Audit Section 2 Flashcards
(152 cards)
Which of the following would an auditor most likely consider in evaluating the control environment of an audit client?
Management’s operating style.
According to COSO, each of the following is a principle relating to the risk assessment component of internal control
1) The organization considers the potential for fraud in assessing risks to the achievement of objectives.
2) The organization identifies and assesses changes that could significantly impact the system of internal control.
3) The organization specifies objectives with sufficient clarity to enable the identification and assessment of risks relating to objectives.
obtain and use information is applied when
the organization obtains or generates and uses relevant, high-quality information to support the functioning of the control. In this case, management is using the exception report (information) to support the control of monitoring overtime costs.
Objectives of an entity include
1) Reliable Financial Reporting
2) Effective and Efficient Operations
The monitoring component of internal control is
1) Assessing information derived from external parties.
2) Assessing the quality of control performance over time.
3) Improving controls that are not operating effectively.
Risk assessment component of internal control
An auditor evaluates an entity’s risk assessment to understand how management addresses risks relevant to financial reporting
Audit Strategy includes:
1) Provide a preliminary assessment of materiality and tolerable misstatement.
2) Outline reporting objectives.
3) Provide the scope of the
Required documentation in an audit in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards?
An audit plan setting forth in detail the procedures necessary to accomplish the engagement’s objectives.
Substantive procedures and tests of controls at the relevant assertion level to test a client’s
significant account balances, transaction classes, and disclosure items in the financial statements.
What is substantive procedures
test a client’s financial statement assertions
Test of controls is
audit procedure to test a client’s financial statement assertions
Auditor most likely to rely on work done by internal auditors?
For financial statement amounts judged by the auditor to require little or no subjectively evaluated audit evidence.
When an audit specialist is used for a client audit
Make no reference to the specialist in the audit report.
An auditor of a nonissuer intends to reference the work of an auditor’s external specialist in the audit report because the reference was relevant to understanding a modification to the auditor’s opinion. In this case, the auditor should indicate in the report
The reference to the auditor’s external specialist does not reduce the auditor’s responsibility for that opinion.
Auditor’s use of the work of an actuary in assessing a client’s pension obligations?
The auditor is required to understand the objectives and scope of the actuary’s work.
The company being audited has an internal auditor that is both competent and objective. The independent auditor wants to assign tasks for the internal auditor to perform. Under these circumstances, the independent auditor may:
Allow the internal auditor to perform tests of internal controls.
Under which of the following circumstances would an auditor be considered to be using the work of a specialist?
The auditor engages a lawyer to interpret the provisions of a complex contract.
An internal auditor’s work would most likely affect the nature, timing, and extent of an independent CPA’s auditing procedures when the internal auditor’s work relates to assertions about the:
Existence of fixed asset additions.
Testing the existence of contingencies, intangiable assets, related party transactions involves
much subjectivity, and should, therefore, be performed by the auditor.
The work of internal auditors may affect the independent auditor’s:
1) Procedures performed in obtaining an understanding of the system of internal control.
2) Procedures performed in assessing the risk of material misstatement.
3) Substantive procedures performed in gathering direct evidence.
Use in determining the auditor’s preliminary judgment about materiality?
The entity’s financial statements of the prior year.
Regard to the consideration of materiality when an auditor is planning and performing a financial statement audit of an issuer?
When determining a tolerable misstatement threshold, an auditor should take into account the amount of misstatements that were accumulated in prior periods.
Materiality should be reevaluated when:
1) There is a substantial likelihood that misstatements of amounts less than the materiality level established for the financial statements as a whole would influence the judgment of a reasonable investor.
2) Materiality levels and tolerable misstatement were originally based on estimated or preliminary financial statement amounts that differ significantly from actual amounts.
3) Changes that occurred after the materiality levels were originally set are likely to affect investor’s perceptions about the company’s financial statements.
What is being considered when establishing materiality
1) Both quantitative and qualitative factors are considered.
2) Materiality is based on the smallest level of misstatement for any one financial statement.
3) The auditor uses his or her professional judgment when assessing materiality.