Audit Evidence part 1 Flashcards
Characteristics of audit evidence
- Audit evidence should be SUFFICIENT & APPROPRIATE.
What is audit evidence ?
-It is proof collected by the auditor of their audit work carried out.
Sufficient
It is the quantity characteristic of audit evidence.
The amount of audit evidence to be collected is based on several factors
Factors that influence the amount of audit evidence to be collected:
- Risk at F.S level: Increased risk at F.S level indicates that more audit evidence is req. to be collected.
- Materiality of items: More audit evidence is required to be collected for material item whereas immaterial items only need to be reviewed if they appear correct.
3.Nature of accounting and control systems: Auditors will place more reliance on good accounting and internal control system, hence limiting the amount of audit evidence to be collected.
4.Source and reliability of information: Where information is obtained from a reliable source then less audit evidence is req. to be collected than unreliable source.
5.Knowledge and experience of business: Where auditors possesses good past knowledge and experience with client and trusts integrity of staff then less audit evidence is req. to be collected.
Appropriate
It describes the quality characteristic of audit evidence. It is further divided into 2 components: Relevance and Reliability.
Appropriate: Relevance
Audit evidence is considered relevant when it addresses the assertion of the item reported in the F.S.
Appropriate: Reliability
-Audit evidence is considered reliable if auditor has obtained it from a trustworthy resource.
-Reliable sources of information/audit evidence are:-
a. Auditor generated over mgmt. generated
documents.
b. Original document over copies
c. 3rd party confirmation over mgmt. confirmation
d. Written confirmation over verbal confirmation.
What are assertions ?
-Indirect claims made by mgmt. and could be made either by informing auditor in person or whenever they include an item in the F.S
- Two kinds of assertions exist: SOPL and SOFP
SOPL assertions
- Occurrence: The transactions and events that have been recorded, have they been occurred in reality.
2.Completeness: The transaction and events that should have been recorded, have they been recorded completely in the F.S
3.Cut-off: Have the transaction and events been recorded in the correct accounting period.
4.Accuracy: The amount and data related to the transaction and events have they been recorded at the correct amount by the mgmt.
5.Classification: Have the transactions and events been recorded properly in their respective accounts.
SOFP assertions
- Completeness: Have the asset, liabilities and equity interests that should have recorded completely, have they been recorded in the F.S
2.Existence: Do the assets, liabilities and equity interests recorded in the book exist in reality.
3.Valuation, allocation and accuracy: Have the assets, liabilities and equity interests been recorded at their appropriate amounts by the mgmt.
4.Rights and Obligations: Does the client hold the right to control the asset recorded in the F.S and is the client under obligation to settle the liability recorded in the F.S.
5.Classification, presentation and disclosure: Have the assets, liabilities and equity been classified properly in their respective accounts and have they been presented in the format prescribed by the accounting std.s and appropriate disclosures related to assets, liabilities and equity interests made as per accounting stds.
How is audit evidence collected ?
-Audit evidence is collected based on which assertion auditor wishes to address.
-It is collected in two ways: tests of controls and substantive procedures.
What is test of controls ?
-These are tests performed by the auditor to assess the operating effectiveness of the I.Cs in preventing, detecting and correcting misstatements due to fraud, error and irregularity.
-Its main focus to ensure I.C procedure operates effectively and does not focus on confirming the monetary value of the transaction or event.
What is substantive procedures ?
-These are procedures that are used /applied to detect material misstatements at assertion level.
-Its main focus is to confirm the monetary value of the transaction and event by addressing each assertion.
-There are 2 kinds of substantive procedures: Test of details and analytical review
Why is analytical review not mandatory to be performed in execution stg. of the audit ?
-It is not mandatory to perform analytical review because this is applied as a substantive procedure and might address only a few assertions. Thus, auditors use it on selected assertions as it is not useful to address all assertions in the SOPL and SOFP.
-A.R is mandatory to perform in planning and completion stg. of the audit.
Test of details
- Theses are tests carried out to verify individuals accounts, balances and disclosures.
How to write audit procedures ?
Use RARECOPI, which stands for :
1. Recalculate: To verify the mathematical accracy of mgmt. calculation.
2. Analytical review: To confirm completeness but need to carry out other testings too to corroborate findings from A.R.
3.Reperform: Do a dummy transaction to confirm occurrence and existence.
4. Enquiry: Ask information from client ; but not so reliable as it is verbal confirmation
5.Confirmation: Obtain 3rd party confirmation like bank confirmation, receivables confirmations and supplier confirmation to ensure existence and rights and obligations
6.Observe: See how the client performs a particular process to ensure existence .
7.Physically verfiy: confirms existence and valuation as auditor is looking at the asset
8. Inspect : Used to inspect documents for signatures , amount, date to confirm rights and obligations, existence and valuation
How to perform receivables circularization ?
-Seek permission from client to perform debtor’s circularization and if received, then these are the following steps to perform:
1. Obtain a list of receivables and cast it. Then select a sample of receivables based upon large balances, old balances and nil balances.
2. Request a written confirmation from the debtors on the balances and that all replies are directly sent to the auditor and not the mgmt.
Have mgmt. sign the request letter to inform debtors this is a genuine request for authorisation.
3. Have mgmt. sign on all request letters before sending them out.
4. For any replies received, these replies should be reconciled to the client’s receivables ledger.
What to do if debtors don’t respond to circularization ?
- Seek permission from the client and send a follow up circularization letter to the debtor.
-If there is no response again then the auditor should request permission from the client to phone call the debtor. Then a senior should phone call the debtor and ask them to respond to the circularization letter sent in writing.
-If there is no response again then the auditor should perform alternative procedures.
-Alternative procedures are: Inspect order placement and dispatch documentation like Gdns and post year-end bank statement to see if payment was made or not.
What to do for responses received with differences?
-Auditor should identify the disputed amounts and determine whether the difference is arising due to error in the client’s records or timing differences and investigate.
-If it is assumed due to errors in the client’s records then inspect the client’s receivable ledger to identify any possible mis postings to justify a response with a difference
-If any balances are flagged as disputed by the receivables then discuss with mgmt. if they believe that customer will settle the payment or not. If not then suggest mgmt. to write off the receivable.
-If response is with difference due to timing difference then inspect post y/e bank statement to agree the money received with the cash in transit.
2 kinds of circularization:
- Positive circularization
- Negative circularization
What is negative circularization and why is not reliable way to obtain audit evidence ?
- Negative circularization is requesting debtors to only respond to the request letters if they disagree with the balance stated or outcome.
- This is an unreliable way of obtaining audit evidence because there is a possibility that the debtor might have not received the letter in the first place or it may be a fake customer. Hence, risk of not detecting material fraud and not collecting S&A audit evidence.
What is positive circularization?
-Requests all debtors to respond to the request letter irrespective of what the balance is stated as or the outcome is.
Why debtors may not respond to circularization?
-It may be a fake sale as a result there is a risk of money laundering
-It may be a fake customer and might not exist in reality, thus risk of fraud
-The cash is in transit and will only be received after the year-end. Thus, need to review the post-Y/E bank statement to ensure payment was received.
Completeness: Receivables
- Analytically review the receivable days for the current year and compare them with the previous year to identify any variances and investigate them.
- Obtain the figure for receivables from the F.S and trace it back to the trial balance and back to the aged receivables listing, receivables ledger and journal to confirm completeness.
- Review the disclosure notes for receivables to ensure adequate disclosure has been made as per the accounting std.