Bioenergetics Flashcards

(45 cards)

1
Q

Overview of pathway types

A

Pathway types: metabolic pathways transfer matter; bioenergetics pertains to energy transduction pathways, which transfer energy via coupled cycles with no transfer of matter; signal transduction pathways transfer info (consist of cycles connected by regulatory interactions only, w/ no matter/E transfer)- these pathways are in reality branched, components are mainly enzymes or transporters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Cells need to oppose the natural direction of reactions… discuss

A

Cells need to oppose the natural direction of matter transfer (according to 2nd law of thermodynamics) to concentrate substrates at low conc in environment-> cell+ convert them into complex, ordered structures by coupling these processes to spontaneous ones so net Gibbs free E<0. Electron transfer+ pmf often coupled.
To prevent driving reactions running out, a chain of coupling reactions linked to a spontaneous one in the environment is used- so E metabolism consists of a chain of coupled cycles linking non-spontaneous reactions in cell w/spontaneous one in env. Chain can branch @ each intermediate+ different organisms use different reactions to start+ end the chain. Life depends on a redox disequilibrium.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Inputs for ETCs

A

Inputs for ETCs: Plants use light E-> create reducing env; animals use reduced compounds from food to oxidise (chemical inputs: PCr (short term), fat, starch, glycogen, protein). Chemolithotrophs oxidise non-organic matter (e.g., nitrifying bacteria oxidise ammonia-> nitrite-> nitrate. A. ferrooxidans+ A.thiooxidans oxidise ferrous iron and reduced sulphur compounds- important in mining for metal extraction from ores+ waste remediation for metal recovery from waste. Sulphur oxidation can, however, produce sulphuric acid).
Geobacter use ferric iron as terminal electron acceptor, reducing-> ferrous iron. S. oneidensis one of organisms causing reduction of Mn in Oneida Lake in New York state.
3 major intermediates in E metabolism, based on: electrons (measured by redox potential), protons (pmf), phosphoryl groups (measured by phosphorylation potential- Other P energy intermediates include PCr, phosphoenolpyruvate, ATP (+GTP,CTP,UTP,dATP), G-6-P, G-1-P, in decreasing order of delta G.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Energy coupling and stoichiometry

A

When energy coupling in ETCs, stoichiometry matters! The driving reaction G needs to outweigh the driven reaction’s G. All forms of E are interconvertible- knowing deltaG stoichiometries allows calculations, e.g., to check that the overall process is feasible thermodynamically or work out what is happening biochemically. E.g.,
Photosynthesis: 2 moles of photons are enough to put 1 mole electrons onto NADP with some left over to move protons and make ATP. Respiration: each protons moving across a 200mV membrane releases 20kJ; making ATP costs ~60kJ/mol, so need at least 3 protons per ATP. Can use calculations to predict yields of bio processes, e.g., how much CO2 you could fix in a year if you’re making biofuel.
Coupling redox processes in mammals: ~90% food intake energy liberated by respiratory chains in mt-> most cellular heat+ATP. About 20% mt proton circuit is uncoupled-> proton leak. Major ATP consumers are actinomyosin ATPase, protein synthesis, plasma membrane Na/K pump (~20% each). Energy production range in adult humans ~80-800 watts (resting-> vigorous exercise).
Various bioenergetic modules can be coupled together to create a bioenergetic toolkit for forming chains.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Electron transfer systems overview

A

Organisms need to get electrons at negative Eh+ a +ve E sink to accept them-> process w/ -ve G that can be coupled to a biologically useful process. Most ETCs involve e- donor system, acceptor system+ intermediate complex w/ a b-type+ c-type cytochrome (bc complex)- these are large protein complexes in membrane connected by smaller mobile e- carriers. Sometimes e- fed back to same donor from start-> cyclic arrangement. Bc complexes in different organisms similar in f(x), structure, subunit composition+ seq. Use of c type cytochrome after cytochrome b happened independently in evolution (oxygenic photosynthesis vs mt)
Quinone e- carriers also similar to each other.
“c” =small soluble protein. In mt/bacteria, it’s a Copper protein. In chloroplasts, plastocyanin. Another c-type cytochrome in some org.s if Cu in short supply. Donor+acceptor systems diverse w/ similarities among

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Photosynth org.s electron carriers/ different ETC systems

A
  • MT: NADH& other dehydrogenases->Q->bc1->cytc->cyt oxidase
  • Non-photosynth bacteria v variable- like mt but w/ bc (not bc1)+ cyt oxidase sometimes cyt o instead
  • Potosynth bacteria (e.g., purple bacteria (anoxygenic))- P870->Q->bc->cyt c2->P870
  • Chlororplasts+ cyanobac: water+PSII->PQ->bf complex->PC->PSI+ Fd+ NADP (->back to bf (cyclic))
    Key reaction centre proteins of PSII+ purple Photosynth bacteria similar. Also similarities between reaction centre proteins PSI and bacteria like chlorobium (combines sulfur oxidisation+ light use). PSI+PSII similarities suggest common ancestor. PSI+ PSII reaction centres are heterodimeric w/ similarities in subunits suggesting derivation by gene duplication+ specialisation.
    The many modern groups of Photosynth bacteria all fit in same scheme. Other models incl PSI-II evolved in cyanobacteria by duplication, I/II side later lost (some lineages). Ultimately, all systems related evolutionarily.
    Cyanobacteria PSI+II Both heterodimeric
    Heliobacteria+, acidobacteria, chlorobium PSI-type Homodimeric
    Chloroflexi, purples+ gemmatimonads PSII-type hetero
    Photosynth likely passed around by horizontal transfer. Chloroplasts derived from endosymbiotic bacteria closely related to modern cyanobacteria. Mt also endosymbiotic, so have v similar cyt oxidase to cyanobacteria.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Overview of evolution of photosystems

