Article 8 Flashcards
(37 cards)
What is article 8?
The right to respect for family and private life
What does article 8(1) state?
Everyone has the right to respect for his private life, his home and his correspondence
What does article 8(2) state?
There shall be no interference by a public authority with the exercise of this right except such as in accordance with the law and is necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security, public safety or economic well-being of the country, for the prevention of disorder or crime, for the protection of health or morals or for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.
How is article 8 a qualified right?
This right needs to strike a balance between the rights of the individual and the rights of the community. This means the state can limit these rights in accordance with the law and if it is to meet a legitimate aim.
What is meant by proportionality?
Is the states interference proportionate in that it has struck fair balance between the rights of the community and the rights of the individual
What is meant by ‘margin of appreciation’?
This is the amount of discretion that the ECtHR gives the state in their interpretation of the convention. It realises that what is tolerated in one state may not be in another.
What is the ‘living instrument principle’?
Article 8 is a negative right, however, it gives the state positive obligations to protect a persons right and takes steps to keep the law under review.
What is a negative right?
the state should respect and not interfere
What is the case used for the ‘Living Instrument Principle’?
Sheffield & Horsham v UK: UK law did not recognise or allow a person who had undergone gender reassignment to change their birth certificate. There was no violation of article 8, however the UK were heavily criticised and the ECtHR thought the UK had a positive obligation to update the law.
What four rights doe article 8(1) cover?
- Family life
- Private life
- Home
- Correspondence
What does in accordance with law mean?
Any interference with this right must be based on a law that is clear and predictable, Copland v UK 2007
What is considered a legitimate aim?
-National security
-Public safety
-Economic well-being of the country
-Prevention of disorder or crime
-Protection of health or morals
-Protection of the rights and freedoms of others
What has the ECtHR defined ‘family life’ as
Children, grandchildren, adoptive and foster relationships, relationships after divorce, other relations with close family ties, married couples and co-habiting unmarried couples, same sex couples
What is the case of Johansen v Norway 1996
A baby was taken into care by the state who then decided to put the child up for adoption. Parental contact was allowed whilst the baby was in care, but this would stop when the baby was adopted. ECtHR decided there was a violation of Article 8 as terminating any chance of the baby and parents being reunited should only b done in exceptional circumstances.
How does the ECtHR protect children?
The state is obliged to facilitate contact between parents and a child when it is in the interest of the child. The rights of the child will always be paramount.
What is the ECtHR view on removal from the state for family life?
As long as they can continue their family life in their original country, they will be removed, Agyarko & Ikuga v Secretary of State for the Home Department. Only in exceptional circumstances would they be allowed to stay
What is the case of Nasri v France 1996?
A convicted rapist who was deaf, unable to speak and illiterate was allowed o stay in France as that is where his family lived.
How does Botta v Italy (1998) define private life?
‘a persons physical and psychological integrity for which respect is due to ensure the development, without outside interference, of the personality of each individual in his relations with other human beings’
Is the right to a private life the same as privacy?
No.
What does a persons physical and psychological integrity include?
Sex life and gender, reputation, name, photographic images and personal data.
Gillan & Quinton v UK (2010)
The police have extended powers under s.44 Terrorism Act 2000 to stop and search any person without reasonable suspicion. This power was used to stop and search people on their way to protest at an arms fair. Despite the wide margin of appreciation in issues of national security, the ECtHR believed this was a disproportionate use of the power
Halford v UK (1997)
The police were listening to the telephone conversation of the Assistant Chief Constable whilst she was at work. There was no legal basis allowing the monitoring of the police telecommunication system, therefore this was a breach of article 8
Rules on medical data
Medical data is considered confidential for both adults and children who are considered Gillick competent
Axon v Secretary of State for Health (2006)
The claimant wanted the court to make a declaration that doctors could not keep medical records of children under 16 confidential from the parent. The courts refused and said the medical treatment of children is confidential if the child is gillick competent