Approaches- Social Learning Theory Flashcards

1
Q

Social learning theorist

A

Albert Bandura

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Socialist learning theorist agreed with which theory but developed further?

A

SL theorist agreed with behaviourism principles but argued understanding human behaviour requires recognizing learning as a cognitive process which happens in a social content

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What serves as a template from our actions?

A

Observing others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which type of reinforcement is a key principle of the social learning theory?

A

Vicarious reinforcement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Vicarious reinforcement

A

when we see someone rewarded for a behavior, we are more likely to mimic it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Vicarious punishment

A

Witnessing someone punished for an action makes us less likely to adopt that behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Modelling

A

individuals we observe and emaluate are referred to as models; live models include parents, friends and family members.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Learning through characters in movies or books is called?

A

Symbolic models

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Identification

A

not all models have the same likelihood of being imitated

we are more likely to imitate models with similar characteristics such as gender and age or people perceived to be attractive or high status

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are mediatational processes?

A

ARRM

attention
retention
reproduction
motivation

and must happen between observing a model perform a behaviour (stimuli) and imitating that behaviour (response)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Mediational processes and SL theorists

A

Social learning theorists argue that human behaviour could not be fully understood without including the tile of cognitive processes that happen between stimuli and response - ARRM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Attention

A

in order to learn from a model, individuals mst pay attention to the model by focusing on specific behavior

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Retention

A

the ability to remember the observed behaviours, this involves encoding the observed behaviour into memory so it can be retrieved later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reproduction

A

The individuals’ belief in their ability to replicate the behavior that the model demonstrated. This depends on the individual’s’ physical capabilities as well as the remembered details of the behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Motivation

A

The willingness to perform the behaviour, which is influences by the expected outcomes, such as rewards or punishments, based on observing the consequences of behaviours in others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mediational processes explain why

A

individuals do not automatically mimic every behaviour they observe, is any of the 4 ARRM mediational processes are missing, the behaviour won’t be imitated

17
Q

Learning and what are not the same?

A

Learning and performance are not the same

18
Q

Explain learning and performance are not the same

A

For behaviourist an immediate response to stimuli indicates learning, equating learning directly w/ performance

HOWEVER

Social learning theory disti=nguisges betweenlearnig and perofrmance, arguing that observed behaviours are internalises -meaning that they are stores as memories fro use when needed, potentially long after the initial observation

19
Q

How was the SLT concepts of modelling and imitating tested?

A

Through Bandura (1961)’s experiment conducted to see if children would copy aggressive behavior demonstrated by an adult towards an inflatable toy known as the Bobo doll

20
Q

Bandura Bobo Doll (1961)
Procedure

A

Ps (children) aged 3-6
were divided into 2 groups

1st group observe an adult demonstrating physical and verbal aggression towards a bobo doll in a room filled with toys

2nd group watched an adult interact non-aggressively w/ different toys

an experimenter observed and recorded the children’s physical and verbal aggression from behind a one-way mirror

21
Q

Bandura Bobo Doll (1961)
Findings

A

Findings revealed that children exposed to an aggressive model were more likely to be aggressive themselves

additionally the results highlighted the role of identification, particularly among boys, who were more likely to mimic aggression after observed a male model compared to those who saw an aggressive female model

22
Q

1963 variation
of Bandura Bobo Doll (1961)

Procedure

A

Symbolic models

children were exposed to a live aggressive adult, a recording of an adult or a cartoon featuring an aggressive cat

-all aggression was directed towards a Bobo doll

23
Q

1963 variation
of Bandura Bobo Doll (1961)

Findings

A

indictaed comaprabled levels of aggression across allgroups, illustrating that modelsm wteher lvie orsymbplic. (recorded or animated), are imitated

24
Q

1965 variation
of Bandura Bobo Doll (1961)

Procedure

A

Vicarious Reinforcement

children witness adults acting aggressively towards a Bobo doll ,followed by the adults receiving (sweets), punishment (being hit w/ a wooden club) or neither

25
Q

1965 variation
of Bandura Bobo Doll (1961)

Findings

A

Indicated that children who observed the adult being punished displayed significantly less aggression towards the Bobo doll compared to children in other conditions

26
Q

Evaluation
robust

A

strength of SLT is it is supported by robust evidence

-e.g Bobo doll study has high internal validity due to its lab setting

-this tsudy ensure nevironemntlas ocntorl by havign Ps follow the same procedure in the same room w/ access to identical toys

-it also used matched pair design to control Ps variables, assessing children’s pre-existing aggression level to ensure each group contained an equal mix of aggressive children

27
Q

Evaluation
ecological validity

A

Bandura’s rs only demonstrated short-term social learning

aggression may not be imitated weeks or months after observation

the study’s ecological validity can also be question , as the aggression observed in a controlled lab setting may not directly translate to real-world scenarios, such as imitating televised violence in school environments

these concerns raise doubts about the applicability of SLT processes to everyday life

28
Q

Evaluation
Inferences

A

rs supporting slt relies on inferences

processes such as identification w. a model vicarious reinforcement, and mediating cognitive factors are not directly observable but are inferred from behavior shown by the child Ps

-these inferences might be incorrect; mediating cognitive factors could have less impact than assumed, nand the true causes of behaviour could be significantly different

29
Q

Evaluation
less reductionist

A

-advantage of SLT - is less reductionist than behaviourism

-giving a more detailed a potentially more valid understanding of human behaviour

-SLT acknowledges the role of consciousness and rationality

-proving a more believable explanation for complex behavior sliek aggression

-behaviourisms focus on simplistic stimulus-response mechanisms man only be appropriate is explaining the learning of basic behaviours

30
Q

Evaluation
reciprocal determinsim

A

SLT’s concept of ‘reciprocal determinism’ is a potentially more valid perspective tna simpler deterministic approaches

-bandura argues that behavior is not only influenced by the environment but also shapes it

-e.g a child’s study habits can alter their reinforcement, achieving an A grade and receiving praise from teacher

-the positive feedback loop then acts as further motivation for the child to increase their effort