AOS2 - civil Flashcards
(34 cards)
Civil Law
An area of law that defines and protects the rights and responsibilities of individuals and organisations.
Civil dispute
A private disagreement between two or more individuals, in which one party makes a claim against another.
Remedy
An order made by a court or tribunal that resolves a breach of civil rights. A remedy should provide a legal solution for the plaintiff in a matter, which must be paid or actioned by the defendant
Liability
The legal responsibility for an act or omission.
The purpose of Remedies
Restore the plaintiff to their original position before the loss occurred.
Plaintiff
The party who is bringing the civil proceedings. The party claiming their rights have been breached.
Defendant
The party who is alleged to have breached the rights of another and are being sued.
Sue
To take civil action against another party., claiming that their rights have been breached by that party.
Damages
A type of remedy that involves one party being ordered to pay money to the other.
BURDEN OF PROOF
- The burden of proof refers to the party who holds the responsibility of proving the facts of a case.
- In civil cases the burden of proof is on the party who is bringing the case.
The plaintiff - In some cases the defendant will have the burden of proof
If they file a counterclaim, making an allegation against the other party and therefore must prove it.
If they raise a defence, they must prove the facts of their defence.
THE STANDARD OF PROOF
- The standard of proof refers to the degree (strength) to which the facts of a case must be proven.
- In civil claims the evidence must be proved on the balance of probabilities.
One party’s version of events are more probable to have occurred than not. - It is less strict than the criminal standard, some doubt may exist.
FACTORS TO CONSIDER BEFORE INITIATING A CLAIM - Costs
- Costs escalate quickly in civil claims.
- A party needs to consider whether the costs are worth the potential remedy
- Costs occur through:
Fees for legal representation
A party may require a solicitor and a barrister. Usually the
Disbursements
Any expense except a legal fee.
Includes Court and tribunal fees
Includes mediation fees
Include fees for expert witnesses
Adverse Costs order
If a plaintiff is unsuccessful in court , they will have to pay their own legal costs and may be ordered to pay for parts of the defendants costs.
FACTORS TO CONSIDER BEFORE INITIATING A CLAIM - Limitation of actions
- Refers to the time restrictions for a civil action to be commenced
The plaintiff needs to begin a proceeding within a certain time period. - Purposes of time limits:
To ensure civil cases are dealt with in a timely manner.
To ensure that evidence is available
To ensure a defendant is not surprised by a claim years after it commenced. - Victorian time limits are set out in the Limitation of actions Act 1958 (Vic)
Different depending on type of action - Limitations of actions can be raised as a defence if the plaintiff brings a case after the time period.
- Plaintiffs can apply for extensions if they have suffered certain types of loss
FACTORS TO CONSIDER BEFORE INITIATING A CLAIM - ENFORCEMENT ISSUES
- There are two ways that a civil claim can resolve:
1) The plaintiff settles the matter - The parties come to their own agreement before an outcome is determined by the court.
2) The court or tribunal make decisions about the liability of the defendant and grants a remedy to the plaintiff. - In some cases the defendant may not or cannot pay:
The defendant may not have any assets to cover the costs of the remedy
The defendant may be in prison, therefore unable to pay
The defendant may leave Australia or be unaccountable making it difficult to pay.
The defendant may be a company which can easily hide assets.
FAIRNESS
- Fairness is defined as “all people can participate in the justice system and its processes should be open and impartial”.
- Impartial process:
The institutions and personnel should be impartial and independent.
There should be no bias towards either party in a proceeding.
Cases should be decided on facts and law, not prejudice.
Apprehended bias also needs to be prevented. - Open process:
Processes should be understood, seen and scrutinised by the public - Participation
The opportunity for both parties to know the case against them.
The opportunity for both parties to represent their version of the case
The use of an interpreter
No delays
EQUALITY
- Equality is defined as ‘all people engaging with the justice system and its processes should be treated in the same way. If the same treatment creates disparity or disadvantage, adequate measures should be implemented to allow everyone to engage with the justice system without disparity or disadvantage’.
- Treated in the same way:
Formal equality is where all people are treated the same way. (Civil rights, pre trial procedures)
Substantive equality acknowledges that formal equality can cause disadvantage/disparity for certain people. - Without disparity or disadvantage:
The decision maker may need to explain certain processes and rights to the parties
It may be necessary to change court/tribunal processes to cater for the needs of parties
A party may need an interpreter
Information should be provided in alternative formats for people with language or literacy barriers.
