical and social resonance for a Jacobean audience:

Similarities in their “Crime” of Marriage:

Marriage Against Royal Will: Both Arabella Stuart and the Duchess of Malfi defied the wishes of their powerful male relatives (King James I and her brothers, respectively) by marrying men they chose for love, not political expediency or familial gain. Arabella secretly married William Seymour, who also had a distant claim to the throne, while the Duchess secretly married her steward, Antonio Bologna, who was of lower social standing.
Threat to Authority: Both marriages were perceived as threats to the existing power structures. King James feared Arabella’s union could produce a rival claimant, while the Duchess’s brothers were incensed by what they saw as a degradation of their noble bloodline and a loss of control over her inheritance and future.
Imprisonment: As a consequence of their defiance, both women were imprisoned. Arabella was confined in the Tower of London, where she eventually died. The Duchess was subjected to psychological torture and ultimately murdered at her brothers’ command.
Social Context of Forced Marriage and Control:

Royal Prerogative: In the Jacobean era, the monarch held significant authority over the marriages of those with royal blood or high social standing, as these unions could have political ramifications. Arabella’s situation highlights the constraints placed on even noblewomen in choosing their spouses. Similarly, the Duchess’s brothers believe they have the right to dictate her marital choices to protect their family’s status.
Class and Lineage: The Duchess’s marriage “beneath her” to Antonio would have been particularly scandalous in the rigid social hierarchy of the time. While Arabella married within the aristocracy, the secrecy and lack of royal consent were still seen as a grave offense.
Female Agency: Both women exhibit a degree of agency in choosing their husbands, defying the patriarchal expectations of their society. However, the tragic consequences they face underscore the limitations placed on female autonomy, even for those of high rank.
Literary Resonance for a Jacobean Audience:

Topicality: Lady Arabella Stuart’s imprisonment and death in 1615 would have been a relatively recent and well-known scandal for the audiences of The Duchess of Malfi, which was likely first performed around 1613-1614. The parallels between her story and the Duchess’s plight would have added a layer of contemporary political and social commentary to the play.
Tyranny and Injustice: Both narratives expose the potential for tyranny and injustice when those in power seek to control the lives and choices of others. The audience might have drawn parallels between King James’s treatment of his cousin and the brutal actions of Ferdinand and the Cardinal.
Sympathy for the Defiant Woman: Despite the societal norms against unauthorized marriages, the stories of Arabella and the Duchess could have also evoked sympathy for women who dared to assert their own desires for love and happiness against oppressive patriarchal control.
Professor Sara Jayne Steen’s Argument:

Scholar Sara Jayne Steen has extensively explored the connections between Lady Arabella Stuart’s life and The Duchess of Malfi, suggesting that the contemporary responses to Stuart’s case can offer insights into how Jacobean audiences might have viewed the Duchess’s actions. While some undoubtedly condemned both women for defying social conventions and royal authority, others may have sympathized with their desire for personal fulfillment.

In conclusion, the tragic story of Lady Arabella Stuart provides a compelling real-life parallel to the central conflict in The Duchess of Malfi. Her defiance of King James’s will and her subsequent imprisonment likely resonated with the play’s original audiences, adding a layer of historical and social significance to the Duchess’s similar struggle against her brothers’ tyranny. The play, therefore, can be seen not only as a fictional tragedy but also as a reflection on the constraints and dangers faced by individuals, particularly women of high status, who dared to challenge the established order in the Jacobean era.

19
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - FIGURES: Giovanna d’Aragona

A

WHO DOM is based on
Giovanna d’Aragona married her state Stuart, had 2 children and a suspicious 3rd with him, chased by brothers and mysteriously died

20
Q

HISTORICAL CONTEXT - FIGURES: King James I

A

A court full of sycophants mirroring the Aragonian brothers + Bosola’s nature

21
Q

GENERAL CONTEXT: Stoicism

A

the endurance of pain or hardship without the display of feelings and without complaint.

22
Q

GENERAL CONTEXT: What did Elizabeth I say during her 1588 Tilbury Docks speech?

A

“I know I have the body but of a weak and feeble woman; but I have the heart and stomach of a king, and of a king of England too”.

23
Q

GENERAL CONTEXT: What is a malcontent?

A

a person who is dissatisfied and rebellious. (With the court)

24
Q

GENERAL CONTEXT: Who is the malcontent in DOM?

