Arson Flashcards

1
Q

S267(1)(a) - ingredients

A

1) intentionally OR recklessly
2) Damages by fire OR damages by means of explosive
3) Any property
4) if he/she knows or ought to know that danger to life likely to ensue.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

s267(1)(b) - ingredients

A

1) Intentionally OR recklessly. AND
2) without claim of right
3) Damages by fire OR damages by means of explosive
4) Any immovable property or any vehicle, ship or aircaft in which that person has no interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

s267(1)(c) - ingredients

A

1) Intentionally OR recklessly AND
2) Damages by fire OR damages by means of explosive
3) Any immovable property OR vehicle OR ship OR aircraft
4) With intent to obtain any benefit OR Cause loos to any person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

s267(2)(a) - ingredients

A

1) Intentionally OR recklessly AND
2) Without claim of right
3) Damages by fire or Damages by means of explosive
4) Any property (other than listed in S267(1) in which that person has no interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

s267(2)(b) - ingredients

A

1) Intentionally OR recklessly
2) Damages by fire OR damages by means of explosive
3) Any property (other than listed in S267(1)
4) with intent to obtain any benefit OR cause loss to any person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Definition of intent

A

Two types of inent

1) Intention to commit the act
2) Intention to get a specific result.

Proven by offender admission and circumstantial evidence including

  • Offender’s action and words before, during, after the event
  • Surrounding circumstance
  • Nature of the act itself.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Reckless - Case Law

A

R v HARNEY
Consciously and deliberately taking an unjustified risk. In NZ it requires proof that the consequence complained of could well happen TOGETHER with an intention to continue the course of conduct regardless of risk

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Proving recklessness

A

1) The defendant consciously and deliberately ran a risk (Subjective test)
2) The risk was one that was unreasonable - based on whether a reasonable person would have taken the same risk in the circumstances (Objective test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Damages by fire

A

Fire damage will often involve burning or charring but is not entirely necessary that property is set alight; melting, blistering of paint or significant smoke damage my be sufficient

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Damages by fire - Case Law

A

R v ARCHER
Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or permanent or temporary impairment of its use or value

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Property

A

Includes real or personal property, and any estate or interest in any real or personal property, [money, electricity], and any debt, and any thing in action, and any other right or interest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Knowing or ought to know

A

Knowing or correctly believing a danger to life is likely to ensue is the aggravating factor that heightens the seriousness of offending

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Danger to life

A

Danger must be to any person other than defendant. Subjective and objectives tests are used to prove a defendant’s degree of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Claim of right - definition

A

In relation to any act, means a belief at the time of the act in a proprietary or possessory right to the property in relation to the alleged offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Immovable property

A

Fixed in place and unable to be moved. Relates to building and land and things growing on land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Benefit - s267(4) definition

A

Any benefit, pecuniary advantage, privilege, property, service or valuable consideration

17
Q

Person (Arson)

A

Includes real people, companies and other organisations

18
Q

Aggravating factors

A

267(1)(a) - knowingly putting a person(s) life in danger
267(1)(b) and (c) - damaging property generally of hight value
267(2) - deals with damage to property that is generally of lesser value and there is no risk to life

19
Q

Obtain

A

Obtain or retain for himself or herself or any other person

20
Q

s267(3) - ingredients

A

1) Intentionally
2) Damages by fire OR by means of explosive
3) Any property
4) With reckless disregards for the safety of any other property

21
Q

Reckless disregard

A

The offender intended to damage some property, recognising that there was a risk of damaging OTHER property as a consequence, but proceeded regardless of that risk