Basic definition of theft Flashcards
(17 cards)
under what piece of legislation can this be found?
S1 Theft Act 1968
what type of offence is this?
either-way
what is the max sentence?
7 years imprisonment
what is the definition of theft?
a person is guilty of theft if they dishonestly appropriate property belonging to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it
what is the AR for theft?
appropriation of property belonging to another
what is the MR for theft?
dishonesty with an intention to deprive
what are some examples of ‘appropriate’?
this has a wide scope. It can include keeping property given to them, stealing, dealing
when can land be stolen?
Land can only be stolen:
* By a trustee in breach of trust;
* By D taking something severed/severing something from land they don’t own (i.e. a carrot); or
* By a tenant taking something fixed to the land
give some examples of things that cannot be stolen
- Electricity
- Confidential information
- Mushrooms, flowers, fruit, foliage on wild land unless D intends to sell them
- Wild animals unless it has been tamed/kept in captivity or captured (i.e. snared rabbit) and someone else takes it
explain ‘belonging to another’
another owns/has control (i.e. D could steal their own property if someone else was in control of it)
what is the position in relation to abandoned property? Give an example.
D cannot be guilty if property is genuinely abandoned. Hard to prove i.e. taking out of date food = theft.
how is it established whether D was dishonest?
- Satisfied if clear dishonesty. If not:
- Schedule 2 categories. If n/a:
- Ivey test
explain the Schedule 2 categories and how these are examined
conduct will not be dishonest if:
D has the right to the property;
Owner would have consented; or
D took reasonable steps (subj.) to find owner & couldn’t
D will raise this & P will need to disprove BARD
what is the Ivey test?
What was D’s actual knowledge/belief (subjective)?
Was their conduct honest/dishonest (objective)?
give an example of clear dishonesty
D will be dishonest even if they were willing to pay
when will D ‘intentionally deprive’ another?
They treat the property as their own
They borrow the property which results in loss of property value/utility (borrowing and return in same condition = no theft)
They part with property on conditions they may not be able to perform (i.e. pawning the property)
what is the difficulty with theft cases? Give an example
MR & AR need to coincide.
Problematic for food and petrol cases:
o Get petrol/eat food (AR) afterwards realise wallet at home and leave (MR) = no theft
o No intention to pay + get petrol/eat food (AR&MR) = theft