approaches Flashcards
(81 cards)
Wundt’s role in psychology
- regarded as the ‘father’ of experimental psychology, as psychology moved from its philosophical roots to controlled research
- he established the first laboratory dedicated to psychology enquiry in 1879
- his approach became known as structuralism
- his work represented the beginning of scientific psychology, separating it from its broader roots of philosophy and biology into a separate branch
- he promoted the use of introspection as a way of studying mental processes
- the systematic analysis of own conscious experience of a stimulus
- His work paved the way for later controlled research and the study of mental processes by cognitive psychologists
Wundt and structuralism
- the attempt to uncover the structure of the mind by describing it in terms of its simplest definable components
- He wished to apply the objective scientific investigation seen in the study of sciences to the study of the mind and cognition
- his approach was to break down the structure of the mind into 2 components
- sensations
- perceptions
definition of introspection
- the first systematic experimental attempt to study the mind and mental processes by breaking up conscious awareness into basic structures of thoughts, images and sensations
- involves examination and observation of mental and emotional processes
overview of introspection
- once this process has occurred, it is furthered by the cataloguing and reporting of the details involved
- Wundt’s sessions occurred in a controlled environment as it was intended as a highly systematic process
- he used the findings from introspection to identify the processes involved in human consciousness
process of introspection
- participants were trained to report conscious experiences as objectively as possible
- they were asked to focus on a sensory object as a stimulus
- participants were asked to look inward and systematically report on their inner mental processes such as emotions and sensations
- they had to describe the duration, quality and intensity of what they felt
- this information was used to generate general theories about perception and mental processes, gaining insight into their working mind
- all were recorded under strictly controlled conditions using the same stimulus and so the process was standardised
strength of the method of introspection- basis for the cognitive approach
- this is because Wundt’s method of introspection paved the way for further analysis of cognitive functions and mental processes
- for example, the cognitive approach emphasises the role of mental processes such as with the use of computer models
- this suggests that the method of introspection has had a widespread impact on the discipline of psychology, leading to the development of further approaches to study behaviour
limitation of the method of introspection- process isn’t replicable
- this is because he relied on participants self-reporting their experiences, which made this process subjective, while the scientific process focuses on objective data
- for example, some participants may have exaggerated or omitted some of their thoughts
- this suggests it is difficult to establish meaningful and general laws of behaviour from this data, which is the primary aim of the scientific approach to psychology
- therefore, his early efforts to study the mind were flawed and wouldn’t meet the criteria of scientific enquiry, suggesting this method can be considered unscientific due to its flawed methodology
strength of Wundt’s role- his methods were systematic and well controlled
- For example, he instructed that all introspections were recorded in a controlled environment which ensured extraneous variables didn’t influence the findings, increasing the internal validity of his conclusions
- Furthermore, all procedures and instructions were carefully standardised such as with the same stimuli, so each participant was tested in the same way
- this systematic approach allowed him to develop general theories of mental processes, enabling other researchers to replicate his methods
- This suggests his research can be considered a forerunner to later scientific approaches in psychology
limitation of Wundt- credibility questioned by others
- For example, Watson (1913) questioned the scientific value and status of introspection, arguing internal mental processes couldn’t be studied scientifically by introspection as it is too subjective
- this is a limitation as Wundt’s method became too difficult to create general principals and laws about human behaviour, which is a necessary criterion of science as for anything to be scientifically recorded, it must be able to be measured
emergence of psychology as a science overview
- science is concerned with empirically observable facts that can be measured and replicated
- aims to acquire knowledge through systematic and objective methods
- the science of psychology would observe human behaviour and deduce the laws that govern it
- the subjective nature of behaviour has led to different approaches to the study of psychology
emergence of psychology as a science evaluation- can claim to be scientific
- this is because psychology has the same aims as the natural sciences which is to understand, predict and describe behaviour in a systematic and observable manner
- many approaches rely on the use of scientific methods such as lab studies to investigate theories in a controlled and unbiased manner
- this suggests that throughout the 20thc, psychology has established itself as a scientific discipline
emergence of psychology as a science evaluation- not all approaches use scientific methods
- for example, the humanistic approach rejects the scientific approach, preferring to focus on individual experiences
- the psychodynamic approach makes use of the case study method which doesn’t use representative samples
