Attachment - people to know. Flashcards

0
Q

Main Kaplan and cassidy,

A

1985

Test , re test reliability

they tested babies at 18 months and again at 6 years

100 of secure babies still secure,

75 % of avoid ant babies still avoidant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Egeland and Sroufe

A

1981

Psychological availability is most important in allowing babes to form attachments.

  • over physical abuse or neglect - psychological unavailability is the worst!!!!
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Main and solomon

A

1986

Insecure disorganised -

from looking at “at risk kids” from abusive PCGs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

lamb et al

A

1985
SS is highly artificial - lacks ecological validity.

ignores attachment to other care givers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Sroufe

A

1983

secure infants are lively to grow up to be

  • popular
  • higher self esteem
  • social leaders
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hazen and Shaver

A

1987

Adult avid ant style is similar to infant avoid ant style.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Bretherton

A

1985

Secure attachment comes from a responsive style in the home.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Belsky and Rovine

A

1988

insecure avoidant style - - comes from INTRUSIVE OR REFLECTING DISCOMFORT WITH PHYSICAL CONTACT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Bowlby said ….

A

1958-69

If monotropy is not consistent from 6 months to 2-3 years with ONE PCG then there are dire developmental consequences in terms of social , psychological and even cognitive mal-adaptations.

Sensitivity Period

SENSITIVITY PERIOD

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Marrone

A

1998

SS is simulating an everyday experience for most children. - hospital waiting room. - baby sitter.

Reunion behaviour gives a clearer picture of the state of attachment than even the response of separation itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

social releasers …

A

crying , and “social smile”

survival mechanisms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Houston and Aronson

A

2005

working v non working mothers

studied 1053 mothers

    • social and cog tests on infants
    • mothers self report 2x per day, on their actions

The economic and social benefits of maternal employment outweigh any loses that may result from the time spent away from the child.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Schaffer and Emerson

A

1964

Glasgow study - 60 babies, Monthly intervals for the first 18 months.

by 18 months 3 percent had 1 PCG, most had 5!!!!!!!

Attachment most likely to form with those who respond accurately to the babies signals. - SENSITIVE RESPONSIVENESS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Ljzendoorne and Kroonberg

A

1988

Cultural variations in attachment styles

japan 27 resistant -(they keep them super close through early years)

germany 35 avoidant ( they make kids get out there and explore the environment!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rutter

A

1972

made the distinction which Bowlby often confused between

Deprivation - loved and lost

Privation - Never loved at all.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dollard and Miller

A

1950

Behavioural theory of Attachment.

operant and Classical conditioning.

16
Q

Goldberg

A

2000

the advantage of the SS is that even when the mother may adapt her behaviour to please the experimenter - - THE CHILD DOES NOT

hence why child behaviour is the focus.

17
Q

Bates et al

A

1985

Early attachment styles did not predict behavioural problems at 3 years.

18
Q

Thomas

A

1998

multi types of attachment figure s available

father, grand parent. uncle, sibling , friend, teacher.

from studying Caribean and european families

infants seem to form equally important attachments with lots of care givers

19
Q

Skeels

A

1949

Orphanage Studies!!!!!!!!!

those that remained in the orphanage

IQ at 3 - - - - 64
IQ at 4 - - - - 60

those who transferred to a foster home at 3

IQ at 3 - - - - 64
IQ at 4 - - - - 92

WAs this lack of stimulus or maternal deprivation

they thought lack of stimulus - hard to be sure!!

20
Q

Meins

A

2003

firstly thought up - Mind Mindedness - joint attention - sharing experiences is super important.

DYNAMIC ATTACHMENT

a secure infant balances their attention between exploration and care giver orientated behaviour.

the other attachment styles are manifestations of these behaviours being out of balance.

21
Q

Main and Western

A

1981

children behave differently depending on which parent they are with,

attachment type not consistent between care givers

proof that attachment style is not a character trait of the child.

22
Q

Parke

A

2002

children development outcome is affected not by parents gender but by the kind of relationship that exists within each different parent child couple.

dont discriminate against the father child relationship MAN!!!!!

23
Q

Schaffer

A

2004

the attachment system is so powerful that even maltreated children persist to try to form attachments

24
Q

Ainsworth - - Baltimore - -

A

1971, 78

26 Babies,

every 3-4 weeks for 3-4 hours,

for the first year of babies life. - total of 72 hours

they needed a standard against which to compare their findings.

Strange situation SS - devised in 1969

25
Q

Strange Situation -

A

devised in 1969 by Mary Ainsworth to measure how a baby reacts to low and high stress in attachment and exploration situations.