25
GENERAL CONTEXT: What are some Machiavellian traits?
Machiavellians are sly, deceptive, distrusting, and manipulative. They are characterized by cynical and misanthropic beliefs, callousness, a striving for … money, power, and status, and the use of cunning influence tactics.
26
GENERAL CONTEXT: Who is the Machiavellian in the DOM?
Ferdinand
27
GENERAL CONTEXT: What are the humours?
Black Bile Yellow Bile Phlegm Blood ## Footnote The Four Humours was a prevalent theory in ancient Greek and Roman medicine, significantly influencing medical thought until the 19th century. It proposed that the human body comprised four fundamental fluids, or "humours": Blood: Associated with a sanguine temperament, characterized by cheerfulness, sociability, and a ruddy complexion. It was linked to the element of air, the season of spring, and a hot and moist nature. Yellow Bile (Choler): Linked to a choleric temperament, marked by ambition, leadership qualities, and a potentially fiery or angry disposition. It corresponded to the element of fire, the season of summer, and a hot and dry nature. Black Bile (Melancholy): Associated with a melancholic temperament, often seen as analytical, detail-oriented, and potentially prone to sadness or pensiveness. It was connected to the element of earth, the season of autumn, and a cold and dry nature. Phlegm: Related to a phlegmatic temperament, characterized by calmness, coolness, and a somewhat unemotional or apathetic demeanor. It corresponded to the element of water, the season of winter, and a cold and moist nature. The theory suggested that health resulted from a balance of these four humours, and an imbalance would lead to illness and specific personality traits. These humours were also believed to be influenced by factors like diet, climate, and even astrological events. While the Four Humours theory is no longer considered scientifically accurate, it profoundly impacted the course of Western medicine and even left its mark on language, with terms like "sanguine," "choleric," "melancholic," and "phlegmatic" still used to describe personality types.
28
GENERAL CONTEXT: Who might the humours link to in the play?
Black Bile: Bosola (melancholic) Yellow Bile: Ferdinand (to much emotion) Phlegm: Cardinal (emotionless) Blood: Duchess (too full of blood + love)
29
GENERAL CONTEXT: What were medieval attitudes to revenge?
- Vengeance and feud were an essential part of these cultures, revenge was considered both a right and a duty and was legislated and regulated by social norms. - It was an important tool for obtaining justice and protecting property, family, and reputation.
30
GENERAL CONTEXT: How had renaissance attitudes to revenge changed by comparison to medieval?
The Renaissance witnessed a fascinating shift in attitudes towards revenge compared to the medieval period. While both eras acknowledged the concept of redressing wrongs, the underlying justifications, societal implications, and artistic representations evolved significantly. Medieval Attitudes to Revenge: Custom and Obligation: In the medieval period, revenge was often deeply ingrained in social custom and perceived as a familial or clan obligation. The concept of "blood feud" was prevalent, where the responsibility to avenge a wrong, particularly murder, fell upon the victim's kin. This was seen as a matter of honor and maintaining social order in the absence of strong centralized authority.   Wergild (Man-Price): Medieval legal systems, such as the Anglo-Saxon "wergild," offered an alternative to blood feuds. This system allowed for monetary compensation to be paid to the victim's family, aiming to prevent cycles of violence. However, the option of revenge often remained, especially if the injured party felt that monetary compensation was insufficient to restore their honor.   Religious Influence: The Church's stance on revenge during the Middle Ages was complex. While Christian teachings generally advocated for forgiveness and leaving vengeance to God ("Vengeance is mine, I will repay, says the Lord" - Romans 12:19), the reality of societal norms often superseded this ideal. There was sometimes a distinction made between personal vindictiveness and a more righteous form of retribution seen as upholding justice. Narrative Focus: Medieval literature often depicted revenge as a heroic act, particularly in epic poems and sagas. The focus tended to be on the restoration of honor and the defeat of evil, with less emphasis on the psychological complexities or moral ambiguities of the avenger. Renaissance Attitudes to Revenge: Rise of Centralized Authority and Law: The Renaissance saw the consolidation of state power and the development of more sophisticated legal systems. This led to a growing tension between private revenge and the authority of the law. The state increasingly asserted its right to administer justice, and private acts of vengeance began to be viewed as a challenge to this authority and potentially destabilizing to society.   Humanism and Individual Conscience: The rise of humanism emphasized individual reason, morality, and conscience. This led to more nuanced considerations of revenge. While the desire for justice was still acknowledged, the ethical implications of taking the law into one's own hands were more intensely debated. Revenge could be seen as a passionate and potentially corrupting force that could lead to further sin and tragedy.   Influence of Classical Literature: Renaissance thinkers and writers were deeply influenced by classical Greek and Roman literature, particularly the tragedies of Seneca. Senecan revenge tragedies, with their themes of ghosts urging revenge, elaborate plots, and bloody outcomes, became a major influence on Renaissance drama in England and elsewhere. These plays often explored the psychological turmoil of the revenger and the destructive consequences of their actions.   