A

Cyanobacteria PSI+II Both heterodimeric
Heliobacteria+, acidobacteria, chlorobium PSI-type Homodimeric
Chloroflexi, purples+ gemmatimonads PSII-type hetero

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Electron carrier summary- 9
Hint: metals included

A

Electron carriers: aa residues poor carriers, so protein complexes of ETC need other redox components to carry e- in/ between complexes. 2 type of e- carrier: small organic molecules (carry 1/2e- w/H+- also hydrogen carriers); metals (1e-). ETC often alternate between them so as e- pass, protons alternately released+ taken up- arranged on opposite sides of mem so e- transport coupled to proton transport (main f(x)/ e-transport).
* NAD carries 2e-, 1H+; water soluble
* FMN/FAD: 1/2H, protein bound. These+Q can couple 1e- reactions w/2e- ones.
* Quinone: 1/2H, membrane soluble. UbiQ in mt+bacteria, plastoQ (chloroplast); menaQ (some bacteria); phylloQ (PSI). differences in head groups+ isoprenoid tail length.
* Tyr: 1H, protein bound. Particularly important for Photosynth
* Fe-S centre: 1e-. Usually 1Fe, 1Fe2S, or 4Fe4S
* Fe (III) haem: 1e-. Porphyrin rings differ (e.g., a,b,c in mt)
* Mg (II) in chlorophyll: 1e-. Chl a,b, etc differ in ring. No Mg2+ in pheophytin.
* Cu centre: 1e-, 1 in plastocyanin, 2 centres in Cyt Ox.
* Mn centre: 1-4e-. 4 centres in oxygen evolving centre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Haems and chlorophyll

A

Haems may be non-cov bound (cyt a,b0 or cov bound (c-type cyt incl cyt f in chloroplasts). Cyts distinguished by max absorption (in nm) on spectra denoted by suffix: a600, b560, c550.
Chlorophyll a+ b differ by 1 group: a has -CH3, b has -CHO. B invented multiple times in evolution while a used in photochemistry of plants, algae, most cyanobacteria. Evidence that chlorophyll d670 (like a but CHO instead of vinyl), 97% chlorophyll in A marina) also involved in photochem. Chlorophyll f709 (another -CH3 in a (different to the one altered to get b)-> CHO) in C thermalis (90% a, 10% f, 1% d when grown under far red) mech of function controversial. Bacteria like Rhodopseudomonas have cyclic tetrapyrrole bacteriochlorophyll like those above. Phaeophytins+ chlorophylls w/out central Mg2+ can be made in lab (chemical mistreatment)- also have role in Photosynth.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Mn centres

A

Mn centres- Mn centre couples 4e- reaction (ox/2H2O-> O2) to 1e- turnovers of PSII. O2 production every 4 flashes of light. Kok’s “S state model” proposes series of 5 states, 1 of which (S4) evolves O2 (on transitioning to S0) while transitions S0->S4 stimulated by flashes. Mn cluster evolution ~3bln yrs ago, allowed e- extraction from H2O, generating O2 as toxic byproduct, allowing evolution of aerobic organisms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

ETC sequence via PSII

A

e.g., of ETC: PSII: light E-> e- lost from “special pair” of chlorophyll molecules, through another chlorophyll ChlD1, a peophytin Ph, bound QA, ferrous iron, to reversibly-binding QB. b559= cyt of uncertain f(x), possibly for avoiding photodamage under light stress. Loss of e- from special pair creates strongly oxidising species, allowing e-s to be extracted from H2O @ [Mn]4 O2 evolving centre via TyrZ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Electron transfer through proteins

A

Electron transfer through proteins: e-s must pass through protein to get from donor to acceptor carrier. Nature of protein makes little difference- e-s tunnel between carriers- a quantum mechanical phenomenon depending on: distance between carriers (too slow @>14A); free E/redox potential difference between donor+ acceptor (rate fast @ intermediate deltaG but slow @ high deltaG); response of donor+ acceptor and their env to change in charge from e- loss/gain; dielectric constant of intervening protein. So donor+ acceptor need to be close, have similar Em, rate and direction transfer manipulatable by changing distance/deltaG between carriers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Electron transfer in mitochondria: overall

A

Electron transfer in mt
Note that stoichiometry in mt is 1CI: 2CII: 3CIII: 6CIV: 6cytc: 60UQ.
Several complexes funnel into Q: CI, CII (succinate dehydrogenase of TCA cycle), glycerol-3P dehydrogenase, ETF:Q oxidoreductase, dihydroorotate DH, malate quinone oxidoreductase. Evidence for order of components from studies on reox of reduced chain, inhibitor effects, Em values.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Electron transfer in mitochondria: complex I

