Behavioural polymorphisms Flashcards
Animals in the same situations, don’t all respond the same way - why not?
1) Hormones, parasites, neurophysiology, diurnal cycles all affect behaviour – see specialist lectures.
2) Animals play different strategies.
3) Animals have different personalities.
Can individuals in the same species play different strategies?
Yes and this is explored in the game theory “Hawk - Dove game”
What is the “Hawk-Dove game”?
The “hawk” and “dove” are strategies played by players of the same species, NOT two different species.
What does the Hawk do in the “Hawk-Dove game?” in regards to resources
HAWK: very aggressive, always fights for some resource, taken by the winner.
In the “Hawk-Dove game”, what occurs when hawk vs hawk
Fights are costly. Model assumes all hawks are equally strong, so 50% chance of winning a fight.
What does the Dove do in the “Hawk-Dove game?” in regards to resources
never fights for a resource. Initially displays aggression but if the opponent tries to fight, it withdraws before it gets injured. Cost is waste of time.
What happens when Dove vs Dove in “Hawk-Dove game”
Dove meeting dove wins 50% of contests, but takes time.
What happens when Hawk vs Dove in “Hawk-Dove game”
Dove meeting hawk, recognised as hawk quickly so little time cost, no injury.
How do we know whether a strategy will persist?
By looking at it’s Evolutionary Stable Strategies
it depends on the costs and benefits of each strategy!
What are Evolutionary Stable Strategies?
strategies which cannot be invaded by another strategy.
If we have a pure population of doves, is this an evolutionary stable strategy?
If invaded by a hawk, the hawk wins all encounters, gets all the resources and never has to fight so would outcompete doves. So pure dove not an ESS.
If we have a pure population of hawks, is this an evolutionary stable strategy?
If invaded by a dove – doves don’t pay any injury costs, but never win. So fights with hawks are neutral, and doves can persist in hawk populations as long as the resource isn’t vital. So pure hawk not an ESS either.
Are there any values which give a stable mixed population?
If assume winner pays no cost and loser all the costs
you can plot this value for each frequency of hawks and doves to see if there’s any population mix which would be stable.
Where the lines cross is a stable mixture of hawks and doves.
At the ESS point, what would happen if you added individuals of either strategy
lowers fitness of that strategy More Hawks would have lower fitness than that of dove. More Doves (fewer hawks) would have lower fitness than Hawks. So returns to the ESS frequency.
What is the impact of adding a hawk?
As both lines have negative slopes, the addition of any Hawk lowers everyone’s fitness!
What does the game theory explain?
This game explains why most animal contests involve only ritual fighting behaviours rather than outright battles.
Describe how speckled Wood butterflies play Hawk or Dove
- territory ownership of a patch of light on the forest floor
- Whoever gets there first is the owner. Owners play Hawk and defend the territory
- If another male arrives in an occupied light spot, he plays Dove and retreats immediately.
- If two arrive together, they both think they own it and fight by spiralling round each other until one concedes – i.e. they both play Hawk.
Bourgeois strategy!!
What is the bourgeois strategy?
Playing Hawk when owning a territory, but Dove when invading someone else’s territory
Give an example of animals playing bourgeois strategy?
Speckled Wood Butterflies
Give an example of animals playing “anti-bourgeois” strategy
Mexican spiders
How do Mexican Spiders play “anti-bourgeois strategy”
- territories in gaps between stones in walls and rubble.
- territory holder plays Dove, and runs away if attacked.
- attacker plays Hawk and invariably wins.
- get a domino effect of one spider displacing another all across the wall.
Where do mexican spiders hold territory?
in gaps between stones in walls and rubble.
With Mexican spiders, why does the territory holder give in so easily?
If there are lots of territories, but fighting is expensive, then letting an intruder have the territory and avoiding the fight is probably adaptive.
What is anti-bourgeois strategy?
an individual plays Dove when the individual is an owner of the resource, whereas it plays Hawk when it is not an owner