Basic research methods Flashcards

1
Q

What is an independent variable

A

the variable that is manipulated by the researcher

one that changes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what is a dependent variable

A

the variable that is being measured

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is an extraneous variable

A

a variable that might affect the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is a confounding variable

A

a variable that interacts with the IV and affects the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what are demand characteristics

A

when a participants works out the aims of an experiemtn and behaves in a way they think the experimenter wants them to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what is a lab experiment

A

an experiment that has control of all variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Evaluation of a lab experiment

A

strengths- high control means findings are reliable

  • high internal validity
  • cause and effect can be established

weaknesses

  • low ecological validity
  • demand characteristics
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is a field experiment

A

an experimental investigation carried out in a natural environment e.g. school

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

evaluation of field experiement

A

strenghts

  • high ecological valdity
  • low demand characteristics

weaknesses

  • time-consuming, small sample size, low pop validity
  • do not have full control of extraneous variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a natural experiment

A

experimenter takes advantage of a naturally occurring event, does not have control of the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evaluation of natural experiment

A

strenghts

  • high ecological valdity
  • low demand characteristics

weaknesses

  • no control, less reliable as hard to replicate
  • no control of extraneous variables, low internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is a quasi-experiment

A

an experiement which uses a pre-existing IV that does not vary
usually a character trait e.g. phobia, age, gender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 3 types of experimental design

A
  • matched pairs
  • independent groups
  • repeated measures
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are repeated measures

A

where participants take part in all all levels of the IV and the results of the DV. in both conditions are compared
take part in both conditions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what are independent groups design

A

when participants are split into different conditions, so different participants take part in each levels of the IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is matched pairs design

A

when different participants are used in each level of the IV but they are matched as similarly as possible, they are similar on key characteristics that are likely to affect the DV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

evaluation of repeated measures

A

strengths

  • less participants needed so cheaper
  • less participant variables

weaknesses

  • demand characteristics
  • order effects, acting as a confounding variable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

evaluation of independent groups design

A

strengths

  • less demand characteristics
  • no order effects

weaknesses

  • more participant variables as they are not matched
  • more participants needed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

evaluation of match pairs

A

strengths

  • less demand characteristics
  • less order effects
  • less participant variables

weaknesses

  • time consuming
  • more participants needed
  • still some participant variables
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

way to overcome limitations in repeated measures

A

counterbalancing- half participants experience the conditions in one order, the half experience them in a different order

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

way to overcome limitations in independent groups

A

random allocation- each participant has the same chance of being in each condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

ways to overcome limitations in match pairs

A

pilot study- consider key variables that might be important on the DV when matching

23
Q

what is standardization

A

when the procedure of the study is standardized so that all participants have the same experience so that individual differences do not cause participants to engage with the study in a different way

