Attachment Flashcards

(87 cards)

1
Q

What is Sensitive Responsiveness

A

Sensitive responsiveness: A caregivers ability to perceive, interpret and appropriately respond to an infant’s signals, emotions and needs. A caregiver who is sensitive is attuned to the infant’s cues and reacts in ways that are supportive and comforting.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the the role of the Father in attachment

A

Role of the father: Providing stimulating playful interactions and fostering exploration & risk taking behaviours. Whilst also serving as a secondary attachment figure that supports the child’s cognitive, emotional and social development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Degree of Sensitivity

A

Degree of sensitivity: More secure attachments are formed to their children are found in fathers who show more sensitivity to their children’s needs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Schaffer and Emerson (1964) study

A

Stages of attachment more specifically the formation of early infant adult interactions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What participants were featured in Schaffers stages of attachment theory

A

Included 60 babies - 31 male and 29 female all from Glasgow.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What was Schaffers (1964) procedure

A

Researchers visited the babies every month for the first year then at 18 months
Researchers asked the mothers questions about the kind of protests their babies showed in 7 everyday separations to measure the babies attachments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline what the Asocial stage is

A

Asocial Stage: Starts from 0-6 weeks babies observable behaviour towards humans and inanimate objects is similar. Babies prefer to be with people and show a preference towards familiar people and are more easily comforted by them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline what the Indiscriminate attachment stage is

A

Indiscriminate attachment: Starts from 6 weeks - 7 months Babies start displaying more obvious and observable social behaviours. Showing a clear preference for being with other humans, recognise and prefer the company of familiar people. Usually accept cuddles and comfort from anyone and don’t usually show separation or stranger anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline what specific attachment stage is

A

Specific attachment: Starts from 7-9 months Babies form this attachment with the primary attachment figure the person who offers the most interaction and responds to babies signals the best. Start to display signs of stranger and separation anxiety\

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline what the Multiple attachment stage is

A

Multiple attachment: Start at 9+ months Shortly after forming specific attachments they extend this behaviour to other people whom they regularly spend time with.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is Imprinting

A

Imprinting: Bird species form an attachment to the first large moving object that they meet.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Contact comfort

A

Contact comfort: Physical and emotional comfort that an infant receives from being in physical contact with its primary caregiver.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What did Lorenz (1935) study

A

Lorenz studied the imprinting of Greylag Goslings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What participants featured in Lorenz’s study

A

12 Greylag Goslings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was Lorenz’s setup for this study

A

Lorenz randomly divided 12 geese eggs into 2 batches
Half of them were hatched with their mother
The other half were incubated where they imprinted on Lorenz

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the Critical period Lorenz outlined for imprinting

A

Chicks need to attach within the set time period of 4 and 25 hours after hatching if it doesn’t occur within this time frame chicks wouldn’t attach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Did Lorenz Geese try to mate with other Geese

A

No as whatever species the Gosling imprinted upon they would develop sexual feelings towards that species

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Sluckin (1996) criticise Lorenz for

A

Sluckin (2006) replicated Lorenz study but used ducklings after successfully imprinting onto himself; he kept 1 duckling in isolation for over 5 days (past Lorenz critical period) however still managed to imprint himself onto this duckling suggesting a sensitive period.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Harlow (1958) study

A

Harlow studied baby Rhesus monkeys with a wire and cloth mother

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What participants featured in Harlow’s research

A

16 Baby Rhesus Monkeys

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the procedure in Harlow’s study

A

Harlow setup 2 conditions for the monkeys
Condition 1: The Wire mother produced milk whilst the cloth mother didn’t.
Condition 2: The Cloth mother produced milk whilst the wire mother didn’t.
The monkey was then frightened to see which mother theyd take comfort in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What did Harlow find in his study

A

The monkeys sought comfort in the cloth mother regardless of which mother produced milk
Showed that contact comfort was of more importance than food

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the consequences of Harlow’s research

A

Monkeys reared with the wire mother only were the most dysfunctional also having diarrhea a sign of stress
Monkeys reared with the cloth mother were more aggressive and less sociable, often taking it out on their young.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What was Harlow’s critical period for forming attachments

