AUDIT PRINCIPLES MODULE 7 Flashcards

(51 cards)

1
Q

establishes the basic principles and essential procedures and to provide guidance and to provide guidance regarding a firm’s responsibilities for its system of quality control for audits and reviews of historical financial information, and for other assurance and related services engagements.

A

PSQC 1 (Philippine Standards on Quality Control 1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Consists of policies designed to achieve the objectives of quality control and the
procedures necessary to implement and monitor compliance with those policies.

A

System of Quality Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Established and implemented to ensure that a public accounting firm adheres to the
standards of the accounting profession.

A

System of Quality Control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

NOT A QUESTION!

The firm shall design a system of quality control designed to:

  • provide it with REASONABLE ASSURANCE that the firm and its personnel comply with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements
  • reports issued by the firm or engagement partners are appropriate in the circumstances.
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Set of policies and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that the
public accounting firm complies with professional standards.

A

Quality control system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The nature and extent of quality control procedures depend on factors such as:

A
  1. Its size and nature of its policies
  2. Degree of operating autonomy allowed to its personnel
  3. The nature of its practice
  4. Its organization
  5. Its geographic dispersion
  6. Appropriate cost/benefit consideration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

NOTE:

The quality control policies and procedures shall be documented and communicated to the firm’s personnel.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Elements of a System of Quality Control:

A
  1. Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the firm
  2. Ethical Requirements
  3. Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Specific Engagements
  4. Human Resources
  5. Engagement performance
  6. Monitoring

MNEMONIC: HARLEM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

are established to measure the quality of performance of individuals and organizations.

Standards relating to the accounting profession concern themselves with CPA’s professional qualities, the judgment exercised in their professional engagement, and the CPA firm’s quality control policies and procedures

A

Standards

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The partner or other person IN the firm who is responsible for the engagement and its performance, and for the report that is issued on behalf of the firm, and who, where required, has the appropriate authority from a professional, legal or regulatory body

A

Engagement Partner

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

All partners and staff performing the engagement, and any individuals engaged by the firm or a network firm who perform procedures on the engagement. This excludes external experts engaged by the firm or a network firm.

A

Engagement Team

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A sole practitioner, partnership, or other entity of professional accountants

A

Firm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A partner, OTHER PERSON in the firm, suitably qualified external person, or a team made up of such individuals, NONE OF WHOM IS PART OF THE ENGAGEMENT TEAM, with sufficient and appropriate experience and authority to objectively evaluate the significant judgments the engagement team made and the conclusions it reached in formulating the report.

A

ENGAGEMENT QUALITY CONTROL REVIEWER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A process designed to provide an OBJECTIVE EVALUATION, ON or BEFORE the date of the report, of the significant judgments the engagement team made, and the conclusions it reached in formulating the report.

A

ENGAGEMENT QUALITY CONTROL REVIEW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

An individual OUTSIDE THE FIRM with the competence and capabilities to act as an engagement partner, for example, a partner of another firm, or an employee (with appropriate experience) of either a professional accountancy body whose members may perform audits and reviews of historical financial information, or other assurance or related services engagements, or of an organization that provides relevant quality control services.

A

SUITABLY QUALIFIED EXTERNAL PERSON

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The firm shall establish policies and procedures designed to promote an internal
culture based on the recognition that quality is essential in performing engagements.

A

Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the firm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the ENGAGEMENT PARTNER should take responsibility for the overall quality of each audit engagement to which the partner is assigned

A

Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the firm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

engagement partner should set an example regarding the quality of audit by emphasizing through actions and messages the importance of performing work that complies with professional standards, complying with the firm’s quality control, and issuing appropriate reports

(the engagement partner should be a good example to its staff or members, in order for them to follow and do their work properly)

A

Leadership Responsibilities for Quality within the firm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

The FIRM shall establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that the firm and its personnel comply with relevant ethical requirements

A

Relevant Ethical Requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

throughout the audit engagement, the engagement partner shall remain alert, through observation and making inquiries as necessary, for evidence of noncompliance with relevant ethical requirements by members of the engagement team

A

Relevant Ethical Requirements

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Five Fundamental Ethical Requirements:

A
  1. Integrity
  2. Objectivity
  3. Professional Competence and Due Care
  4. Confidentiality
  5. Professional behavior
22
Q

The engagement partner should form a conclusion on compliance with independence requirements that apply to the audit engagement.

