Biopsychology Flashcards
(39 cards)
LoF - What is it?
Localisation of function suggests specific brain areas control specific functions
LoF - What opposes it?
Lashley theory of holism; higher order thinking requires multiple parts of the brain.
LoF - What observable evidence do we have?
Neurological Evidence such as Tulving’s brain scans for memory stores.
LoF - What case evidence do we have?
Phineas Gage - severed frontal lobe; different personality suggests frontal lobe responsible for personality/consciousness.
LoF - What methodological refute can we think of?
Lab settings for brain scan studies; weak ecological validity; brain may act differenly in natural environments.
LoF - What case study refute do we have?
Phineas Case Study - hard to generalise case study to entire populations.
HL - What is it?
The dominance of one hemisphere for certain functions.
HL - example?
Language prod/understanding left hemisphere function only.
HL - Contralateral flow?
Hemispheres controlling the function of opposite sides of the body, e,g, left hemisphere controlling right arm.
HL - Famous contralateral opportunist?
Sperry with the split-brain studies. (1968)
HL - Describe split-brain studies: Who, How, What - use example of keyring.
11 epileptic patients who had their corpus callosum split.
Measured contralateral functioning using tachistoscope.
Hands hidden under screen, computer in front of them; stared at red cross in centre of screen.
Word such as ‘Key Ring’ displayed on screen. Joined brain would say they saw ‘keyring’.
Left controls speech: right eye contralaterally controlled by left hemisphere, so they could say ‘Ring’ and draw a ‘Key’ but not put the two together.
Evidence of contralateral functioning.
HL - What’s great about Sperry’s study?
Supporting evidence!
Lab high internal validity!
HL - What’s not so great about Sperry’s study?
Low population validity - 11 patients who all had Epilepsy, which could’ve affected their performance..
Lab - high control - low ecological validity.
PLAS & FR - What are they, how do they link?
Plasticity - the brain’s ability to bridge/prune synapses to adapt to functions carried out by individual.
Functional Recovery - ability of other areas in the brain to take over functions of damaged area through synaptic bridging.
PLAS & FR - Shit tonne of supporting studies, give 2.
Taijiri et al (2013):
Rats w/ lesions affecting their neural performance.
Addition of stem cell neurons allowed functional recovery - bridging between lesioned area and working area.
Maguire et al (2007):
Field exp. on London taxi drivers.
Significantly larger hippocampus than control.
Same routes travelled repeatedly longitudinally, bridging formed.
Hippocampus responsible for spatial awareness.
PLAS & FR - What refutes Taijiri’s study though?
Ethology - to what extent can we extrapolate animal studies to humans?
PLAS & FR - What other refutes can we think of?
Well, Hirstein found theoreticised negative plasticity:
Phantom Limb Syndrome in 60-80% amputees…
PLAS & FR is great at a young age but..
Declines with age.
BRAIN - What are the 3 concentric systems?
Cerebral cortex - higher order functioning
Limbic system - emotional intelligence
Central core - unconscious activity/primal drive
BRAIN - 4 Lobes and their functions?
Frontal - Conscious personality/motor cortex
Parietal - Somatosensory cortex
Occipital - Visual cortex
Temporal - Auditory cortex
BRAIN - Broca/Wernicke’s Area
BrOca’s area - Speech PrOduction
WErnickE’s area - Speech ComprEhEnsion.
BRAIN - Broca/Wernicke’s evidence?
Peterson et al Brain Scan’s:
Reading/Listening tasks:
Broca - production/reading highlights
Wernicke - understanding/listening highlights
BRAIN/LoF - Support for Peterson’s study?
Methodology on point
BRAIN/LoF - Refute for Peterson’s study?
Eco validity weak