Basic Idea/Case Name Flashcards by Colleen Hanasyk

Q

Separate Legal Personality

A

Salomon

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Dual Capacity

A

Lee

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Corporate Veil

A

Kosmopolous

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Ostensible Authority

A

Freeman

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Actual Authority

A

CanLab

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Actual Authority

A

CanLab

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Mutual Intention

A

Kelner

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Common Mistake: both believed that the corporation existed

A

Black v. Smallwood; Newborne

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Adoption (Pre-Incorporation)

A

Sherwood

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Assigning Rights, Repudiation

A

139 v 1131

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Enforcement of Obligation (Deposits)

A

Benedetto

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Governing Executive Authority and Directing Mind

A

Rhone

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Identification Theory Criteria

A

Canadian Dredge

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Identification Theory and Charitable Orgs

A

Church of Scientology

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Fraud on the Corp (Sole Shareholder)

A

373 v BMO

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Identification Theory and Public Interest

A

Deloitte

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Dredge Factors in Civil Cases

A

Dejong

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Division of Power Influence

A

Automatic Self-Cleansing, s.102(1), s.146(1)

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Business Dealings: Fiduciary Duties

A

Lac Minerals

How well did you know this?

1

Not at all

2

3

4

5

Perfectly

Q

Fiduciary: Mutual Atonomy/Interest

A

Hardman Group

Q

Fiduciary Duty to Corporation

A

Wise

Q

Sitting on Multiple Boards

A

Re Sports Villas

Q

Self Dealing - Fruit of the Poison Tree

A

Aberdeen

Q

Self Dealing - Protection under Articles

A

Transvaal

Self Dealing: sufficient disclosure

Coleman

Self Dealing: material interest/personal relationships

Exide

Corp Best Interest/personal interest

UPM

Personal Interest: Shareholders

North-West

Intentional exclusion

Cook v. Deeks

Opportunity Criteria: missed corporate opportunity

Regal (Hastings) Ltd.

Bona Fide Rejection

Peso Silver

Resignation prompted by opportunity

CanAero

Reasonable Care/Reliance on Good Faith/Mere Errors

Re Brazilian Rubber

continuous attention/subjective-objective test

Soper

Duty to Creditors/BJR Applied

Wise

Prioritizing interests/BJR Applied

BCE

Mere errors of judgment/absence of fraud

Kamin

Reasonable process needed/BJR not Applied

Smith

Experts & duty to inquire/BJR Not applied

UPM

Hindsight in Duty of Care

CW Shareholders

Oppression Remedy vs Fiduciary

Brant Investments

Corporate Social Responsibility

Dodge v. Ford Motor Co.

Presumption of equality, Dividends clause

McClurg

presumption of equality, individual rights

International Power

Share rights, Additional Obligations

Edmonton Country Club

Shareholders Requisitioning Meeting

Oppenheimer

shareholder proposal

Michaud

De Jure Control/ Unanimous Shareholder Agreement

Duha Printers

Binding Unanimous Shareholder Agreement

Sportscope