Behaviourist Approach Flashcards

1
Q

1st assumption

A

Humans are born a blank slate
Nothing is inate
Nurture
Environmental determinism
Tabula rasa = blank slate
Born with basic responses: crying, pain and hunger

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

2nd assumption

A

Behaviour is learned through conditioning
Classical = learned by association
Operant = learn by consequence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Classical conditioning

A

Stage 1-
US - UR
NS - no response

Stage 2-
US + NS - UR

Stage 3-
CS - CR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Operant conditioning

A

Positive reinforcement - reward that increases likelihood of action being repeated
Negative reinforcement - unpleasant experience removed after actions so more likely to repeat
Punishment - stimulus that weakens behaviour (unpleasant = avoid)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

3rd assumption

A

Humans and animals learn in similar ways
Pavlov and skinner
E.g
Classical conditioning - aversion therapy
Operant conditioning - token economy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Aims of aversion therapy

A

Develop a strong dislike to something ‘aversion’ to a stimulus
Can treat:
Drug/alcohol abuse
Gambling
Smoking

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Main component of aversion therapy

A

Classical conditioning
Operant conditioning
Covert sensitation
New developments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Classical conditioning- aversion therapy

A

E.g give alcoholic sickness drug (UCS-UCR)
Pair drugs with alcohol(UCS +NS - UCR)
Association will cause them to avoid alcohol (CS-CR)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Covert sensitisation - aversion therapy

A

Encourages imagination
No physical unpleasant stimuli
E.g imagine becoming homeless when gambling

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Operant conditioning - aversion therapy

A

Once association is made (classical) the person tends to avoid it
E.g alcoholic avoid the pub
Negative reinforcement is now motivating them to avoid stimulus

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

New developments - aversion therapy

A

Tryptophan metabolites - stops alcohol breaking down properly so it creates negative effects
However when alcohol is avoided it creates feelings of tranquility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Apply assumption 1 to the therapy

A

Covert sensitisation- we can teach ourself associations as nothing is inate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Apply assumption 2 to the therapy

A

Same principle but changes association and replaces pleasure with unpleasant state
- this should suppress desired behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Evaluation of therapy - research to support

A

S- strength
E- smith found alcoholics sober after 1 year of therapy
E- helpful for certain addictions
W- strength as its successful and can help others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Evaluation of therapy - patient drop out

A

S- weakness
E-Bancroft found 50% did not complete the full programme
E- shows high drop out rates
W- can’t evaluate the effectiveness as the willing participants are trying to to change/want to

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evaluation of therapy - treatment of homosexuality (ethics)

A

S- weakness
E- e.g men being shown imagine of ‘pin up’ males when on drugs or in unpleasant situations
E- carried out until 2006 in a way to stop homosexuality
W- weakness as it was highly unethical and caused life long emotional and physical harm to individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Watson and Rayners methodology

A

Albert ‘little albert’
Controlled observation
He was well developed and emotionally stable

18
Q

What was Alberts conditioning schedule

A

Loud noise (us) - fear (ur)
Rat (Ns) - no response
Noise + rat (us+ns) - fear (ur)
Rat (cs) - fear (cr)

19
Q

Watson and Rayners initial procedure

A

Tested him at 9months with a rabbit, dog, monkey, mask and cotton wool
Showed no fear

20
Q

Observation 1 procedure

A

11 months 3 days

White rat presented
then shown again with bar struck behind him
Then struck again as he reaches for rat

21
Q

Observation 2 procedure

A

11 months 10 days

Rat alone then blocks in between as distraction
then repeated rat and loud bar

22
Q

Observation 3 procedure

A

11 months 15 days
Introduced new stimuli like fur, cotton wool, his hair, Santa mask

First rabbit and dog alone with dogs in between

Fur coat and cotton wool alone

Watson hair

Santa mask

23
Q

Observation 4 procedure

A

Location changes to a well lit lecture room with mattress on the floor (4 people in room) - 11 months 20 days

Rat, rabbit, dog alone

Rat alone

Rat and Loud noise

Rat alone twice with blocks in between

Rabbit and dog alone with dog barking

24
Q

Observation 5 procedure

A

12 months 21 days

Shown all stimuli like rat, rabbit, mask but no joint stimuli
Also had blocks
All placed really close to him

25
Observation 1 findings
Fell forward and whimpered
26
Observation 2 findings
Played happily with blocks but fell, cried and tried to crawl away
27
Observation 3 findings
Rabbit and rat he fell and whimpered whereas other things he was less bothered (kicked with his feet)
28
Observation 4 findings
Rat = bent over crying + lifted his hands Dog = fell over when it barked
29
Observation 5 findings
Rat he leaned back and covered his eyes and was scared/withdrew from all stimuli
30
Incidental findings
When scared he sucked he’s thumb to remove his fears
31
1st conclusion of classic research
Study shows conclusively that directly conditioned emotional responses do occur when there was previously no response
32
2nd conclusion of classic research
Stimulus generalisation E.g rat - rabbit, dog, fur, cotton wool, Santa mask etc
33
3rd conclusion of classic research
The view is that the response (fear) will persist and modify personality throughout life
34
Evaluation of research - protection from harm
S- weakness E-didn’t remove fears, life long trauma E- shouldn’t experience more stress than daily life = breached W- weakness as its permanently damaged him
35
Evaluation of research - alternative evidence
S- strength E- research supporting E- OH mower said operant conditioning maintains phobias and classical conditioning creates them W- supports that behaviour can be conditioned
36
Evaluation of research - informed consent
S- weakness E- Albert is too young to give full informed consent E- only his mum consented but not to the extent of research W- weakness breaches ethical guidelines
37
Evaluation of research - methodology
S- strength E- highly controlled environment - base line tests at 9 months E- recorded/filmed - impacts ecological validity as it was an empty dark room with 4 strangers W- strength due to control of variables
38
Evaluation - application
S- strength E-can help people in real life situations E-more valid if it can help wider population e.g aversion therapy for alcoholics W-strength as it benefits wider society
39
Evaluation- reductionism
S- weakness E-reduces complex human behaviour to simple stimulus response E- this is too basic explanation W- weakness as it ignores other factors of explanation of behaviour
40
Evaluation - deterministic
S- weakness E-removes personal and moral responsibility for behaviour E-as a result of us being born a ‘blank slate’ W- weakness as it generalises too much and takes away personal responsibility
41
Evaluation- scientific
S- strength E-uses a scientific method E- adds credibility and support to the key concepts W- strength as it is a trusted result and can be published
42
Debate - should we use conditioning on children
ON PAPER FLASHCARDS - IN FOLDER