23
Q
  1. obtain relevant information to identify circumstances and relationships that creates threats to independence
  2. evaluate information on identified breaches of the firm independence policies and procedures to determine whether they create threats to independence
  3. take appropriate SAFEGUARDS to eliminate such threats to reduce them to an acceptable level, or if considered appropriate, to withdraw from audit engagement, where withdrawal is permitted by law or regulation
24
Q

What ruins the independence requirement?

A

Relationships

25
the FIRM should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable that it will only undertake or continue relationships and engagements where the firm: 1. Is COMPETENT to perform the engagement and has the capabilities (CAPABLE), including time and resources, to do so 2. Can comply with relevant ethical requirements (the five fundamental ethical requirements and independence) 3. Has considered the integrity of the client, and does not have information that would lead it to conclude that the client lacks integrity
Acceptance and Continuance of Client Relationships and Specific Engagements
26
Information that would assist engagement partner regarding acceptance and continuance of client relationship:
1. Identity and business reputation of client's principal owners, key management-related parties, and those charged with governance 2. Nature of client's operations, including its business practices 3. Indications that the client might be involved in money laundering or any other criminal activities 4. The reasons for the proposed appointment of the firm and non-reappointment of the previous firm
27
THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES in assisting engagement partner regarding acceptance and continuance of client relationship may include:
1. obtaining information as deemed necessary 2. if a potential conflict of interest is identified 3. if issues have been identified
28
The FIRM shall establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that it has sufficient personnel with the competence, capabilities, and commitment to ethical principles necessary to: (a) Perform engagements in accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements (b) Enable the firm or engagement partners to issue reports that are appropriate in the circumstances
Human Resources (Assignment of Engagement Teams)
29
THE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES in Human Resources (Assignment of Engagement Teams):
1. Recruitment 2. Performance evaluation, compensation, and promotion 3. Capabilities and competence 4. Career development 5. Assignment of engagement teams
30
The firm shall assign responsibility for each engagement to an engagement partner. The firm should establish policies and procedures requiring that: ▪ The identity and role of the engagement partner are communicated to key members of client management and those charged with governance; ▪ The engagement partner has the appropriate capabilities, competence, authority and time to perform the role; and ▪ The responsibilities of the engagement partner are clearly defined and communicated to that partner.
Assignment of Engagement Teams
31
The engagement partner should be satisfied that the engagement team COLLECTIVELY has the appropriate capabilities, time, and competence to:
o An understanding of, and practical experience with, engagements of a similar nature and complexity through appropriate training and participation o An understanding of professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements. o Appropriate technical knowledge, including knowledge of relevant information technology. o Knowledge of relevant industries in which the clients operate. o Ability to apply professional judgment. o An understanding of the firm’s quality control policies and procedures
32
The firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance: (a) The engagements are performed in accordance with the professional standards and other regulatory and legal requirements (b) That the audit report issued is appropriate in circumstances
Engagement performance
33
The firm promotes consistency in the quality of engagement performance through its policies and procedures.
Engagement Performance
34
ENGAGEMENT SUPERVISION includes the following:
• Tracking the progress of the engagement. • Considering the competence and capabilities of individual members of the engagement team, whether they have sufficient time to carry out their work, whether they understand their instructions and whether the work is being carried out in accordance with the planned approach to the engagement. • Addressing significant matters arising during the engagement, considering their significance and modifying the planned approach appropriately; and • Identifying matters for consultation or consideration by more experienced engagement team members during the engagement.
35
A REVIEW consists of consideration of whether:
• The work has been performed in accordance with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements; • Significant matters have been raised for further consideration; • Appropriate consultations have taken place and the resulting conclusions have been documented and implemented; • There is a need to revise the nature, timing, and extent of work performed; • The work performed supports the conclusions reached and is appropriately documented; • The evidence obtained is sufficient and appropriate to support the report; and • The objectives of the engagement procedures have been achieved.
36
The firm shall establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that the firm, its personnel, and, where applicable, others subject to independence requirements (including experts contracted by the firm and network firm personnel), maintain independence where required by the Philippine code.
