Arguemts For God From OBSERVATION Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

What can the world tell us about God’s existence?

A

There is an analogy of the painting and how it enables us to draw inferences about the painter just as the world around us enables us to draw inferences about God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What do the supporters of their design argument point to?

A
  • The order in the world (everything works properly)
  • The beauty of nature
  • Everything seems to have an ultimate purpose
  • Complexity in the world
    It is extremely unlikely that all this would occur by chance, therefore this is strong evidence for existence of God
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between a posteroiori and a prior argument?

A

Posteriori: can show the existence of gods is probable and uses inductive reasoning (inductive reasoning)
Priority: claims to provide conclusive proof of God‘s existence (deductive reasoning)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was Aquians’ influence?

A

Aquinas believed that the only way humans can know God (in a limited way) is through the world he created
He also develops aristotles four causes theory and in particular the final cause which is the purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the two ways Aquinas thought that God’s existence can be demonstrated?

A

Natural theology
Revelation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the five ways for Aquinas?

A

In Summa Theologica, Aquinas wrote five succinct arguments that demonstrate the existence of God through observation of the world.
These are called the five ways.
The ‘fifth way’ is his teleological argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What was Aquinas’s fifth way?

A

We can see that things which lack intelligence such as natural bodies act for an end. Whatever lacks intelligence cannot move forward towards an end unless it is directed by some being with knowledge and intelligence. Therefore, some intelligent being exist by whom all natural things are directed to their end and this is God

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What analogy does Aquinas give for his fifth way?

A

Like a bow and arrow and how the arrow is shot to its mark by the archer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are some examples of non-thinking living beings?

A

A bee pollinating a plant and making honey.
The heart constantly pumping blood around the body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are examples of design and purpose?

A

The eye
Lungs
Wings
A giraffe neck

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Who was Paley?

A

He was a rationalist who lived at a time when scientists were making exciting new discoveries and great advances in mechanical engineering (due to the Industrial Revolution).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What story does Paley say to explain his idea?

A

Paley imagines himself walking across a heath and coming across a stone lying on the ground, which he strikes with his foot. It is natural and unsurprising that the stone is there.
However, if he came upon a watch on the ground, this would demand further explanation as it is not natural but complex
The watch has several intricate, moving, independent parts; it is framed, has beautifully made cogs, levers, springs etc., all of which work together for a purpose– to tell the time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Paleys analogy?

A

He is saying that the universe is like a watch.
Which has complex features and parts and each part has a function and these who work together to perform a purpose.
This shows that the universe has been designed by designer and its purpose is to sustain life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are Paley’s premises of his argument?

A

P1. If one found a watch on a beach, observation of it would suggest purpose and design in its manufacture.
P2. Objects in nature can be observed which suggest purpose and design.
P3. Anything that can be observed to be designed must have a designer.
C. Nature demonstrates the existence of a designer which we call God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are some examples of purpose in nature?

A

Complexity of the human eye
The wings of a bird and the fins of a fish

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What does Paley say about regularity and order?

A

Paley also argued that the regularity, order, pattern and predictability that we observe in the natural world are further indications of God’s design. For example:
• The rotation of the planets
• The regularity and predictability of gravity
• The seasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are criticisms of Paley’s argument?

A
  • we may be ignorant of how watches are made
  • Watches sometimes go wrong
  • Some parts of a watch me appear to have no purpose
  • The watch cannot have come together by chance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who is Hume?

A

He was an influential philosopher and was known for his empiricism and scepticism and made criticisms of teleological arguments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is Humes first criticism?

A

Analogy doesn’t Work:
They Work by arguing that because X is like Y in one respect, they must be like in another respect.
Aquinas is fifth way and Paley teleological argument are both arguments from analogy
He is saying that analogies can lead to mistaken conclusions

20
Q

What is Hume’s second criticism?

A

God is inferred not proven

21
Q

What is Hume’s third criticism?

A

God is assumed

22
Q

What did Charles Darwin come up with?

A

He made a scientific development and he made the theory of natural selection

23
Q

What is natural selection?

A

Natural selection is the process by which living entities (animals, plants, bacteria) which are better adapted to their environment tend to survive, and produce more offspring.

24
Q

What are the four main principles of natural selection?

