attachment Flashcards
what was tronicks ‘still face’ experiment into caregiver-infant interactions
the mother and infant began by interacting normally, the mother was then instructed to stop responding, this distressed the baby who screamed, cried, rocked, behaviour returned to normal once mother resumed interaction
what was melzoff and moore’s research into caregiver-infant interaction
they found that infants aged 2-3 weeks tended to mimic adults specific facial expressions and hand movements, this supports the idea that infant mimicry is an innate ability to aid the formation of attachments, also seen in infants less than 3 days old
what was papousek’s research into caregiver-infant interactions
found that using a rising tone to indicate an infant that it was their turn for interaction is cross-cultural, this suggests that caregiverese is an innate, biological device to facilitate the formation of attachment
evaluation of research into caregiver-infant interactions
practical application is that hospitals now place mums and babies in a room together following birth to encourage interaction
adults tend to use caregiverese to all infants not just those that they have attachments to which suggests it aids communication not forming attachments
interactional synchrony is not found in all cultures, eg. little interaction in kenyan cultures but infants still have high levels of secure attachment
what are the issues with conducting research into caregiver-infant interactions
whilst many studies show the same patterns of interaction it is difficult to be certain what is taking place from the infants perspective so we do not know that the observed behaviours necessarily have special meaning
observations are generally well controlled procedures, filmed from multiple angles so fine details can be recorded and analysed
babies are unaffected by being observed so their behaviour does not change which provides good validity
however, mother could be affected and change behaviour based on what the researcher is looking for in order to come off as a good mother
what is the asocial stage of attachment (schaffer and emerson)
0-6 weeks
infants are unable to properly distinguish between people and objects
they do show a preference for eyes and face
what is the pre-attachment stage (schaffer and emerson)
6 weeks - 3 months
infants become attracted to humans
show emotional behaviour but not directed at specific individuals
what is the indiscriminate attachment stage (schaffer and emerson)
3-7 months
infant begins to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar peoplee but does smile more are known people
seeks attention from numerous people and generally content with attention from anyone
what is the discriminate attachment stage (schaffer and emerson)
7-8 months
infants begin to form strong attachments to one individual
what is the multiple attachment stage (schaffer and emerson)
9 months+
infants form strong emotional ties with others
attachment to main caregiver remains the strongest
what were maccobys 4 characteristics of an attachment relationship
seeking proximity
distress on separation
joy on reunion
orientation of behaviour towards attachment figure
what is the definition of an attachment
a strong, emotional bond between two people that is reciprocal
what are the types of caregiver-infant interactions (5)
bodily contact, caregiverese, mimicking, interactional synchrony, reciprocity
evaluation of the stages of attachment (schaffer and emerson)
it is based on research that had high validity but poor population validity
there is conflicting evidence about what age children can form multiple attachments, evidence from other cultures suggest it is much earlier
all babies are different and may develop at different types
carpenter - contradicts asocial stage
what was carpenters research evaluating the stages of attachment
he presented babies with familiar and unfamiliar voices and faces
he found that 2 week old babies looked at a face the longest when it was their mothers face with their mothers voice
they were distressed by mothers face with a different voice
what are the 3 types of attachment
secure attachment (type b)
insecure-resistant attachment (type c)
insecure-avoidant attachment (type a)
what are the characteristics of a secure attachment (type b)
the infant is happy to explore and use mum as a safe base
shows moderate levels of stranger + separation anxiety
shows joy on reunion
linked to attentive mothers who respond to their childs needs
what are the characteristics of an insecure-resistant attachment (type c)
the infant is not happy to explore and clings to mum
show extreme levels of stranger and separation anxiety
resist reunion and may cry and shout
linked to ambivelant/unpredictable mothers
what are the characteristics of an insecure-avoidant attachment (type a)
the infant is happy to explore but they do not need mum as a safe base (independent)
there is not separation or stranger anxiety
actively avoid reunion, may ignore mother/caregiver
linked to unresponsive/ignorant mothers
what is the care-giver sensitivity hypothesis in explaining different attachment types
ainsworth believed that the type of attachment the child develops is entirely due to the mother
secure children have mothers who respond appropriately to the childs needs by picking up on the signals
what is the temperament hypothesis in explaining different attachment types
kagan believed that it was all down to the temperament of the child
those who are naturally good at forming relationships do so early in life and form close relationships with parents
seen later is life as those with pleasant temperament are more popular
what was takahashi’s research into cross-cultural variations in attachment
replicated ainsworths procedure in japan
findings:
- 68% securely attached (similiar to 66% in US)
- no insecure-avoidant
- 32% insecure-resistant
- babies were more disturbed when left alone and in 90% of cases they had to stop this activity early
conclusion:
- could be due to cultural differences as mother and infant are always together
- strange situation was created for the US so the procedure/experimental design failed
what was grossman’s research into cross-cultural variations into attachment
studies german infants
findings:
- they were more likely to be insecurely attached (insecure-avoidant)
- no proximity seeking behaviour
conclusion:
- cultural norms of interpersonal distance so no proximity seeking behaviour
- there are cross-cultural variations
what was the dogon tribe research into cross cultural variations in attachments (not stats)
no maternal deprivation or lack of physical contact in dogon culture
they use natural parenting where any female looks after any kid so there is no stranger anxiety
there is high secure attachment and no insecure-avoidant
not many variations in attachments despite different parenting techniques