AP GOV 4.3 Flashcards

(49 cards)

1
Q

Article III

A

This the part of the Constitution that establishes the judicial branch. Makes the Supreme Court the highest court in the land. Grants Congress the authority to create lower federal courts (district and appellate courts). States the lifetimes tenures of justices.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Judiciary Act of 1789

A

This established the structure (3-tiered system) of the court system. This defined original jurisdiction and appellate jurisdiction for the Supreme Court. Gave Congress the power to establish “inferior courts” - Can be put up for review. Said that the federal courts could review laws and actions of other branches on the basis of Constitutionality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Federalist 78

A

This defined the judicial branch as the “weakest” branch. Hamilton frequently mentioned how appointments and life tenures ensure judicial independence. SCOTUS serves as a protector of the Constitution interpreting every law. Mentioned judicial review. Said it is not to worry about because without the “sword” (executive) or the “purse” (legislative) it cannot accomplish anything. (Talking about judicial implementation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Supreme Court

A

This is the highest court of the United States, establishes by article III. It serves as the judicial branch’s check on the other two branches. Emphasizes on protecting individual rights.

Cases that are heard by SCOTUS include freedom of religion, discrimination, law enforcement.

This can be reached through original jurisdiction, which is uncommon unless t involves ambassadors or other high-ranking ministers. Most cases go through the district court, then court of appeals, and then the Supreme court if they choose to here it. writ of certiorari.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

District Court

A

These are the general trial courts of the United States. 94 district courts. Both under federal and state level. Their judges have to be appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

Civil Cases:
Disputes between citizens of different states or countries
Disputes between corporations, governments, or people
Civil rights violations
Patent and trademark infringement
Breach of contract involving US gov

Criminal cases:
Violations of federal laws
Violations of income tax and narcotic laws
Crimes committed on federal property
Mail theft

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

US Court of Appeals

A

This is the federal court that reviews decisions from lower courts. They ensure their was no judicial error and that the proceedings were fair.

13 circuits

10% or fewer of the decisions are appealed to the US Supreme Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

State Courts

A

Courts that handle cases related to state laws and constitution.

If the court’s interpretation of federal law/US Constitution is appealed, it goes to the court of appeals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Appellate Courts

A

These are the courts that review the decisions of the lower courts to determine if the law was applied in the correct manner along with if the proceedings of the case was fair.

Cases come from district courts.
Known as “Appellate Jurisdiction”.
Do not retry cases or hear new evidence
Do not hear witnesses testify
No jury

Relieves SCOTUS’s caseload

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Original Jurisdiction/Appellate Jurisdiction

A

Original jurisdiction refers to the authority of a court to hear a case for the first time. This is important because they have the power to initially adjudicate cases involving state dispute (district courts) or ambassadors and public ministers (Supreme Court).

Appellate Jurisdiction is the authority of a court to review and make decisions on appeals from the lower courts on the basis of unfair proceedings or judicial error. They do not conduct trails, they instead examine the record from the lower court to determine if the law in the lower court was applied correctly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Criminal law/ Civil Law

A

Criminal law is all crimes that violates public law. Crimes like murder, assault, theft, drunk driving. Tried in criminal court. Judges can punish offenders with jail time.

Civil Law is a lawsuit in the form of monetary liability. These are between individuals or businesses. Property disputes, contracts, and family law. Tried in civil court, judges can order monetary compensations or make decisions about property or family.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Due Process

A

This is a clause found i the 5th and 14th amendments that guarantees that no state can take away from a person any “life, liberty, or property without due process of law.” This includes procedural protections for individuals in the criminal justice system.

Right to a trial by jury, right to an attorney, freedom from self-incrimination (5th amendment)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Grand Jury/ Petit Jury

A

A Grand Jury is a group of citizens that review evidence presented by the prosecution and decide for “probable cause” to believe a individual should be put on trial. They determine if there is enough evidence, If yes, an indictment (charge of a serious crime) will be issued against the individual.

A petit jury is also known as trial juries. They decide both criminal and civil cases. In a criminal case, they have to be proven without a reasonable doubt. In a civil case, it is more likely than not.

