Article 34-36 Flashcards

1
Q

Article 34 TFEU

A

Prohibits quantitative restrictions and Measures which have an equivalent effect (MEQRs).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Quantitative Restriction

A

‘Measures which amount to a total or partial restraint of (according to the circumstances) imports, exports or goods in transit’.
Geddo

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

MEQR

A

‘All trading rules enacted by member states which are capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially, intra-community trade are to be considered MEQRs’.
Dassonville

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Measures

A

Includes laws and regulations enacted by member states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Directive 70/50

A

Provides a list of MEQRs and categorises them as distinct or indistinct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Distinctly applicable measure

A

National rules which only apply to imports.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Indistinctly applicable measure

A

National rules which apply to both imports and domestically-produced goods but have the potential to hinder or frustrate the free movement of goods.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Cassis de Dijon

A

EU introduced two principles here to make it easier to identify indistinctly applicable measures:

(i) The rule of reason
(ii) The rule of mutual recognition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rule of reason

A

Can the restriction satisfy the non-exhaustive list of mandatory requirements:

(i) Public health (Rewe-Zentral)
(ii) Protecting culture (Cenetheque)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mutual recognition

A

If the goods have been lawfully introduced in one member state, then there should be no reason as to why they should not be introduced into the one in question.

Criminal Proceedings Against Prantl

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did Keck do?

A

Revisited MEQRs, by introducing the concept of product requirements and selling arrangements.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Product Requirements

A

Relate to the composition, packaging, presentation or generic designation of products.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Selling Arrangement

A

Measures imposed by member states relating to the way the products are sold or marketed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Examples of a selling arrangement

A

Prohibiting pharmacies from advertising their products outside of their premises.
R v Hunermund

Prohibiting TV ads for certain products
Leclerc-Siplec

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Examples of a product requirement

A

A requirement to individually package chewing gum dispensed by a vending machine.

Schwarz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Derogations of Art 36

A

Public Morality
Public Policy
Public Security
Protection of Life/Health of humans, animals or plants
Protection of national treasures
Protection of industrial and commercial property

17
Q

Protecting Public Morality (Derogation)

A

R v Henn and Darby (prohibition on porn was justified)

18
Q

Protecting Public Policy (Derogation)

A

R v Thompson (Restricted exportation of collector’s coinage)

19
Q

Protecting IP (Derogation)

A

Terrapin

20
Q

Criminal Proceedings Against Prantl

A

Import of Italian wine into Germany was normally restricted. It was eventually allowed because it was legally marketed in Italy

21
Q

Plan for an Art 34 Prollam Q

A
  • Identify what Article 34-36 does
  • QR or MEQR
  • (if MEQR) then ask if Distinct or Indistinct
  • (if distinct) May be justified derogations listed in Art 36
  • (if indistinct) May be justified under Cassis
  • If it doesn’t pass Rule of Reason use Keck
  • Product Requirement or Selling Arrangement?
  • Product Requirements Breach Art 34
22
Q

Why do product requirements breach Art 34?

A

“Any alteration regarding the product itself imposes a double burden on the imported goods, and therefore constitutes an obstacle to the FMOG”.

23
Q

Why do selling arrangements not breach Art 34?

A

They do not impose a double burden and therefore do not stand in the way of FMOG.

24
Q

Protecting Public health

A

Inspection requirement on imported apples was justified because of the risk to health from something not present in domestic apples.

Rewe-Zentral