Behavioural Finance Flashcards

The behavioral finance perspective, behavioral biases of individuals, and behavioural finance and the investment process

1
Q

5 belief-perseverance biases

(cognitive errors)

A

Conservatism

Representativeness

Illusion of control

Confirmation

Hindsight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Conservatism bias

A

Maintains prior views / forecasts by inadequately incorporating new information

Overweights past information compared to new

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Consequences and mitigation of conservatism bias

A

Consequences:

  • Slow to update view / forecast when presented with new information
  • May choose to maintain prior belief than to deal with mental stress of updating beliefs when given complex data

Mitigants:

  • Properly analyse and weight new information to dertemine its value (e.g. using Baye’s theorem)
  • Seek professional advice if information is difficult to interpret
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Representativeness bias

A

New information is classified based on past experience or classification, such as using heuristics (e.g. if-then assumptions or rule-of-thumb), instead of rigorous analysis

2 types including: base rate neglect (overweights new info) and sample size neglect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Consequences and mitigation of representativeness bias

A

Consequences:

  • May lead to statistical or information-processing errors
  • Could produce incorrect understanding that persists and biases all future thinking about the information

Mitigants:

  • Better understand laws of probability and statistical analysis
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Illusion of control

A

When an individual thinks they can control or affect an outcome when they can’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Consequences and mitigation of illusion of control bias

A

Consequences:

  • Leads to excessive trading > Increases transaction costs > Lowers overall portfolio returns
  • Overconcentrate in own stock thinking they can control the outcome of the price

Mitigants:

  • Objectively review past trades including all winning and losing trades to identify tendency
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Confirmation bias

A

Looks for (and notices) information that confirms their existing beliefs, and ignore or undervalue what contradicts their beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consequences and mitigation of confirmation bias

A

Consequences:

  • Could hold onto investment for tool long due to overconfidence in initial beliefs
  • Example: Investor holding too much employer stock

Mitigants:

  • Seek out contrary views and further information
  • Re-evaluate after every change in company fundamentals
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hindsight bias

A

Selective memory of past event, actions, or what was knowable in the past

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Consequences and mitigation of hindsight bias

A

Consequences:

  • Tendency to see things as more predictable than they really are
  • Results in excessive risk taking, overconcentration of stock positions
  • Can become critical of the performance of others (because you “knew it all” along) and unfairly dismiss managers

Mitigants:

  • Recognise and come to terms with own mistakes
  • Record and objectively examine past investment decisions
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

4 information-processing biases

(cognitive errors)

A

Framing

Anchoring & adjustment

Mental accounting

Availability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Framing bias

A

Decisions are affected by the way in which the question or data is framed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Consequences and mitigation of framing bias

A

Consequences:

  • Fail to properly assess risk and end up overly risk-averse or risk-seeking
  • Choose suboptimal risk for their portfolio / assets based on the way a presentation is made

Mitigants:

  • Detect by asking whether one’s decision is based on realising a gain or a loss
  • Acknowledge the imapct of loss aversion on one’s willingness to take risk
  • Use more appropriate analysis e.g. compare current price to instrinsic value
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Anchoring & adjustment

A

Estimates probabilities based on an initial default view (anchor) which is adjusted up/down to reflect subsequent information and analysis

Overweight on statistically arbitrary, psychologically determined anchor points

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consequences and mitigation of anchoring & adjustment

A

Consequences:

  • May stick too closely to original estimates when new information is learned

Mitigants:

  • Don’t rely on past prices or market levels to influence decisions
  • Observe changes in company fundamentals
  • Concentrate on the future potential of the company to influence buy/sell decisions
17
Q

Mental accounting

A

Money is treated differently depending on how it is categorised

18
Q

Consequences and mitigation of mental accounting

A

Consequences:

  • Structuring investments into discrete buckets without regard for correlations among assets
  • Failing to lower portfolio risk by combining assets with low correlation
  • Overemphasis on income generating assets at the expense of eroding principal in the process, resulting in lower total return

Mitigants:

  • Combine all assets into one summary to see the true asset allocation of various mental account holdings
  • Create a portfolio strategy taking all assets into consideration
  • Focus on total return, not just investment income
19
Q

Availability bias

A

Undue emphasis on the information that is readily available or easily recalled. Includes:

  • Retrievability (easy to recall)
  • Categorisation
  • Narrow range of experience
  • Resonance
20
Q

Consequences and mitigation of availability bias

A

Consequences:

  • Choose manager / investment based on advertising or recalling names they’ve heard
  • Limit investment choices to what’s familiar and fail to consider alternatives > Results in under-diversification and/or inappropriate asset allocation
  • Overreact to recent market conditions while ignoring data on historic performance
  • Over emphasis on events with large media attention/advertising

Mitigants:

  • Maintain carefully researched and constructed IPS with appropriate research and analysis of all decisions and a long-term focus
  • Ask “where did I hear this idea?”
21
Q

6 emotional biases

A

Loss-aversion

Overvonfidence

Self-control

Endowment

Regret-aversion

Status quo

22
Q
A