Basic principles HS Flashcards

(487 cards)

1
Q

Diagnosis question =

A

Cross-sectional analytic study = observational study that analyses data from a
population at a specific period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Aetiology question =

A
  • Cohort study = longitudinal study that follow a population, often one that has a
    particular exposure – e.g. smoking
  • Case-control study = population study in which two existing groups differing in
    outcomes are identified & compared based on basis of some supposed causal
    attribution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prognosis question

A

cohort

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Tx question

A
  • RCT / Systematic Review of RCT
  • Note: can test for superiority between two variables, or for equivalence
    (i.e. equally as effective)
  • Cluster trials is where randomize clusters of patients, e.g. GP surgeries
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

evaluation questiuons

A

Systemic review/ MA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

cohort +

A
  • Best information about causation
  • Able to examine a range of outcomes
  • Good for rare exposure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Disadvantages of cohort studies

A
  • Long follow up = expensive & time-consuming
  • Bad for rare outcomes
  • Bad for long latency periods
  • Can have different follow-up for exposed / non-exposed
  • Confounders not recognized
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CCS +

A

Simple / easy to conduct = don’t require long follow ups
* Best for rare outcomes
* Good for long latent periods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

disadvantages of a CCS

A

Inferior to a cohort study
* Bad for rare exposure
* Controls may not represent where sample is from = often requires
several controls per case
* Cases don’t represent full disease spectrum = cured / died
* Recall bias
* Confounders not recognized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

BIAS

A

Systematic introduction of error into a study that can distort the results in a non-random way

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

selectio bias

A

Error in assigning individuals to groups, leading to differences in
group’s qualities that may influence the outcomes
* To make inferences from results, we require sample to be
representative of population = requires random sampling (or if
smaller group some stratified randomization)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

ways in which selection bias can arise

A
  • Sampling selected subjects not representative of population
    2. Volunteer volunteer subjects not representative of population
    3. Non-responder responders are not representative of the
    populat
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

recall bias =

A
  • Difference in accuracy of recollection of study participa
  • could be due to time, greater recall in those w the disease (issue in CCS)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Publication bias

A
  • Failure to publish / include certain studies because they have
    negative results = important in systematic revie
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

hawthorne effect

A
  • Group changing its behavior due to knowledge it is being studi
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

procedure bias

A
  • Subjects in different groups receive different care, other than just the intervention
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

info bias

A
  • Information about participants is incorr
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

methods of randomisation - simple

A

computer random number generator (may have chance bias)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

stratified randomisation

A

– to make sure you have equal numbers of e.g. different severities of illness in each

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

minimisation bias

A

computer algorithm forms groups to ensure comparability (smaller studies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

key principle of randomisation

A

t must ensure unpredictable assignment to groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

concealed randomisation tends to

A

o yield less impressive results – because without this you over-estimate the effect by
selection bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

regression to the mean =

A

People often get better or worse regardless of intervention = not intervention causing change

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

regression to mean example

A

If you are measuring something that randomly varies (e.g. BP which is fluctuant) and you’re always
looking at the extremes, a significant proportion of the people who are in the extremes are there by
chance
B. Therefore, when you re-measure the group, on average they will “regress to the mean”
C. In the example of BP = if you measure a group of people with high blood pressure, when you next
measure them, they will improve (decrease BP) on avera