A

A mother figure had to be introduced within 90 days. After 90 days it was impossible to attach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Strengths of Animal studies (Lorenz & Harlow)
Practical application findings have informed social workers and clinical psychologists about the importance of early bonding in child development Highly controlled environment.
18
Weaknesses of Animal studies (Lorenz & Harlow)
Anthropomorphic research difficult to generalise to humans Ethical issues Harlow's monkeys were subjected to extreme distress leading to negative outcomes.
18
What are the 2 explanations of attachment
Classical and Operant conditioning.
19
How is the baby positively reinforced by the mother in attachment (OC)
The baby is positively reinforced for crying as it receives comfort or food.
19
How is the Caregiver negatively reinforced in attachment (OC)
Caregiver is negatively reinforced because the baby is confronted/fed the crying stops.
20
Explain Classical conditioning in attachment
Food → Happy Baby (UCS) (UCR) Mother + Food → Happy Baby (NS) (UCS) (UCR) Mother → Happy Baby (CS) (CR)
21
What is Unconditioned Stimulus in CC (Before Conditioning)
Food.
21
What is the Unconditioned Response in CC (Before Conditioning)
Happy Baby/ Pleasure.
22
What is the Neutral Stimulus in CC (During Conditioning)
Mother.
22
What is the Conditioned Stimulus in CC (After Conditioning)
Mother.
23
What is the Conditioned Response in CC (After Conditioning)
Happy Baby/Pleasure.
24
What is Drive reduction theory (Dollard & Miller)
Driver reduction: Infants form attachments to caregivers because they associate them with the satisfaction of their needs, particularly hunger.
24
Outline Drive reduction theory (Dollard & Miller)
Primary Drive - Hunger Primary Reinforcer - Food/Milk Secondary Drive - Obtaining Food Secondary Reinforcer - Caregiver Drive Reduction - Seeking proximity with caregiver.
25
What is Monotropy (Bowlby)
Monotropy: Infants are born with a natural need to form a strong bond with a primary caregiver. This attachment is more important than any other, Bowlby believed this to be a mother figure.
26
What are Social releasers:
Social releasers: Innate behaviours that babies perform to attract the attention of caregivers and encourage a natural response like smiling or crying.
27
What is Internal working model (Bowlby)
Internal working model: Infants develop a mental representation of their attachment relationship with their primary caregiver. This model serves as a template for future relationships.
28
What was Ainsworth's strange situation
Strange situation: Controlled observation designed to asses the attachment security of infants.
29
What was the environment for Ainsworth strange situation
Took place in a lab setting with either one way mirrors cameras or both. To observe infants' behaviours as they are exposed to 8 episodes lasting 3 minutes each.
30
What participant featured in Ainsworth's strange situation
100 Middle class American infants aged 12-18 months.
30
What behaviours were observed and how often in Ainsworth's strange situation
Main behaviours were observed every 15 seconds Proximity to caregiver Separation anxiety Stranger anxiety Secure base behaviour Response to reunion.
31
Outline The Strange situation procedure
Child and caregiver enter an unfamiliar playroom Child is encouraged to explore Stranger comes in and tries to interact with the child The caregiver leaves the child and the stranger together The caregiver returns and the stranger leaves Caregiver then leaves the room leaving the child alone Stranger returns Caregiver returns and is reunited with the child
32
Outline the findings of Ainsworth Strange situation
70% were securely attached 15% were insecurely resistant 15% were insecurely avoidant
33
Outline attachment type B
Secure attachment: Psychologically healthy outcome, charcaterised by moderate stranger and separation anxiety alongside ease of comfort when reunited with caregiver and as a secure base for reassurance.
34
Outline attachment type A
Insecure Avoidant attachment: Marked by low stranger and separation anxiety but weak attachment as they show little response to reunion and may avoid caregiver interaction altogether.
34
Outline attachment type C
Insecure Resistant attachment: Charcaterised by by high levels of stranger and separation anxiety and strong attachment. Seek greater proximity with caregiver and explore less however resist being comforted during reunion.
35
Outline Disorganised attachment
Disorganised Attachment: Characterised by a lack of a clear attachment strategy. Children display contradictory behaviour such as freezing, confusion and approaching and retreating from caregiver. Thought to arise when a caregiver is both a source of comfort and fear.
36
Strengths of Ainsworth strange situation
Controlled observation Highly standardised
37
Weaknesses of Ainsworth strange situation
Culture bias and lack of population validity. AInsworth study used only Middle class American mothers and children not representative of real life. Controlled observation lacks ecological validity
37
What did Ijzendoorn (1988) study
Ljzebdoorn conducted a meta analysis of 32 studies using the strange situation of attachment.
38
What 8 countries did Ijzendoorn study
UK, Sweden, Japan, Netherlands, USA, Israel, Germany, China
39
What were the findings for the UK, China and Germany in Ijzendoorn meta analysis
UK- Secure 75%, Avoidant 20%, Resistant 5% Germany- Secure 57%, Avoidant 35%, Resistant 8% China- Secure 50%, Avoidant 25% Resistant 25%
40
Strengths of Ijzendoorn meta analysis
Large sample size of 1,990 babies Reducing impact of anomalous increased internal validity
41
Weaknesses of Ijzendoorn meta analysis
