Bioenergetics Flashcards
(45 cards)
Overview of pathway types
Pathway types: metabolic pathways transfer matter; bioenergetics pertains to energy transduction pathways, which transfer energy via coupled cycles with no transfer of matter; signal transduction pathways transfer info (consist of cycles connected by regulatory interactions only, w/ no matter/E transfer)- these pathways are in reality branched, components are mainly enzymes or transporters.
Cells need to oppose the natural direction of reactions… discuss
Cells need to oppose the natural direction of matter transfer (according to 2nd law of thermodynamics) to concentrate substrates at low conc in environment-> cell+ convert them into complex, ordered structures by coupling these processes to spontaneous ones so net Gibbs free E<0. Electron transfer+ pmf often coupled.
To prevent driving reactions running out, a chain of coupling reactions linked to a spontaneous one in the environment is used- so E metabolism consists of a chain of coupled cycles linking non-spontaneous reactions in cell w/spontaneous one in env. Chain can branch @ each intermediate+ different organisms use different reactions to start+ end the chain. Life depends on a redox disequilibrium.
Inputs for ETCs
Inputs for ETCs: Plants use light E-> create reducing env; animals use reduced compounds from food to oxidise (chemical inputs: PCr (short term), fat, starch, glycogen, protein). Chemolithotrophs oxidise non-organic matter (e.g., nitrifying bacteria oxidise ammonia-> nitrite-> nitrate. A. ferrooxidans+ A.thiooxidans oxidise ferrous iron and reduced sulphur compounds- important in mining for metal extraction from ores+ waste remediation for metal recovery from waste. Sulphur oxidation can, however, produce sulphuric acid).
Geobacter use ferric iron as terminal electron acceptor, reducing-> ferrous iron. S. oneidensis one of organisms causing reduction of Mn in Oneida Lake in New York state.
3 major intermediates in E metabolism, based on: electrons (measured by redox potential), protons (pmf), phosphoryl groups (measured by phosphorylation potential- Other P energy intermediates include PCr, phosphoenolpyruvate, ATP (+GTP,CTP,UTP,dATP), G-6-P, G-1-P, in decreasing order of delta G.)
Energy coupling and stoichiometry
When energy coupling in ETCs, stoichiometry matters! The driving reaction G needs to outweigh the driven reaction’s G. All forms of E are interconvertible- knowing deltaG stoichiometries allows calculations, e.g., to check that the overall process is feasible thermodynamically or work out what is happening biochemically. E.g.,
Photosynthesis: 2 moles of photons are enough to put 1 mole electrons onto NADP with some left over to move protons and make ATP. Respiration: each protons moving across a 200mV membrane releases 20kJ; making ATP costs ~60kJ/mol, so need at least 3 protons per ATP. Can use calculations to predict yields of bio processes, e.g., how much CO2 you could fix in a year if you’re making biofuel.
Coupling redox processes in mammals: ~90% food intake energy liberated by respiratory chains in mt-> most cellular heat+ATP. About 20% mt proton circuit is uncoupled-> proton leak. Major ATP consumers are actinomyosin ATPase, protein synthesis, plasma membrane Na/K pump (~20% each). Energy production range in adult humans ~80-800 watts (resting-> vigorous exercise).
Various bioenergetic modules can be coupled together to create a bioenergetic toolkit for forming chains.
Electron transfer systems overview
Organisms need to get electrons at negative Eh+ a +ve E sink to accept them-> process w/ -ve G that can be coupled to a biologically useful process. Most ETCs involve e- donor system, acceptor system+ intermediate complex w/ a b-type+ c-type cytochrome (bc complex)- these are large protein complexes in membrane connected by smaller mobile e- carriers. Sometimes e- fed back to same donor from start-> cyclic arrangement. Bc complexes in different organisms similar in f(x), structure, subunit composition+ seq. Use of c type cytochrome after cytochrome b happened independently in evolution (oxygenic photosynthesis vs mt)
Quinone e- carriers also similar to each other.
“c” =small soluble protein. In mt/bacteria, it’s a Copper protein. In chloroplasts, plastocyanin. Another c-type cytochrome in some org.s if Cu in short supply. Donor+acceptor systems diverse w/ similarities among
Photosynth org.s electron carriers/ different ETC systems
- MT: NADH& other dehydrogenases->Q->bc1->cytc->cyt oxidase
- Non-photosynth bacteria v variable- like mt but w/ bc (not bc1)+ cyt oxidase sometimes cyt o instead
- Potosynth bacteria (e.g., purple bacteria (anoxygenic))- P870->Q->bc->cyt c2->P870
- Chlororplasts+ cyanobac: water+PSII->PQ->bf complex->PC->PSI+ Fd+ NADP (->back to bf (cyclic))
Key reaction centre proteins of PSII+ purple Photosynth bacteria similar. Also similarities between reaction centre proteins PSI and bacteria like chlorobium (combines sulfur oxidisation+ light use). PSI+PSII similarities suggest common ancestor. PSI+ PSII reaction centres are heterodimeric w/ similarities in subunits suggesting derivation by gene duplication+ specialisation.