A
  1. Replication: Organisms reproduce themselves, passing their characteristics onto their offspring.
  2. Random mutation (change): Every generation brings new characteristics, some better for survival, some worse.
  3. Harsh conditions: In the fight for survival, those with a slight advantage will be more likely to reproduce, causing small changes in the species
  4. Aeons of time: Small changes in the species add up from generations to generation, resulting in new species
25
What are examples of natural selection?
The net of a giraffe getting longer to reach leaves on higher branches. Polar bears have the thickest for any bear species in order to adapt the Arctic environment
26
What are some issues for the design theory?
Natural selection points to a world where survival is a matter of random, lucky chance. Countless species (dinosaurs, mammoths, the dodo etc.) have not survived because they could not adapt, or could not adapt quickly enough, to a changing environment.
27
How do theists react to natural selection?
Most people fully accept the theory of evolution– they combine it with theism, claiming that God is responsible for evolution (theistic evolution).
28
What did Tennant argue with natural selection
Tennant argued that Beauty is not necessary for survival so cannot be ‘explained away’ by natural selection The human ability to appreciate beauty, to enjoy art, music and literature is evidence of a divine creator.
29
Why is random chance seen as wrong?
If order and design in the world is simply random chance, we have to make other assumptions - for example, that gene mutation caused something as complex as an eye to develop from basic light-sensitive cells
30
What is the anthropic teleological argument?
That the universe is so exactly right for human life that it must have been designed.
31
Who made the anthropic principle?
Tennant
32
What are examples of the anthropic principle?
- The Big Bang (strength was perfect and couldn’t vary by one part in 10/60) - Gravity (without it there would be no expansion of the universe) - Precise distance from the sun (just enough light and heat for life to occur) - The moon (prevents Earth from wobbling as it spins)
33
What was Tennants conclusion?
If these things were only slightly altered, no form of complexity or life could exist in the universe The chance of this chain of events occurring by pure chance is so low that we are forced to conclude that is not a set of amazing coincidences but that is designed by God to be that way
34
What are the premises of the anthropic argument?
1. For human life to come into existence, very specific, unconnected, physical conditions need to be in place 2. All these features are found in place in this universe 3. Either these special features have occurred by chance (the Epicurean hypothesis) or by Intelligent Design (the ‘God hypothesis’.) 4. The probability of all these features occurring by chance/coincidence is minute 5. Most likely explanation is an Intelligent Designer (God) intended to create a universe that would produce human life. 6. Therefore, God exists.
35
How does the anthropic principle answer challenge of evolution?
It means natural selection and the Big Bang are part of God’s plan – they strengthen the case for God.
36
What are challenges to the anthropic principle?
Assuming that the entire universe exist for the sick of human beings is very unlikely as there are 100 billion+ of galaxies in the universe Most of the universe is bleak, cold and barren and what is this purpose? There’s so many different possibilities in the universe, it is likely that conditions for a hospitable planet will happen
37
What is Tennants aesthetic argument?
Tennant also argued that the human ability to appreciate and enjoy beauty, art, music and literature is evidence of a divine creator. Beauty is not necessary for survival nor for the development of life so cannot be ‘explained away’ by Darwinist ideas/science.
38
What is Aquinas’s cosmological argument?
Of Aquinas five ways the first three are his cosmological argument. He began his argument by looking at the world around him and he reasoned that: - Nothing comes from nothing - The universe exist so something must have made it - That can only be God
39
What is Aquinas first way?
The argument of motion: Whatever is motion must be put in motion by another. However, this first mover cannot be put in motion by something else as then this would cause it to go back onto infinity. Therefore, it is necessary to arrive at first mover, put in motion by no other and this has to be God (unmoved mover)
40
What is Aquinas’s second way?
This is the argument from cause: He argues that everything within the universe is a result of succession of causes and effects. Cause must be caused and nothing can be as own cause. There cannot be an infinite regression of causes because then there will be no first cause therefore there must be a first course. This is the uncaused causer which is God
41
What is Aquinas’s third way?
The argument from contingency: Universe is contingent (dependent of upon something else for existence exist) If things sometimes do not exist then it is possible that there was a time when nothing existed. Yet there is something now which cannot come from nothing so there must be a different type of being which is a necessary being which has brought things and beings into existence This is God
42
What is Aquinas’s conclusion from his second argument?
An explanation for the universe existing cannot be found within the universe. And nothing comes from nothing so therefore the universe must exist because of God
43
What are Humes criticisms of Aquinas second cosmological argument?
- He argues that numbers can go back to infinity so it is possible that the cause and affect chain is also infinite. - He said it is unreasonable to extend the idea of cause to something outside or experience: since we have not experienced the initial motion of course we cannot assume that there was an initial motion or cause not everything has a cause or explanation - The term necessary being has no meaning. Being that cannot not exist is impossible, because something that exist, by definition, could not exist.
44
What did Leibniz say?
He made the principle of sufficient reason and as rational creatures we are entitled to seek a rational sufficient explanation for why everything in universe is the way it is. By sufficient explanation he means complete explanation rather than incomplete. Leibniz argues that the universe can’t just be "there" with no reason. There must be something outside of it (a necessary being) that explains why anything exists at all—this, he says, is God.
45
What is complete and incomplete explanation for Leibniz?
For example, if someone died and the doctor explained that this happened because of his heart stopped beating this would be an incomplete explanation. The doctor gave the immediate cause but we want a sufficient explanation in order to know why his heart stopped beating.
46
What are Leibniz premises for his argument?
- P1 All contingent facts/things in the world must have an explanation (PSR) - P2 The fact that the world exists must have an explanation - P3 The existence of the world can’t be explained by other [contingent] things in the universe. - C1 The existence of contingent things/beings must be explained by something which is not contingent – something Necessary - C2 This Necessary Being is called God.
47
What is Leibniz conclusion?
No other explanation other than God could ever be sufficient I was almost all scientific explanations are almost incomplete and not sufficient