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
precise vs accurate
1. Precise = Narrow CIs 2. Accurate = Close to real value
26
Treatment fidelity
How accurately the intervention is reproduced from a protocol or model
27
randomisation
Purpose is to ensure that any confounding characteristics are equally distributed between the two study groups, avoiding selection bias
28
internal validity
How well study was conducted, taking confounders into account & removing bias
29
Ext validity
Generalizability how well the study can be applied to different scenarios / patients / environment
30
Association
* Two variables are said to be associated when one is found more commonly in the presence of the oth
31
3 types of association
- spurious - indirect - direct
32
Spurious assoc
* An association that has arisen by chance and is not real
33
indirect association vs direct
* The association is due to the presence of another factor (a confounding variable - direct: * A true association not linked by a third (confounding) variab
34
how do we know if an association is causal
bradford hill
35
face validity
does it test what it is meant to
36
content validity
refers to the extent to which a test or measure assesses the full content of a subject or area.
37
criterion validity
concerns the comparison of tests. You may wish to compare a new test to see if it works as well as an old, accepted method. The correlation coefficient is used to test such comparisons
38
concurrent validity
the predictor and criterion data are collected at or about the same time. An example could be testing a new, shorter test of intellectual functioning against a standard measure
39
predictive validity
- validation, the predictor scores are collected first and criterion data are collected at some later/future point. - Here you want to know if the test predicts future outcomes.
40
construct validity
extent to which a test measures the construct it aims to
41
convergent validity
a test has convergent validity if it has high correlation w anothet test that measures the same construct
42
divergent validity
demonstrated by a low correlation with a test that measures a different construtc
43
INITIAL 2 QUESTIONS ON RCT CHECKLISTS
- Did the study ask a clearly focused question - PICO - was the study design app for the question - why was it an RCT
44
Methods of randomisation RCT
Good randomisation is truly random i.e. random computer-generated numbers etc. = this is allocation concealment / unpredictable assignment B. Randomisation methods based on date of presentation to clinic, order of presentation to clinician, letter of name / number in date of birth etc. = not adequate methods of randomisation & do not allow allocation concealment they might allow the allocating clinician to predict / guess what group the patient might be in before deciding to recruit them into the study * Inadequate methods can cause baseline differences of the groups age, gender, co-morbid conditions (if not excluded), severity of condition, lifestyle: must be comparable in ALL respects other than intervention they are receivi
45
What can be done with randomisation to ensure balance
nce, researchers may have to ‘stratify’ randomisation – this means that it you know of a very powerful confounder – say age – you may need first to split participants into ‘young’ and ‘old’ before you randomi
46
what might need to be done for a small sample size
replacement randomisation - equal numbers in each arm
47
* Equipoise=
refers to the situation where the researchers have no preference between the treatments being studied in a t
48
when is equipoise lost
when those designing the trial or recruiting patients into it do have a preference for one treatment over another, it can be considered unethical to recruit patients into the trial as you are offering some patients what you believe to be a “worse option
49
What does blinding prevent
1. Prevents observer bias = form of reactivity in which researcher’s cognitive bias causes them to subconsciously influence the participants of experiment = could influence extra quality of care to these patients 2. Or confirmation bias = see results that aren’t there 3. Expectation bias (Pygmalion effect) = Observers may subconsciously measure or report data in a way that favours the expected study outcome 4. Also prevents placebo effect – or reduces it
50
attrition bias
lost from the study - were these accounted for
51
Intention to treat analysis
used to mitigate impact of attrition bias. All patient analyzed even if didn't complete study = if dropped out either use data before drop out or include this in analysis as a limitation of the study / potential negative of the therapy
52
RCT - follow up
Were all participants followed up / data collected in same way? 1. Same time of day? – sun down phenomenon in dementia, higher levels of cortisol in morning, relation to meal times 2. During same period? – time of year may have impact, e.g. winter = more illnesses 3. Did participants receive the same attention from health workers? – observer / procedural bias 4. Was data collection potentially subjective? – especially relevant if considering placebo effect – treatment group aware = report side effects
53
RCT - sample size
high enough power required to avoid false N - T2 error
54
underpowered study
not enough pts to distinguish real effect of a Tx -> type 2 error
55
how can we ensure we have enough pptd
do a power calc
56
Bradford Hill criteria
1. Strength = effect size 2. Reproducibility = in concordance with other findings 3. Specificity = other likely explanation for results 4. Temporality = effect occurs after cause 5. Biological gradient = greater exposure = greater effect 6. Plausibility = logical mechanism by which effect is achieved SRS-TBP | several rascals stop to be peasants
57
RCT is gold standard for
- cause and effect - However, not ethical to allocate patient to a certain exposure that may be harmful (equipoise) -> cohort
58
cohort studies allow for
startification - reduce risk of confounders
59
selection bias in cohort studies
- selection bias - reduced generalisability -> less EV - . Patient who are more concerned about health more likely to do clinical trial & therefore more likely to get good results B. Only selecting patients with certain outcomes / severity of condition in an attempt to get better results = not representative of full disease spectr
60
Questionnares are subject to
recall and response bias
61
non differential error =
- = random misclassification of exposure equal in both groups - Leads to bias towards null (false negative) and hide true relationships by diluting an existing relationship = type II statistical
62
differential error
- non-random misclassification of exposure proportion misclassified differs between the two groups (normally from recall / observer bias) - Leads to bias in either direction (false negative or positive) i.e. = creating spurious associations (type I statistical error) or obscuring true ones (type 2 error)
63
cohort - accurate outcome measure
If outcome measurement reporting is universally poor (non-differential error) = will lead to bias towards the null (type II error) B. If outcome measurement reporting is more accurate in one group (differential error) = may get a spurious positive relationship - T1 error
64
confounding =
“Distortion (or potential for distortion) of association between outcome and exposure, by a third factor which has an association with both exposure & outcom
65
if confounding variables have not been taken into account during design or analysis
, association between exposure and outcome could be biased = can stratify, or (more often) do Multi-Variable Regression
66
cohort - follow up
- was it long enough for exposure to manifest - those lost may have had diff outcomes
67
cohort - incomplete follow up
Allows selection bias -> May reduce power of the study even if it is non-differential between the study group
68
cohort: insufficient length of FU
May mean that relevant outcomes are not observed and associations not detected – leading to: A. Bias towards the null B. Underestimation of outcome & exposure associati
69
systematic review benefits
- speed - ethics - is it defensible to conduct a controlled trial if the answer is already available in trials alr done - 3. Increase total sample size improved power = improving certainty & preci 5. Permit sub groups analysis
70
systematic reviews give an indication of
- any heterogeneity in findings * I2 = represents the heterogeneity between studies - larger value suggests greater risk findings due to chance
71
steps of a SR
- clear question - protocol before searching - search strategy - conclude results in a subjective way
72
publication bias
e * Not including abstracts / grey literature introduces publication
73
Cross sectional study
- Observational study - Source population is examined to see what proportion has the outcome of interest, or has been exposed to the risk factor of interest, or both. - Looks at individuals within a population at a single point in time
74
prevalence study =
cross sectional
75
when are cross sectional studies useful
- Less reliable for determining the prevalence of very rare conditions with a short duration but can often provide useful estimates of disease burden for a particular population. - Descriptive technique rather than analytical, so they cannot be used to estimate the relationship between cause and effect - Most suitable to investigate diagnosis
76
pyramid of evidence
77
absolute risk =
- Chance of an event occurring” * Is affected by condition prevalence - max risk = 1
78
relative risk
* “Risk of an event occurring in an exposed group versus the population (non-exposed group)” = Risk in Experiment Group ÷ Risk in Control * RR of 1 = number difference between the groups: <1 = less likely / >1 = more likely
79
which type of risk does not consider prev of the condition
relative risk
80
RRR
* “(Experimental Event Rate – Control Event Rate) ÷ Control Event Rate” * (EER-CER)/CER (Event Rate = Absolute Risk )
81
ABSOLUTE RISK REDUCTIO
n – a.k.a. risk difference / attributable risk: * “Risk without treatment – Risk with treatment
82
NNT -
Number of patients who need to be treated to prevent one additional adverse outcome in a given time
83
NNT EQUATION
= 1 ÷ Absolute Risk Reduction = ROUND UP to full number!
84
NNH
- Number of patients need to be exposed to a particular risk-factor in order for one additional patient to be harmed in a given time” * i.e. the number of patients that need to be treated for one to get a side effect
85
NNH equation
- 1 ÷ (Incidence in Treated – Incidence in Untreated) * (i.e. 1 ÷ Absolute Risk Increase) = ROUND DOWN to full number!
86
when is odds ratio sed
case controls
87
odds ratio =
- “Number of people who develop an outcome to the number of people who don’t - approximates RR if the outcome is rare
88
RR is used in
cohorts
89
hazard ratios =
- “The ratio of hazard rates in two groups” * e.g. if = 2, hazard occurs twice as much in given exposure group
90
PAR
- how much disease prev would change if a RF was removed - Some exposures dramatically increase individual risk, but have little impact on population risk – i.e. rare exposures
