Article 8 Flashcards

1
Q

What is article 8?

A

The right to respect for family and private life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does article 8(1) state?

A

Everyone has the right to respect for his private life, his home and his correspondence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does article 8(2) state?

A

There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is article 8 a qualified right?

A

This right needs to strike a balance between the rights of the individual and the rights of the community. This means the state can limit these rights in accordance with the law and if it is to meet a legitimate aim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by proportionality?

A

Is the states interference proportionate in that it has struck fair balance between the rights of the community and the rights of the individual

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is meant by ‘margin of appreciation’?

A

This is the amount of discretion that the ECtHR gives the state in their interpretation of the convention. It realises that what is tolerated in one state may not be in another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the ‘living instrument principle’?

A

Article 8 is a negative right, however, it gives the state positive obligations to protect a persons right and takes steps to keep the law under review.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a negative right?

A

the state should respect and not interfere

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the case used for the ‘Living Instrument Principle’?

A

Sheffield & Horsham v UK: UK law did not recognise or allow a person who had undergone gender reassignment to change their birth certificate. There was no violation of article 8, however the UK were heavily criticised and the ECtHR thought the UK had a positive obligation to update the law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What four rights doe article 8(1) cover?

A
  1. Family life
  2. Private life
  3. Home
  4. Correspondence
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What does in accordance with law mean?

A

Any interference with this right must be based on a law that is clear and predictable, Copland v UK 2007

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is considered a legitimate aim?

A

-National security
-Public safety
-Economic well-being of the country
-Prevention of disorder or crime
-Protection of health or morals
-Protection of the rights and freedoms of others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What has the ECtHR defined ‘family life’ as

A

Children, grandchildren, adoptive and foster relationships, relationships after divorce, other relations with close family ties, married couples and co-habiting unmarried couples, same sex couples

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the case of Johansen v Norway 1996

A

A baby was taken into care by the state who then decided to put the child up for adoption. Parental contact was allowed whilst the baby was in care, but this would stop when the baby was adopted. ECtHR decided there was a violation of Article 8 as terminating any chance of the baby and parents being reunited should only b done in exceptional circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How does the ECtHR protect children?

A

The state is obliged to facilitate contact between parents and a child when it is in the interest of the child. The rights of the child will always be paramount.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the ECtHR view on removal from the state for family life?

A

As long as they can continue their family life in their original country, they will be removed, Agyarko & Ikuga v Secretary of State for the Home Department. Only in exceptional circumstances would they be allowed to stay

17
Q

What is the case of Nasri v France 1996?

A

A convicted rapist who was deaf, unable to speak and illiterate was allowed o stay in France as that is where his family lived.

18
Q

How does Botta v Italy (1998) define private life?

A

‘a persons physical and psychological integrity for which respect is due to ensure the development, without outside interference, of the personality of each individual in his relations with other human beings’

19
Q

Is the right to a private life the same as privacy?

A

No.

20
Q

What does a persons physical and psychological integrity include?

A

Sex life and gender, reputation, name, photographic images and personal data.

21
Q

Gillan & Quinton v UK (2010)

A

The police have extended powers under s.44 Terrorism Act 2000 to stop and search any person without reasonable suspicion. This power was used to stop and search people on their way to protest at an arms fair. Despite the wide margin of appreciation in issues of national security, the ECtHR believed this was a disproportionate use of the power

22
Q

Halford v UK (1997)

A

The police were listening to the telephone conversation of the Assistant Chief Constable whilst she was at work. There was no legal basis allowing the monitoring of the police telecommunication system, therefore this was a breach of article 8

23
Q

Rules on medical data

A

Medical data is considered confidential for both adults and children who are considered Gillick competent

24
Q

Axon v Secretary of State for Health (2006)

A

The claimant wanted the court to make a declaration that doctors could not keep medical records of children under 16 confidential from the parent. The courts refused and said the medical treatment of children is confidential if the child is gillick competent

25
Q

S and Marper v UK (2009)

A

The applicants had their dna taken at the police station when they were arrested on suspicion of committing a crime. They were found not guilty, but their dna was still retained on the national police database. There was a procedure for getting the dna removed from the database, but this was at the discretion of the police. The ECtHR considered this to be disproportionate as it did not balance the rights of the individual against the needs of the community.

26
Q

What is the UK law on data protection?

A

There is no specific privacy law in the UK. Confidential documents are covered by the tort of breach of confidence and the Data Protection Act 1998 controls the use of personal data by businesses and the state

27
Q

When can press intrusion be justified?

A

If it is in the interests of justice according to article 10. The courts try to balance the freedom of the press with the right to privacy. Neither article 8 or 10 have priority over the other. Decisions to grant injunctions to respect a persons right to a private life will be decided on the facts of each individual case.

28
Q

Campbell v MGN Ltd (2004)

A

Naomi Campbell claimed that the newspapers should not have printed a photograph of her attending a narcotics anonymous meeting including details of the treatment she was having for drug addiction. The HOL agreed that this information was private.

29
Q

Murray v Express Newspaper PLC (2008)

A

JK Rowling’s infant son was photographed in the street and the picture was published in a national magazine. It was held that the claimant’s right to privacy outweighed the magazines right to publish. The children of people who were not famous should expect not to be photographed without their knowledge or consent.

30
Q

What is the Protection from Harassment Act 1997?

A

It is a criminal offence to pursue a course of conduct amounting to harassment. It’s also a crime when the conduct puts the victim in fear of violence. It includes racial and religious harassment, certain forms of protest and some anti-social behaviour.

31
Q

What is the Malicious Communications Act 1998?

A

This act covers the sending of letters, electronic communications or articles of any description which convey a grossly offensive message, or threat, or information which is false (and the sender knows it is false). This could be a form of cyber-bullying as the senders intention is to cause distress or anxiety

32
Q

Examples of family and private life

A

-Wood v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis (2009) : violation of article 8
-R v Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police & ors (2014) : disproportionate under article 8

33
Q

What does ‘home’ include?

A

Where you permanently live or where you live sometimes. The law treats owners and occupiers of property equally (Khatun v UK 1998)

34
Q

Connors v UK (2004)

A

The ECtHR accepted that land where caravans were parked lawfully was the person’s home whereas caravans parked on a playing field were not (Price v Leeds City Council 2005)

35
Q

Niemietz v Germany 1993

A

Police searched the offices of a lawyer. The ECtHR said that ‘home’ could include the workplace. The search was also a violation of the lawyers ‘private life’.

36
Q

What does correspondence include?

A

Telephone conversations, text messages, emails, fax, letters etc. it the state wants to interfere with any of these things, they require justification under article 8 (2). This also extends to interference with correspondence of people held in custody

37
Q

What is the Investigatory Powers Act 2016?

A

Allows the security services a range of powers including hacking and other forms of surveillance to protect public safety.