- in addition, the subject of study, humans, are active participants in research, responding to demand characteristics
- therefore, a scientific approach to the study of human thought, behaviour and experience may not always be desirable or possible
assumptions of the behaviourist approach
- explains behaviour in terms of what is observable and measurable, trying to maintain objectivity within research
- relied on lab studies
- only this observable behaviour should be studied
- not concerned with investigating mental processes as they were seen as irrelevant and so behaviourists rejected introspection as it involved concepts that were vague and difficult to measure
- believe all behaviour is learned
- behaviour is explained through a stimulus-response association
- the basic processes that govern learning are the same in all species
classical conditioning
- learning via association
- occurs when 2 stimuli are repeatedly paired together, the unconditioned stimulus and the neutral stimulus
- the neutral stimulus eventually produces the same response that was first produced by the unconditioned stimulus alone
procedure of Pavlov’s experiment (1927)
- The dogs were surgically fitted with a tube to measure saliva production
- Pavlov presented the dogs with food to confirm that it naturally triggered salivation, an unconditioned response which was the basline measurement
- Pavlov introduced a neutral stimulus of a bell that initially did not elicit salivation
- The neutral stimulus was repeatedly paired with the unconditioned stimulus by him ringing the bell just before presenting the food
- Over multiple trials, the dogs began to associate the neutral stimulus (bell) with the presentation of food
evaluation of Pavlov- high level of control and scientific methodology used
- For example, he conducted his experiments in controlled laboratory settings, carefully measuring variables such as the timing of stimulus presentation and the amount of saliva produced to quantify the responses, ensuring that his findings were reliable
- These controls ensured the replicability of the findings because of the standardised procedures
- this level of rigor allowed him to establish clear cause and effect relationships between the neutral stimulus and the conditioned response
- The use of empirical methods aligns with the behaviorist perspective, which emphasizes observable and measurable behavior
- By employing scientific methods, Pavlov’s research contributed to psychology’s development as a rigorous and empirical science, influencing later behaviorists such as Watson and Skinner
evaluation of Pavlov- lack of generalisability
- For example, his research was conducted on dogs which differ from humans in terms of cognitive processes as human behavior is often influenced by higher-order thinking and cultural factors, which are not present in animals
- While classical conditioning explains many reflexive responses, it oversimplifies the learning processes involved in human behaviours such as language acquisition or decision-making, suggesting his findings may not fully account for the complexity of human learning
- therefore, application of his work to human behaviour requires caution due to the reductionist nature of classical conditioning
evaluation of Pavlov- ethical concerns
- his study involved the implantation of devices to collect saliva, which raised ethical questions about the treatment of the animals
- The invasive nature of these procedures may have caused unnecessary distress and suffering to the dogs, which raises concerns about the ethical implications of using animals in research
- such practices are scrutinized in modern psychological research, where ethical guidelines prioritize the welfare of animal subjects
evaluation of classical conditioning- oversimplifies learning
- this is because the theory neglects the role of cognitive processes such as thought and perception in learning
- this suggests classical conditioning cannot fully explain complex human behaviours and all forms of learning that involve conscious decision-making and reasoning
- therefore, while it is effective for explaining basic learning processes, its reductionist approach fails to capture the complexity of behaviour, limiting its application to broader psychological matters
evaluation of classical conditioning- practical application
- this is because the ideas behind classical conditioning have led to the development of treatments for phobias
- For example, treatment techniques for phobias such as systematic desensitisation have been effective in treating phobias by gradually replacing fear responses with relaxation through counterconditioning
- this demonstrates the relevance of classical conditioning to improving the lives of individuals and managing maladaptive behaviours
evaluation of classical conditioning- support from Little Albert
- this is because a child was conditioned to fear a white rat (neutral stimulus) by pairing it with a loud noise (unconditioned stimulus) which elicited fear (unconditioned response)
- after repeated pairings, he displayed fear (conditioned response) in response to the rat which was now a conditioned stimulus, and generalised this fear to similar stimuli such as a fur coat
- this is a strength as it evidences that it can explain the acquisition of emotional responses such as phobias
operant conditioning
- a form of learning in which behaviour is shaped and maintained by its consequences of reinforcement and punishment and so is learning via consequences
- Skinner believed learning is an active process where humans and animals operate on their environment
- emphasises the role of reward and reinforcement in behaviour
reinforcement definition
a consequence of behaviour that increases the likelihood of that behaviour being repeated
positive reinforcement
- receiving a reward when a certain behaviour is performed
- increases the likelihood the behaviour will be repeated