Revenge Tragedy as a Genre: The Renaissance, particularly the Elizabethan and Jacobean periods in England, saw the emergence of "revenge tragedy" as a distinct and popular dramatic genre. Plays like Hamlet, The Spanish Tragedy, The Duchess of Malfi, and The Revenger's Tragedy delved into the complexities of revenge motives, the moral dilemmas faced by avengers, and the often-tragic outcomes for all involved. These plays often questioned the justice of private revenge and explored its psychological and societal costs.   Moral Ambiguity: Unlike some medieval narratives where revenge was clearly justified, Renaissance revenge tragedies often presented a more morally ambiguous picture. The revenger might start with righteous intentions but become corrupted by the act of seeking vengeance, blurring the lines between justice and personal vendetta. The plays often ended with widespread destruction, suggesting the ultimately self-destructive nature of revenge. In the Renaissance, while the impulse for revenge remained a powerful human emotion and a compelling dramatic theme, there was a growing awareness of its problematic nature in the context of evolving legal systems, humanist ethics, and the tragic consequences often depicted in literature. The medieval emphasis on revenge as a social obligation began to give way to a more critical examination of its morality and its impact on individuals and society. The Duchess of Malfi, written in this period, reflects these shifting attitudes by portraying the destructive cycle of revenge and the moral decay it breeds
31
GENERAL CONTEXT: Who said Webster ‘saw the skull beneath the skin”?
T. S. Eliot's poem Whispers of Immortality | around 1918
32
GENERAL CONTEXT: What company first performed DOM?
The King's Men (the acting company to which Shakespeare belonged) at the indoor Blackfriars Theatre in 1614, before being later revived at the outdoor Globe Theatre. ## Footnote The company that first performed The Duchess of Malfi was The King's Men. This was the acting company to which William Shakespeare himself belonged. They premiered the play in 1614 at the Blackfriars Theatre, an indoor playhouse that allowed for more sophisticated staging and lighting effects compared to the open-air Globe Theatre, where it was later revived.   The fact that The Duchess of Malfi was first performed by the King's Men is relevant to AO3 (Contexts) in OCR A Level English Literature for several reasons: Jacobean Theatre Context: Understanding the theatrical landscape of the time is crucial. The King's Men were a prominent company, and their performance practices, the nature of the indoor and outdoor theatres they used, and the audiences they catered to would have influenced how the play was written and received. For example, the Blackfriars' more intimate setting and use of artificial light might have contributed to the play's intense and claustrophobic atmosphere. The later performances at the Globe would have reached a larger, more diverse audience. Authorship and Influence: John Webster was a significant playwright of the Jacobean era, writing in a period heavily influenced by the conventions of revenge tragedy, popularised by playwrights like Shakespeare (a key figure for the King's Men). Knowing the company's background helps contextualise Webster's work within this dramatic tradition. Social and Political Context: The Jacobean era, under King James I, was a time of political intrigue, religious tensions (particularly anti-Catholic sentiment which might be reflected in the portrayal of the Cardinal), and social anxieties. Plays often subtly reflected or engaged with these issues. The King's Men, as a company operating under royal patronage, would have been navigating these sensitivities.   Performance vs. Text: The play was published in 1623, some years after its first performance. The title page of the quarto even mentions it was "Presented privately, at the Black-Friers; and publicly at the Globe," suggesting differences between the performed and printed versions. This distinction is important for understanding the play as a dramatic text intended for the stage, not just a literary work. Considering the original performance context encourages analysis of elements like staging, audience response, and the potential impact of specific theatrical choices that might not be fully evident in the written text alone.   In essence, knowing the original performance company and the theatrical context provides valuable insights into the play's creation, its initial reception, and how it might have communicated its themes and ideas to a Jacobean audience. This historical and cultural understanding is a key component of achieving high marks in AO3 for your OCR A Level English Literature studies.
33
GENERAL CONTEXT: Which modern production most closely imitates the original playhouse?
The modern production that most closely imitates the original playhouse conditions for The Duchess of Malfi is likely to be those staged at the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse in London. Here's why: Modeled after the Blackfriars Theatre: The Sam Wanamaker Playhouse is an indoor theatre specifically designed to recreate the atmosphere and staging conditions of the indoor Jacobean playhouses, of which the Blackfriars Theatre was a prime example and where The Duchess of Malfi was originally performed. Candlelight: Productions at the Sam Wanamaker Playhouse often utilize candlelight for illumination, mirroring the lighting conditions of the original indoor playhouses. This creates a more intimate and atmospheric experience for both the actors and the audience. Intimate Space: The Playhouse is a smaller, more enclosed space compared to the outdoor Globe Theatre, which aligns with the private performances at Blackfriars before the play was also staged publicly at the Globe. This intimacy would have influenced the staging and acting styles of the time. Historical Considerations: The Sam Wanamaker Playhouse is dedicated to exploring and presenting plays in conditions as close as possible to their original performance contexts. Their productions often consider historical staging practices, music, and performance styles.
