Attack Plan Short Flashcards
(55 cards)
Partnership Fiduciary Duty
RUPA: breach of duty of loyalty or duty of care
UPA: broad
Corporation Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Duty of Loyalty and Duty of Care
Duty of Care
Business Judgment rule with Van Gorkham (duty to be informed)
Business Judgment Rule (3)
Presumption that directors acted in (1) good faith, (2) were informed, and (3) was in the best interest of the shareholders
Van Gorkham
Will take reasonable, affirmative steps to become informed when making corporate decisions
Duty of Loyalty
Two ways to breach: self dealing or corporate opportunity.
Self Dealing (2)
Must determine whether director validated transaction pursuant to (1) Section 144 and whether passes the (2) intrinsic fairness test.
Section 144 (3)
A self dealing transaction can be validated by (1) disclosure and board authorization by majority vote, (2) disclosure and shareholder authorization, OR (3) was fair at the time it was authorized.
Intrinsic Fairness Test
Was the transaction fair?
Corporate Opportunity (2)
Use Section 5.05 of the American Law Institute Test to determine (1) when there was a corporate opportunity and (2) if that opportunity was taken advantage of.
American Law Institute Test - When
(1,2,3ab,4)
When director: (1) becomes aware of opportunity in their corporate capacity, OR (2) should have know it was an offer to the corporation, (3) (a) became aware of opportunity through the use of corporate info and (b) should know corporation was interested, OR (4) knows it was closely related to corporation’s current or expected biz.
American Law Institute Test - Taken Advantage (1-4a,b,c)
Director may not take advantage unless (1) the opportunity is offered to corp AND (2) disclosure concerning the conflict of interest is made AND (3) the opportunity is rejected by the corporation AND (4) EITHER (a) rejection is fair, (b) opportunity is rejected in advance by disinterested directors, OR (c) the rejection is authorized or ratified by the shareholders.
Indemnification
Permissive and Mandatory
Mandatory Indemnification
required when director or person being sued is wholly successful on the merits
Permissive Indemnification
usually specified in the bylaws
Director and Officer Insurance
provides a broad range of financial protection for lawsuits
Piercing the Veil (2)
Must be (1) Alter Ego (bal test) and (2) deception, misrepresentation, or fraud
Piercing the Veil - Alter Ego
Three factors to consider: (1) commingling of funds, (2) failure to observe corporate formalities, (3) undercapitalization.
Partner Liability - UPA v RUPA
UPA: partners are jointly liable for K, severally and jointly for torts
RUPA: jointly and severally liable for all obligations
Partnership: Sharing Profits and Losses
Profits shall be shared equally or split up by agreement, losses will be equal to % of profit breakdown.
Transfer of Partnership Interest
Partner may transfer financial interest but not management interest.
Partnership Order of Priorities during Winding up (4)
(1) non-partner creditors, (2) partner creditors, IF MONEY LEFT: (3) return of capital, (4) return of profits
Partnership - Creditors (what they can go after)
Partnership creditors: can go after partnership and individual property
Individual creditors: individual property
Partnership Liability (3)
(1) Ks entered into on partnership’s behalf authority, (2) any wrongful act/omission of a partner acting in course of biz, (3) certain circumstances where a partner misapplied money or property of a 3rd person