24
Q

what are the types of observation

A

participant and non-participant
overt and covert
naturalistic and controlled

25
outline and evaluate naturalistic observation
researcher observes naturally occuring beahviour and does not get involved, carried out in natural setting strength- high external validity- findings can be applicable to other similar settings weakness- low control of extrnaeous variables reducing internal validity
26
outline and evaluate experimental obervation
when the researcher attempts to control some variables, reduces how natural the behaviour and environment is usually carried out in lab setting so paritipants know they are being studies strengths- high levels of control- can check for reliability weakness- lacks external validity- not reflective of everyday behaviour demand characteristics
27
outline and evaluate an overt observation
when paritipants are aware they are bien observed and usually know the nature and purpose of research strengths- ethically sound- as p's are aware they are being observed so informed consent can be given weakness- demand characteristics
28
outline and evaluate covert observation
when the participants do not know they are being observed, researcher is normally hidden strengths- high validity as p's are more likely to show natural behaviours and there are no demand c's weaknesses- ethical issues
29
outline and evaluate participant observation
when researcher joins the group being studied strengths-researcher csn understnsd behaviour that is being shown which increases validity weaknesses- reduces objectivity, researcher may develop a relationship with participants which may change the results investigator effects
30
outline and evaluate non-participant observation
when the researcher remains external to those being observed and records the date more objectively strengths- allows researcher to remain more objective and reduces investigator effects weaknesses- valuable data may be missed as researcher may not understand behaviour being shown
31
what is investigator effects
when an experimenter influences the outcome of research
32
what are the 2 types of observational design
unstructured- where experiemnter records everything they see behavioural categories- when researcher operationalises the behaviour being measured, so that all observers know what they are looking for
33
what are the 2 types of sampling procedures in an observation
event sampling- watch entire event and record every time a behaviour happens time sampling- recording behaviour at a set time interval during an observation
34
what are the 5 sampling techniques
- volunteer - random - opportunity - stratified - systematic
35
what is volunteer sampling | evaluate it
when the researcher places an advert asking for participants for their research strengths- easy and less time consuming weaknesses- may be a bius as asking for volunteers attracts a certain type of person- more motivated, have more time non-generalisable- due to bias, may not be representative of target population
36
what is opportunity sample | evaluate it
when a researcher picks those who are most easily available strengths- quick and easy, less costly weaknesses - bias may occur as the researcher may only select those who look approachable or who they want to take part - non-generalisable- sample selected may only be from one certain area so is not representative of target population
37
what is random sampling | evaluate it
when all members of a target population have equal chance of being selected participants may be selected using a random number generator or putting names in a hat strengths- unbiased as everyone has equal chance of taking part more generalisable- as everyone has equal chance the sample may be more representative of the target population weaknesses- time consuming sample selected may still not be representative of the target population so may not be able to generalise to everyone
38
what is systematic sampling | evaluate it
invloves having access to the target population then putting them in order and the researcher picks every nth participants from the list of participants available strengths- less bias than opportunity, researcher has no influence over who is selected once system has been decided generalizability- it is fairly representative so can be genralised however there is still a small chance it wont be
39
what is stratified sampling | evaluate it
this is where a sample reflects key characteristics of the subgroups in a target population the researcher identifies the different types of people that make up the target population and works out the proportion of people in certain subgroups strengths - no researcher bius as once strata has been established the researcher has no say over the participants - high generalizability- produces a representative sample as there is a proportion of representation in sub groups weaknesses - time-consuming and costly - complete representation of the population is not possible
40
what is an aim
an aim is a general statement that outlines what is being investigated, the purpose of the investigation developed from previous theory and research
41
what is a hypothesis
a specific prediction about the outcome of the investigation, should be fully operationalised
42
what is a null hypothesis
this states no difference/correlation in the findings of the research there will be no significant difference between....
43
what is an experimental hypothesis
used when an experiemntal mehtofs has been carried out and there is an IV and DV
44
what is an alternative hyopthesis
used in non-experimental mehtods e,g, obervations, correlations etc
45
what is a directional hypothesis
this predicts the direction of the results, when one condition of the IV has more of an effect on the DV there will be significantly more...
46
what is a non-directional hypothesis
does not predict the direction of the results. states there will be no different there will be a significant difference between....
47
what are the ethical guidelines
- informed consent - right to withdraw - deception - protection of participants - debriefing - confidentiality
48
what is informed consent
investigators should inform all participants of the objectives of the investigation should inform of all aspect of research and intervention that might influence their willingness to participate
49
what is deception
when information is withheld from participants or they are misled in anyway
50
what is protection of participants
participants should not be harmed in any way by the investigative procedures- physically or emotionally loss of self esteem is psychological harm
51
what is a debrief
once an experiemnt is over researchers should provide the participants with any information to complete their understanding of the nature of the experiment the researcher should discuss the experiences with the participants in order to monitor any onforenseen engstive effects
52
what is right to withdraw
participants must be made aware that they can withdraw from the experiment at any time and refuse to take part or refuse to contiure or withdraw their results after debriefing
53
what is confidentiality
information obtained during an investigation is confeidential unless otherwise agreed in advance participants have a right to belive any information they provide will be treated confidentially