91
95% CI =
- Range of values that is 95% likely to contain the true value * The result is the true result for the sample – the confidence intervals contain the true result for the entire population within them
92
Width of 95% CI
Width represents uncertainty to value (i.e. the precision), if crosses line of no effect (i.e. RR =1), this represents ‘no difference’ between the groups
93
p value =
Likelihood that the observed result is due to chance if is > 0.05 then say the results are statistically insignificant
94
null vs alt hypothesis
- null: no difference between parameters - alt: there is a difference
95
power
e probability of correctly rejecting the null hypothesis (power is increased by increasing sample size)
96
Precision is basically
width of CI
97
* If the 95% CI’s for RR includes
* If the 95% CI’s for RR includes 1 = p value by definition is over 0.05 so results aren’t statistically significant
98
p value of ? indicates stat signficance
under 0.05
99
T1 error
- * Null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected = false positive - not affected by sample size
100
T2 error
- Null hypothesis is incorrectly accepted = false negative * Decreased by smaller sample size
101
Pearsons correlation coefficient
Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient indicates how closely the points lie to a line drawn through the plot
102
PCC values
- R = 1 shows strong positive correlation b) R = -1 shows a strong negative correlation c) R = 0 no correlat
103
standard deviation
* Expresses by how much the members of a group differ from the mean value for the gro
104
1 SD from mean =
68.3% of values
105
2 SD from mean
95.4% of values
106
3 SD from mean =
99.7%
107
margin of error
* We use the idea of a ‘margin of error’ when we talk about how our sample results relate to people not in the sample i.e. ‘the population’ * That margin has to get bigger in relation to factors that would inevitably increase the variation between samples
108
standard error of the mean
* The measure of possible variation between samples is called the standard error * = Standard Deviation / Square Root: (Number of Patients)
109
parametric tests
- can be measured, usually normally distributed - Student's t-test paired or unpaired * - Pearson's product-moment coefficient -> correlation
110
Non parametric tests
- MWU - wilcoxon - chi sq - spearman rank
111
students T test - paired vs unpaired
2. Paired data refers to data obtained from a single group of patients, e.g. Measurement before and after an intervention 3. Unpaired data comes from two different groups of patients, e.g. Comparing response to different interventions in tw
112
MNU
Unpaired data
113
Wilcoxon signed rank test
st compares two sets of observations on a single s
114
chi sq =
used to compare proportions or percentages
115
spearman =
correlation
116
phase 1 trial
- small group, assessing safety of drug, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and side-effects prior to larger studies
117
# 2a vs 2b phase 2 trial
- larger group to assess dosing & efficacy * 2a = assesses optimal dosing * 2b = assesses efficacy
118
phase 3 trial
3 larger group still (thousands) primarily focusing on effectiveness, compare to other drugs & long-term safety
119
Phase 4 trial
after drug or treatment has authorized for prescription, looking at longer term benefits
120
Ethics of clinical trials - Nuremberg code
- Must have informed & voluntary consent - Must avoid all unnecessary suffering - Must only be conducted by qualified people
121
Helsinki Declaration (1964) sai
any researcher had to be subjected to independent ethical comittee review
122
General ethical principles
- In a therapeutic method are risks > benefit? (non-maleficence vs. beneficence) – including whether what is being researched is worthwhile - Not possible without humans = beneficial results can be achieved from no other mean - Maximise confidentiality / privacy D. No equipoise = all patients in a fair group E. Ethical committee approval F. Patients have right to withdraw at any time
123
research ethics approval
- Always required for research involving human participant / human data / human tissue including recently dead, foetal material * Not normally required if not using above, or if is an audi
124
who gives ethical approval for research
- NHS Research Ethics Committees (REC) give this, otherwise university has to approve * Not normally required for research involving NHS staf
125
Importance of ethical committee approval?
A. Protects participants B. Protects researchers / minimise potential for claims C. Protects reputations of institutions D. Condition for grants / funding E. Legal requirement for some research involving patient lacking mental capacity
126
Consent procedure in research
- voluntary & informed - not pressured - no financial incentive - have time to decide - aware they can withdraw
126
how is approval for research from NHS REC obtaineda
application done online via IRAS
126
Biomedical ethics - autonony
the autonomous individual freely acts in accordance with a self-chosen plan
127
beneficence
acting in best interests of pts
128
Non-maleficence
- do not cause harm
129
justice
treat all patients fairly (with equity)
130
nelignence
- A breach in the legal duty of care which results in damage ● Often passive, or an omission
131
when is negligence criminal
- non consensual Tx - not acting in pts best interests
132
bolam principle
- Principle that establishes whether an act or omission by a HCP breached the duty of care & thus they were negligent ○ Not negligent if an established body of professionals supports the act, even if the practice was not standard care (e.. guidelines)
133
Bolitho test for negligence
- Adaptation of the Bolam principle - States courts can’t just accept what professionals say, must consider if it is logical first
134
stigma =
Mark of disgrace associated with a particular circumstance, quality, or person.
135
Process of producing stigma:
1. Labelling = distinguishing differences between people 2. Stereotyping = making assumptions based on those differences 3. Othering = separates person e.g. diabetes - diabetics 4. Discrimination
136
Types of stigma - felt
shame you feel as a result of stigma, may be due to your condition.p
137
passing stigma =
(not seeking help) → very relevant to health conditions like addiction = may act as a barrier to health-seeking behaviour
138
withdrawing stigma =
→ can worsen health conditions
139
covering stigma =
hiding it can exacerbate sense of stigma = worsen health conditions - may also present friends/ family from noticing
140
enacted stigma
discrimination by others
141
courtesy stigma =
= felt by someone who is with someone else who is being stigmatised.
142
equality act
- 2010 - Makes it illegal to discriminate directly or indirectly against people with MH problems in public services and functions, access to premises, work, education and transport
143
Implications of stigma in medicine
- fear of stigma -> impact on health seeking behaviours - concerns abt confidentiality - TX can lead to stigma e.g. wheelchair
144
health education =
give people knowledge & skill to change potentially health damaging behaviours e.g. advice from health professionals, mass media campaigns
145
health protection=
- a core public health function focused on safeguarding individuals, groups, and populations from various health threats - e,g, managing infectious diseases, addressing envir hazards, responsing to outbreaks
146
primary prevention
prevents onset of disease e..g. addressing cause
147
types of primary prevention
- Universal (whole population) ○ Selective (risk group) ○ Individual (identify high risk individuals eg. genetic mutations)
148
secondary prevention =
= cure/ identify disease earlier e.g. screening
149
tertiary prevention
manage disease
150
beatties typology
- health persuasion - mass media campaign - legislation - personal counselling - community based initiatives
151
symptom iceberg
- 70% of symptoms are never reported ○ The way symptoms are perceived = illness behaviours → this is what influences if someone presents to the doctor or not
152
Zolas triggers for health seeking behaviour
1. Interference with work/ hobbies/ house work 2. Interference with social relations 3. Interpersonal crisis = death of relative/ friend, divorce, loss of child etc 4. Putting a time limit on symptoms = will seek help if not resolved by certain time 5. Sanctioning = told to by someone else
153
Barriers to health seeking - availability
- avail of svcs - cant get appts & geographical avail
154
barriers to health seeking - cultural
- stigmisation of MH in certain cultures - ○ Feel like different class/ culture to doctor → “won’t understand them”
155
barriers to health seeking - prev exp
- bad experiences - ○ Felt stigma ○ Language barrier, no interpreter → reduced rapport with doctor ○ Didn’t get what they wanted e.g. Abx
156
barriers to HSB - logistics
- time - childcare - loss of earnings from work - cant get there e.g. no transport
157
barriers to HSB - risk perception
- Don’t smoke (lung cancer) → “won’t happen to me” ○ Or perceive as risk & scared of finding out results ○ Already had & now having different symptoms so not perceived as risk
158
How to reduce barriers in certain ethnic groups
- availability of interpreters - info leaflets in different languages - Better understanding of the health beliefs of different ethnic groups 5. Targeted advice for different groups based on their risk factors
159
inverse care law
better off areas have better access to care than poorer ones (despite better health) → demonstrated by the Black Report 1980
160
Marmot Review (2010) proposed 5 policies to address health inequalities:
- Give every child the best start in life - Enabling all people to maximise their capabilities and have control over their lives - Ensuring a healthy standard of living for all - Creating fair employment and good work for all - Creating and developing healthy and sustainable places and communities
161
BBB - SPIKES
- setting - comfortable & quiet. Offer other ppl to be there - perception - establish what they know & ICE - invitation - what do they want to know today - Knowledge - slowly give info, allow large pauses, reg check understanding - emotions & empathy - tell truth abt prognosis, if dont know diagnosis -> refer - strategy and summary - make a plan for follow up, future steps, check understanding, ask if any ?
162
BBB - ABCDE
Advanced preparation Build a relationship Communicate well Deal with patient reactions Encourage and validate emotions
163
Screening =
“The systematic application of a test or inquiry, to identify individuals at sufficient risk of a specific disorder to warrant further investigation or direct preventive action, amongst persons who have not sought medical attention on account of symptoms of that disorder
164
wilson criteria for a screening programme - the condition
- Common or severe disease = important health problem b) Epidemiology & natural history well understood: - MUST have a latent stage - long pre-clinical durations