A

Complex I: cryo-EM by Zhu et al- structure+ additional subunits in different states to infer coupling mech. 14 subunits in bacteria. Mt has same core structure w/ additional subunits (31 in mammals). L shaped w/ peripheral arm protruding into matrix, containing FMN+ 8 Fe-S centres and a large membrane domain w/ no cofactors. E- flow NADH->FMN-> 8Fe-S->Q. peripheral arm+ mem domain change orientation (may link to proton translocation)- open 112o+ closed 105o states. ND5,4,2 subunits of mem domain have homology to antiporters, initially thought to export protons driven by conformational change, now process thought to be driven by string/ charged residues along middle of complex. Mvmt/ peripheral arm drives transfer of charges along string, H+ expelled from NuoL only(“domino model”). Reverse e- transfer (RET) when QH2/Q high- may lead to damaging level/ ROS production. Evidence that CI may deactivate under some conditions to minimise this.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

ETC in mt: complex II

A

Complex II (AKA succinate dehydrogenase of Krebs cyc): ox succinate-> fumerate, then 2e- reduce Q-> QH2 in membrane. 4 peptide subunits A-D, e- pass succinate-> closely bound FAD in A-> 3Fe-S centres/B-> UQ bound to transmembrane C&D. b haem bound to C/D does little (e-/H+ not transferred across mem in CII)- may help reduce e- loss onto molecular O2, which would produce ROS. Phosphatidylethanolamine probably structural. Redox centres all within suitable distance, redox potential/FAD high (assists oxidising succinate?) + potential/ 4Fe-4S centre low (balanced by difference between it& 3Fe-4S). CII may generate ROS on reperfusion following ischaemia (in which several metabolic pathways-> fumarate accumulation- this runs SDH backwards, -> succinate accumulates)- on reperfusion, SDH leads to high QH2/Q ratio, RET in CI+ high ROS.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

ETC in mt: complex III (hint: Q cycle+ evidence for it)

A

Complex III (AKA cyt bc1 complex): 500kD dimer. 11 subunits/monomer. 4nm transmembrane domain (26 helices+ key redox centres), 7.5nm matrix domain (core proteins), 4nm intermembrane domain (2/ other redox centres. Core proteins absent from bacterial CIII, give structural stability+ act as peptidases for imported proteins. CIII oxidises UQH2, reduced cyt c. 3 redox active peptides are Rieske ISP containing 2Fe2S cluster, cyt c1 containing haem c1, transmembrane cyt b w/ haems bH&bL. e-/H+ flow via Q cycle:
1) QH2 binds o (outer) Q binding site, 1e- -> Rieske FeS centre, leaves QH. Bound. H+ released outside
2) ISP (Fe S protein) head rotates, e- from FeS-> cyt c via cyt c1. 2nd e- QH. in o via b haems, reduces Q->QH in i (inner) site. Q in o site returns to Q pool
3) ISP rotates back, repeat step 1 so QH. on both i and o sites.
4) Repeat step 2 but reduce QH. to QH2 in i- may return to pool/ bind o site
Net effect of 1 cycle: 2QH2 oxidised to Q @o+ 1Q reduced to QH2 @i= 1QH2->1Q and 2 cyt c reduced. 2H+ per QH2 @o released+ 2H+ taken up @i= 2H+ released per cycle (per e- pair).
Evidence for Q cycle: EPR (e- paramagnetic resonance) studies; crystal structures for b haems; seq data+ crystal structures for Q binding sites; stoichiometry of proton/e- transport; single turnover exps w/ photo- bacteria showing predicted seq/ e- transfers; if oxidised cyt c added to complex when QH2 present-> QH. generated @o, which reduces cyt bs-> oxidant-induced reduction; mutants in ISP hinge slow/stop complex.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

mt ETC: complex IV and supercomplexes

A

Complex IV: subunits I,II,III+ another 10 proteins in mammalian mt complex. Crystal structure of mt, purple bacteria, paracoccus available. Reduced cyt c binds CIV, transfers 1e- to CuA centre (2 Cu ions bound to His residues). Then e-s->haem a->binuclear Fe-Cu centre (cyt a3+CuB) so both Fe+Cu reduced-> O2 binds haem a3, is reduced-> 2H2O, consuming 4 “substrate” H+ from matrix, while 4 more H+ pumped from matrix (per 4e-).

Supercomplexes: “respirasome” typically contains CI,III,IV (Cryo-EM). CII sometimes included. Good evidence for these in mt, but contents vary in addition to free complexes+ subpopulations (uneven stoichiometry). Organisation may help efficient e- transfer between complexes+ avoid ROS production. Some mice studies show respirasome formation disruptable w/out impairing ox Pi. Formation may depend of proteins w/ synth regulated by HIF, cardiolipin may also have a role. Supercomplexes assembly increases w/ exercise+ may decrease due to heart failure/ischaemia. Unsure if supercomplexes for in bacterial membranes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Other respiratory ETCs