The many modern groups of Photosynth bacteria all fit in same scheme. Other models incl PSI-II evolved in cyanobacteria by duplication, I/II side later lost (some lineages). Ultimately, all systems related evolutionarily.
Cyanobacteria PSI+II Both heterodimeric
Heliobacteria+, acidobacteria, chlorobium PSI-type Homodimeric
Chloroflexi, purples+ gemmatimonads PSII-type hetero
Photosynth likely passed around by horizontal transfer. Chloroplasts derived from endosymbiotic bacteria closely related to modern cyanobacteria. Mt also endosymbiotic, so have v similar cyt oxidase to cyanobacteria.
Overview of evolution of photosystems
Cyanobacteria PSI+II Both heterodimeric
Heliobacteria+, acidobacteria, chlorobium PSI-type Homodimeric
Chloroflexi, purples+ gemmatimonads PSII-type hetero
Electron carrier summary- 9
Hint: metals included
Electron carriers: aa residues poor carriers, so protein complexes of ETC need other redox components to carry e- in/ between complexes. 2 type of e- carrier: small organic molecules (carry 1/2e- w/H+- also hydrogen carriers); metals (1e-). ETC often alternate between them so as e- pass, protons alternately released+ taken up- arranged on opposite sides of mem so e- transport coupled to proton transport (main f(x)/ e-transport).
* NAD carries 2e-, 1H+; water soluble
* FMN/FAD: 1/2H, protein bound. These+Q can couple 1e- reactions w/2e- ones.
* Quinone: 1/2H, membrane soluble. UbiQ in mt+bacteria, plastoQ (chloroplast); menaQ (some bacteria); phylloQ (PSI). differences in head groups+ isoprenoid tail length.
* Tyr: 1H, protein bound. Particularly important for Photosynth
* Fe-S centre: 1e-. Usually 1Fe, 1Fe2S, or 4Fe4S
* Fe (III) haem: 1e-. Porphyrin rings differ (e.g., a,b,c in mt)
* Mg (II) in chlorophyll: 1e-. Chl a,b, etc differ in ring. No Mg2+ in pheophytin.
* Cu centre: 1e-, 1 in plastocyanin, 2 centres in Cyt Ox.
* Mn centre: 1-4e-. 4 centres in oxygen evolving centre
Haems and chlorophyll
Haems may be non-cov bound (cyt a,b0 or cov bound (c-type cyt incl cyt f in chloroplasts). Cyts distinguished by max absorption (in nm) on spectra denoted by suffix: a600, b560, c550.
Chlorophyll a+ b differ by 1 group: a has -CH3, b has -CHO. B invented multiple times in evolution while a used in photochemistry of plants, algae, most cyanobacteria. Evidence that chlorophyll d670 (like a but CHO instead of vinyl), 97% chlorophyll in A marina) also involved in photochem. Chlorophyll f709 (another -CH3 in a (different to the one altered to get b)-> CHO) in C thermalis (90% a, 10% f, 1% d when grown under far red) mech of function controversial. Bacteria like Rhodopseudomonas have cyclic tetrapyrrole bacteriochlorophyll like those above. Phaeophytins+ chlorophylls w/out central Mg2+ can be made in lab (chemical mistreatment)- also have role in Photosynth.
Mn centres
Mn centres- Mn centre couples 4e- reaction (ox/2H2O-> O2) to 1e- turnovers of PSII. O2 production every 4 flashes of light. Kok’s “S state model” proposes series of 5 states, 1 of which (S4) evolves O2 (on transitioning to S0) while transitions S0->S4 stimulated by flashes. Mn cluster evolution ~3bln yrs ago, allowed e- extraction from H2O, generating O2 as toxic byproduct, allowing evolution of aerobic organisms.
ETC sequence via PSII
e.g., of ETC: PSII: light E-> e- lost from “special pair” of chlorophyll molecules, through another chlorophyll ChlD1, a peophytin Ph, bound QA, ferrous iron, to reversibly-binding QB. b559= cyt of uncertain f(x), possibly for avoiding photodamage under light stress. Loss of e- from special pair creates strongly oxidising species, allowing e-s to be extracted from H2O @ [Mn]4 O2 evolving centre via TyrZ.