165
wilson criteria for a screening programme -the test
- ) Simple, safe, precise & validated f) Isn’t harmful / acceptable level of harm, i.e. benefit outweighs harm (including of future potential investigation - ) Distribution of test values well known & suitable cut off d) Agreed pathway following positive resu
166
wilson criteria for a screening programme - The Tx
- ) Effective intervention that leads to better outcomes if given earlier b) Cost-effective can be measured in terms of both life saved & QAL
167
wilson criteria for a screening programme - the programme
- c) RCT evidence showing programme effective in ↓ mortality / morbidity d) Benefit > harm e) The programme is continually reviewed by for quality assura
168
too low cut off for screening
end up identifying too many people needing unnecessary further investigations (too many false positives i.e. HIGH SENSITIVITY but LOW SPECIFICITY)
169
Too high screening cut off
= all the people you identify are more likely to have disease, but you will inevitably miss some (low false negative rate i.e. LOW SENSITIVITY but HIGH SPECIFICITY)
170
+ of screening
- Better patient outcomes: a) Better survival / less requirement for radical therapy (e.g. can do breast-conserving, or not need chemo) b) May require less long-term therapy so more cost effective 2. Reassurance for those with negative results
171
- of screening
- longer morbidity if prognosis is unaltered – over-diagnosis 2. Cost of resources 3. False reassurance for those with false-negatives 4. Unnecessary investigations for false-positives / over-treatment of borderline abnormalities (may not have died from condition): a) Waste of resources b) Health implications for patient iatrogenic damage / stress
172
lead time bias
Lead time = time between picking up disease via screening and the disease presenting symptoms * Diagnosed earlier so appears survival is longer but in fact just diagnosed for longer = “artefactual extension of survival"
173
lengh time bias
- More likely do detect a more slowly growing and more treatable cancer, meaning that prognosis is good anyway, so not that much benefit * i.e. detect diseases with a longer sojourn time
174
other bias in screening
selection -Well-educated individuals tend to worry and comply with screening programmes better = individuals often healthier & will therefore have better outcomes
175
why dont we have a PSA screening
- poorly understood, many other things raise PSA - PSA true sensitivity / specificity unknow - Currently active monitoring is about as successful as treating = no benefit of screening - median survival following diagnosis is 15 yrs
176
AAA screeing
> US scan for men > 65 - single scan
177
components of antenatal screening
A. Foetal anomalies B. Maternal pre-existing issues C. Maternal obstetric complications
178
benefits of antenatal screening
- Gives women / parents more information and choice about raising child with Down’s or abortion B. Allows time to prepare if wanting to continue with pregnancy and access support groups to ensure they have support system in place for when baby arrives C. Allows pre-planning and identification of any challenges and adaptations that will be required D. Also provides reassurance to women who are low risk
179
risks of antenatal screening
A. Only a SCREENING TEST hence a negative result does not guarantee child won’t have Down’s i.e. false positives and also false negatives B. Risk of diagnostic testing miscarriage of an otherwise healthy baby could occu
180
CC involves women of which ages
25-64
181
CC invitations
A. 25-49 y/o = every 3 years B. 50-64 y/o = every 5 years C. Annual if HIV
182
exceptions to antenatal screening
- virgins may choose not to be screened - low risk - If women present with symptoms or signs of cancer then they are not screened and referred urgently 3. If previous history of CIN then have more frequent surveillanc
183
when is CC rescheduled
- Currently menstruating 2. Less than 12 weeks post-natal = reschedule 3. Current pelvic infectio
184
FIT testing
- 50 -74 - every 2 years - abn -> colonoscopy
185
BC screening
- mammogram: 50-70 yrs - every 3 years > after 70 can self refer
186
Surveillence programme for DDH
- not a screeninf programme
187
Normative ethics =
- Branch or moral philosophy (ethics) concerned with criteria of what is morally right or wrong, evaluated standards for the rightness and wrongness of actions
188
virtue ethics =
- a branch of normative ethics which treat the concept of moral virtue as central to ethics
189
meta ethics
The nature of ethical terms and concepts and to attempt to understand the underlying assumptions behind moral theories
190
deontology =
An ethical theory that states it is possible to determine the rightness or wrongness of actions by examining actions themselves without focusing on the consequences
191
consequentialism =
- an ethical theory that states it is possible to determine the rightness or wrongness of actions by examining its consequences
192
Consent in kids
● Patient 16+ can consent (or if Gillick competent) : - ○ Parents can refuse (or consent if patient is not competent to consent) ○ If doctor disagrees with parent’s decision (not in best interests) can be taken to court → parents must act in the child’s best interest
193
when can we treat w/o consent
emergency
194
patient under 16 cannot
REFUSE treatment - but can consent!
195
Patient > 16 is considered
competent - can accept and refuse Tx
196
common vs statute law
- Common law Law that arises from a ruling court case, e.g. it sets a precedent 2. Statute law Written l
197
which ways can conset be given
1. . Written 2. Oral 3. Non-verb
198
when is consent not always req
- ● If patient requires emergency treatment and they can’t consent ● Can be detained under Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 in hospital if have infectious disease ● Mental Health Act 19
199
Gillick comp
- Parental rights yield if child reaches sufficient understanding + intelligence. Assessed with Fraser Guidelines = can’t overrule this consent * If Gillick competent (i.e. u16) can ACCEPT treatment but can not REFUSE treatment
200
parental autonomy
* Parent responsibility mother / father (only one needed), legal guardian, local authory - must act in best interest of the child
201
When is a child considered competent according to fraser guidelines
A Understand all aspects of advice + its implications = doesn’t apply if young person lacks capacity consent required from parents B. Cannot persuade them to tell parents or allow you to tell them C. Person is likely to have sex without contraception (upon requesting it) D. Their health is likely to suffer without such advice / treatment – in best interest for them to receive it without parental knowledge
202
if u suspect coercion when prescribing contraception
- Suspicion of coercion, sexual exploitation (e.g. partner much older) * Child protection guidelines followed / involve police * This includes if you know they’re having sex when they don’t have capacity to conse
203
under what age can kids NEVER consent
- If under 13 years of age: * Should inform parents, social services / police as can’t consent at this age = statutory rape (regardless of consent
204
MCA and MHA
MCA cannot be used when MHA applies and VV
205
Two-stage functional test of capacity
- In order to decide whether an individual has the capacity to make a particular decision you must answer two questions: 1. Stage 1: * “Is there an impairment of or disturbance in the functioning of a person’s mind or brain?” If so, 2. Stage 2: * “Is the impairment or disturbance sufficient that the person lacks the capacity to make a particular decision?
206
a person is deemed not to have capacity if unable to
1. Understand information 2. Retain information 3. To use or weigh up that information 4. To communicate decision
207
Principles of MCA act 2005`
1. Presumed to have capacity unless proven otherwise 2. Must take all steps to allow patient to have capacity (e.g. speak in their language, not in jargon, hearing aid, change environment) 3. Unwise decision does not mean patient does not have capacity 4. Make decisions for patient in their best interes
208
when can relatives make decisions for a person that lacks capacity
if they have power of attorney
209
MCA - decisions made for a person must be
- in their best interests - It should also be minimally restrictive of that persons rights / freedom
210
LPA =
this allows the patient to appoint an attorney to act on their behalf if they should lose capacity in the future. There is a formal legal protocol to register an attorn
211
Advanced statement of wishes
es are about expressing preferences – i.e. written statements of wishes. They are not legally binding but the should be taken into account
212
Advanced directives =
- specific decision to refuse treatment (can’t demand treatment) * Trumps best interests every time as is equal to consent * Are beneficial as they extend patient auto
213
Ulysses arrangements =
Ulysses Arrangements used in psychiatry, i.e. when someone has bipolar etc which allow someone to direct how they are treated if they have relapsing / remitting capacity
214
A person cannot refuse ... with an advanced directive
Note: can not refuse basic personal care, such as offer of provision of oral food and drink (can refuse artificial nutrition) / prevention of bed sore
215
DOLS
- Deprivation Of Liberty Safeguards: allow restraint and restriction only if this is in the persons best interest - sets out a process that hosp and care homes must follow
216
conditions to deprive liberty under DOLS
- That the arrangements are in the person’s best interest 2. The person is appointed someone to represent them 3. The person is given a legal right of appeal over the arrangements 4. The arrangements are reviewed and continue for no longer than necessary
217
Safeguarding kids=
- Protecting child from maltreatment 2. Preventing impairment of child’s health / development 3. Ensure child grows up in circumstances consistent with provision of safe & effective care
218
if u suspect a child is in immediate danger ->
If suspect a child is in immediate danger refer to local authority social care (or police if very urgent)
219
Section 17 of childrens act
- Under Section 17 of Children’s Act 1989 = deemed to be in need if, without the provision of services by a local authority, a child is: 1. Unlikely to maintain or achieve satisfactory level of health & development 2. Their health or development is likely to be significantly impaired 3. They are disabled
220
Section 44
* Section 44 = Emergency Protection Order (EPO) can be sent by police, NSPCC & social services: 1. Requires person to produce child to applicant 2. Prevention of removal of child from safe place, e.g. hospital, or ensures removal to safe place 3. Gives parental responsibility of child
221
how long does a section 44 last
8 days - can extend for 7 days only
222
paeds confidentiality
- . Must seek child’s permission before discussing with parent / guardian – BUT obligation NOT ABSOLUTE * If risk of abuse or sexual consent (< 13 y/o) must break confidentiality
223