Meta analysis claimed to study cultural variations comparisons were made between countries and not cultures Ainsworth strange situation is an etic approach (America) and Ijzendoorn exhibits culture bias by trying to apply this theory to different cultures Each country has multiple cultures with different child rearing practices sample may not be representative of real life.
42
What is Maternal Deprivation
Maternal Deprivation: Prolonged separation from a primary caregiver, particularly in early childhood this can lead to emotional cognitive and social issues. Including affectionless psychopathy, lower IQ and developmental delays.
42
Critical period Maternal deprivation Bowlby
First 2.5 years of life where separation from primary caregiver can have severe and potentially irreversible psychological consequences
43
What is Affectionless psychopathy
Affectionless psychopathy: A severe consequence of early deprivation, characterised by a lack of empathy and absence of guilt and remorse also display antisocial behaviour. Theseindividuals often struggle to form emotional connections and may display aggression or criminal behaviour.
43
What did Bowlby's 44 thieves (1994) study
Examined the link between affectionless psychopathy and maternal deprivation.
44
What participants were featured in Bowlby's study
44 Criminal teenagers accused of stealing.
45
Outline Bowlby's 44 thieves study
All thieves were interviewed for signs of affectionless psychopathy Their families were also interviewed to see whether the thieves had prolonged separations from their mothers Bowlby also established a control group of 44 non-criminal but emotionally disturbed young people.
46
Outline Bowlby's findings
Bowlby found that 14/44 thieves displayed characteristics of affectionless psychopathy 12/14 experienced early maternal separation or deprivation. Only 2 people in the control group showed signs of affectionless psychopathy.
46
Study criticising Bowlby Maternal deprivation
Koluchova (1976) Czech twins who were isolated for the first 7 years of their lives by their mother and father. Found in a state of extreme deprivation they were placed in a foster home where they received love and care from foster parents and made significant progress in development despite their early deprivation (past critical period).
47
What was the aim of Rutters Romanian orphans study (2011)
The extent to which good care could make up for poor early experiences in the institutions.
48
What participants featured in Rutters Romanian orphan study (2011)
165 Romanian orphans which had been adopted by families in the UK Control group of English children adopted at around the same time
49
How was the Romanian orphans development tracked in Rutters study
Physical, cognitive and emotional development was assessed at ages 4,6,11,16 and 22-26.
50
How did the age of adoption affect the rate of recovery for the Romanian orphans
The mean IQ: Before 6 months was 102 Adopted between 6 months and 2 years was 86 Adopted after 2 years was 77
51
What is Quasi-Autism in Romanian orphans studies Rutter (2011)
Quasi-Autism: Autistic like behaviours such as social withdrawal and difficulty forming attachment.
51
What attachment type did Romanian orphans exhibit if they were adopted after 6 months (Rutter 2011)
Disinhibited Attachment type: Children display equal affection and sociability towards both familiar people and strangers without showing stranger anxiety
52
What are behaviours associated with Disinhibited attachment (Rutter 2011)
Behaviours include attention seeking, clinginess and social behaviour towards all adults.
53
What were the physical delays in development shown by children who spent over 6 months in institutional care (Rutter 2011)
Significant delays in physical development included growth retardation, lower weight & height and delayed motor milestones.
54
What was the aim of Zeanah (2005) study
To asses the development of 136 Romanian Children aged 6-31 months.
54
What were the Romanian children assessed on in Zeanah (2005)
Assessed on a baseline of Cognitive Language Social Psychiatric Brain functioning indicators.
55
What participants featured in Zeanahs (2005) study
136 Romanian children most of whom spent the majority of their lives in institutional care Control group of 72 children who had never lived in an institution.
56
What conditions were the Romanian children randomly assigned to (Zeanah 2005)
68 Children were assigned to continue institutional care 68 Were placed in foster family homes 72 Children who never lived in an institution.
57
How were the Romanian children's attachment type assessed Zeanah (2005)
Zeanah used Ainsworth's strange situation.
57
Outline Zeanah’s (2005) findings
Institutional group only 19% were securely attached Institutional group 44% were disinhibited attached Whilst control group 74% were securely attached Control group less than 20% were disinhibited attached.
58
Did Zeanah (2005) use random allocation in his study
Yes in order to improve internal validity by making sure participant variables are spread evenly across both groups.
59
What did Hazan and Shaver (1987) investigate
Whether early attachment styles influence adult relationships
60
What was the procedure for Hazan & Shaver's love quiz (1987)
Created a love quiz published in newspapers Received 620 responses from 205 men and 415 women Questionnaire assessed participants early attachment experiences and current romantic relationship experiences
61
What were their attachments classified as (Love quiz)
Secure, Avoidant and Resistant
62
What were Hazan and Shavers findings
56% were Secure 25% were Avoidant 19% were Resistant
63
How did Securely attached people describe their relationships
Happy, trusting and enduring
64
How did Avoidant attached people describe their relationships
Difficult to trust others, feared intimacy and often experienced jealousy
65
How did Resistant attached people describe their relationships
Worried about their partners leaving them, displayed emotional highs and lows and were more possessive