Asch (1955) CONTEXT AND AIMS Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

What is conformity?

A

Copying majority group.

Following course of action favoured by majority.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define majority influence:

A

Influenced by the way the majority think or act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define public compliance:

A

Someone alters their behaviour to conform.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define private acceptance:

A

Someone alters behaviour and beliefs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What did Jenness (1932) do?

A

Jelly bean jar.
Produce an estimate.
-results suggest an ambiguous situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did Sherif use auto kinetic effect to investigate conformity?

A

Participants give estimate.
Group of 3- estimate again.
—–> influenced by others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did Sherif develop Jenness?

A

His participants changed estimate under own violition.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Asch’s criticism of Jenness & Sherif:

A

Experimenter bias.

Demand characteristics.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Asch’s reasons for studying conformity:

A
  • Jenness & Sherif was limited- measured formation of group norms.
  • lacked impact ( like ambiguous situations- no clear answers)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Asch’s main aim:

A

Investigate effects of group pressure ( in unambiguous situations)
When obvious incorrect answer would they conform or give independent answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Asch: Number of participants

A

123 male undergraduates from US colleges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Asch: Research method used

A

Controlled observation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Asch: IV

A

Confederates or not.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Asch: DV

A

If participant conformed or not

—-> number of errors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Asch: Procedure

A
  • 1 naive, 6-8 confederates.
  • two cards: 1 standard line, 3 comparison lines
  • report judgements. X18 (12 critical trials)
  • debriefed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is a critical trial?

A

Confederates give obviously wrong answer.

17
Q

Standard line:

A

Comparison lines:

18
Q

Why was participant sat second to last?

A

Feel apart of the group.

Doesn’t know what last person will say.

19
Q

Why didn’t the confederates give away wrong answer on every trial?

A

Show they can be truthful.

20
Q

Variations of the baseline study (5)

A
  • size of majority
  • truthful partner
  • inaccurate partner
  • changes mind
  • partner leaves
21
Q

What is gradual majority influence?

A

Gradually increasing the size of majority to influence individual.

22
Q

What is degree of wrongness?

A

How obvious the wrong answer is

23
Q

Of all the critical trials ____ of responses were wrong.

____ were right.

24
Q

_____ never gave wrong answer.

25
Variation: Size of majority
More confederates, more likely to conform
26
Variation: Truthful partner
Reduce pressure to conform
27
Variation: Inaccurate partner
Reduce pressure to conform. | Pressure of a dissenter increased
28
Variation: changes mind
When confederate independent= naive independent. | Independent first 6 critical trials- then conformed
29
Conclusions:
Strong tendency to conform (clear answer) | Bigger majority= more pressure
30
What does the study tell us about resisting conformity?
Have confidence | 'Believe in own judgement'
31
Evaluate methodology: lab experiment Strength
Control extraneous variables- we know its the is causing the change in dv Have standardised procedures makes it easy to replicate and check reliability
32
Evaluate methodology: lab experiment Weakness
Artificial environment- not natural behaviour Lack ecological validity A trivial task of no importance ----> demand characteristics
33
Evaluate methodology: Reliability Larsen (1974) Perrin & Spencer (1980)
Larsen- conformity levels lower than Asch Perrin & spencer- 1/396 conformed- scientists
34
Evaluate methodology: Validity
Feel they need to conform (obvious lines are different length) - demand characteristics
35
Comparison line task valid test of conformity?
Artificial lad- not true behaviour Latane & Darley- smoke in room task more realistic Trivial task
36
How ecologically valid?
Not natural environment Can't generalise Not true behaviour
37
Saying answers out loud could affect conformity:
Personality - shy: conform - confident: independent
38
Evaluate methodology: Sampling
Volunteer sample- more helpful Show more demand characteristics- dont want to mess up results biased- all males- can't generalise
39
Evaluate methodology: Ethical issue
Lied about aims- "vision experiment" Deception | Lie to make accurate