Electron transfer through proteins
Electron transfer through proteins: e-s must pass through protein to get from donor to acceptor carrier. Nature of protein makes little difference- e-s tunnel between carriers- a quantum mechanical phenomenon depending on: distance between carriers (too slow @>14A); free E/redox potential difference between donor+ acceptor (rate fast @ intermediate deltaG but slow @ high deltaG); response of donor+ acceptor and their env to change in charge from e- loss/gain; dielectric constant of intervening protein. So donor+ acceptor need to be close, have similar Em, rate and direction transfer manipulatable by changing distance/deltaG between carriers.
Electron transfer in mitochondria: overall
Electron transfer in mt
Note that stoichiometry in mt is 1CI: 2CII: 3CIII: 6CIV: 6cytc: 60UQ.
Several complexes funnel into Q: CI, CII (succinate dehydrogenase of TCA cycle), glycerol-3P dehydrogenase, ETF:Q oxidoreductase, dihydroorotate DH, malate quinone oxidoreductase. Evidence for order of components from studies on reox of reduced chain, inhibitor effects, Em values.
Electron transfer in mitochondria: complex I
Complex I: cryo-EM by Zhu et al- structure+ additional subunits in different states to infer coupling mech. 14 subunits in bacteria. Mt has same core structure w/ additional subunits (31 in mammals). L shaped w/ peripheral arm protruding into matrix, containing FMN+ 8 Fe-S centres and a large membrane domain w/ no cofactors. E- flow NADH->FMN-> 8Fe-S->Q. peripheral arm+ mem domain change orientation (may link to proton translocation)- open 112o+ closed 105o states. ND5,4,2 subunits of mem domain have homology to antiporters, initially thought to export protons driven by conformational change, now process thought to be driven by string/ charged residues along middle of complex. Mvmt/ peripheral arm drives transfer of charges along string, H+ expelled from NuoL only(“domino model”). Reverse e- transfer (RET) when QH2/Q high- may lead to damaging level/ ROS production. Evidence that CI may deactivate under some conditions to minimise this.
ETC in mt: complex II
Complex II (AKA succinate dehydrogenase of Krebs cyc): ox succinate-> fumerate, then 2e- reduce Q-> QH2 in membrane. 4 peptide subunits A-D, e- pass succinate-> closely bound FAD in A-> 3Fe-S centres/B-> UQ bound to transmembrane C&D. b haem bound to C/D does little (e-/H+ not transferred across mem in CII)- may help reduce e- loss onto molecular O2, which would produce ROS. Phosphatidylethanolamine probably structural. Redox centres all within suitable distance, redox potential/FAD high (assists oxidising succinate?) + potential/ 4Fe-4S centre low (balanced by difference between it& 3Fe-4S). CII may generate ROS on reperfusion following ischaemia (in which several metabolic pathways-> fumarate accumulation- this runs SDH backwards, -> succinate accumulates)- on reperfusion, SDH leads to high QH2/Q ratio, RET in CI+ high ROS.
ETC in mt: complex III (hint: Q cycle+ evidence for it)
Complex III (AKA cyt bc1 complex): 500kD dimer. 11 subunits/monomer. 4nm transmembrane domain (26 helices+ key redox centres), 7.5nm matrix domain (core proteins), 4nm intermembrane domain (2/ other redox centres. Core proteins absent from bacterial CIII, give structural stability+ act as peptidases for imported proteins. CIII oxidises UQH2, reduced cyt c. 3 redox active peptides are Rieske ISP containing 2Fe2S cluster, cyt c1 containing haem c1, transmembrane cyt b w/ haems bH&bL. e-/H+ flow via Q cycle:
1) QH2 binds o (outer) Q binding site, 1e- -> Rieske FeS centre, leaves QH. Bound. H+ released outside
2) ISP (Fe S protein) head rotates, e- from FeS-> cyt c via cyt c1. 2nd e- QH. in o via b haems, reduces Q->QH in i (inner) site. Q in o site returns to Q pool
3) ISP rotates back, repeat step 1 so QH. on both i and o sites.
4) Repeat step 2 but reduce QH. to QH2 in i- may return to pool/ bind o site
Net effect of 1 cycle: 2QH2 oxidised to Q @o+ 1Q reduced to QH2 @i= 1QH2->1Q and 2 cyt c reduced. 2H+ per QH2 @o released+ 2H+ taken up @i= 2H+ released per cycle (per e- pair).
