Arson Flashcards

1
Q

Arson
Sec 267(1)(a)
Crimes Act 1961

A

Intentionally or recklessly

Damages by fire or
means of explosive

Any property

If he knows or
Ought to know that danger to life is
likely to ensue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Intent

A

Deliberate act or ommission

Intent to produce a specific result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

R v Collister

A

Circumstantial evidence from which an offenders intent may be inferred can include:

  1. Offenders actions/words before/during/after
  2. Surrounding circumstances
  3. The nature of the act itself
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

R v Harney

A

Recklessness means the conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustifiable risk.

In NZ it involves proof that the consequences complained of could well happen, together with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardsless of risk

Held:
While it is necessary to prove that the defendnat foresaw the risk of injury to others, it is not necessary that he recognised the extent of the injury that would result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Recklessness

A

It must be proved not only that;

the defendant was aware of the risk and proceeded regardless

But also

It was unreasonable for him to do so

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Archer

A

“Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or impairment”

Set fire to toilet paper in bathroom and blackened tp of sink

It was held that any change in an object that impairs its value or usefullness may constitute damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Property

A

In practice property will generally be physical tangible items

Includes real and personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property (money,electricity) and any debt, and anything in action, and any other right or interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Knows or ought to know

A

Knowing or correctly believing

The defendant may believe something wrongly, but cannot know something that is false.

Subjective- did he know human life was likely to be endangered by his actions?

Objective- would a reasonable person have recognised the risk?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Danger to life

A

Human life and the danger must be to the life of someone other than the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Initial Action

VAWSEIPO

A
Victim
Appreciation- Risks / Safety
Witnesses- locate & contain
Scene- Freeze,control,guard,preserve
Evidence- identify, note and preserve
Ingredients- what offence has been committed
Powers- available to you
Offenders - Identify /apprehend
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Initial Action 1st CIB member

A
  1. Gain information
  2. Ensure initial actions are attended to
  3. Conduct a reconnaissance
  4. Carry out an appreciation and take any immediate action
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Witness Statements

ADVOKATES

A
Amount of time under observation
Distance - witness & suspect
Visibility at the time
Obstructions - to the view of witness
Known or seen before?
Any reason to remember / distinguishable
Time lapse since (time delay)
Error - material / descrepencies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Peace Model

A

Preparation / Planning

Engage and explain

Account / probe / challenge

Closure

Evaluate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Free Recall

A
Explain / Engage
Free recall
Sketch plan
Summary
Witness topics
RIIT’s
Summary
Record statement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

10 prinicples of investigative interviewing

A
  1. At the heart of investigation
  2. Aim to discover the truth
  3. Info must be complete, accurate, reliable
  4. Keep an open mind
  5. Act fairly
  6. Questions can be persistent
  7. Special consideration
  8. Suspects must be interviewed in accordance with the law
  9. Care to intentify suspect special consideration
  10. Be sensitive to cultural / religious background
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Examples of special consideration interviewees

A
Children
Elderly
Intoxicated
Traumatised
Intellectual/mental disability
Family violence / sex victims
English 2nd language
17
Q

Identifying suspects

A
Area canvas
Fingerprints
DNA
Witness evidence
CHIS
External agencies
Response to media publicity
Police notings / intel
18
Q

Role of montitor

A

Ensure video recording equipment is set up and functioning

Operate the equipment where required during the interview

Be present in the monitor’s room throughout the interview

Take accurate and legible interview notes

Provide support to the interviewer

Record the time at significant points throughout the interview