-
Access
- Access is defined as ‘all people should be able to engage with the justice system and its processes on an informed basis’.
- Engagement:
Providing a range of dispute resolution methods:
Physical access:
Technological access:
Financial access:
No delays: - Informed basis:
Education:
Information:
Legal services:
Legal representation:
MEDIATION
- Involves an independent third party known as the mediator who facilitates conversation between disputing parties so they voluntarily come to a mutual resolution.
- There is an emphasis on maintaining the relationship between the parties.
- Features of meditation:
Parties may be ordered to attend mediation (s 66 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic)) or may privately hire a mediator to avoid court.
The mediator facilitates conversation. They do not provide legal advice or recommend potential outcomes.
Resolutions are non-binding but can be legally enforceable if a settlement agreement is signed.
Legal representation is usually not used in mediation.
It is generally an informal and non-adversarial environment.
There are no rules of evidence. Evidence is not even usually presented, as the emphasis is on resolution, not proving the
standard of proof. - Successful outcome when parties reach a decision.
Deeds of settlement can be signed to make decisions legally binding. - Mediation is not suitable when:
Parties are not willing to negotiate. Or do not understand and participate in the process.
CONCILIATION
- Involves an independent third party known as the conciliator who facilitates conversation between disputing parties and provides specialised knowledge and assistance so they voluntarily come to a mutual resolution.
- Parties cna arrange private conciliation or may be ordered to attend conciliation by the court under s 66 of the Civil Procedure Act 2010 (Vic)
- Conciliation can be used by other legal bodies such as VCAT and CAV
- Features Of conciliation:
The conciliator can offer resolution suggestions and possible solutions (unlike mediation).
The agreements are non-binding but can be enforceable if parties sign a deed of settlement (or ask VCAT/court for it to be ordered)
Legal representation is usually not used in conciliation.
It is generally an informal and non-adversarial environment.
There are no rules of evidence - Potential outcomes include an apology or financial compensation
- Conciliation is not appropriate when:
There is a history of animosity or violence between parties.
Parties are highly emotional and/or are unwilling to compromise.
ARBITRATION
- Arbitration involves an independent third party known as the arbitrator who listens to parties present evidence and makes a binding decision.
- Arbitration is available when people choose to settle their dispute through arbitration or are ordered to attend arbitration.
- Features of arbitration:
Arbitration is less formal than a trial, without the strict rules of evidence and procedure that are used in civil court trials.
Arbitration results in a binding and enforceable decision, known as an arbitral award.
Proceedings and outcomes are usually private.
Arbitration is commonly used by parties to resolve large commercial contract disputes
Arbitration is cheaper, faster and less formal than trials.
Arbitration can be conducted in a court (especially the Supreme Court) but is not the same as a trial.
Arbitration is used in the Magistrates’ Court to resolve civil claims of under $10,000.
-
THE SUPREME COURT - COURT OF APPEAL
- Original Jurisdiction:
No original jurisdiction - Appellate Jurisdiction:
Hears appeals from:
The county court on question of law, question of fact, and/or the remedy awarded
The Supreme court trial division on question of law, question of fact, and/or the amount of damages awarded
Appeals from the president or vice president of VCAT
THE SUPREME COURT - TRIAL DIVISION
- Original Jurisdiction:
Can hear claims of unlimited amounts. In practice it usually only hears complex claims exceeding $100,000.
Parties can choose judge alone trials or a jury of 6
Examples include, representative proceedings, defamation involving complex arguments. - Appellate Jurisdiction:
Hears appeals from:
The Magistrates court on a point of law
VCAT on a point of law
The appeal is heard and decided by a single judge
THE COUNTY COURT
- Original Jurisdiction:
Can hear claims of unlimited amounts. In practice it usually only hears claims exceeding $100,000.
Parties can choose judge alone trials or a jury of 6.
Examples include, personal injury claims, negligence, contract disputes. - Appellate jurisdiction:
The county court does not have a civil appellate jurisdiction.
THE MAGISTRATES COURT
- Original Jurisdiction:
Can hear minor civil disputes involving claims up to $100,000
If the damages sought are under $10,000, the MC will use arbitration to resolve the dispute.
Examples include, minor workplace injuries, small claims under employment contracts, car accident claims. - Appellate Jurisdiction:
No appellate jurisdiction