Evidence for Q cycle: EPR (e- paramagnetic resonance) studies; crystal structures for b haems; seq data+ crystal structures for Q binding sites; stoichiometry of proton/e- transport; single turnover exps w/ photo- bacteria showing predicted seq/ e- transfers; if oxidised cyt c added to complex when QH2 present-> QH. generated @o, which reduces cyt bs-> oxidant-induced reduction; mutants in ISP hinge slow/stop complex.
mt ETC: complex IV and supercomplexes
Complex IV: subunits I,II,III+ another 10 proteins in mammalian mt complex. Crystal structure of mt, purple bacteria, paracoccus available. Reduced cyt c binds CIV, transfers 1e- to CuA centre (2 Cu ions bound to His residues). Then e-s->haem a->binuclear Fe-Cu centre (cyt a3+CuB) so both Fe+Cu reduced-> O2 binds haem a3, is reduced-> 2H2O, consuming 4 “substrate” H+ from matrix, while 4 more H+ pumped from matrix (per 4e-).
Supercomplexes: “respirasome” typically contains CI,III,IV (Cryo-EM). CII sometimes included. Good evidence for these in mt, but contents vary in addition to free complexes+ subpopulations (uneven stoichiometry). Organisation may help efficient e- transfer between complexes+ avoid ROS production. Some mice studies show respirasome formation disruptable w/out impairing ox Pi. Formation may depend of proteins w/ synth regulated by HIF, cardiolipin may also have a role. Supercomplexes assembly increases w/ exercise+ may decrease due to heart failure/ischaemia. Unsure if supercomplexes for in bacterial membranes.
Other respiratory ETCs
Yeast mt: lack conventional CI, have alt NDH-2 type. Transfers e- NADH->UQ but doesn’t pump H+. found in many other species incl. bacteria.
Plant mt: additional e- transport pathways incl. NDH-2. Also, outward facing NAD(P)H-Q oxidoreductase+ alt oxidase pathway (e- Q->O2, both w/out H+ transport). Allow variable efficiency of E coupling+ heat production.
Non-photo-bacteria: many ETCs, some unusual e- donors (Fe(II), H2)/ acceptors (nitrate, fumerate). P. denitrificans well studied bc ETC similar to mt. E coli- different quinol oxidases depending on growth conditions
Microbial fuel cells: if O2/ other e- acceptor not available, some bacteria pass e- directly to env (e.g., external electrode-> current in external circuit) by direct contact, pili (nanowires), endogenous mediators- basis of microbial fuel cells. Interest in Geobacter/Shewanella etc. have high propensity for extracellular current production (linked to role in extracellular metal oxidation)- could metabolise waste-> electricity.
Photosynthetic ETC (overall)
Energy coupling steps: Light harvesting by pigment antenna system; primary e- transfer in light-activated reaction centre; e- transfer down ETC assoc. w/ H+ transport; return protons through ATP synthase. Last 2 steps highly analogous to mt, 1st 2 only in photo org.s. Purple bacteria, cyanobacteria, algae+ higher plants most studied. Purples only have 1 type/PS w/ cyctic ETC, others have 2 PS arr in Z scheme starting w/ ox of H2O-> O2, ending w/ NADP->NADPH.
Light catching pigments: chlorophylls a+ b= primary in plants, green algae; a also in reaction centre (cyanobacteria don’t generally use b)- some cyanobacteria also use other chlorophylls. Phyceorythrobilin+ phycocyanobilin in cyanobacteria+ red algae. Beta-carotene+ lutein (AKA xanthophyl)= carotenoids w/ f(x) incl light harvesting and photoprotection in plants, algae. Bacteriochlorophyll in bacteria. All have conjugated systems (circular in chl b, linear in others) accounting largely for light absorption.
Basic process: arrays of chlorophyll/ bacteriochlorophyll/ phycobiliprotein complexes. Red/blue quantum of light absorbed anywhere in array, but excitation E (“exciton”) needs rapid («1ns to compete w/ fluorescence+ non-radioactive decay of excited state)+efficient transfer down chain to reaction centre. Triplet state undesirable-> free radical production so systems contains carotenoids+ other pigments to catalyse their decay
Purple bacteria and light harvesting complexes 1 and 2
Purple bacteria- typically 2 types light harvesting complexes LHI (closely assoc w/ reaction centre, form ‘core’ complex)+ LH2 (when light abs by peripheral antenna LH2, E->LHI->reaction centre)- LH complexes cover large area, trap light+ funnel to reaction centre.
LH2 crystal structure-> 9 alpha subunits surrounded by concentric ring/9 beta subunits- mainly membrane-spanning alpha helices. Bacteriochlorophyll molecule between each beta (9 total), w/ plane of ring parallel to membrane, Abs 800nm (B800). 2nd bacteriochlorophyll ring perpendicular to mem, 18 total, lie inside B800 ring between alpha+beta subunits, abs @850nm (B850). E abs @800->resonance E transfer from B800 to B850 (close together, transfer quick). Exciton can jump from one LH2 ring to another LH B850 or LH1 (abs 875), then finally to reaction centre, transfer <1ps by direct coupling of orbitals when molecules <1.5nm apart. Resonance E transfer over 2nm in ~1ps. Recent studies suggest quantum mechanical processes (quantum coherence) improve transfer efficiency. Transfer E downhill.
LH1- similar concentric rings of alpha+beta subunits, B875 sandwiched between, bigger central hole (than LH2) housing reaction centre complex. Little gap in ring (out of place alpha) gives e- accepting Q access to reaction centre.
Light harvesting reaction centre and electron transport
Reaction centre: light drives e- ‘thermodynamically uphill’. 1st High-res X-ray of membrane complex= r viridis reaction centre- subunits H,M,L, cyt c, 4 molecules bacteriochlorophyll (BC), 2 bacteriopheophytin, Qs a+b, 1 non-haem Fe, 4 haems. 11 transmembrane alpha helices, symmetric w/ 2 branches across membrane (only 1 kinetically active in e- transfer). Once exciton passed LH1-> centre, ~200ps for e- to cross mem BC->Qa (quick to compete w/ fluor., non-radio decay+ stabilize initial charge separation). E-> “special pair”/ chlorophylls, redox potential shifts, becoming strong e-donor, e- -> BC-> phaeophytin-> Qa-> Qb rapidly to avoid E loss+ special pair decay. Qb leaves after receiving 2nd e-.
e- transport: reaction centre-> cyt bc-> c-type cyt-> back to reaction centre, converting deltaEh-> deltap (pmf) by Q cycle, then use pmf to make ATP- cyclic photophosphorylation. Doesn’t generate reducing equivalents (sources from env). Transhydrogenase-> reducing equivalents from NADH-> NADP+, w/ ratios [NADPH]/[NAD+]/[NADP+][NADH]>400 sustainable by E from pmf. Cyt bc intersects respiratory pathway, can be used in dark aerobic conditions w/ complex I+ cytochrome oxidases.
Light harvesting in cyanobacteria and chloroplasts
Light harvesting in cyanobacteria: have large phycobilisome in semicircle arrangement w/ higher E outside and reaction @ inside, all on thylakoid mem (many in bacteria) for light harvesting. Photons unidirectionally flow down E cascade: Phycoerythrin565-575-> phycocyanin615-640-> allophycocyanin650-655-> reaction centre. Iron deficiency-> phycobilisome replaced w/ iron stress induced antenna protein- form ring around reaction centre reminiscent of purple system- appears to act as PSI antenna, perhaps different role for PSII (exact f(x) unclear)
Fun fact- phycocyanin= safe blue food dye, emits reddish sheen- fluorescence when nothing to pass E to.
Light harvesting in chloroplasts: has LH1 that binds PSI, LHII associated both PSI+ PSII,+ pigments bound into PSs themselves. Proteins from complex multigene families. Dimers PSII+ trimers/LHCII in supercomplexes.
ETC between photosystems/Z scheme
ETCs between PSs (chloroplasts+ cyanobacteria): transport same in all oxygenic species. PSI+II arr. In series in Z scheme. Abs of photon excites e- in PSII to plastoquinone pool, e- flow down to cyt bf complex (similar to complex III, incl Q cycle)-> plastocyanin-> PSI where light abs, e- excited-> NADP+, where have sufficiently -ve Eh to reduce CO2.
Photosystem II
PSII: e- transfer up to Qb identical to purple bacteria. On e- donating side of special pair, reactions differ between oxygenic+ non species- e- from O2 evolving centre (has 4Mn ions on luminal side of complex, taking 4e- from H2O->1O2- 4Mn cluster allows 4 oxidising units to collect before O2 made, avoiding ROS production)->Tyrz ->P680 from PSII. Cyt b559 f(x) uncertain, probably photodamage protection(structural role also suggested)
Mn use for H2O oxidation- possibly bc immediate evolutionary precursor/ oxygenic photosynthesisers were Mn-oxidising phototrophs. Mn(II) abundant in oceans (weathering igneous materials)- argued that oxidised Mn deposits from shortly before appearance of O2 @ high conc consistent w/ this.