Independence
37
assistants/staff should be informed of their responsibilities - Their responsibilities, include the need to comply with relevant ethical requirements, and to plan and perform an audit with professional skepticism as required by PSA 220 V - The responsibilities of respective partners where more than one partner is involved in the conduct of audit engagement - Objectives of the work performed - Nature of entity's business - Risk-related issues and any problems that may arise - The detailed approach to the performance of audit engagement 706
DIRECTION
38
monitoring the progress of the audit resolving accounting and audit issues - Tracking the progress of the audit engagement - Considering the competence and capabilities of individual members of the engagement team, including whether they have sufficient time to carry out their work, whether they understand instructions, and whether the work is being carried out in accordance with the planned approach to the audit engagement - Addressing significant matters arising during the audit engagement - Identifying matters for consultation or consideration by more experienced engagement team members during the audit engagement.
Supervision
39
if procedures evidence and documentation are appropriate for the conclusion - Critical areas of judgment, especially those relating to difficult or contentious matters identified during the course of the engagement - Significant risks - Other areas the engagement partner considers important
Review
40
seeking assistance from authoritative sources within or outside the firm on the difficult or contentious matter
Consultation
41
The firm shall establish policies and procedures for dealing with and resolving differences of opinion within the engagement team, with those consulted and, where applicable, between the engagement partner and the engagement quality control reviewer.
Differences of Opinion
42
The firm shall establish policies and procedures for the retention of documentation for a period sufficient to meet the needs of the firm or as required by law or regulation.
Differences of Opinion
43
The firm shall establish policies and procedures requiring, for appropriate engagements, and engagement quality control review that provides an objective evaluation of the significant judgments made by the engagement team and the conclusions reached in formulating the report. • Such policies and procedures should: o Require an engagement quality control review for all audits of financial statements of listed entities; o Set out criteria against which all other audits and reviews of historical financial information, and other assurance and related services engagements should be evaluated to determine whether an engagement quality control review should be performed; and o Require an engagement quality control review for all engagements meeting the criteria established in compliance with above paragraph.
Engagement Quality Control Review
44
The firm’s policies and procedures should address the appointment of engagement quality control reviewers and establish their eligibility through: o The technical qualifications required to perform the role, including the necessary experience and authority; and o The degree to which an engagement quality control reviewer can be consulted on the engagement without compromising the reviewer’s objectivity.
Criteria for the Eligibility of Engagement Quality Control Reviewers
45
The firm’s policies and procedures are designed to maintain the objectivity of the engagement quality control reviewer. For example, the engagement quality control reviewer: o Is not selected by the engagement partner; o Does not otherwise participate in the engagement during the period of review; o Does not make decisions for the engagement team; and o Is not subject to other considerations that would threaten the reviewer’s objectivity.
Criteria for the Eligibility of Engagement Quality Control Reviewers
46
Policies and procedures on documentation of the engagement quality control review should require documentation that: o The procedures required by the firm’s policies on engagement quality control review have been performed; o The engagement quality control review has been completed BEFORE the report is issued; and o The reviewer is not aware of any unresolved matters that would cause the reviewer to believe that significant judgments the engagement team made and the conclusions the reached were not appropriate.
Documentation of the Engagement Quality Control Review
47
The engagement partner shall consider the results of the firms monitoring progress as evidenced in the latest information circulated by the firm and, if applicable, other network firms and whether deficiencies noted in that information may affect the audit engagement.
Monitoring
48
A deficiency in the firm's system of quality control does not necessarily indicate that a particular audit engagement was nomperformed in accordance with the professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements, or that the auditor's opinion was not appropriate.
Monitoring
49
The firm should establish policies and procedures designed to provide it with reasonable assurance that it deals appropriately with: ▪ Complaints and allegations that the work performed by the firm fails to comply with professional standards and regulatory and legal requirements; and ▪ Allegations of non-compliance with the firm’s system of quality control
Monitoring – complaints and allegations
50
The firm should establish policies and procedures requiring appropriate documentation to provide evidence of the operation of each element of its system of quality control.
Monitoring – Documentation
51
Systems of quality control in compliance with PSQC 1 (redrafted) are required to be established by
December 15, 2009