Arguments Regarding Existence, Based On Observation ( Cosmological/Teleological ) Flashcards

(5 cards)

1
Q

To what extent is the cosmological argument, a sufficient explanation for the existence of God?

A
  1. Problems with motion and causation
  2. Illogical rejection of infinite regress
  3. Logical leap to a necessary being/the God of classical theism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Critically assess Aquinas’ Fifth Way.

A
  1. PURPOSE/ANALOGY OF THE ARROW & THE ARCHER
  2. NATURE OF GOD (LEAP TO THE GOD OF CT)
  3. CHALLENGE OF CHANCE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

‘Paley’s teleological argument successfully defends the existence of God.’

A
  1. PURPOSE/ANALOGY OF THE WATCHMAKER
  2. NATURE OF GOD (LEAP TO THE GOD OF CT)
  3. CHALLENGE OF CHANCE
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

‘The world was created by chance, not by God’s design.’ Discuss.

A
  1. World created by Gods design
  2. Paley is unconvincing/god of classical theism
  3. World created by chance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

To what extent does Hume successfully argue that observation does not prove the existence of God?

A
  1. Cosmological/first cause
  2. Humes criticism of teleological
  3. Logical leap to the god of classical theism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly