Appellate Review Flashcards
Chapter 14 (38 cards)
What is appellate review?
Consider how the availability of appellat review affects other aspects of the judicial proceeding, such as discovery, case management, and sanctions.
What are the two types of appellate review?
- Final Judgment Reviews: where the case goes all the way and the final judgment is reviewed
- Interlocutory Appeal: A decision, in the middle of the case, gets reviewed, and then sent back to the court to continue
What is the principle of finality?
“Final Judgment Rule”: Appeals may only be taken from a “final decision” of the district court
What is the final decisions of district courts?
28 U.S.C. § 1291
The courts of appeals have jurisdiction over appeals from all final decisions of the district courts . . . except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court
The final judgment is what marks the end of the case in the trial court
What are interlocutory decisions?
28 U.S.C. §1292
Explains that the Court of Appeals have jurisdiction over certain interlocutory decisons: (1) interlocutory orders of the district courts; (2) interlocutory orders appointing receivers, or refusing orders to wind up receiverships or to take steps to accomplish the purposes; and (3) interlocutory decrees of such district courts or the judges thereof determining the rights and liabilities of the parties to admiralty cases in which appeals from final decrees are allowed
What happens if the district court makes an order not appealable?
28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
If such order involves a controlling question of law where there is substantial ground for difference of opinion, the court shall state that this order is immediately appealable, and the Court of Appeal, in their discretion, can take the appeals case
What is the New York Approach?
N.Y.C. P.L.R. 5701
New York allows appeals, on every decision the court makes, to the state’s intermediate appellate court, even when no final judgment has been made.
What is a judgment on multiple claims or involving multiple parties?
FRCP 54(b)
When more than one claim for relief is presented, the court may direct entry of final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only if the court expressly determines that there is no just reason for the delay
Otherwise, any order that adjudicates less than all the claims, does not end the action and may be revised at any time before the entry of judgment
What is Judgment on Multiple claims or involving multiple parties essentially saying?
FRCP 54(b)
Rule 54(b) provides a means to permit an appeal from one or more final decisions on individual claims, without waiting for final decisions to be rendered on ALL claims in the case
Claims that were dismissed is a “final judgment.”
When is there an exception to an appeal?
Appeal gives the power of review and as long as the matter remains open, unfinished, or inconclusive, there may be no intrusion by appeal
A collateral order was a final decision on the security bond. (Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541)
Is a discovery order compelling a defendant to disclose info immediately appealable?
Mohawk Industries v. Carpenter, 558 U.S. 100
Discovery order compelling a defendant to disclose info it claimed was attorney-client privilege did not qualify for immediate appeal under the collateral order doctrine as the litigants could be sufficiently protected by post-judgment appeal
Decisions Involving “Collateral Orders”
Can a denial of class certification be appealable?
FRCP 23(f)
A court of appeas may permit an appeal from an order granting or denying class action certification under this rule, but not from an order under Rule 23(e)(1).
What is the appealability over divesture situations?
Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294
District court directed defendant in violation of antitrust laws to divestiture of its subsidiary but reserved its ruling on a specific plan to divestiture. The Supreme Court ruled the divestiture decree was sufficiently final even without the plan being yet formuated . . . because if appealed and overturned, the divestiture could be hard to undo
Is a denial of protective order immediately appealable?
United States v. Copar Pumice Co., Inc. 714 F.3d 1197
Defendants sought to appeal the denial of a protective order for documents from law firms that had provided legal advice about mining. The Tenth Circuit held that an interlocutory appeal was not available under the collateral order doctrine. Overall the discovery decision was not immediately appeallable .
Decisions Based on “Pragmatic Finality”
What are essentially the exceptions to the Final Rule?
There needs to be a final rule before an appeal, however, there are exceptions: (1) Collateral orders; (2) pragmatic finality; and (3) mandamus
Apart from collateral order appeals, what are some avenues that a litigant has for appeals?
(1) The party could ask the district court to certify an appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292;
(2) the party could petition the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus;
(3) Under pragmatic doctrine, a court may assume jurisdiction where the danger of injustice by delaying appellate review outweighs the inconvenience and costs of piecemeal review
What is a mandamus?
28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)
The Supreme Court and all courts established by Act of Congress may issue all writs necessary or appropriate in aid of their respective jurisdictions and agreeable to the usages and principles of law
What is the rule on Physical and Mental Examinations?
FRCP 35(a)
A litigant must ask the court for approval before asking an opposing party to submit to a mental and physical examination
This writ is not supposed to be used as a substitute for appeal but is appropriately used when there is “usuprtion of judicial power” or a clear abuse of discretion
What are many of the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding mandamus concerning?
Many of the Supreme Court’s decisions regarding mandamus concern discovery disputes
What is the Supreme Court’s three-part test for issuance of the writ of mandamus?
(1) There must be “no other adequate means” to attach relief sought;
(2) the movant bears the burden of showing that the right to relief is “clear and indisputable”; and
(3) The issuing court in its discretion “must be satisfied that the writ is appropriate under the circumstances
Mandamus relief is used sparingly
What is a discretonary appeal?
28 U.S.C. § 1292(b)
A district court will grant an order for certification to appeal; then the Court of Appeal will decide to take it or not
The court will consider factors to determine whether there is “no just reason for delay” for the issuance of a Federal Rule 54(b) certificate
What rules can the Supreme Court prescribe in accordance with § 2072?
28 U.S.C. § 1292(e)
The Supreme Court may prescribe rules in accordance with §2072 of this title, to provide for an appeal of an interlocutory decision to the courts of appeals that is not otherwise provided
The Court has only used this once
What is the precedent to the limitations on certifications?
28 U.S.C §1292(b)
This rule is limited to the order certified by the district court, it “is not tied to the particular question formulated by the district court.” The appellate court may address any issues fairly included within the certified order because it is the order and not the controlling question that is appelable
What are the allowances on issuances of injunctions?
28 U.S.C. §1292(a)(1)
Interlocutory orders of the district courts . . . or the judges thereof, granting, continuing, modifying, refusing, or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions, except where a direct review may be had in the Supreme Court