Artic Final Fall 2024 Flashcards
(29 cards)
draw the vowel quadrilateral
Spanish vowels
ɑ, ɛ, i, o, u
Spanish consonants
stops: p, t, k, b, d, g
fricatives: f, x, s
affricate: tʃ
glides: w, j
lateral: l
nasals: m, n, ŋ
flap: ɾ
trill: r
phonological features of AAE (name 3 examples + their processes)
word final cluster reduction (tɛst-tɛs)
r-deletion except word-initial; derhotacization of schwar (gɑrd-gɑd)
deletion of nasal consonant (mun-mu)
/l/ deletion in word final NEXT TO CONSONANT (hɛlp-hɛp)
stopping of interdentals (ðə-də)
change voiceless and voiced interdentals to /f/ and /v/ (ruθ-ruf)
before syllabic nasals /v/ as /b/ (sɛvən-sɛbən)
word final /θ/ becomes /f/ (sauθ-sauf)
neutralization of /ɪ/ and /ɛ/ before nasals; distinction between two phonemes is eliminated (pin & pen, bin & ben, tin & ten)
How are the following CV’s produced:
ti
so
fay
the
do
what are the components of a speech sound evaluation?
gather medical and educational background information on the client, what languages and/or dialects do they speak, previous therapy(s), test phonology, dynamic assessment, discuss with the parents/caregivers about their observations, determine tx/prognosis
what are NYS’s criteria for eligibility for service?
33% delay in speech-language or 25% in two areas
advantages and disadvantages of standardized tests
advantage: covers all the sounds that need to be tested, results can be compared to typically developing peers
disadvantage: standardized population may not be representative of the population I am working with (e.g. bilingual or dialectal)
how to calculate % delay without tech
child’s “test” age/developmental age; convert to percent; subtract percent from 100 to get child’s % delay in phonology
e.g. 4/5 -> 80% -> 100-80= 20% delay
name 5 ways to assess speech without standardized tests
informal language/speech sample, use tests in a nonstandard way, criterion-referenced measures, single word test in nonstandard way (consonant accuracy), examine error patterns/analysis, gather phonetic inventory
implications for testing perception
informal pair testing: if they can’t perceive the difference then they can’t produce it. aka need to work on perception BEFORE articulation.
SMART goals
e.g. velar fronting
given a verbal prompt, the client will perceptually discriminate /k/ and /g/ in the initial position at the word level to target velar fronting with minimal cues and 80% accuracy across 3 sessions.
given a verbal prompt, the client will produce /t/ and /d/ in the initial position at the word level to target devoicing with moderate cues and 80% accuracy across 3 sessions.
what information should a rationale include?
evidence-based/peer-reviewed sources supporting the logical justifications for goals or treatment.
what should a clinician determine before deciding on treatment methodology?
what are the targets, what kind of environment to treat in, trajectory, etc.
approaches to intervention for speech sound disorders (4)
traditional approach, minimal pair approach, cycles approach, metaphon
what is good about the traditional approach?
targets both speech perception and production, emphasis on practice with motor production, speech sounds should be treated individually
what is good about the cycles approach?
works on process for several weeks, targeting a different speech sound in each session, recycling occurs.
what is good about the minimal pairs approach?
linguistic-based approach, conceptual approach (child learns that two sounds signal different meanings and to avoid confusion they must be differentiated)
what is good about metaphon?
attempts to increase awareness that contrasts between speech sounds for reading, good back up for minimal pair therapy
age of acquisition: 2-3 y/o speech sounds
p, b, d, m, n, h, w
age of acquisition: 3-4 y/o speech sounds
t, k, g, ng, f, y
age of acquisition: 4-5 y/o speech sounds
v, s, z, sh, ch, j, l
age of acquisition: 5-6 y/o speech sounds
voiced th, zh, r
age of acquisition: 6-7 y/o speech sounds
voiceless th