Attachment (P1) Flashcards

1
Q

Schafer and Emerson stages of attachment (1964)

A

1)Asocial stage
2)Indiscriminate attachment
3)Specific attachment
4)Multiple attachments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Asocial stage

A

-0-6 weeks
-This is when the infant responds to objects and people similarly- but may respond more to faces and eyes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Indiscriminate attachments

A

-6 weeks-6 months
-This is when the infant develops more responses to human company.
-Although they can tell the difference between different people, they can be comforted by anyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Specific attachments

A

-7 months and onwards
-This is when the infants begin to prefer one particular carer and seeks for security, comfort and protection in particular people
-They also start to show stranger anxiety and separation anxiety.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Multiple attachments

A

-10-11 months onwards
-This is when the infant forms multiple attachments and seeks security, comfort and protection in multiple people.
-They may also show separation anxiety in multiple people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

PEEL- how does the Glasweigain baby study by Schaffer and emerson lack internal validity (AO3 Limitation)

A

-One limitation is a lack of internal validity
-It uses self report methods as the parents kept a daily diary
-Therefore the accuracy of data collection may not be the best. The parents may not have included the full detail and social desirability bias may have occurred.
-The parents may have skewed their reports so they appear to be closer to what they see as socially acceptable or desirable.
-Ie. they may intentionally not report and negative experiences that they had.
-This also may be demand characteristics as they try to tailor their report to fit or go against what they think is the aim/hypothesis of the study.
-Therefore, caution should be taken when placing confidence in the conclusions drawn from this study.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

PEEL- How does the Schaffer and Emerson study lack population validity?

A

-One limitation is the lack of internal validity
-Infants in the study all came from Glasgow and were mostly from working class families. In addition, the small sample size of 60 families reduces the strength of the conclusions drawn from the study. Schaffers stages of attachent lack population valdity and temporal validity.
-Parenting techniques have changed significantly since the 1950s, such as through the influence of Bowlby’s work, so caution should be taken when generalising the findings.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bowlby’s monotropic theory of attachment (ASCMI)

A

A= Adaptive- attachments are an advantage, or beneficial to survival as it ensures a child is kept safe, warm and fed.

S= Social releasers- innate ‘cute’ behaviours such as smiling and cooing, unlock the innate tendency for adults to care for a child because they activate the mammalian attachment system.

C= Critical period- this is the time in which an attachment can form- Bowlby suggested that if it does not in this time it never will- it attachment does not form you will be intellectually, socially, emotionally and physically stunted. Bowlby proposed it as more of a ‘sensitive period’- 6 months-2 years

M= Monotropy- Bowlby suggested that you can only form one ‘special’ attachment, usually with the biological mother. It is unique stronger and different to others.

I= Internal working model- A mental schema for relationships. Develop our perception of our attachment with our primary attachment figure. This explains similarities in attachment patterns across families. Those who have a dysfunctional internal working model will seek out dysfunctional relationships and behave dysfunctionally within them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What were the findings of Harlow’s experiment on monkeys?

A

-Baby monkeys preferred soft cuddly cloth surrogate monkeys to a wire mesh monkey that could dispense milk.
-Baby monkeys clung to the cloth monkey and only went to the wire monkey to feed.
-The findings showed that feelings of comfort and security are critical to maternal-infant bonding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Procedure of Harlow’s study on monkeys

A

-Harlow investigated attachment in rhesus monkeys.
-He constructed two surrogate mothers: one harsh ‘wire mother’ that provided milk, and one soft, cuddly ‘towelling mother’ that did not provide milk.
-The amount of time that the baby monkey spent with each mother was recorded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conclusions of Harlow’s study on rhesus monkeys

A

-Harlow concluded that baby rhesus monkeys have an innate drive to seek contact comfort, suggesting that attachment with parents is formed through an emotional need for security.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

AO3 Ethics/Cost-benefit analysis on animal studies in Harlow’s monkeys PEEL

A

-One limitation is the ethical issues in Harlow’s research.
-The baby rhesus monkeys suffered greatly in terms of emotional separation from their biological mother at such an early age due to the procedure Harlow used.
-If the species of primates are considered sufficiently human-like to generalise the results, then it stands to reason that the effects of psychological harm that they will have endured are similar to that of a human baby.
-There is, however, the question of whether the insight obtained was sufficiently important to psychologists understanding of attachment that Harlow was justified in his approach, if a cost-benefit analysis was undertaken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Procedure of Lorenz’s study on geese

A

-Lorenz conducted an experiment where he divided goose eggs into two batches.
-One batch was hatched naturally by the mother, and the second batch was hatched in an incubator and Lorenz was the first moving object they saw.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Findings of Lorenz’s study

A

-Lorenz found that straight away after birth, the naturally hatched goslings followed the mother goose, whereas the incubator-hatched goslings followed Lorenz.
-Lorenz noted that this imprinting only occurred after within a critical period of 13-16 hours after hatching and the relationship persisted over time and proved to be irreversible.
-If the hatchlings don’t imprint in the critical period, they never imprint.
-Once birds have imprinted, they cannot imprint again.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

AO3 Lorenz study on Geese- difficulty generalising to humans PEEL
(More complex/no imprinting)

A

-Since Lorenz only studied animals, we cannot generalise the results to humans as we are unable to conclude that they would behave in the same way.
-The mammalian attachment formation appears to be much more complex and different to that of bird species.
-Human parents, especially mothers, show more emotional reactions to their offspring and can form attachments beyond the first few hours after birth, and humans don’t imprint.
-So, whilst some of Lorenz’s findings have influenced our understanding of attachment formation, caution must be applied when drawing wider conclusions about the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is imprinting?

A

When an animal attaches to the first moving thing it sees after birth. Thought to be irreversible (13-16 hours post hatching in Lorenz)- no matter the object

17
Q

AO1 Procedure and findings of Bowlby’s juvenile thieves study (effects of institutionalisation)- also can be used as AO3 for Research support for Bowlbys maternal deprivation hypothesis

A

-Bowlby compared 44 juvenile theives with non-thieves who had experienced emotional problems
-Bowlby found that 32% the theives exhibited affectionless psychopathy, characterised by a lack of social conscience
-Bowlby found that 86% of the affectionless psychopaths had experienced a maternal separation compared to 17% of the theives who were not categorised as affectionless psychopaths, and only 4% control group.
-This supports his view that maternal deprivation can have serious, long-lasting effects.

18
Q

Conclusion of Bowlbys juvenile theives study

A

-These findings suggest a link between early ongoing separation from the primary caregiver and later social maladjustment.
-The maternal deprivation hypothesis appears to lead to affectionless psychopathy and a greater risk of engaging in antisocial behaviour.

19
Q

Procedure of Rutter (2011) ERA (English and Romanian Adoptee) study

A

-Rutter et al. Conducted a longitudinal study of 165 children who had spent their early years in a Romanian orphanage.
-111 of these children were adopted before 2 years old and the rest adopted by 4 years old.
-They were compared to a control group of 52 British children.
-The social, cognitive and physical development of all infants was examined at regular intervals. (Ages 4,6,11,15 and 22-25)

20
Q

Findings of Rutter et al (2011) Romanian orphan study (effects of institutionalisation)

A

-Before adoption, the Romanian orphans showed delayed development and were physically smaller with many classified as ‘mentally retarded’.
-Almost all the Romanian orphans who were adopted by age 6 months caught up on these measures of development when compared to the British control group.
-The Romanian children who were adopted after 6 months continued to show significant deficits in all areas of development; they were also more likely to experience difficulties with peer relationships and often had disinhibited attachments