Assault Flashcards
(41 cards)
What is assault by penetration?
Sexual Offences Act 2003, s2
(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina or anus of another person (B) with a part of his body or anything else,
(b) the penetration is sexual,
(c) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(d) A does not reasonably believe that B consents
What is the sentence for assault by penetration?
Triable on indictment
Life imprisonment
What body parts does the penetration have to be by?
This offence involves penetration by any part of the body or anything else whatsoever (eg: finger, tongue, sex aid, bottle, living creature etc…).
What body parts have to be penetrated?
Covers the insertion into the vagina or anus (though not the mouth) of anything, provided that the penetration is ‘sexual’.
CANNOT BE THE MOUTH
Who can commit sexual assault by penetration?
It is gender neutral and can be committed by anyone of any gender.
Can the evidential presumptions be applied to this offence- s75 and s76?
Yes- both apply.
What is the definition of the term ‘sexual’?
s78 2003 Act- defines the term sexual and provides that penetration, touching or any other activity will be sexual if a reasonable person would consider that:
(a) whatever its circumstances or any person’s purpose in relation to it, it is sexual by its very nature; or
(b) because of its nature, it may be sexual and, because of its circumstances or the purpose of any person in relation to it, it is sexual
What do (a) and (b) mean?
(a) covers things that a reasonable person would consider to be sexual (eg: masturbation and penetration by the penis)
(b) covers things that may or may not be considered sexual by a reasonable person depending on the circumstances or the intentions of the person carrying it out or both (eg: doctor in surgery/undertaking medical procedure and getting sexual gratification from it)
If the activity would not appear to a reasonable person to be sexual at all, then it will not meet either criterion and, irrespective of any sexual gratification the person might derive from it, the activity will not be ‘sexual’
Does this cover weird or exotic fetishes?
Therefore weird or exotic fetishes that no ordinary person would regard as being sexual or potentially sexual will not be covered- (R v Court [1989] and R v Tabassum [2000]).
Unusual fetishes that are outside the understanding of reasonable people would not be regarded as fetishes eg: foot fetish of a shoe shop owner
What offence is excluded from the definition of sexual?
It applies to all offences under Sexual Offences Act where this term is used, excluding:
- Sexual activity in a public lavatory (under s71)
- Sexual communication with a child (under s15A)
Both of these have their own definitions
What about a non-consensual unwanted kiss where D forces his tongue into the mouth of V?
This could not be s2 offence, it has the potential to fall under s3 of the offence- sexual assault.
What is sexual assault?
Sexual Offences Act 2003, s3
(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—
(a) he intentionally touches another person (B),
(b) the touching is sexual,
(c) B does not consent to the touching, and
(d) A does not reasonably believe that B consents
What is the sentence for sexual assault?
Triable either way
10 years’ imprisonment on indictment
What is the definition of ‘touching’?
s79(8) states that touching includes:
- with any part of the body;
- with anything else
- through anything
- and in particular, touching amounting to penetration (this could include kissing)
Can touching a person’s clothing be touching?
Touching for the purposes of the above offence includes touching a person’s clothing while they are wearing it. Therefore, where a man approached a woman and asked ‘Do you fancy a shag?’, grabbing at a pocket on her tracksuit bottoms as she tried to walk away, he was properly convicted of the s. 3 offence even though he did not touch her person (R v H [2005])
Can the touching be reckless, or just intentional?
The conduct must be intentional (rather than reckless or accidental). It also has to be sexual.
What is meant by reasonable belief?
Whether a belief is reasonable is to be determined having regard to all the circumstances, including any steps the defendant has taken to ascertain whether the victim consents (s. 3(2))
Case- intent and sexual touching
AG ref [2020], D while travelling on a train, had kissed the victim, on the lips without her consent. At trial, D stated that the kiss had not been sexual. Rather, it had been a friendly reassuring gesture. The trial judge accepted submissions that it was a necessary ingredient of the offence for the prosecution to prove that D intended the touching to be sexual- COA disagreed
Does D have to intend the touching to be sexual?
The statutory ingredients of the offence under s. 3 do not contain the requirement that the defendant intended the touching to be sexual
The scheme of the Act is that wherever an offence is committed against the victim by sexual touching, proof of sexual intention as part of the mens rea is not required
Does the part of the body touched have to be a sexual organ?
The part of the body touched does not have to be a sexual organ or orifice
How forceful must be the touching be?
There is no requirement for force or violence so the lightest touching will suffice
Does touching include through V’s clothing?
R v H [2005]- held that it was not Parliament’s intention to preclude the touching of V’s clothing from amounting to a sexual ‘assault’
What happens if the touching was not automatically sexual?
Where touching was not automatically by its nature ‘sexual’, the test under s. 78(b) applies
Trial judge asks the jury to determine whether touching was ‘sexual’ by answering 2 questions
1. would the jury, as 12 reasonable people, consider that the touching could be sexual and, if so
2. whether in all the circumstances of the case, they would consider that the purpose of the touching had in fact been sexual
Does V need to be aware of the touching? Case?
The victim need not be aware of the touching
R v Bounekhla [2006]- accused surreptitiously took his penis out of his trousers and ejaculated onto a woman’s clothing when pressed up against her dancing in a club. If touching does not occur, the offence is not completed, although the circumstances may amount to an attempt. Nevertheless, it remains arguable that ejaculation onto a victim’s clothing without contact with any part of the accused’s body still constitutes a touching