This is why OJ did not get convicted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Litigants

A

This is a person involved in a lawsuit. This can be under a plaintiff or defendant.

Government litigation: Lawsuit that involve the government.

Institutional litigant: A group that brings a lawsuit to change the law or defend an existing rule.

Litigants in person are people who represent themselves in court. Taxi Driver from Suits.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Plaintiff/ Defendants

A

A plaintiff is a person who brings a case against another person in a court of law.

A defendant can be an individual or business that was sued and accused and summoned into the court of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Class Action Lawsuit

A

A civil lawsuit brought by a GROUP of people who have all been negatively affected in a similar way by the same entity. They share any settlement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Briefs

A

Briefs are written arguments that lawyers submit to court. They can be used in Supreme Court cases, appellate cases, and motions.

The purpose is to convince the court that their position is right. They show legal comparison as well as summarize the case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Precedent

A

Precedent is a previous court ruling that serves as a base for deciding future cases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Stare Decisis

A

This is a legal principle that means “to stand by things decided”. This is important because it shows the legitimacy of the court when following precedent. By following precedent, it maintains consistency in legal interpretations.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Justices/Chief Justice

A

There are 9 SCOTUS justices. Nominated by President and confirmed by Senate in majority. Maintain checks and balances through judicial review.

The chief justice is the head of the Supreme Court. They are responsible for presiding over court proceedings and ensuring an efficient display of justice. Appointed by the President. Confirmed by Senate. Serve a life tenure. They preside over oral arguments and lead discussions when deciding cases. They oversee the court schedules. Some famous justices are John Marshall and Earl Warren, where they expanded the powers of the judiciary through their interpretations of the Constitution in their court decisions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Presidential Appointments/ Senatorial Courtesy

A

In Article II, they can appoint federal officials with the advice and consent of the Senate. Around 4,000 positions, 1,200 of which are confirmed by the Senate.

This is a political traditions where senators look at the preferences of their colleagues when it comes to judicial nominations in their home state. If a judge is not favored by the senator from that state, they will most likely not be nominated. Reflects state representation an relationship between the Executive branch and Senate in judicial appointments.

20
Q

Criteria for Judges/Nomination criteria

A

Judicial experience, most of them being clerks for justices. Ideaologies are really important according to the President.

21
Q

Senate Judicial hearings

A

Senate has to give a simple majority in order to confirm the appointee.

22
Q

Independence/life term

A

This is when federal justices have independence due to them having life tenures. This is believed to be from the fact that they do not have to worry about unfair elections, or adhering to their constituents for votes.

Established by Article III, holding office during “good behavior”

serve for life, resign, or retire, or get impeached by congress.

Not influenced

23
Q

Writ of Certiorari

A

This is a request for SCOTUS to review a case decision from the lower courts. The justices will accept this based on the significance of the case, or resolving disputes amongst the lower courts.

They get to hear and select the cases SCOTUS deems fit for hearing, rather than having an obligation to a large amount of appeals.

