AR - Criminal Law Flashcards

(67 cards)

1
Q

What is Actus Reus?

A

Actus Reus refers to the prohibited physical conduct of a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is individual autonomy?

A

Individual autonomy is the ability of a person to make their own decisions.

Case example: R v Kennedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the principle of maximum certainty in law?

A

Law should be clear and open so that everyone has access to it, and must be applied in a precise and predictable manner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does ‘innocent until proven guilty’ mean?

A

It is a legal principle that ensures a person is considered innocent until evidence proves otherwise.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is correspondence in criminal law?

A

In criminal law, both actus reus (the act) and mens rea (the guilty mind) are required to constitute a crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is an exception to the requirement of mens rea?

A

Strict liability offences require no fault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is fair labeling in the context of law?

A

It is unfair to label someone inaccurately; the punishment must reflect the severity of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the presumption against retrospective liability?

A

Laws must not be retrospective; a person cannot be tried for an offence if the conduct was not an offence when committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are the three types of actus reus?

A
  1. Conduct crimes: no consequence needed.
  2. Result crimes: prohibited conduct must result in a consequence.
  3. State of affairs crimes: being at a particular place at a particular time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is an example of a state of affairs crime?

A

Being in possession of a controlled drug under S.5 Misuse of Drugs Act 1971, regardless of intent to use or distribute it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What must be shown to establish actus reus?

A

It must be shown that the defendant’s act was voluntary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are involuntary actions?

A

Involuntary actions are where the defendant lacked any control over their acts, resulting in a state of automatism.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is an example of an act done by muscle without control of the mind?

A

A spasm or reflex action, such as being stung by a swarm of bees or having a heart attack while driving.

Examples given in Hill v Baxter and R v Mitchell.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is an act done by a person who was not conscious of what they were doing?

A

An example is R v Quick.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the general rule regarding omissions?

A

An omission (failure to act) cannot make a person guilty of an offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are the justifications for the general rule on omissions?

A
  1. The criminal court cannot force people to act as good samaritans.
  2. It is difficult to determine which omissions should result in punishment.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What is a duty arising out of contract?

A

If you have a contract of employment requiring specific acts, failure to perform these acts can result in criminal liability.

Example: R v Pittwood.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is a duty by virtue of relationship?

A

If you are a parent and fail to care for your child properly, resulting in death or injury, you could be criminally liable.

Example: R v Gibbons and Proctor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is a duty by virtue of assumption of care for another?

A

If you take responsibility for caring for someone and fail to do so properly, resulting in death or injury, you could be criminally liable.

Example: R v Stone and Dobinson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is a duty by public office?

A

Holders of public office may have a duty to act that extends beyond working hours, particularly police officers.

Example: R v Dytham.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is a duty by virtue of creating a dangerous situation?

A

If you create a dangerous situation, you are obliged to rectify it. Failing to do so, resulting in death, injury, or damage, can lead to liability.

Example: R v Miller.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the established relationship that creates a duty of care between a doctor and a patient?

A

Doctor + patient = established duty of care

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
In which case was it determined that if a doctor acts in the interest of the patient, it is not considered an omission?
Airedale NHS Trust v Bland
26
Who determines the existence of a duty to act in law?
A judge
27
What is the significance of the case R v Khan and Khan in relation to duty of care?
Judge determines whether there is evidence capable of establishing a duty in law
28
What are the principles concerning morality in law?
Distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior
29
What does the Good Samaritan law entail?
Makes a person responsible for helping others in an 'emergency situation'
30
Is the Good Samaritan law active in England?
No
31
List advantages of the Good Samaritan law
* Protection of those in danger * Modern view may favor moral responsibilities * Imposes a duty on people to help
32
List disadvantages of the Good Samaritan law
* Risk that untrained person may cause more harm * Could lure people into danger
33
What are some problems with the law on omissions?
* Difficulties deciding when a duty exists * Assuming a duty
34
What is the implication of the case R v Stone and Dobinson regarding assuming a duty?
Is it fair to impose a duty when someone has voluntarily undertaken care of another?
35
What did the High Court emphasize in Airedale NHS v Bland regarding withdrawing treatment?
Withdrawing treatment = not guilty for the omission
36
What did the High Court in Bland state about a positive act of terminating a patient's life?
Would be unlawful
37
Fill in the blank: The law's lack of certainty makes it difficult to decide when a duty _______.
[exists]
38
Who decides if certain facts are proved regarding duty in the case?
The jury
39
What happens if more than one person witnesses an emergency?
Issues arise regarding who is responsible
40
What is the general adult responsibility concerning care?
Normally responsible for looking after themselves
41
42
What is the definition of causation in criminal law?
Chain of causation between the D's act or omission and the harm/damage caused
43
What is the first stage of causation?
Factual Causation
44
What does factual causation establish?
A link between the defendant's act (or omission) and the result required for the crime
45
What is the legal test for factual causation?
'But For' Test
46
What does the 'But For' Test determine?
But for the defendant's conduct/actions the victims would not have suffered the injury
47
What is a leading case for factual causation?
R v Pagett
48
In R v White, what was the outcome regarding factual causation?
But for yes - not fc
49
What is the second stage of causation?
Legal Causation
50
What must be proven in legal causation?
The act was more than a minimal cause of a result
51
What is the quote from R v Kimsey regarding legal causation?
'Must be more than a slight or trifling link'
52
What is the legal test for determining substantial cause?
Were the defendants actions the substantial and operating cause?
53
What can break the chain of causation?
Intervening acts
54
What is a novus actus interveniens?
An intervening act that can break the chain of causation
55
How many ways can causation be broken?
Three ways
56
List the three ways causation can be broken.
* An act of a third party * The victims own act * A natural and unpredictable event
57
What must the intervening act be to break the chain of causation?
Sufficiently independent of the D's conduct and sufficiently serious
58
What is an example of an intervening act in medical negligence?
Medical treatment is very unlikely to break the chain of causation
59
What is the significance of R v Cheshire in legal causation?
Must be sufficiently independent
60
What does R v Smith signify regarding intervening acts?
Overwhelmingly bad
61
What does R v Jordan illustrate about intervening acts?
Palpably wrong
62
In what situation will D be liable if the victim's own act leads to injury?
Unless can prove to court that the V's response was 'daft'
63
64
What is the Daftness test in criminal law?
If the D caused V to act in a reasonably foreseeable way then any injury to the V will be considered to be caused by the D ## Footnote This principle is used to determine the chain of causation in criminal cases.
65
In R v Roberts, what was the outcome regarding the chain of causation?
V's acts were reasonably foreseeable so the chain of causation was not broken ## Footnote This case established that if the victim's response to the defendant's actions is foreseeable, the defendant is liable.
66
In R v Williams and Davis, what broke the chain of causation?
V's acts were not in proportion to the threat so broke the chain of causation ## Footnote This case illustrates that if the victim's response is disproportionate, it may not be considered a foreseeable reaction.
67
What does the 'Thin Skull' Rule state?
A D can never claim that a V's 'unusual' beliefs or condition can amount to a novus actus interveniens ## Footnote This means that the defendant must take their victim as they found them, regardless of any pre-existing conditions.