Armed Conflicts Flashcards

(45 cards)

1
Q

Hague conferences

A

1899 - 1907

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

1899-1907

A

Hague conferences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Geneva conventions (4 conventions : 3 revisions + 1 new)

A

1949

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

1949

A

Geneva conventions (4 conventions : 3 revisions + 1 new)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Additional protocols I and II of Geneva Conventions

A

1977

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

1977

A

Additional protocols I and II of Geneva Conventions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rome statute of the international criminal court

A

1998

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

1998

A

Rome statute of the international criminal court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

ICRC customary law rules (160 rules)

A

2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

2005

A

ICRC customary law rules (160 rules)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Prohibition of the use of force in international relations

A

Art 2 §4 - UN Charter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Art 2 §4 - UN Charter

A

Prohibition of the use of force in international relations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

3 exceptions to the prohibition of the use of force in IR (=RI)

A
  • self-defense : art 51 - UN Charter
  • peacekeeping operations : chapter VII - UN Charter
  • consent by the government of the state concerned
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Self-defense

A

Art 51 - UN Charter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Art 51 - UN Charter

A

Self-defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Peacekeeping operations

A

Chapter VII (art 42) - UN Charter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Chapter VII (art 42) - UN Charter

A

Peacekeeping operations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Applicability of jus ad bellum and jus in bello

A

The two sets of rules apply in PARALLEL but INDEPENDENTLY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

No influence of jus ad bellum on jus in bello - principle / source

A

The equality of belligerants principle - Preamble of AP I

20
Q

If violation of jus in bello ?

A

Cannot justify a resort to force in violation of jus ad bellum - Preamble of AP I

21
Q

Human rights in armed conflicts ?

A

Human rights continues to apply to a situation of armed conflicts -> EXTRATERRITORIAL APPLICATION (within its territory ans subject to its jurisdiction)
- Art 2 §1 - pacte international relatif aux droits civils et politiques
- Art 1 - european convention of HR

22
Q

Interpretation of HR in order to be lawful under IHL

A

Unlawful under IHL will be unlawful under HR

23
Q

Relations of IHL / international criminal law

A

Violations of IHL can be war crimes
International criminal law condamns war crimes + genocide, crimes against huulanity, crime of agression

24
Q

Constituents elements of crimes (ICC)

A
  • An objective element (actus reus) : criminal conduct in a crime definition
  • A subjective element (mens rea) : intention + knowledge
25
Proof of genocidal intent (mens rea)
Repeated acts of violation of IHL
26
Examples of accusation of genocide
- 2019 : Israël (by South africa) - 2023 : Myanmar (by Gambia) Both cases, they refute the genocide saying it’s not an ethnical reason
27
Sets of rules appling during an armed conflict
- General international law (UN Charter) : jus ad/contra bellum - LOAC / IHL : jus in bello - Human Rights Law - National law
28
Why distinction between IAC and NIAC is important ?
- NIAC : IHL didn’t apply until 1949 - but tendency : same rules for both - Differences : NIAC : no combatant statute, no right to kill and destroy, no protection against prosecution, no detention right, no occupation -> state agree not to grant rebels this rights but equilibre des forces entre eux
29
Art 2 GC
Application of GC to IAC : - state vs state or more - state vs international organization (Peu importe si l’etat de guerre n’est oas reconnu par l’un d’eux) -> no level of intensity is required
30
Application of GC to IAC : - state vs state or more - state vs international organization (Peu importe si l’etat de guerre n’est oas reconnu par l’un d’eux) … -> no level of intensity is required art ?
Art 2 GC
31
State vs National liberation movement = IAC (only if ??? Is ratified)
Art 1 §4 AP I
32
Art 1 §4 AP I
State vs National liberation movement = IAC (only if ??? Is ratified)
33
Kill legaly
Only in IAC
34
When armed conflict start ?
First shot fired
35
Quelles règles pour NIAC ? Art ?
Art 3 CG IV : minimum of precaution (following provisions)
36
Elements d’identification du NIAC (depend of interests)
- identifiable parties to the conflict / organization of parties - intensity of hostilities Pour cour, si compliqué : principlenof effectivity : regarde les faits
37
Art 3 CG IV : minimum of precaution (following provisions)
NIAC
38
Internal disturbances (peacetime)
Art 1§2 AP II : Intensité / organisation pas assez forte pour faire un NIAC
39
Art 1§2 AP II : Intensité / organisation pas assez forte pour faire un NIAC
Internal disturbances (peacetime)
40
Conflit state vs rebels
Art 1 §1 AP II : application du AP II (pas pour rebel c/ rebel)
41
Art 1 §1 AP II : application du AP II (pas pour rebel c/ rebel)
Conflist state c/ rebels
42
Intervention in support of the gouv State-state c/ rebels
NIAC stays a NIAC
43
NIAC stays a NIAC
Intervention in support of the gouv State-state c/ rebels
44
Intervention in support of the rebels
NIAC may become NIAC if : - direct intervention : pas 2 conflits, IAC absorbe le NIAC - indirect intervention : NIAC -> IAC if logistical support (no suficient alone) + overall control (from Tadic, Appeals Judgment 1999) -> threshold (=seuil)
45
NIAC may become NIAC if : - direct intervention : pas 2 conflits, IAC absorbe le NIAC - indirect intervention : NIAC -> IAC if logistical support (no suficient alone) + overall control (from Tadic, Appeals Judgment 1999) -> threshold (=seuil)
Intervention in support of the rebels