34
GENERAL CONTEXT: 3 reasons the play is set in Italy:
1) Italy acts as a theatrical metaphor, allowing dramatists to criticise the court of King James I of England by setting their plays in the distant European country. 2) The Duchess of Malfi is set in Italy because that is where the historical events it is based on occurred 3) Italy was associated with corruption
35
GENERAL CONTEXT: Why was hierarchy so important to a Renaissance audience?
were composed of four social classes: the nobles the merchants the tradesmen the unskilled workers
36
GENERAL CONTEXT: What was the name of the London mental asylum?
Bethlem Royal Hospital (1247 -) The names 'Bethlem' and 'Bedlam', by which it came to be known, are early variants of 'Bethlehem'. It is first referred to as a hospital for 'insane' patients in 1403, after which it has a continuous history of caring for people with mental distress. ## Footnote Bethlem Royal Hospital: Founded in 1247 as the Priory of St Mary of Bethlehem in London. It is the oldest psychiatric institution in the world. Over time, the name "Bethlehem" was shortened and corrupted in popular speech to "Bethlem" and eventually "Bedlam." Bedlam: Became the colloquial and infamous name for Bethlem Royal Hospital. The conditions within Bedlam historically became synonymous with chaos, uproar, and the mistreatment of the mentally ill. Due to its notoriety, "bedlam" entered the English language as a term to describe any scene of madness and confusion. The Duchess of Malfi and Bedlam: Written and performed in the early 17th century, during a time when Bedlam's reputation was growing. The play directly references "Bedlam" in Act IV, Scene II. Ferdinand, driven to madness by guilt over his role in the Duchess's death, believes he is a wolf and raves like a patient in Bedlam. The inclusion of a scene with a group of madmen sent to torment the Duchess in the same act is also seen by some critics as drawing on the public's fascination (and perhaps fear) of the inmates of Bedlam. These characters exhibit disjointed thoughts, songs, and behaviors that would have likely been associated with the popular image of madness linked to the institution. The play, therefore, reflects the contemporary awareness and cultural significance of Bedlam as a place of extreme mental derangement and a spectacle for public curiosity. In essence, Bethlem was the actual hospital, while Bedlam was its notorious nickname that permeated the public consciousness and, consequently, found its way into literature like The Duchess of Malfi as a powerful symbol of insanity and human suffering.
37
GENERAL CONTEXT: What was Hippocrates’ view on the womb?
Hippocratic corpus, believed that the womb was not a stationary object, but one that traveled throughout the body, often to the detriment of the women's health. ## Footnote While Hippocrates himself lived in ancient Greece (around 460 – 370 BCE), long before the Renaissance and the Jacobean era in which The Duchess of Malfi was written (early 17th century), his medical theories, particularly the Humoral Theory, had a lasting influence that extended into Webster's time. Here's how Hippocrates and his ideas relate to The Duchess of Malfi: 1. The Four Humors: Hippocrates proposed that the human body was composed of four fluids or "humors": blood, phlegm, yellow bile (choler), and black bile (melancholy). Health was believed to result from a balance (eucrasia) of these humors, while illness (dyscrasia) arose from an imbalance.   This theory was incredibly influential and persisted throughout the medieval and Renaissance periods, impacting medical understanding and even shaping personality theories. 2. Reflection in The Duchess of Malfi: While Webster doesn't explicitly name-drop Hippocrates, the influence of the humoral theory can be seen in the play's depiction of characters and their states of mind, particularly in relation to madness and strong emotions. Ferdinand's Lycanthropy: His descent into believing he is a wolf (lycanthropy) in Act V is a dramatic manifestation of madness. While the Elizabethans also considered supernatural explanations for such conditions, a humoral perspective might have attributed it to a severe imbalance, perhaps an excess of black bile leading to melancholic delusion and a bestial transformation in his mind.   Melancholy and Other Emotional States: The intense passions and psychological distress experienced by several characters could be interpreted through the lens of humoral theory. For instance: Bosola's cynicism and brooding nature could align with an excess of black bile, the humor associated with melancholy. Ferdinand's fits of rage and choleric behavior could be linked to an excess of yellow bile. The Duchess's initial vitality and warmth might be associated with a sanguine temperament (excess of blood). The Cardinal's coldness and lack of emotion could be seen as a phlegmatic disposition (excess of phlegm).   Medical Discourse of the Time: The play reflects contemporary Jacobean concerns about health and disease. Webster and his audience would have been familiar with the basic tenets of humoralism, even as new medical ideas began to emerge during the Renaissance.   3. Hysteria and the Wandering Womb: While Hippocrates is also associated with the ancient Greek idea of "hysteria" being caused by a wandering womb, this specific concept doesn't appear as directly in The Duchess of Malfi. However, the play's intense focus on female sexuality and the attempts to control the Duchess's reproductive capacity could be seen within a broader context of contemporary anxieties surrounding the female body and potential physical or emotional instability attributed to it.