1
Q

Edmond Van Den Bossche on 1984

A

“1984 is a political statement. It contains no prophetic declaration, only a simple warning to mankind. “

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bernard Crick on 1984

A

“1984 is not a prophecy, it is plainly a satire and a satire of a particular, even a peculiar kind- a Swiftian satire”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Jean-Claude Michea on 1984

A

“The story told in 1984 is, above all, the story of the rebellion of the individual; thus 1984 is apparently the story of failure. “

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Edmond Van Den Bossche on society in 1984

A

“ His fellow intellectuals have sold their inalienable right to think freely for security and a semblance of physical well-being.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Grossman on society

A

“Technology exists as a tool for stagnation rather than progression”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Roger Luckhurst on Orwell’s exploration techniques in Part 1

A

“Orwell invokes the power of private memory to resist the state’s rewriting of history…He explores the resistant potential of desire and sexuality, described as ‘the force that would tear the Party to shreds’, and of purposeless art, represented by the useless beauty of the paperweight he cherishes that embodies ‘a little chunk of history they had forgotten to alter’. These are all systematically dismantled by the Party’s reprogramming in the closing chapters of the book.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Michael Thorp on the Party

A

“The Party’s success is down to its ability “to destroy the individual and turn him into an automation”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

EM Forster on Big Brother

A

“Big Brother also lurks behind Churchill and any leader whom propaganda utilises or invents.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Amin Malak On 1984 THT comparison

A

‘like Orwell who in 1984 extrapolated specific ominous events and tendencies in twentieth-century politics, she tries to caution against right-wing fundamentalism, rigid dogmas, and misogynous theosophies that may be currently gaining a deceptive popularity. The novel’s mimetic impulse then aims at wresting an imperfect present from a horror-ridden future’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Dominick M. Grace on Offred’s narrative style

A

“Offred’s narrative strategies consistently stress the failure of any single reading of an event to be valid.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Jem Berkes on language

A

“Language becomes a method of mind control with the ultimate goal being the destruction of will and imagination”

…The characters are “slaves of the media” as they follow it and its instructions and misinformation without question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Terry Eagleton on language in 1984

A

“In ‘1984,’ Orwell demonstrates how the corruption of language leads to the erosion of individual autonomy, highlighting the fragility of independent thought in totalitarian societies.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Stuart Hall on writing restrictions in THT

A

“Atwood’s ‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ illuminates the ways in which the restriction of writing functions as a form of ideological control, threatening independent thought and reinforcing hierarchical power structures.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Margaret Atwood on 1984 & narrative voice

A

“Orwell’s ‘1984’ demonstrates how a restricted narrative voice can serve as a tool of totalitarian control, stifling independent thought and perpetuating oppressive regimes.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Martha Nussbaum on narration in THT

A

“In ‘The Handmaid’s Tale,’ Offred’s unreliable narration serves as a powerful reminder of the constant threat to independent thought in a society where truth is obscured and dissent is dangerous.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lionel Shriver on 1984

A

• “Orwell describes a world of total state surveillance, where love and independent thought are treasonous”

17
Q

Jeffrey Meyers on Winston

A
  • “Winston, locked in loneliness, becomes a lunatic, a minority of one, the only man still capable of individual thought”
  • ‘Winston feels that he may indeed be the last man’
18
Q

Patrica Hill on God in 1984

A

“There is room or only one God in Oceania, and his name is Big Brother”

19
Q

THT Angela Gulick on technology

A

“Gilead is working in the opposite direction, moving towards a time when technology was of limited development”

20
Q

1984 Anthony Burgess

A

‘Orwell’s modern hell was basically a reproduction o British misery in the postwar rationing years, with the addition of Stalin’s police-state style added on”

21
Q

Susanna Becker on Atwood

A

“Atwood belongs to those writers of contemporary world literature who…. address pressing global issues”

22
Q

Margaret Atwood on human and freedom

A

dystopias “challenge us to re-examine what we understand by the word human, and above all what we intend by the word freedom”

23
Q

Atwood on speculative fiction

A

“…nothing happens that the human race has not already done at some time in the past, or that it is not doing now… We’ve done it, or we’re doing it, or we could start doing it tomorrow. Nothing inconceivable takes place”

“the projected trends on which my future society is based are already in motion”

24
Q

Carol L. Beran: “Images of Women’s Power in Contemporary Canadian Fiction by Women” (1990)

Carol L. Beran is a Canadian writer and literary critic, who has written specifically about Atwood’s works.