when can confidentiality be broken
- life threatening situations: self harm, suicide, DVLA - Demanded by Court Statute / CQC / NHS fraud / GMC / Parliament (or certain communicable diseases) - disclosure in public interest to prevent harm - Patient lacks capacity & disclosure is in their best interest
224
Disclosure is in public interest to prevent harm:
A. Communicable disease to partner B. Intention to murder / terrorism prevention C. DVLA informed Insulin, Epilepsy, TIAs if patient won’t D. Knife / gun wounds police must be informed E. Protect children F. Prevent trafficking
225
anonymous - confidentiality
can be used for stats purposes if anonymous
226
deceased - confidentiaity
* Usually allowed to disclose to certain parties unless patient explicitly requested complete confidentiality upon deat
227
BREAKING CONFIDENTIALITY (simplified)
1. Protect children 2. Protect public – e.g. from acts of terrorism 3. Required by courts 4. Prevent or detect a crime 5. Provide care in life-threatening circumstances 6. Protect the service provider in life-threatening circumstances
228
Indepndent MH advocate
- Allocated worker to support patient, allow them to express their views & concerns, & to defend their rights a) Doesn’t advise them, but gives them objective information to facilitate them making a decision b) Accompany & support them at meeting
229
AMHP =
- Usually psychiatrist, although could be social worker, CPN etc. - Is someone with special training in mental health, who makes application for section
230
Section 12 approved dr =
usually psychiatrist, although can be GP, who has been approved under MHA for sectioning patient
231
section 2 of MHA
- Detainment in hospital for assessment, e.g. this is done when diagnosis is unclear, & when a treatment plan needs to be put in place - sig risk to self/ others
232
Who must apply for a section 2
Must be applied for by AMHP & approved by 2 doctors (one must be section 12 approved) = 2 independent
233
duration of a section 2
28 days
234
section 3
- . Power Detention in hospital for treatment. Patient must have a diagnosis for this (can include prior diagnosis), and treatment must be available & expected to improve patient - can be treated with meds
235
section 3 -ation b) If want to administer surgical intervention, ECT etc
SOAD approval
236
Who must apply for a section 3
Must be applied for by AMHP & approved by 2 doctors (one must be section 12 approved) = 2 independendent doctors
237
Duration of a section 3
. Duration 6 months (reviewed after initial 3 months), then renewed for another 6 months, then annually after
238
section 4 =
- Detention in hospital for emergency assessment, when S.12 Doctor can’t be obtained quickly (when they’re present converted to SECTION 3)
239
What cannot be done under a section 4
treatment
240
who can apply for a section 4
Can be applied for by an AMHP (or technically nearest relative). Only requires 1 other qualified doctor to approve
241
duration of a s4
72 hrs
242
Section 5(2)
- doctor holding powers - can be converted to a S.2 / S.3 when AMHP, S.12 Doc and SOAD available - applied for by dr, doesnt need approving
243
duration of section 5(2)
72 hrs
244
section 5(4)
- nurse holding powers - can be converted to 5(2) when dr available - applied for by nurse doesnt need approving
245
Section 5(4) duration
only 6 hrs
246
section 125 =
A. Power Police can use this to hold you or take you to a place of safety if they think you are suffering from MHD - Does not need any approvals
247
duration of a section 135
36 HRS - CAN BE EXTENDED
248
section 136
A. Power Police can use this to hold you or take you to a place of safety if they think you are suffering from a MHD - does not need any approvals
249
duration of a 136
B. Duration 24 hours + 12 hour
250
section 17
A. Power To leave ward whilst on an inpatient section * : Enforced treatment, whilst living in community = must follow certain conditions - if break these conditions pt recalled
251
HRA
. Right to life: * The European court has held that the article requires hospitals to take measures to ensure steps are in place to secure an individual's right to life = mostly relevant with regards to suicide 2. Prohibition of torture: * Have to justify medical treatment (as side effects / process e.g. ECT) could be classified as torture * Relevant to MHA as could give patient cheaper drug with worse side effects (can’t do this), or give drug instead of psychological therapy 3. Right to liberty & security: * Everyone has right to freedom cannot be taken away without good reason
252
HRA - right to a fair trial
4. Right to a fair trial: * Everyone sectioned has the right to a mental health review tribunal hear
253
limited rights
- authorities can interfere e.g. s it’s not a breach of your right to personal freedom if you’re detained following a criminal conviction or under mental health legislation and the correct procedure was followe
254
Qualified rights
A public authority can sometimes interfere with your rights if it’s in the interest of the wider community or to protect other people’s rights. These rights are qualified The following rights are qualified: A. Article 8 - your right to respect for private and family life B. Article 9 - freedom to manifest your religion or belief C. Article 10 - freedom of expression D. Article 11 - freedom of assemb
255
absolute rights
- can never be restricted - e.g. right to not be tortured or treated in inhumane way - right to hold religious and non-religious beliefs
256
Fertility and LD
- : most people with LD have sexual interests. It is discouraged as they may not be able to provide sufficient care, capacity to consent or refuse sex - Serious issues including sterilisation are dealt with by the Court of Protection when a patient doesn’t have capacity
257
LD - if sterilisation or abortion are being considered then
If sterilization or abortion are being considered as a possible option for a person who is considered to lack capacity, and the person has no-one else to support or represent them, an Independent Mental Capacity Advocate (IMCA) must be appointed
258
Disability Discrimination Act (1995):
- Illegal to discriminate against someone applying for a job because of a disability & employers are expected to make reasonable adjustments to their premises to assist disabled users * Includes: 1. Reasonable adjustment during recruitment 2. Allowing someone with anxiety to have own desk instead of hot desking 3. Installing physical changes, e.g. ramp for wheel-chair access 4. Letting disabled person work somewhere else, e.g. ground floor for wheel chairs, or quieter room 5. Allowing phased returns to work & flexible hour
259
What is an audit
- Audit is the systematic critical analysis of the quality of medical care, including: 1. Procedures for diagnosis = including pathways 2. Procedures for treatment 3. Care of patient
260
How does an audit measure quality
1. Outcomes, e.g. survival 2. QOL for patient 3. Cost-effectiveness
261
stages of an audit
Set standards what should be happening 2. Collect data measure current situation 3. Analyze assess against standards set 4. Identify steps to improve 5. Implement changes 6. Re-evaluate collect more
262
benefits of audits
- 1. Clinical education is improved 2. Can improve teamwork 3. Improve patient care: can identify if pt outcomes met, prevent near misses becoming incidents, ensure pt satisfaction 4. fulfils contractual obligations
263
negatives of audit process
- snapshot - influenced by confounding factors, may not be rep - hard to identify if something is a problem - e.g. hard to know what desired outcomes are
264
what can limit audits
- small sample size - reduced usefulness of results - Can be hard to do as takes time for people to implement change (get used to new way) - cost/ time constraints of making the change
265
clinical audit =
is a way of finding out whether you are doing what you should be doing by asking if you are following guidelines and applying best practice
266
Research =
- evaluates practice or compares alternative practices, with the purpose of contributing to a body of knowledge by asking what you should be doing
267
NICE technology appraisals
- Aim of appraisal is to assess evidence base for: clinical / cost-effectiveness of new / existing technology providing - authoritative source of advice = mandatory for a CCG to fun
268
developing tech appraisals
-1. Topic selection – through consultation with industry, NHS and patient groups topics agreed with Department of Health 2. Data submission – industry required to submit all trial data according to NICE criteria (e.g. use of NICE endorsed questionnaires / tests) 3. Data review – NICE appraisal committee allocates data to an academic center to report on clinical and cost-effectiveness - NICE report - 6. Call for contributions – committee reaches a preliminary conclusion - interested parties are called to contribute e.g. Royal Colleges, patients, healthcare professionals 7. Funding – the reports are finalized and if issued as mandatory, CCGs must fund if service is required 8. Guidance issued: * If issued as mandatory, CCGs must fund service if req
269
Technology appraisals - NICE issue a report based on
- A. Clinical effectiveness industry required to submit all trial data & then NICE reviews B. Cost effectiveness identified with the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio = (cost A – cost B) ÷ (QALYs B – QALYs A) * NICE commissions an independent academic center to undertake this review
270
aims of guidelines
- improve QOH - Provide standards against which HCPs should be assessed * Reduce unacceptable variations 3. Helps to make informed decisions based on evidence 4. Improve communication between patient & HCP = allow patient to make informed decisions
271
assessing efficacy of guidelines
SSRI-AC - Scope & purpose = what intends to do 2. Stakeholder involvement = has it considered preferences of users / target population 3. Rigor of development: * Has it been formed using systematic approach 4. Independence (editorial) = recommendations not due to external influence 5. Applicability = tools / advice on how to implement, and identified barriers to implementation 6. Clarity = does it make clear recommendations
272
good guidelines should be
273
Barriers to use of guidelines
- lack of awareness of how current practice is inappropriate - attitudes - cred of resource - overreliance on trusted sources - time limits and contraints - b) Organisational culture behaviour, pressure to act / follow certain
274
Encouraging people to adopt guidelines
- multifaceted approach - involve pt - educational sessions - audio/ visual aids/ computeer reminders
275
publically available performance indicators
- * Performance league tables are a technique for displaying comparative rankings of performance indicator scores of several similar providers = set standard of acceptable performance for surgical procedures * If any apparent large variations DOH investigates * e.g. for cardiac surgery mortality
276
why do we have publically available performance indicatirs