A

Yeast mt: lack conventional CI, have alt NDH-2 type. Transfers e- NADH->UQ but doesn’t pump H+. found in many other species incl. bacteria.
Plant mt: additional e- transport pathways incl. NDH-2. Also, outward facing NAD(P)H-Q oxidoreductase+ alt oxidase pathway (e- Q->O2, both w/out H+ transport). Allow variable efficiency of E coupling+ heat production.
Non-photo-bacteria: many ETCs, some unusual e- donors (Fe(II), H2)/ acceptors (nitrate, fumerate). P. denitrificans well studied bc ETC similar to mt. E coli- different quinol oxidases depending on growth conditions
Microbial fuel cells: if O2/ other e- acceptor not available, some bacteria pass e- directly to env (e.g., external electrode-> current in external circuit) by direct contact, pili (nanowires), endogenous mediators- basis of microbial fuel cells. Interest in Geobacter/Shewanella etc. have high propensity for extracellular current production (linked to role in extracellular metal oxidation)- could metabolise waste-> electricity.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Photosynthetic ETC (overall)

A

Energy coupling steps: Light harvesting by pigment antenna system; primary e- transfer in light-activated reaction centre; e- transfer down ETC assoc. w/ H+ transport; return protons through ATP synthase. Last 2 steps highly analogous to mt, 1st 2 only in photo org.s. Purple bacteria, cyanobacteria, algae+ higher plants most studied. Purples only have 1 type/PS w/ cyctic ETC, others have 2 PS arr in Z scheme starting w/ ox of H2O-> O2, ending w/ NADP->NADPH.
Light catching pigments: chlorophylls a+ b= primary in plants, green algae; a also in reaction centre (cyanobacteria don’t generally use b)- some cyanobacteria also use other chlorophylls. Phyceorythrobilin+ phycocyanobilin in cyanobacteria+ red algae. Beta-carotene+ lutein (AKA xanthophyl)= carotenoids w/ f(x) incl light harvesting and photoprotection in plants, algae. Bacteriochlorophyll in bacteria. All have conjugated systems (circular in chl b, linear in others) accounting largely for light absorption.
Basic process: arrays of chlorophyll/ bacteriochlorophyll/ phycobiliprotein complexes. Red/blue quantum of light absorbed anywhere in array, but excitation E (“exciton”) needs rapid («1ns to compete w/ fluorescence+ non-radioactive decay of excited state)+efficient transfer down chain to reaction centre. Triplet state undesirable-> free radical production so systems contains carotenoids+ other pigments to catalyse their decay

20
Q

Purple bacteria and light harvesting complexes 1 and 2

A

Purple bacteria- typically 2 types light harvesting complexes LHI (closely assoc w/ reaction centre, form ‘core’ complex)+ LH2 (when light abs by peripheral antenna LH2, E->LHI->reaction centre)- LH complexes cover large area, trap light+ funnel to reaction centre.
LH2 crystal structure-> 9 alpha subunits surrounded by concentric ring/9 beta subunits- mainly membrane-spanning alpha helices. Bacteriochlorophyll molecule between each beta (9 total), w/ plane of ring parallel to membrane, Abs 800nm (B800). 2nd bacteriochlorophyll ring perpendicular to mem, 18 total, lie inside B800 ring between alpha+beta subunits, abs @850nm (B850). E abs @800->resonance E transfer from B800 to B850 (close together, transfer quick). Exciton can jump from one LH2 ring to another LH B850 or LH1 (abs 875), then finally to reaction centre, transfer <1ps by direct coupling of orbitals when molecules <1.5nm apart. Resonance E transfer over 2nm in ~1ps. Recent studies suggest quantum mechanical processes (quantum coherence) improve transfer efficiency. Transfer E downhill.
LH1- similar concentric rings of alpha+beta subunits, B875 sandwiched between, bigger central hole (than LH2) housing reaction centre complex. Little gap in ring (out of place alpha) gives e- accepting Q access to reaction centre.

21
Q

Light harvesting reaction centre and electron transport

A

Reaction centre: light drives e- ‘thermodynamically uphill’. 1st High-res X-ray of membrane complex= r viridis reaction centre- subunits H,M,L, cyt c, 4 molecules bacteriochlorophyll (BC), 2 bacteriopheophytin, Qs a+b, 1 non-haem Fe, 4 haems. 11 transmembrane alpha helices, symmetric w/ 2 branches across membrane (only 1 kinetically active in e- transfer). Once exciton passed LH1-> centre, ~200ps for e- to cross mem BC->Qa (quick to compete w/ fluor., non-radio decay+ stabilize initial charge separation). E-> “special pair”/ chlorophylls, redox potential shifts, becoming strong e-donor, e- -> BC-> phaeophytin-> Qa-> Qb rapidly to avoid E loss+ special pair decay. Qb leaves after receiving 2nd e-.
e- transport: reaction centre-> cyt bc-> c-type cyt-> back to reaction centre, converting deltaEh-> deltap (pmf) by Q cycle, then use pmf to make ATP- cyclic photophosphorylation. Doesn’t generate reducing equivalents (sources from env). Transhydrogenase-> reducing equivalents from NADH-> NADP+, w/ ratios [NADPH]/[NAD+]/[NADP+][NADH]>400 sustainable by E from pmf. Cyt bc intersects respiratory pathway, can be used in dark aerobic conditions w/ complex I+ cytochrome oxidases.

22
Q

Light harvesting in cyanobacteria and chloroplasts

A

Light harvesting in cyanobacteria: have large phycobilisome in semicircle arrangement w/ higher E outside and reaction @ inside, all on thylakoid mem (many in bacteria) for light harvesting. Photons unidirectionally flow down E cascade: Phycoerythrin565-575-> phycocyanin615-640-> allophycocyanin650-655-> reaction centre. Iron deficiency-> phycobilisome replaced w/ iron stress induced antenna protein- form ring around reaction centre reminiscent of purple system- appears to act as PSI antenna, perhaps different role for PSII (exact f(x) unclear)
Fun fact- phycocyanin= safe blue food dye, emits reddish sheen- fluorescence when nothing to pass E to.
Light harvesting in chloroplasts: has LH1 that binds PSI, LHII associated both PSI+ PSII,+ pigments bound into PSs themselves. Proteins from complex multigene families. Dimers PSII+ trimers/LHCII in supercomplexes.

23
Q

ETC between photosystems/Z scheme

A

ETCs between PSs (chloroplasts+ cyanobacteria): transport same in all oxygenic species. PSI+II arr. In series in Z scheme. Abs of photon excites e- in PSII to plastoquinone pool, e- flow down to cyt bf complex (similar to complex III, incl Q cycle)-> plastocyanin-> PSI where light abs, e- excited-> NADP+, where have sufficiently -ve Eh to reduce CO2.

24
Q

Photosystem II

A

PSII: e- transfer up to Qb identical to purple bacteria. On e- donating side of special pair, reactions differ between oxygenic+ non species- e- from O2 evolving centre (has 4Mn ions on luminal side of complex, taking 4e- from H2O->1O2- 4Mn cluster allows 4 oxidising units to collect before O2 made, avoiding ROS production)->Tyrz ->P680 from PSII. Cyt b559 f(x) uncertain, probably photodamage protection(structural role also suggested)
Mn use for H2O oxidation- possibly bc immediate evolutionary precursor/ oxygenic photosynthesisers were Mn-oxidising phototrophs. Mn(II) abundant in oceans (weathering igneous materials)- argued that oxidised Mn deposits from shortly before appearance of O2 @ high conc consistent w/ this.

25
Cytochrome b6f and Photosystem I
Cyt b6f: f(x) similar to complex III- oxidises Q, passing e- to small soluble protein, operating a Q cycle. Also structurally similar. Cyanobacteria Q/b6f/c6-PC shared between respiratory+photosynth pathway. PSI: accept e- from plastocyanin or c-type cyt in some algae/ cyanobacteria-> P700 chlorophyll special pair->2 monomeric Chla+ phylloquinone Q. Pass 3 different Fe4S4 clusters Fx,a,b, -> ferredoxin. PSI= heterodimer of PsaA+PsaB, analogous to DI+D2 in PSII. Whole complex isolated as a trimer. Cyclic transfer round PSI also possible: doesn’t produce NADPH, allowing balancing needs for ATP+ reducing equivalents; increases lumen acidification (regulatory response?); uses e- from ferredoxin passed to PQ; 2 routes: PGR5+ PGRL1 or membrane complex (similar to complex I) w/ peripheral arm.
26
Evolution and diversity of photosystems
Evolution/diversity: Roles of complexes+ differences between cyanobacteria+ chloroplasts unclear. Green sulphur bacterium Chlorobium has photo machinery similar to PSI (e- out through FeS clusters-> ferredoxin); no PSII equiv, but e- suppliable back to reaction centre, e.g., by ox H2S->S. Overall, diversity of PSs can be categorised to PSI/PSII-type. In cyanobacteria, b6f complex same as for respiration (chloroplasts got it from cyanobacteria- endosymbiosis).
27
Safety valves for quenching unused energy
Safety valves: E abs+ not used for photochemistry dangerous, +damage possible esp to PSII even if used. Safety valves can quench unused E (non-photochemical quenching/ NPQ): * Xanthophyll cycle- high light-> favour conversion xanthophyll carotenoid violaxanthin-> zeaxanthin (reversible de-epoxidation)- enhances quenching. Violaxanthin associated w/ light harvesting complex, well placed to modulate f(x). * PsbS: antenna protein that is pH sensitive- enhances NPQ by unclear mech, likely synergistic effect w/ violaxanthin. Chloroplast antenna don’t have clear homologues in photobacteria, but similar to cyanobacterial high light inducible proteins (HLIPs)- potential part of stress response * PSI/II have diff abs (700 vs 680nm), may run @ diff rates. In chloroplast, if PSII too fast, light harvesting antenna shifts away from it+ vice versa (‘state transitions’) due to kinase responding to redox state of PQ pool (PQ pool reduction-> kinase activation-> Pi LHCII-> LHCII leaves PSII). Cyanobacteria have equivalent state transitions where phycobilisome decoupled from 1/other PS. * Phycobilisome assoc. ‘orange carotenoid protein’ may modulate its f(x)
28
Safety valves for discharging ETC
Safety valves may also help discharge the ETC: * Chloroplasts have terminal oxidase (similar to mt)- passes e- from reduced PQ->O2 * Cyanobacteria respiratory ETC in same mem as PSs, incl PQ, cyt b6f, plastocyanin. Intersection-> respiratory chain can take xs e-s+ pass to O2 (esp important in fluctuating light) * Some species- flavo-diiron proteins- transfer xs e- direct/indirectly to O2 in ctrled way. Flv1/3 protect PSI (cyanos and many euk algae), Flv 2/4 PSII (some cyanos)
29
Chemiosmotic hypothesis and models for H+ transport
“chemiosmotic hypothesis” proposes that: e- transport is coupled to H+ transport across a membrane; the membrane is relatively impermeable to protons; return of protons through the membrane (e-chemical proton gradient) is coupled to ATP synth; there are other transporters in membrane, some powered by H+ gradient General schemes for mt+ thylakoids: mt extrude protons when given O2 pulse w/ oxidisable substrate present. Chloroplasts take up e- when light. Similar experiments w/ purified mt Complexes I,III,IV, chloroplast PSI+II, bf complex show e- transport associated w/ H+ transport. 2 models for H+ translocation 1) Redox loop models- H+ carried across mem w/e- as H on same small molecule (e.g., UQ). Alternating e-+ H+ carriers on correct sides/mem-> H+ transport directly coupled to e- transport (e.g., PSs/Q cycle) 2) Proton pump model- e-/H+ flows separate, w/ indirect coupling mechanism e.g., conf change in protein Redox loop model for Z-scheme in chloroplasts (Q cycle moves H+ by redox loop too). Proton pumping by complex I is via conf changes assoc. w/e- transfer that drove H+ extrusion electrostatically. CII doesn’t transport H+. Q-cycle accepted mech for CIII. CIV transports H+ by redox loop+ proton pump mechs. Oxygenic Photosynth- proteins liberated into thylakoid lumen by H2O oxidation, translocated across by PQ+ cy tbt complex, removed from matrix by NADPH formation.
30
Membrane permeability to H+ ions and uncouplers
Permeability of membrane to H+: Permeability increased by uncouplers. Proton translocators (lipophilic weak acids, cross mem protonated or deprot) catalyse electrophoretic proton uniport across mem. If pmf exists, proton translocator cycles catalytically. @ =ve face of mem, DNP-O- protonated-> DNP-OH+ vice versa. Overall, H+ crosses mem. Proton ionophores uncouple protein translocation from ATP synthesis. Uncouplers allow rapid e- transport w/out coupled APT synth, demonstrated to act as proton ionophores provide evidence for return of H+ being coupled to ATP synth.
31
Coupling electron transport to H+ synthesis
Coupling e- transport/ATP synth via pmf shown in O2 electrode. If all ADP-> ATP, pmf builds up, stopping e-transport-> mt idling (state 4). ADP added-> O2 consumption rate increases to active state 3 (ADP->ATP)+ pmf drops- shows e-transport directly linked to ability to make ATP. When nearly all ADP used up, return-> state 4- this is respiratory ctrl (Add UCP-> e-transfer resumes). Mt state transition occurs w/ work/exercise. Max exercise-> O2 consumption x10. All isolated mt have proton leak across inner mem, rate of which increases exponentially w/ pmf size, so significant in state 4 but not state 3. Respiratory ctrl ratio= state3 rate/state 4 rate= inverse measure of mt proton leakiness. Leak due to free fatty acids (cycle across mem w/ CO group carrying H+) or UCPs (generate heat in BAT- NB diff mech used in mt in plants like Titan Arum (use alternative oxidase to ox reduced Q directly w/out proton gradient)). PO ratio= mol O2 use per mol ADP use.
