AUDIT PRINCIPLES MODULE 7 Flashcards
(51 cards)
establishes the basic principles and essential procedures and to provide guidance and to provide guidance regarding a firm’s responsibilities for its system of quality control for audits and reviews of historical financial information, and for other assurance and related services engagements.
PSQC 1 (Philippine Standards on Quality Control 1)
Consists of policies designed to achieve the objectives of quality control and the
procedures necessary to implement and monitor compliance with those policies.
System of Quality Control
Established and implemented to ensure that a public accounting firm adheres to the
standards of the accounting profession.
System of Quality Control
NOT A QUESTION!
The firm shall design a system of quality control designed to:
- provide it with REASONABLE ASSURANCE that the firm and its personnel comply with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements
- reports issued by the firm or engagement partners are appropriate in the circumstances.
Set of policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that the
public accounting firm complies with professional standards.
Quality control system
The nature and extent of quality control procedures depend on factors such as:
- Its size and nature of its policies
- Degree of operating autonomy allowed to its personnel
- The nature of its practice
- Its organization
- Its geographic dispersion
- Appropriate cost/benefit consideration
NOTE:
The quality control policies and procedures shall be documented and communicated to the firm’s personnel.
Elements of a System of Quality Control:
- Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the firm
- Ethical Requirements
- Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Specific Engagements
- Human Resources
- Engagement performance
- Monitoring
MNEMONIC: HARLEM
are established to measure the quality of performance of individuals and organizations.
Standards relating to the accounting profession concern themselves with CPA’s professional qualities, the judgment exercised in their professional engagement, and the CPA firm’s quality control policies and procedures
Standards
The partner or other person IN the firm who is responsible for the engagement and its performance, and for the report that is issued on behalf of the firm, and who, where required, has the appropriate authority from a professional, legal or regulatory body
Engagement Partner
All partners and staff performing the engagement, and any individuals engaged by the firm or a network firm who perform procedures on the engagement. This excludes external experts engaged by the firm or a network firm.
Engagement Team
A sole practitioner, partnership, or other entity of professional accountants
Firm
A partner, OTHER PERSON in the firm, suitably qualified external person, or a team made up of such individuals, NONE OF WHOM IS PART OF THE ENGAGEMENT TEAM, with sufficient and appropriate experience and authority to objectively evaluate the significant judgments the engagement team made and the conclusions it reached in formulating the report.
ENGAGEMENT QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER
A process designed to provide an OBJECTIVE EVALUATION, ON or BEFORE the date of the report, of the significant judgments the engagement team made, and the conclusions it reached in formulating the report.
ENGAGEMENT QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW
An individual OUTSIDE THE FIRM with the competence and capabilities to act as an engagement partner, for example, a partner of another firm, or an employee (with appropriate experience) of either a professional accountancy body whose members may perform audits and reviews of historical financial information, or other assurance or related services engagements, or of an organization that provides relevant quality control services.
SUITABLY QUALIFIED EXTERNAL PERSON
The firm shall establish policies and procedures designed to promote an internal
culture based on the recognition that quality is essential in performing engagements.
Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the firm
the ENGAGEMENT PARTNER should take responsibility for the overall quality of each audit engagement to which the partner is assigned
Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the firm
engagement partner should set an example regarding the quality of audit by emphasizing through actions and messages the importance of performing work that complies with professional standards, complying with the firm’s quality control, and issuing appropriate reports
(the engagement partner should be a good example to its staff or members, in order for them to follow and do their work properly)
Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the firm
The FIRM shall establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that the firm and its personnel comply with relevant ethical requirements
Relevant Ethical Requirements
throughout the audit engagement, the engagement partner shall remain alert, through observation and making inquiries as necessary, for evidence of noncompliance with relevant ethical requirements by members of the engagement team
Relevant Ethical Requirements
Five Fundamental Ethical Requirements:
- Integrity
- Objectivity
- Professional Competence and Due Care
- Confidentiality
- Professional behavior
The engagement partner should form a conclusion on compliance with independence requirements that apply to the audit engagement.
Independence
- obtain relevant information to identify circumstances and relationships that creates threats to independence
- evaluate information on identified breaches of the firm independence policies and procedures to determine whether they create threats to independence
- take appropriate SAFEGUARDS to eliminate such threats to reduce them to an acceptable level, or if considered appropriate, to withdraw from audit engagement, where withdrawal is permitted by law or regulation
Independence
What ruins the independence requirement?
Relationships