24
Rule of Four
This is an informal practice where if at least 4 out of the 9 Supreme Court justices vote to grant a writ of certiorari, the Court must agree for the case to be put on the court's docket.
25
Law Clerks
These are legal assistants who work directly for justices on SCOTUS. practically do all the work. Draft opinions, help research cases, review legal argument precedents, Key support staff
26
Justiciable/Standing
Justiciable refers for a case being appropriate for a court to hear. Standing is the legal requirement that a plaintiff must be directly affected by the issue they are suing for.
27
Amicus Curiae
Amicus curiae's are legal documents filed in court cases by NON-PARTIES, people file these when they have a strong interest in the case. Non-profit organizations, gov. agencies, academic institutions. They may show the significance of the legal questions at stake when numerous are filed. SCOTUS gives significant weight to them when they come from well-respected sources.
27
Solicitor General/ Department of Justice
The Solicitor General represents the United States before the Supreme Court. They argue cases when the federal government is a party. File amicus curiae when the government has a significant interest in the case. To see if the case aligns with the executive branch. Only choosing a small number of Cases to pursue when the gov. loses in the lower courts. The department of Justice is the federal department responsible for enforcing federal laws, advising the president about decisions they may make, and representing the US government in legal matters
28
Oral Arguments
A part of the judicial process where attorneys present their case verbally before a court. Lawyers may summarize key points of their written briefs and respond to any questions of the judges. 30 minutes to an hour. Take place after written briefs have been submitted and reviewed by the court.
29
Petitioner/Respondent
A petitioner is a person who is suing somebody in a case. There can be multiple petitioners A respondent is the party who is required to answer a petition filed against. They are the defendant of the lawsuit. The person being sued or appealed.
30
Majority Opinion/Concurring Opinion
The majority Opinion is the courts official decision that received the support of over half of the justices on the court. Written by the chief justice A Concurring Opinion is a separate opinion from a justice who agrees with the opinion but may not agree with the legal reasoning for the decision.
31
Dissenting Opinion
This is a written statement by one or more judges who disagree with the decision of the case. They explain their reason for the disagreement.
32
Per curiam opinion
This refers to a court opinion issued by the court as a whole, instead of one specific judge. Straightforward and non-controversial
33
Original Intent/Strict Constructionism
This refers to a theory of the Constitution that argues that it should be interpreted as it was written according to what the Founding Fathers intended when they wrote it. historical context This refers to a theory that argues the Constitution should be interpreted with avoiding broad powers or broad interpretations
34
Judicial Restraint
Judges should limit their own power to uphold laws and precedents established by legislative and executive branches Not creating policy, rather interpreting existing laws based on their original Intent.
35
Judicial activism
Judges should take an active role in interpreting the law and making decisions by creating legal precedents/ changing existing ones
36
Litmus test
An examination of a potential candidate that determines whether the official will receive their vote. In Senate nomination hearings
37
Judicial Implementation
The process where court decision are actually translated into actual public policies. Public Opinion, Executive Branch support, the legislative branch passing laws that may contradict or undermine court decisions.
38
Political Questions
Issues SCOTUS deems inappropriate for judicial review due to the judicial arguing it is a question for the political branches of the government (Executive and Legislative)
38
influence of Interest Groups
They may file amicus curiae. They may lobby the executive branch on judicial appointments in order to influence the nomination to support their agenda.
39
Executive Check on Judiciary
The President's power to nominate federal judges. These nomination can shape the judiciary because they may share political and legal views along with the President who appointed them.
40
Legislative Check on the Judiciary
Have the power to impeach and remove federal judges. Congress can change the size of SCOTUS Congress may pass laws that limit what types of cases federal courts may hear.
41
Marshall Court
Significantly shaping the power and role of the judiciary branch, supremacy clause, judicial review, protection of private property rights. Favoring economic development and national unity. Marbury v. Madison - Judicial Review McCulloch v. Maryland - Supremacy Clause Gibbons v. Ogden - Federal authority over interstate commerce.
42
Warren Court
Civil rights, civil liberties. Brown v. Board of Education - segregation in schools is unconstitutional. (Overturned Plessy v. Furguson) Miranda v. Arizona - Miranda Rights Some people saw it as judicial activism rather than strict constitutional interpretation Due Process Clause - His interpretations led to expanded rights
43
Burger Court
Conservative rulings Criminal Justice and Civil Rights Education, religious freedom, reproductive rights Shift away from liberal precedents Roe v. Wade - Abortion is a constitutional right US v. Nixon - Executive Privilege power is decreased.
44
Roberts Court
Dobbs v. WHO - Overturning Roe v. Wade. free exercise of religion, LGBTQ+ rights, abortion Judicial restraint in not overturning established precedents compared to previous courts. Ideologies line up quite frequently
45
Rehnquist Court
More Conservative Favored states' rights over federal power US v. Lopez - Limited power of federal gov under the Commerce Clause,
46
Current Justices and Ideology
John Roberts - Clarence Thomas - Samuel Alito - Sonia Sotomayor- Elena Kagan - Neil Gorsuch - Brett Kavanaugh - Amy Coney Barrett - Ketanji Brown Jackson -