A
  • One of Beran’s most famous quotes about The Handmaid’s Tale is: “Offred’s power is in language”:
    ○ By this she means that although almost all of Offred’s freedoms, choices and power were stripped away from her, she was still able to record her story via the cassettes referred to in the Historical Notes
    ○ Her voice and her story continue long after Gilead has fallen
    ○ This is contrasted with Professor Piexioto, who lacks the ability to verbalise with any sense of emotion, because to him Offred is an object of scientific study
  • Beran believes that “in finding power in words, in speaking, Offred has moved from being a victim”
25
Notes on HULU TV Adaptation of THT (2017)
The white, wide-brimmed bonnet and red cloak have become synonymous with women’s oppression, and the TV adaptation did not deviate from the symbolism of the specific costumes of the novel. * The release of the series coincided with the election of Donald Trump, and the rise of movements and laws to limit women’s reproductive freedom: ○ Women began to wear outfits inspired by the television series at protests against these measures * In the series, Offred’s face is often shown very close to camera, allowing the audience a greater emotional connection to the character: ○ This close focus on the character’s face also narrows the visual field, mirroring Offred’s limited perspective in Gilead ○ This is in contrast to the book, in which we as the reader have very little physical description of Offred to go on, as though to represent her individuality fading
26
Feminism and 1984 Feminist critics have often denounced Orwell as a misogynist due to his portrayal of women in the novel.
* Jennifer O’Dee (2013) stated that “Orwell characterises his women under a misogynistic lens”: ○ Winston sees women as one of two groups: sexless/mothers (Mrs Parsons/Katharine) or sexual temptresses (Julia/prostitute) might recognise society's lack of gender everyone wears same overalls, does same jobs, aims to get rid of role of "mother" - might see this society as freedom for women)
27
Reactions to 1984 by Orwell
* Orwell as ill whilst writing on the Scottish island of Jura * He also stated that the novel was not intended as an attack on socialism or the British Labour Party, of which he was a supporter: ○ He set the book in a fictionalised future version of Britain in order to emphasise the fact that totalitarianism, if not fought against, could triumph anywhere * Orwell died in 1950
28
Dorian Lynskey on Nineteen Eighty-Four and Orwell
* Dorian Lynskey, writing in The Guardian in 2019, said that 1984 “remains the book we turn to when truth is mutilated, when language is distorted, when power is abused, when we want to know how bad things can get”: ○ He cites President Trump’s adviser, Kellyanne Conway, who first used the phrase “alternative facts” in 2017, although he does acknowledge that Trump was not a dictator - Orwell wrote the book that killed him. - The word “Orwellian” has turned the author’s own name into a capacious synonym for everything he feared and hated. - Orwell’s famously translucent prose conceals a world of complexity - His real talent was for analysing and explaining a tumultuous period in human history. - He always tried to tell the truth and admired anyone who did likewise.
29
Notes on Michael Radford’s 1984 film (released in 1984)
The 1984 film version of the novel featured John Hurt as Winston Smith and Richard Burton as O’Brien, * The choice of Hurt as the character of Winston embodied his physical frailty and guarded optimism * However, there are some differences between the novel and the film: ○ The film ends with Winston saying “I love you” rather than “Big Brother”, leaving the ending ambiguous - does he love Big Brother or Julia? ○ There is also an implicit suggestion that Julia might actually be a spy in the film
30
Orwell
“Nazi theory indeed specifically denies that a thing such as ‘the truth’ exists” “Two plus two could certainly equal five if the fuhrer wanted it”
31
MARXISM
In literary theory, a Marxist interpretation reads the text as an expression of contemporary class struggle. Literature is not simply a matter of personal expression or taste. It somehow relates to the social and political conditions of the time. *How it relates is of course up for debate. Is the text a mirror of social values? Is it a form of propaganda for the ruling classes? Can literature challenge social norms? These are the questions that preoccupy Marxist literary critics. **Karl Marx theorized that human beings are the product of their social and economic environment**.Marx himself often treated literature as simple propaganda for the ruling classes. **Kellner** takes a Marxist perspective, as this statement describes how **the literature is a direct political and economic reflection of the experiences of the author** and, thus, the world in which the author lived when he wrote, or at the very least the world that the author feared was on the horizon. As a whole, 1984 seems to be stating that **politics is solely a constant struggle for power** and the only change brought about is the **replacement of one ruling class with another**. This ideal is solidified by the class structure of the Party members within 1984 and ultimately by the power-plays of the Party, which is to be impressed upon all citizens of Oceania.
32
Rebecca Stokwisz on Surveillance
Fear of betrayal and **inculcated self surveillance** keep the handmaids from speaking out
33
See 1984 from a humanist perspective
Ellergy for human rights 6 months after decoration of human rights See 1984 from a humanist perspective - Orwell explemfiying the consequences of what happens when u take away those human right see freedom of speech / fair trail / etc … Original title the “last man in Europe “ FINISH LISTENING TO AND MAKING NOTES FROM IN OUR TIME PODCAST
34
You should also be aware that AO5, according to OCR, counts as any of the following:
• a students’ own alternative readings • the views of classmates (take care about how to credit these in an academic essay: a simple “Others have stated/suggested etc” will do) • views from academics in literary criticism (e.g. A.C Bradley, G. Wilson Knight, Jacqueline Rose) • theoretical perspectives (reading the text through a particular theoretical lens e.g. feminism or Marxism) • critical perspectives over time (i.e. the way the text has been viewed critically over time) • for drama, readings provided by productions (offers both directorial interpretation as well as actors’ interpretations) • stage and screen adaptations of works
35
Judy Simons on Gilead
…a warped society existing in a sterile and dangerous wasteland, where fertility has become a precious commodity to be used for state purposes in a grotesque parody of Biblical familial practices.
36
Ildney Cavalcanti
The monthly rape synthesises the institutionalized humiliation, objectification, and ownership of women in Gilead.