32
How to calculate pmf size
Pmf size (formula above)- delta psi calculated from measures transmembrane distribution of permeant cation @ equilibrium, like K+ in presence of valinomycin/synthetic lipi-soluble cations (TPMP+)- rapidly cross mem+ reach equilibrium. Then mem potential calc w/ Nernst equation if [K+] on each side measured. pH difference across mem calculated from distribution/permeant weak acid (e.g. acetic)- cross mem protonated but not charged- equ distribution determined by deltapH, not membrane potential. For compartments w/ acid inside (thylakoids, lysosomes), use weak bases instead.For photosynthetic mems, measurements in electrochromic shift (change in pigment st=pectral properties in response to electical potential) an be used. Mt pmf ~210mV, thylakoid 180, bacteria 100-200. Thylakoid pH and mem potential more variable (mem pot varies depending on species+lighting).
33
ATP synthase structure
ATP synthase: similar across bacteria, mt, chl. Separation by mechanical treatment/salt washing-> F0+F1. F1 soluble, will hydrolyse ATP but not synth. Has 3alpha+ 3beta (globular head, ATPase activity in beta), 1 gamma(rotating crank), 1delta (holds stator arm on top of head), 1epsilon (connects gamma to F0) subunits F0: 1a (connect stator to c ring), 2b (stator arm), 8-15c (H+ translocating rotor) subunits- alone, acts as H+ channel, blockable by DCCD w/ singl Asp or Glu at centre of membrane on subunit c (suggests residue essential to proton channel). Oligomycin more widely used inhibitor of intact ATP synthase, also blocks F0 1st Crystal structure F1 ATPase beef heart 2.8A res- gamma forms bend alpha helical structure en=xtending whole length of pore up centre of F1, asymmetrically placed in pore, partly held by hyrdrophobic residue ring where the 6 alpha/beta subunits meet @F1 top. Structure stongly supports binding change mech+ dependence on rotation of gamma:
34
ATP synthase binding change mechanism
Binding change mechanism: pmf provides E by proton flow via F0 to make ATP+ promote release from catalytic sites where it forms spontaneously; E-linked substrate binding, formation of tightly bound ATP+ release @ 3 separate interacting sites 120o out of phase in catalytic cycle;binding changes required driven by conf changes in F1, driven by gamma, driven by c of F0. Alpha-beta pairs remain still, catalytic sites in betas @interface w/alpha. ADP+Pi bind L state; ATP forms spontaneously in T state (binds ATP better than ADP); ATP release from O state.
35
ATP synthase proton flow and c ring rotation
Proton flow/c rotation through F0 causes gamma rotation up tp 270Hz, visualisable microscopically. Proton enters half-channel from p side, binding c1; proton displaces R210 (glu/asp) toward adjacent c2; R210 binds c2, displacing H+ bound to it; displaced H+ (has been held longest) leaves other half channel on N side; c ring rotates, R210 remains on c2; c2 now on p-side, ready for another H+- all events concerted. Rotational can go either way, but pmf keeps it unidirectional. ½ channels ID’d on cryo-EM.
36
Gearing and stoichiometry of ATP synthase, directional control
Gearing/ stoichiometry: #H+s=#c subunits->360 rotation->3ATP. #c/3=#H+/ATP, e.g., 8c in bovine mt-> 2.7H+/ATP. 10 in yeast, 15 cyanos. NB pmf also used for other transmembrane channels- net #H+/ATP may be even higher. NB ATP synthase may exist as dimer in mt. Directional ctrl: ATP synth driven by pmf or ATP hydrolysis to generate pmf possible. Mammals have peptide inhibitor of hydrolysis IF1 (diff from stator), binding ATP synthase likely pH-dependently. Simialr system in cyanos. Chl use redox regulation via gamma.
37
ATP translocators
Translocators: to get ATP in/out of mt/Chl. Use adenine nucleotide translocator (well studied, 10% mt protein)- active carrier catalysing electrophoretic exchange of ATP4- out/ADP3- in across mt inner mem (net export of -ve charge favoured by pmf)- undergoes large conf change between C+M states(can be locked in 1 state by carboxyatractyloside (C) or bongkrekic acid (M)). Binding affinity to ATP/ADP diff fo C/M states so cycling-> exchange. Yeast has 35 genes in this protein family. Many other mt carriers (pi, pyruvate, di/tricarboxylate) homologous w/ like structure. Pi translocator (symporter) imports H2PO4- w/ H+, also favoured by pmf. “ATP synthasome” suggested to be formed by ATP synthase+ translocators.
38
Mitochondrial evolution and mutation
Genome: in humans, mt genome codes Complex I,III,IV, ATP synthase, r/tRNAs-remnant of original bacterial genome- other genes lost/relocated to nucelus. Allen argues genes retained where regulation in response to redox poise of mt needed (CORR-co-location for redox reg)- may also allow reg of exp In relation to complex assembly (CES ctrl by epistasy of synth and COCOA colocation for ctrl/assembly). Huge genome size variation (plasmodium 6kb vs Arabidopsis 367kb), w/ some variations in code. Transcription usually by viral-type RNAP. Inheritance maternal: sperm mt actively destroyed in fertilised egg by UQ-dependent mech. All mtDNAs descended from that of single/ small group (“mt Eve”) living 100-200k yrs ago. Mutation+ evolution rapid (10-17x nuclear DNA) partly due to high ROS levels from ETC-> high polymorphism even in ethnically closely related groups- one reason behind extensive use in forensics+ other areas, e.g., ID remains of last 2 children of Tsar Nicholas II/Russia/ ID skeleton under Greyfriars Car park, Leicester as Richard III/ resolve racehorse breeding arguments/trace prehistoric human migration across Europe/Americas/Oceania
39
Mt Diseases and protein transfer