- 1. Readily available info in other areas (e.g. schools, police etc.) = why shouldn’t we measure outcomes, as this is the measure of quality 2. There is often a lack of evidence base behind practice should back up what we do with numbers 3. The realization that there is a wide variation in practiced standard / public evidence of deficiency in quality of care 4. Internet / increasing public education reducing the previous high level of trust public has in HC
277
advantages of publically available performance indicators
Allows quantification of quality in an easily categorised & measurable way (e.g. deaths in surgery) 2. Should drive improvements in quality = can identify outliers & therefore allow for this to be improved upon 3. Should identify areas for improvement 4. Give patient trust in doctor & allow patient more choice = transparent, honest & open
278
limitation of publically available performance indicators
- Mis-leading, e.g. doctor with high death rate may be because does more complex surgeries = ‘case-mix’ - most hosp deaths not preventable - no proven correlation w care - Could result in bad hospitals getting worse / good getting better patient with good prognosis go to good hospital - 5. Creates an individualistic culture of blame
279
cost effective vs clinically effectiev Tx
- Cost-effective intervention – is ALWAYS clinically effective B. Clinically effective – is not always cost-effective
280
adverse events =
“An unintended event resulting from clinical care and causing patient harm (physical or psychological
281
Never event =
- Serious, largely preventable patient safety incidents that should not occur if the available preventative measures have been implemented - wrong site surgery e.g.
282
near miss events
A situation in which events or omissions, arising during clinical care fail to develop further whether or not as the result of compensating action, thus preventing injury to a patient
283
When do adverse events occur
- when factors at diff levels align e.g. swiss cheese model
284
reporting of advserse events
- drs have a duty to report adverse events and near misses 1. Report on the National Reporting & Learning System = confidential 2. Reporting done to prevent future errors occurs - Root cause analysis
285
RCA
“structured investigation that aims to identify the true cause of a problem and the actions necessary to eliminate it
286
Serious hazard of transfusion
sUK haemovigilance scheme collects anonymised info on adverse events / reactions to blood trans
287
Yellow card scheme
a system: yellow card system = drug reactions and side-effects reported on a yellow card at bac
288
most common Adverse events
- prescribing - wrong dose, drug, route - comm failure - delay/failure in diagnosis
289
duty of candour
1. Must tell patient when something has gone wrong 2. Must apologize & offer appropriate resolution 3. Must explain the potential short & long-term effects
290
Swiss Cheese Model
many events have to align for an adverse event to occur
291
SCM - active failures - knowledge based
-. Knowledge-based: wrong plan formed due to inadequate knowledge / experience (e.g. junior doctor misdiagnosis (unintentional)
292
SCM - active failures - rule based
: Misapplication of ‘good rule’ / guideline (i.e. applying guideline for 10y/o to neonat
293
SCM - active - skill based
- : Attention / memory lapse = unintended deviation from good action / plan * These are commo
294
SCM - routine error
intentional - normalisation bad practice
295
SCM - situational error
intentional - l: Context-dependent (i.e. shortcuts when overwhelmed / understaffe
296
SCM - REASONED ERROR
: Deliberate deviation from protocol thought to be in best interest at ti
297
SCM - malicious error
: Deliberate act intended to ha
298
e.g. of latent errors SCM
e.g. working environment, staff training, staff hou
299
Adverse events - steps to pt safety
- Build safety culture - lead and support staff - intergrate RM activity - promote reporting - involve and comm w patients - implement solutions to prevent harm - learn and share safety systems
300
other aspects of pt safety (3)
1. Fitness to practice 2. Reporting near misses & adverse events learning from these 3. Incentivize good quality Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) paym
301
Measures of quality – Donabedian Model
2. Structure – this is good quality because the right things are present 3. Process – good quality because the right things are done 4. Outcome – good quality because things turn out right
302
2 stage process of complaints
1. local resolution 2. national level
303
local resolution of compliants
* Encouraged to express directly to staff at the time * 1st step is to contact service provider directly e.g. GP or hospital OR contact CC - Complaints should normally be made within 12 months of an incident but this can be extended if there are good reasons for the delay * If unhappy with outcome / decision / process then can escalate
304
PALS
– can offer advice about the process + help resolve issues informally
305
Claims - if patient not satisfied with local resolution
* If individual is not satisfied with the dealing / outcome of this Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman = independent of government /NHS
306
Eurocare study
a uniform data collection protocol and statistically analyzes problem. It collects data on the 5 year survival of cancer patients in different countries. The UK had one of the worst survival statistics in Europe
307
EUROCARE
= EUROpean CAncer REgistr
308
reasons for the UK performing so badly in the EuroCare study
1. Differences in data collection 2. UK has an older population 3. Patients present later in the UK 4. Lower social classes don’t access the services 5. Poor access to treatment = delay in diagnostic pathways
309
The results of the eurocare study lead to
creation of the calman hine report
310
Recommendations of the calman hine report
- Concluded unacceptable variation in quality of treatment between hospitals = services were disjointed & outcomes were poor 2. So would be better to centralize treatment to improve quality, with primary care at the center of this 3. Should ensure all patient have equal access to care 4. Public & professionals educated on recognizing early signs 5. Services should be patient centered given clear info on treatment options & outcomes 6. Cancer registration & monitoring of outcomes is essential 7. Psychosocial needs of carers & patient recognized
311
resolutions from the CHR
- resulted in the formation of cancer networks - 3 levels of care - PC - Cancer unit - Cancer center
312
Role of PC in the cancer network
prevention and early diagnosis
313
Cancer unit =
(1 per 250,000) treat common cancer, make diagnosis (non-complex chemo & surger
314
cancer center =
treat rare cancers, radiotherapy, complex chemotherapy & surg
315
reasons for centralising cancer care
1. Not cost effective to have resources for everything everywhere 2. Clinicians become more expert so better outcomes = been shown clinicians with higher vol. have better outcomes especially important as will see more of the rare cancers * Easier to have alliance between providers = share best procedure knowledge, less variation 3. Patient will receive better care for their specific condition = can get more holistic care as can integrate all serv
316
Issues with centralising cancer care
* Some hospitals get neglected with resources & have worse care * Cost to patient of travel
317
What are the Aims of the Strategic Cancer Networks?
- Reduce incidence of cancer. - Maximize survival of cancer patients. - Enhance quality of life of cancer patients and their families. - Improve the patient experience of cancer services. - Provide a high quality service focused on the needs of the patients and carers.
318
What do the Strategic Cancer Networks do?
- Develop strategic plans for delivering better care. - Implement national policies. - Deliver the improvements in care. - Provide a channel for communication between groups across the network. - Provide resources for audits and research.
319
cancer networks
- created to implement the NHS cancer plan - primary aim is to reduce inequalities in cancer care - 34
320
National Cancer Research Network
- created in resp to need to imporve infrastructure within NHS for clinical research in cancer - established in 2001 - Aim = improve the speed, quality and integration of research, ultimately resulting in improved patient car
321
Cancer research institute
- was created to help develop common plans for cancer research - helps avoid duplication of studies - established in 2001
322
Roles of cancer research institute
1. Invest in facilities + resources for research 2. Maintain cancer research database and analyze new research 3. Develop research initiatives 4. Coordinate clinical trials for new dru
323
cancer reform strategy
1. Prevention 2. Early diagnosis overcome barriers preventing presentation to GP (including awareness of symptoms), education of GPs & more screening, new referral guidelines, decision aiding tools 3. Treatment being better reduce waiting times (2 week wait), improve clinical trials, better training 4. Living with & beyond cancer partnership with charities, clinicians and patient to increase support + services for survivors (ended 2013) 5. Inequality reduction 6. Delivering care in most appropriate settings locally for patient convenience when possible, but centralised if this improves quality of care PETLID
324
Cancer registration
- conducted by 4 cancer registries which collect data and submit to ONS - National Cancer Intelligence Network (NCIN) at ONS coordinates this & carries out secondary analysis: * Attempt to identify all new cancers diagnoses & follow these patients up
325
What does cancer registration allow for
Allows comparisons in the incidence of disease & survival in different places and populations groups – and also allows researchers to examine the long term outcome under different treatments or between population groups
326
who is resp for reporting cancer diagnoses
Doctor responsible for reporting this have to inform patient - to ONS
327
Functions of cancer registration
1. Monitoring trends in incidence, survival & variations between areas & social groups 5 year survival 2. Evaluate effectiveness of screening programmes 3. Evaluate quality & outcomes of current care 4. Evaluate impact of environmental & social factors on cancer risk
328
Relative cancer survivals
survival compared with people without the illn
329
observed cancer survival
actual number following observational period
330
net cancer survival
probability of surviving cancer in absence of other illness
331
cruide cancer survival
probability of death from cancer in presence of other causes of death
332
confounding factors and death rates
- can control for it via: - Indirect standardisation: observed/ expected mortality rate > 100% is more than expected - direct standardisation - stratum spec rates * = rate in a specific segment / stratum of the population
333
Psych consq of cancer
- appearance: chemo and hair loss, mastectomy - disruption of assumptove world theory - Family / friends death forces to confront own mortality 2. Worry about leaving people behind, especially children 3. Grief 4. Uncertainty
