Article 8 Flashcards

(30 cards)

1
Q

What is Article 8?

A

Right to Private and Family Life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does Article 8(1) say?

A

“Everyone has the right to respect for his”:
Private life
Family life
Home
Correspondence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What kind of right is it?

A

A qualified right - can be taken away by state if sufficient reasons

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Can article 8 be used in private disputes? Use a case.

A

No, they cannot be used in private disputes.
Case of Campbell v MGN - newspapers serve as a public function

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Under the case of Pretty v UK, what does the scope of Article 8 include?

A

“physical and social identity,
gender identification,
name,
sexual orientation
and personal development”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

A: Physical and Social Identity - cases and what they stated

A

Botta
ECtHR did say that Article 8 includes the psychological and physical wellbeing as well as the development of a personality without outside interference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

B: Sex life and Gender - cases and important rules/statements made from them

A

Dudgeon

Bellinger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

C: Personal data - what does this include, use cases and rules from them

A

Includes DNA details and medical records

S&Marper - retaining someones DNA without charging them with a criminal offence is a breach of article 8

MS - health data is a ‘vital principle in the legal systems’

Gillick Competence for under 16’s discussing contraception with doctors was allowed in the case of Axon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

D: Names - what is said about names, use case

A

Names are central to identity

The case of Johansson showed that naming your child is a private matter unless the name could potentially cause ridicule or prejudice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

E: Reputation - what overlaps here, use cases and explain rule/statement

A

A.8 & A.10 overlap

Case of Sir Cliff Richard states we should look at what is ‘in’ and ‘of’ the public interest when balancing

Van Hannover - pictures of children took without consent - When balancing articles 8 and 10 the court should consider whether the photos/articles contribute to a debate of general public interest

PJS - states neither article has precedent over the other

Weller - family is included

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

2: Family Life - definitions part 1

A
  • Kroon v Netherlands 1995
    o biological and social definition
  • Lebbink v Netherlands 2004
    o close family ties
  • Marckx v Belgium 1979
    o grandchildren included
  • Berrehab v Netherlands 1989
  • continues after divorce
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Family life - definitions part 2

A
  • Kamal v UK 2016
    o cohabiting couples
  • Pini v Romania 2004
    o adoptive relationships
  • X v Switzerland 2017
    o foster relationships
  • Schalk and Kopf v Austia 2011
    - same sex relationships
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Some more cases on family life and what they state

A

Gaskin - adopted/foster kids and unmarried couples still count as ‘family’

Yousef - best interests of child are always before the parents - also seen in Johannsen

R(Agyarko & Ikuga) - deportation allowed as relationship was seen to be able to go on. Courts have wide margin of appreciation with deportation matters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does a home have to be owned by an individual or not?

A

No, the case of Khatun said it applies to owners and occupiers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can A.8 right to home be used in private matters?

A

No - McDonald v McDonald - private matter so couldn’t be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rules and case on people who bring things like caravans onto land

A

A.8 right to home will be applicable if the person is being evicted from somewhere they can lawfully occupy (Connors)

If occupation of land is unlawful, such as a playing field, then A.8 will not apply - Price

17
Q

What was the case where the couple was denied a license to move back into their home house and what does the right of home extend to?

A

Couple was refused a license and was seen as a breach in the case of Gillow

Niemetz states that the definition of ‘home’ is wide and therefore extends to business premises

18
Q

4: Correspondence - what does this right mean?

A

It means that you have the right to communication without interception

19
Q

What did the case of Klass state

A

Secret surveillance isn’t a breach so long as it is necessary and used to promote public safety, or promote freedom of others

20
Q

Complete sentence and use case: Any interference must be ________

A

Any interference must be justified under article 8(2) and be in accordance with law

Investigatory Powers Act

21
Q

More cases for correspondence

A

Barbalescu - Right to correspondence and private life in the workplace

Copland - monitored phone calls, emails etc. of teacher that were not for purposes of her job

Halford - calls tracked after she lodged a complaint against her superior

Golder - includes those who are in prison

22
Q

What are the three things that if satisfied can result in a justified restriction of article 8

A

The limitation must be:
In accordance with law
In pursuit of a legitimate aim
Necessary in a democratic society

23
Q

It is in accordance with law - cases and what it means

A

Means any interference must be based on law that is clear, predictable and accessible by the claimant.

RIPA - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act
Investigatory Powers Act

24
Q

In pursuit of a legitimate aim - what are the aims

A

National Security
Public Safety
Economic Wellbeing of the Country
Preventing crime or disorder
Protecting health and morals
Protecting rights and freedoms of others

25
In pursuit of a legitimate aim - part 1 cases - NS, PS, EWotc
National Security: Klass - terrorism Smith and Grady - HAS to be a national security concern - discovering sexuality in the army was a breach Public Safety: Buckley - justified Economic Wellbeing of the Country: Gillow
26
In pursuit of a legitimate aim - part 2 cases - PcoD, PHaM, PRaFoO
Preventing crime or disorder: Malone - ECtHR stated that interception of communications was justified to prevent crime and disorder Protecting Health and Morals: Laskey Dudgeon - Court stated that protection of morals could include safeguarding the moral standard of society Protecting Rights and Freedoms of Others: Chappell
27
It is necessary in a democratic society - what must this be and what case did the court look at to consider what could be proportionate restriction?
This must be proportionate so it balances the rights of the individual against the rights of the community Case of Handyside
28
What questions does the Handyside test ask?
1. Is there a pressing social need for the restriction? 2. Does the restriction correspond to that need? 3. If so, is that restriction a proportionate response to that need? 4. Are the reasons given relevant and sufficient?
29
What will courts use when deciding if a restriction is proportionate?
Margin of Appreciation
30
What does margin of appreciation mean and explain wide and narrow with cases
Margin of appreciation is how much leeway the courts are given in their decision Wide margin - more leeway, less strict Evans Klass Narrow - less leeway for decision, stricter Dudgeon