Mt diseases incl 80% MELAS (Mt encephalopathy, lactic acidosis+ stroke-like episodes) cases having substitution in mt tRNA-Leu gene; MERRF (myoclonic epilepsy+ ragged red fibres) usually sub in tRNA-Lys gene; NARP usually sub in ATP6; LHON usually mutations in NDH genes. Mt protein import: most mt proteins encoded in nucleus, translated in cytoplasm. Several destinations- need several pathways for transport. Many proteins, particularly matrix ones, have import seq cleaved off in matrix. Others have internal recognition seqs recognised by transport machinery- mt transit seq ~20-30 aa on N terminus, though seqs of diff peptides not strongly homologous, but form amphipathic alpha helix w/ +ve charges on 1 side (recognised by import machinery). Pathway of import depends on destination: 1) Most proteins enter via TOM, then: 2) May then pass-> TIM23, then: 3) can enter matrix via preseq-translocase-assoc motor PAM+ cleavage by mt processing peptidase MPP. 4) Otherwise, could be release from TIM23, (enter via TOM, stay in inner mem), or: 5) Or bypass TIM23+ go to IMS using mt IMS assembly machinery MIA or 6) Go to outer mem w/ sorting+assembly machinery SAM complex or 7) Inner mem via TIM22 or 8) Go to outer mem directly w/ mt import machinery protein 1 (Mim1) and 9) To inner mem directly by synthesis in my+ export via OXA
40
Mt Structure
Mt structure: membranes inner, outer, Cristal (site of ox Pi). Cristae connected to inner mem by cristal junctions (regulate cell death), outer+ inner connected by contact sites (protein transport)- both depend on complex of MICOS proteins (developed @ time of endosymbiosis. Endosymbiotic origin of cristae indicated by ancient homology of MICOS). Cristal junctions may limit continuity w/ IMS-> translocated H+s may not be able to diffuse away. Complexes likely @ diff locations in cristae- ATP synthase @ apex- its dimerization may be assoc. w/ its location
41
Mt dynamics
Mt dynamics: cristal structure, shape, density can change according to cell physiological state (incl nutritional status)- probably depends on MTORC1. In some cells, continuous mt fusion/fission. Fusion dominates->mt can form single network/reticulum. Fission dominates-> 100s small particulate mt. Fusion in mammals depends on GTPases Mfn1+2 (outer mem fusion)+ GTPase OPA1 (inner). Fission requires GTPase Drp1. Fusion likely requires mem potential ->fission/fusion cycle can have role in quality ctrl of mt- damaged mt may be unable to rejoin, get degraded. Exercise can ~2x mt in skeletal muscle. Differentiation can cause changes in mt levels in cells.
42
Mt lifecycle
Mt lifecycle: De novo mt synth impossible. Need to form from existing mt by fission, mtDNA rep, incorporation of new proteins+ phospholipids (mt biogenesis). Post-mitotic tissues (heart, brain) where cells no longer dividing, no net accumulation of mt, w/ turnover every ~10-25 days. Mainly degraded by autophagy (random surrounding of areas of cytoplasm by 2xmem of autophagic vesicle, which then fuses lysosomes->degradation)
43
Anaerobic mt
Anaerobic mt/ organisms w/ mt w/ partially/fully lost genomes * Mt in metazoans in O2-poor env (e.g., shellfish living in sediments, parasitic worms in animal digestive tracts): use e- transport coupled to H+ translocation in mt-> ATP. Use non-O2 terminal acceptors (nitrate, nitrite, NO) or molecules generated during metabolism (=/= pyruvate->lactate/ethanol) * Hydrogenosomes: degenerate mt producing H2, typically found in unicellular euks living in guts. represent mt in varying states of evolutionary “reduction”- have many proteins typical of mt, incl protein import components. Some have other features: Blastocystis has complex I+II, II may run backward,+ alternative oxidase. Nyctotherus has remnant mt genome incl some components/ complex I * In Giardia, no complex I/II, but remnant organelle (mitosome)- functions in Fe-S cluster biogenesis These modified mt sometimes called Mt-related organelles (MROs). Monocercomonoides (anaerobic protist) doesn’t have any mt, has new pathway for Fe-S cluster biogenesis able to function in cytosol w/out need for separate compartment.
44
Cp evolution and diversity, structure
All contain 120-200kb genome, representing remnant genome of ancestor represented by cyanos now. Al encode components of PSI+II, b6f, ATP synthase, protein synth, ribulose bis-phosphate carboxylase (rbcL), r/tRNAs+ others. Similar arguments for gene retention to mt. Transcribed by bacterial-type RNAP (chl encoded). Land plants also have viral-type RNAP likely derived from RNAP in plant mt. Uniparental inheritance. Import pathways well-studies, some appear to have been recruited from ancestral ‘cyanobacterial’ endosymbiont. Chl structure: stroma+ thylakoids, some stacked (granal lamellae- unstacked are stromal). PSI in stromal+ ends of granal stacks; PSII in stacks, Cyt b6f equally distributed, ATP synthase stromal. Division by binary fission, many proteins ID’d- depends on mix of bacterial-type proteins+ host proteins superimposed. Evolutionary history: many photo organisms have chl w/ >2 mem- 2ndary chl where chl-containing euk was engulfed again by another euk- these chl can be traced back to endosymbiosis that gave rise to red+ green algae+ glaucophytes (which have peptidoglycan wall). Nuclear encoded proteins entering thylakoid lumen of some algae may cross up to 5 mems. Paulinella chromatophora= protist that independently invented chloroplast (its symbiont shown by phylogenetic analysis to be of cyano origin but only distantly related to green alga symbiont). Over 70 genes relocated-> nucleus, products reimported- opportunity to study independent solution to same import problem, where proteins <90aa enter w/out targeting seq+ larger proteins have this seq. Another independent chl invention claimed in marine alga- ‘nitroplast’ N-fixing organelle.
45
Non-photosynthetic cp
Non-photosynthetic chloroplasts- * developmental: proplastids, amyloplasts- convertible to chl * evolutionary: in non-photo plants (Epifagus, Monotropa)- retain chl genome. Apicomplexa (incl Toxoplasma+ plasmodium) have photosynthetic ancestry, have remnant chl w/ 35kb genome encoding ClpC+ SufB+ prteins for their exp- reason for retention controversial. Essential drug target (doxyclycline, fosmidomycin (DXR (enzyme in non-mevalonate pathway of isoprenoid biosynthesis absent in humans but present in plants, euk alae, cyanos) inhibitor) * Some species have chl w/ lost genomes (rafflesia)+ some plants/algae lost chl altogether.