334
asuumptive world theory
- Benevolence theory = not everything in world is good * That world is meaningful = bad thing happens to good person, so point of being good is shattered * May change biography = who I am – can also directly change identity * The assumption of invulnerability = nothing bad could happen to me * Can’t rely on body anymore * Can control fate = loss of control of fate
335
Global burden of cancer prev
Lung > breast > colorectal > prostate
336
Global causes of cancer death
- Lung > colorectal > breast > prostate * 33,000 deaths per year from lung malignancy (almost all caused by smoking)
337
Uk top 3 cancer
1. Female = breast / Male = prostate 2. Lung 3. Bowel
338
Incidence changes in uk cancer rates
1. Incidence of most increases with age 2. Bladder currently decreasing due to reduced occupational exposure to aniline dyes 3. Lung decreasing overall (still increasing in women) 4. Liver increasing due to alcoholism 5. Melanoma increasing due to holidays abroa
339
childhood cancer rates =
- Peak incidence at 2-5yrs * Leukaemias > brain/CNS > lymphomas * Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia most common
340
cancer MDT
STERAMLINES AND CO-ORDINATES CANCER CARE SO IT IS NOT FRAGMENTED
341
members of cancer MDT
A. CORE: Medical staff (physician, oncologist, radiologist, histopathologist), specialist nurse, MDT co-ordinator B. EXTENDED: Physio, dietician, palliative care, chaplain, social worker
342
function of cancer MDT
1. Discuss all new diagnosis 2. Decide on management plan & inform primary care 3. Develop guidelines 4. Designate specialist nurse to patient
343
impairment =
Any loss or abnormality of psychological, physiological or anatomical function
344
disability =
Any restriction or lack of ability, resulting from impairment, within a manner considered normal for a human being
345
handicap=
A disadvantage (limitation to role) because of a disability
346
social model of disability
Disability is caused by the way society is organised, rather than by a person’s impairment or difference
347
social constructionism
The concept that there is no such thing as a disabled individual but that society makes people individual
348
medical model of disability
People are disabled by their impairments or differences
349
interaction model of disability
- disability derives from the interaction between the individual and society
350
cost effectiveness analysis
Used when the effect (outcome) of the two interventions is expected to vary * The outcome is measured in natural units e.g. BP, cholesterol level, mortality, live years saved * The outcome is one dimensional - addresses quantity or quality, not both
351
Cost utility analysis
- Used when the effect (outcome) of the interventions on health status has two or more dimensions * Measures outcome in terms of quantity and quality. Combines these into a single measure e.g. the QALY = Quality Adjusted Life Year - Can be used to compare interventions with a disease or condition or across different diseases or treatment options
352
cost benefit analysis
Most comprehensive form of evaluation ● Takes a societal perspective ● All costs and outcomes are included ● Measured in monetary units
353
cost minimisation analyssi
- Assumes both options have the same outcome ● Choose the option that costs the least ● Cannot provide answers where effectiveness is different between competing alternatives
354
cost consequene
Measures costs, measures consequences
355
sensitivity analysis
Vary key assumptions and see if it has an impact’
356
normal grief
Numbness - Yearning/pining - Anger - Disorganisation and despair - Reorganisation
357
Acute grief
- Somatic or bodily distress - Preoccupation with image of the deceased - Guilt relating to the deceased or circumstances of the death - Hostile Reactions - Inability to function as one had before the loss
358
Wordens task of mourning
1. Accept the reality of loss 2. Work through the pain of grief 3. Adjust to an environment in which the deceased is missing 4. Emotionally relocate the deceased and move on with life
359
Pathological grief
- Extended grief reaction - Mummification – preservation of deceased person’s thing or room and denial - Major depressive disorder >2 months after loss
360
fair innings argument
- According to this argument, younger persons have stronger claims to life-saving interventions than older persons because they have had fewer opportunities to experience life. - The implication is that saving one year of life for a young person is valued more than saving one year of life for an older person.
361
Leventhal's Model of Illness Representation
1. Identity of Illness 2. Timeline of illness 3. Consequence of illness 4. Cause of illness 5. Control of illness ● Provides framework/checklist to guide understanding of how patients psychologically represent the illness
362
MUS
- Physical symptoms with no organic disease explanation, assumed they’re caused by psychological factors - related to stress, iatrogenic maintenance, childhood exp
363
impact of MUS
- distress - concern abt future - high cost of ix and mx - iatrogenic harm - Lack of legitimacy (can’t enter sick role) - can’t access support groups and experience social isolation
364
Role of the post-mortem examination influencing the care of the living
- Gain more insight into pathological process allows you to see if diagnostic tests / clinical signs correlate with what was actually going on - help w medical research - prevention of pt deaths in the future - understand disease progression
365
10 legal requirements for a post-mortem
1. Sudden / unexpected death 2. Unknown cause of death / unnatural death (accident / suicide / suspicious) 3. History of violence or substance abuse, alcoholism etc. 4. Death may be due to a medical procedure either invasive or not 5. Industrial disease death 6. Death from negligence 7. Death within 24 hours of admission 8. Not seen by doctor for 14 days 9. Patient detained under MHA 10. Receiving war pension / industrial disability pension unless death shown to be unconnecte
366
Role of HM Coroner
- Investigate and ascertain cause of deaths occurring in suspicious circumstances * Body can’t be release until after coroner satisfied with cause of dea
367
consent in a PM examination
1. A coroner’s post mortem / inquest does not need consent i.e. if there is a criminal investigation 2. Hospital post-mortems do need consent Consent otherwise may be from: 1. The deceased before they died 2. A nominated representative 3. A qualifying relations
368
Quality in healthcare can be measured or examined / evaluated using
Donabedian Model of Structure, Process and Outcom
369
Donabedian model - structure
* Refers to the setting in which care is delivered: includes facilities and equipment * Good care structure and adequate settings + facilities should contribute to good care
370
Donabedian model - process
- How is the care provided in terms of Appropriateness, Acceptability, Completeness or Competency (2 A’s / 2 C’s) - * Measuring process equates strongly to quality of care because you are looking at all of the acts of delivering healthcare
371
donabedian - outcome
* Refers to the end point of care such as survival, improvements in function or speed of recovery - However they are open to bias because outcomes can be influenced by MORE THAN JUST HEALTHCARE
372
what should we inform the GMC of
- cautions - do not need to inform of fixed penalty fines
373
Period prevalence =
number of identified cases during a specified period of time / total number of people in that population
374
point prev
the number of cases in the population at this point in time
375
incidence =
the number of new diagnoses per population during a specified period of time
376
relative risk =
experimental - control risk /// Control risk
377
controlled drug prescription - what needs to be stated in words and figures
it is the quantity supplied which needs to be stated in both figures and words, rather than the dosage 56 (fifty six) tablets
378
is the framework that governs the emergency management of patients who refuse treatment
common law
379
SD values
68.3% of values lie within 1 SD of the mean 95.4% of values lie within 2 SD of the mean 99.7% of values lie within 3 SD of the mean
380
Notify the coroner with these deaths: (PHONE the coroner)
Police custody/prisoners Hospital admission (24hrs) Occupational related (asbestosis) Neglect (ill treatment, starvation) unExpected/sudden death
381
healthy volunteers are always recruited for which phase of a trial
always 1
382
testing sig of a correlation
- parametric (normally distributed): Pearson's coefficient - non-parametric: Spearman's coefficient
383
rELATIVE RISK
EXP EVENT RATE - CONTROL EVENT RATE
384
Increasing the sample size increases the
power of the study and decreases type 2 error
385
used to compare proportions or percentages e.g. compares the percentage of patients who improved following two different interventions
chi sq
386
occurs when two tests for a disease are compared, the new test diagnoses the disease earlier, but there is no effect on the outcome of the disease
lead time bias
387
conditions of an advanced care directive
- MUST BE OVER 18 - must be of sound mind - must be specific - can refuse Tx but not demand it
388
best form of obs study
prospective cohort - can establish a temporal relationship
389
This states that you must tell the GMC, without delay, if anywhere in the world, you:
Are found guilty of a criminal offence Are charged with a criminal offence Formally admit to committing a criminal offence (for example, by accepting a caution) Accept the option of paying a penalty notice for an ASBO Receive a cannabis warning Have had your registration restricted, or have been found guilty of an offence, by another medical or other professional regulatory body. Your conduct (including as part of a management team) has directly contributed to an organisation that has entered into a deferred prosecution agreement.
390
GMC Guidelines state that you must notify the police in case of ? wounds
- knife wounds caused by a violent attack - Personal information about the patient should not usually be disclosed in the initial contact with the police, and they will respond even if the patient's identity is not disclosed.
391
following an unsuccessful resuscitation attempt in hospital, an individual should be observed for signs of life for a minimum
of 5 mins
392
Disclosures to prevent an act of terrorism can be made withou
pt consent
393
how should a patient who has dropped outs datae be analaysed in a study
as part of the group they were allocated to regardless of adherence - ITTA
394
When analyzing data on a scatter plot,? may be used to predict how much one variable changes when a second variable is changed
linear regression
395
A graphical display of continuous data where the values have been categorised into a number of categories
HISTOGRAM
396
If GMC requests pts info,
inform the patient then give it - must comply even w/o patient consent
397
Power =
the probability of (correctly) rejecting the null hypothesis when it is false
398
paticular problems in CCS
recall bias
399
HIV - disclosure
give opportunity to inform, if patient does not inform partner then it is your duty to inform
400
MHA vs MCA
The Mental Health Act overrides the Mental Capacity Act and enables people with capacity to be given treatment against their will
401
Graphical representation of the sample minimum, lower quartile, median, upper quartile and sample maximum
bOX PLOT
402
Variance =
square of SD. Variance is a measure of the spread of scores away from the mean.
403
show publication bias in meta aalysis
if asymmetrical - funnel plot
404
phase 2 studies
assess efficacy of drugs
405
DNACPR and consent
Resuscitation is an active treatment and therefore DNACPRs can be put on non-consenting patients. This is supported by case law
406
Advance directive - most cruicial element
refers to a specific treatment in a specific circumstance
407
MA and power
increases power and reduces p value - improves estimates of the size of the effect by combining individual studies that may be low-powered
408
Controlled drug prescriptions -? must be included on the prescription
the address of the patient
409
MHA - use in non psychiatric issues
should not be used to detain patients (including those with mental health conditions) for non-psychiatric issues
410
the probability of detecting a statistically significant difference
power
411
Increasing the sample size increases
power of the study -> decreases t2 error
412
survival plot
The Kaplan-Meier survival plot displays estimates of decreasing survival with time after an event
413
Expectation bias (Pygmalion effect)
observers may subconsciously measure or report data in a way that favours the expected study outcome.
414
Which phase of clinical trials specifically looks at the efficacy of the drug?
Phase IIb
415
power equation
1 - prob of type 2 error
416
As a doctor, if you identify your job role online,
you should also state your name
417
gathering information at an inappropriate time
late look bias
418
Standard error of the mean =
Standard error of the mean = standard deviation / square root (number of patients)
419
Skewed distributions
- alphabetical order: mean - median - mode - '>' for positive, '<' for negative
420
compares two sets of observations on a single sample, e.g. a 'before' and 'after' test on the same population following an intervention
wilcoxon signed rank test
421
? can be used to combine data from more than one study
forest plot
422
larger studies done on actual patients, comparing treatments with currently available treatment
phase 3
423
If the deceased has an unknown cause of death then they should be
ref to coroner
424
chronic disease prev
In chronic disease prevalence is greater than incidence - in acute disease the incidence is greater than the prevalence
425
acute disease prev
incidence > prev
426
Graphical representation using Cartesian coordinates to display values for two variables for a set of data
scatter plot
427
describes a group changing it's behaviour due to the knowledge that it is being studied
hawthorne effect
428
compares ordinal, interval, or ratio scales of unpaired data
mann whitney u
429
did the study address a clearly focused question
- PICO
430
CAR: randomisation
- was there randomisation - was it sufficent - allocation concealment?
431
Were all participants who entered the study accounted for at its conclusion?
- good study not expected to lose more than 20% - attrition bias - was this accounted for? - intention to Tx analysis
432
Full analysis set shows
an ITTA was carried to
433
Apart from the experimental intervention, did each study group receive the same level of care (that is, were they treated equally)?
- was there a clearly defined protocol - were any additional Tx given - were they similar between study groups - were follow up intervals the same for each study gr
434
what helps limit publication bias in an RCT
Having a protocl before study starts
435
cruical element of randomisation
unpredictable assignment to groups
436
as you increase the sample size what happens to CI
narrower
437
why do a SR
- single studies combined - scientific approach to summarising evidence - reduced inaccuracies from bias - more reliable and quicker - provide more statistical power
438
how can we address confoundung
- restricting entry to study - matching - statification - multi variable regression
439
OR and RR table
440
clinical heterogenecity
Clinical heterogeneity means that the forms of treatment being compared in the individual studies varied.
441
statistical heterogenecity
Statistical heterogeneity means that estimates of how effective the treatment was differed between individual studies.
442
explain your understanding of a meta analysis
Meta-analysis means that the results of more than one study are combined (or pooled) together to create an overall average estimate of the effectiveness of a treatment. Done appropriately this can give a more precise estimate of how well a treatment works
443
why can a MA sometimes not be done for certain measures
- Only one study measured the outcome (e.g. return to physical exercise), so there were no data to pool. - High level of statistical heterogeneity (e.g. pain scores), so meta-analysis would have produced a result that was unreliable.
444
MA - forest plot exlanation
- Figure Xrepresents pooled analysis of X RCTs - Results are expressed in terms of whether treatment was associated with an increased or decreased rate - 95% confidence intervals are presented for each study, and these represent a credible margin of error around each study estimate. - A line is plotted on the graph highlighting the relative risk value of one, this is value taken if there is no association between stenting and risk of admission.
445
Discuss why quickly searching a few key terms on MEDLINE is considered inadequate for a systematic review (2 mark)
Complex search strategies are sensitive enough to identify all potential trials * Using one database might result in omission of trials published in a journal not captured within Medline
446
DATASBASES that can be searched to find studies
- cochrane - textbooks - Direct communication with pharmaceutical/device companies - pubmed - embase - clinicaltrials.gov
447
publication bias
* The likelihood of publishing a study based on the nature and strength of the study findings
448
Name two approaches taken by the authors in this study might have introduced publication bias
- The authors excluded non-English language articles. * The authors excluded conference abstracts.
449
Explain how publication bias might impact the meta-analysis findings
Excluding these studies reduces the power of the metaanalysis (due to smaller sample sizes being excluded)
450
) In a systematic review, what condition must be met before individual study results can be combined in a meta-analysis?
Presence of homogeneity or absence of heterogeneity
451
Based on figure 1 and 2, what statistic did the authors use to determine 'non-combinability’?
presented I2 statistic
452
What other statistic could the author uses to quantify 'noncombinability’?
- Cochran’s Q statistic * Metaregression
453
critically discuss recommendation
- which Intv is better/ no decision can be made off this alone - reasoning - no info on pt preference - no cost estimation - no side effect info - which outcomes show stat sig - sample characteristics may not be rep - out of date search
454
who must consent for a surgical procedure
the cons performing it
455
? may verify death in certain circumstances
RN
456
driving and schizophrenia
Patients with schizophrenia must not drive and must notify the DVLA, until stable and well for 3 months and following a suitable psychiatristy report
457
patient who lacks capacity who needs imminent Ix ->
tx under mental capacity. Common law is used if imminent risk of death
458
Any decision about CPR should be
clearly communicated to all those involved in the pts care
459
failure to publish results from valid studies, often as they showed a negative or uninteresting result
publication bias
460
The hazard ratio is typically used when
analysing survival/ time
461
what is heterogeneity
- used in MA to show how different the studies are - high levels of heterogeneity -> studies are not similar enough for a combined analysis
462
A good MA shows..
homogeneity
463
how much the odds of the disease increase when a test is positive
LR+
464
Full plaster cast should not fly (if >2 hours durations) until
48 HRS AFTER CAST APPLIED
465
Equation for relatie risk reduction
RRR = (risk in control group - risk in treatment group) / risk in control group × 100%
466
probability of obtaining a result by chance at least as extreme as the one that was actually observed, assuming that the null hypothesis is true
p VALUE
467
Comparing paired data ->
wilcoxon signed
468
comparing unpaired ->
man whitney U (unpaired)
469
comparing %/prop
chi sq
470
Sampling bias
subjects not representative of the population
471
commonly employed to compare the means of two groups of subjects
unpaired T test
472
The Mental Health Act overrides the Mental Capacity Act and enables
people with capacity to be given tx against their will
473
selection bias in a SR
Evidence selection bias occurs when a systematic review does not identify all available data on a topic.
474
Ways in which selection bias occurs in a SR
* Evidence selection bias can arise from publication bias, where data from statistically significant studies are more likely to be published than those that are not statistically significant. * Evidence selection bias can arise from poor search strategies * Evidence selection bias can arise from when there is unconscious selection of preferred studies
475
Interpreting a funnel plot
* The outer dashed lines represent 95% confidence intervals of the effect size * The dot represents each individual study * The vertical line represents the overall effect
476
Methods of assessing for publication bias
- funnel plot * Begg -Mazumdar’s test * cumulative meta analysis * Fail safe sample size
477
What further information do the authors need to present in this study before these findings are considered to inform public health interventions
- confounders - heterogeneity - quality of included studies
478
Identify the type of health prevention approach necessary to prevent endometrial cancer in individuals with hypertension (1 mark).
- SP - e.g. routine surveillence, BP medication
479
A technique that facilitates validation of data through cross verification from two or more sources
triangulation
480
A measure of the accuracy with which a sample represents a population
standard eror
481
Which of the following is unlikely to be associated with alcohol consumption?
lung cancer
482
Which modifiable lifestyle risk factor explains the largest proportion of incidence of breast cancer in the UK?
obesity
483
Individuals who stop smoking will, on average, see an increase in their life expectancy. What is the maximum age by which a smoker will need to quit in order that their life-expectancy remains equal to that of a never-smoker?
40
484
What sort of database is CINAHL?
A database of research by health professionals who are not doctors
485